Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a widely used treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), combining targeted chemotherapy and embolization. While effective, TACE can be associated with significant gastrointestinal (GI) side effects, impacting a patient's quality of life.

Quantify the prevalence of key GI complications (diarrhea, nausea, GI toxicity, abdominal pain) following TACE.

Systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, focusing on studies that reported side effects of TACE. Studies not involving cTACE or drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE), non-HCC studies, meta-analyses or systematic reviews, and inaccessible publications were excluded.

A PubMed search for clinical and randomized trials was conducted. Extracted data included study identifiers, demographics, TACE details, and GI side effect prevalences. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool assessed study quality and bias.

The analysis included data from 81 studies with 121 individual study arms and 9495 patients. Diarrhea was reported in 38 studies, with a mean prevalence of 23.46% (2.5; 95% confidence interval (CI): 18.39-28.544) and a weighted prevalence of 23.5%. Nausea was most frequently reported, mentioned in 67 studies, with a mean prevalence of 34.66% (2.4; 95% CI: 29.89-39.44) and a weighted prevalence of 32.5%. Abdominal pain was reported in 59 studies, with the highest mean prevalence of 48.07% (2.9; 95% CI: 42.20-53.93) and a weighted prevalence of 46.1%. GI toxicity was reported in 32 studies, with a mean prevalence of 8.85% (1.4; 95% CI: 5.99-11.70) and a weighted prevalence of 9.9%. DEB-TACE generally led to slightly higher rates of nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and GI toxicity compared to conventional TACE. The type of chemotherapy agent influenced prevalence of GI-side effects, with high prevalences observed for agents such as zinostatin and cisplatin.

This meta-analysis synthesizes current evidence on managing GI side effects in TACE. Standardizing reporting and developing effective management strategies are crucial to improving patient outcomes.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver tumor and is often diagnosed at an unresectable advanced stage. Systemic chemotherapy as well as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) are used to treat advanced HCC. TACE and HAIC have long been the standard of care for patients with unresectable HCC but are limited to the treatment of intrahepatic lesions. Systemic chemotherapy with doxorubicin or chemohormonal therapy with tamoxifen have also been considered, but neither has demonstrated survival benefits. In the treatment of unresectable advanced HCC, cisplatin is administered transhepatic arterially for local treatment. Subsequently, for cisplatin-refractory cases due to drug resistance, a shift to systemic therapy with a different mechanism of action is expected to produce new antitumor effects. Cisplatin is also used for the treatment of liver tumors other than HCC. This review summarizes the action and resistance mechanism of cisplatin and describes the treatment of the major hepatobiliary cancers for which cisplatin is used as an anticancer agent, with a focus on HCC.

To examine physiochemical characteristics and drug release properties of cisplatin powder and lipiodol mixtures formed by a glass membrane emulsification device compared with a 3-way stopcock.

Seven different types of mixtures were evaluated: cisplatin powder and lipiodol directly mixed (suspension), complete cisplatin solution and lipiodol mixed by a 3-way stopcock or the device (emulsion), incomplete cisplatin solution and lipiodol mixed by a 3-way stopcock or the device (solid-in-water emulsion), and contrast material and cisplatin suspension mixed by a 3-way stopcock or the device (solid-in-oil emulsion).

The percentages of water-in-oil were 98.08 ± 0.27% in the emulsion formed by the device, while 70.3 ± 4.63% in the emulsion formed by a 3-way stopcock (P = 0.037). Solid-in-water and solid-in-oil emulsions formed by the device showed 98.09 ± 0.38% and 98.70 ± 0.40% of water-in-oil, respectively, whereas both solid-in-water and solid-in-oil emulsions formed by a 3-way stopcock showed 0.00%. Homogenous droplet sizes were shown by using the device. The half release times of cisplatin in the emulsions formed by the device were 197 ± 19, 244 ± 24 and 478 ± 52 min, respectively, which were significantly longer than the emulsion formed by a 3-way stopcock of 8 ± 8 min (P = 0.046-0.050). Suspension showed the longest release time; however, the viscosity was lowest.

