Brief Reports
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2004. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 1, 2004; 10(3): 427-432
Published online Feb 1, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i3.427
Utility of serum CA19-9 in diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma: In comparison with CEA
Xing-Lei Qin, Zuo-Ren Wang, Jing-Sen Shi, Min Lu, Lin Wang, Quan-Ru He
Xing-Lei Qin, Zuo-Ren Wang, Jing-Sen Shi, Lin Wang, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
Min Lu, Quan-Ru He, Luoyang Central Hospital, Luoyang 471009, Henan Province, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Dr. Xing-Lei Qin, M.D., Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China. qinxinglei@yahoo.com.cn
Telephone: +86-29-5274739 Fax: +86-29-5269313
Received: June 5, 2003
Revised: July 15, 2003
Accepted: July 24, 2003
Published online: February 1, 2004
Abstract

AIM: The diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma is often difficult, making management approaches problematic. A reliable serum marker for cholangiocarcinoma would be a useful diagnostic test. The aims of our study were to evaluate the usefulness of a serum CA19-9 determination in the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS: We prospectively measured serum CA19-9 and CEA concentrations in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (n = 35), benign biliary diseases (n = 92), and healthy individuals (n = 15). Serum CA19-9 and CEA concentrations were measured by an immunoradiometric assay without knowledge of the clinical diagnosis.

RESULTS: The sensitivity of a CA19-9 value > 37 KU·L-1 and a CEA value > 22 μg·L-1 in diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma were 77.14% and 68.57%, respectively. When compared with the benign biliary diseases group, the true negative rates of serum CA19-9 and CEA were 84.78% and 81.52%, respectively. The false positive rates of serum CA19-9 and CEA were 15.22% and 18.48%, whereas the accuracy of serum CA19-9 and CEA were 82.68% and 77.95%, respectively. Serum CA19-9 and CEA concentrations were significantly elevated (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05) in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (290.31 ± 5.34 KU·L-1 and 36.46 ± 18.03 μg·L-1) compared with patients with benign biliary diseases (13.38 ± 2.59 KU·L-1 and 13.84 ± 3.85 μg·L-1) and healthy individuals (12.78 ± 3.69 KU·L-1 and 11.48 ± 3.37 μg·L-1). In 15 patients undergoing curative resection of cholangiocarcinoma, the mean serum CA19-9 concentration was decreased from a preoperative level of 286.41 ± 4.36 KU·L-1 to a postoperative level of 62.01 ± 17.43 KU·L-1 (P < 0.001), and the mean serum CEA concentration from 39.41 ± 24.35 μg·L-1 to 28.69 ± 11.03 μg·L-1(P < 0.05). In patients with cholangiocarcinoma, however, no correlation was found between serum CEA and CA19-9 concentrations (r = 0.036).

CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the serum CA19-9 determination is a useful addition to the available tests for the differential diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma. Serum CA19-9 is an effective tumor marker in diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma, deciding whether the tumor has been radically resected and monitoring effect of treatment.

Keywords: $[Keywords]