The glass membrane emulsification device formed almost 100% water-in-oil, whereas 3-way stopcock produced 100% oil-in-water when incomplete solution or suspension was mixed. Slower cisplatin release was shown in the emulsions formed by the device.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 different embolic agents, namely gelatin sponge particle (GSP) and Lipiodol, for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).We retrospectively reviewed 87 consecutive patients with unresectable HCC who underwent Lipiodol TACE with lobaplatin and 87 consecutive patients with unresectable HCC who underwent GSP TACE with lobaplatin between January 2013 and June 2017 in our institution as the initial treatment. Both groups were compared considering the clinical and laboratory outcomes and imaging findings before and after TACE. Tumor response and adverse events were also evaluated.There was significant difference in the rate of complete and overall response between the groups (P = .029 and .001, respectively), specifically when the tumor size was >5 cm (P = .001). The disease control rate was significantly better in the GSP group than in the Lipiodol group (94.3% vs. 86.4%, P = .011). The response differences in higher stages were significant between the 2 groups (P = .035 and .007, respectively). The grades of adverse events were also significantly different between the groups (P = .000).GSP-as an embolic agent in TACE for HCC-could significantly increase the rate of tumor response 1 month after treatment, especially in large tumors, without any significant increase in severe adverse events, when compared to Lipiodol.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) remains controversial. This systematic review sought to examine the role of TACE in the treatment of HCC with PVT in either the main portal vein (MPV) or portal vein branches (PVB).

PubMed was searched for "hepatocellular carcinoma" and "transarterial chemoembolization" from January 1, 2006 to August 31, 2016. Cohorts treated with TACE for HCC with PVT were included. Meta-analysis of overall survival (OS), mRECIST response, and complication incidence was performed. MPV and PVB subgroups were compared.

Of 136 search results, 13 studies with 1933 TACE patients were included. Median OS (95% CI) was eight (5-15) months. Survival rates after one, three, and five years were 29% (20%-40%), 4% (1%-11%), and 1% (0%-5%), respectively. Only 1% experienced liver failure and 18% had post-treatment complications. Patients with MPV thrombosis had worse survival than PVB patients (p < 0.001), but similar mRECIST response rates (14% vs. 16%, p = 0.238).

TACE is a safe treatment for a highly selected population of HCC patients with PVT. Despite worse survival rates compared to PVB thrombosis, PVT in the MPV should not be considered an absolute contraindication to TACE.

Cisplatin-based concomitant chemoradiotherapy is considered as the standard treatment for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. However, the curative efficacy of cisplatin-based chemotherapy is limited because of the occurrence of cisplatin resistance. Some researches indicate that activating the volume-sensitive Cl(-) channel might be a new strategy for the reduction of cisplatin resistance. However, little is known about the activation pathway of the Cl(-) channels activated by cisplatin. In this study, the cisplatin-activated chloride current was investigated using the whole cell patch-clamp technique in the poorly differentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells (CNE-2Z cells), and the activation pathway of the current was also discussed. The results showed that extracellular application of cisplatin activated a Cl(-) current, showing the properties of significant outward rectification, intracellular ATP dependency, and a selectivity sequence of I(-) > Br(-) > Cl(-) > gluconate, and being inhibited by the Cl(-) channel inhibitors tamoxifen and extracellular ATP. These characteristics are similar to those of the volume-sensitive Cl(-) current in CNE-2Z cells, indicating that cisplatin induces the Cl(-) current by activating the volume-sensitive like chloride channel. The cisplatin-activated current was blocked by suramin (a wide-spectrum purinergic antagonist) and RB2 (a relatively selective P2Y antagonist). In addition, the current was depressed by extracellular application of apyrase. The apoptotic volume decrease induced by cisplatin was also attenuated by RB2. P2Y receptors were expressed in CNE-2Z cells. These results suggest that cisplatin can induce a Cl(-) current by activating volume-sensitive like Cl(-) channels through the P2Y purinoceptor pathway.