Accurate recurrence risk evaluation in patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer (CRC) remains difficult. Traditional histopathological methods frequently fall short in predicting outcomes after adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the use of comprehensive genomic profiling combined with machine learning for prognostic risk stratification in patients with CRC.

A machine learning model was developed using a training cohort of 52 patients with stage II/III CRC who underwent curative surgery at Fujita Health University Hospital. Genomic DNA was isolated from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections and analyzed with a 160 cancer-related gene panel. The random forest algorithm was used to determine key genes affecting recurrence-free survival. The model was validated by developing a risk score with internal and external cohorts, including 44 patients from Keio University Hospital.

Six key genes (KRAS, KIT, SMAD4, ARID2, NF1, and FBXW7) were determined as significant prognostic risk predictors. A risk score system integrating these genes with clinicopathological factors effectively stratified patients in both internal (p < 0.001) and external cohorts (p = 0.017).

This study reveals that machine learning, combined with comprehensive genomic profiling, significantly improves prognostic risk stratification in patients with stage II/III CRC after adjuvant chemotherapy. This approach provides a promising tool for individualized treatment strategies, warranting further validation with larger cohorts.

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy using oxaliplatin in addition to 5-FU-based anticancer agents has become the standard treatment for colorectal cancer, however, there is insufficient evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin combination therapy in the elderly patients. In this study, retrospective analysis of the results from the CCOG-1302 study was performed to confirm them.

The patients in the CAPOX continuous (8 courses of CAPOX) and intermittent (2 courses of CAPOX + 4 courses of capecitabine + 2 courses of CAPOX) treatment arms in the CCOG-1302 study were divided into two groups, namely, the elderly (≥ 70) and non-elderly (< 70 years) groups. The adverse events, residual peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN) and prognosis were analyzed.

The incidence of grade 3 or higher hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities in the continuous and intermittent treatment arm were not significantly different between the elderly and non-elderly groups. During the follow-up period, the percentages of grade I or higher PSN residuals were significantly higher among the elderly individuals in the continuous treatment arm at years 2, 3, 4, and 5. On the other hand, PSN decreased over time in the intermittent treatment arm as well as in the elderly and non-elderly patients. The 3-year DFS was not significantly different between the elderly and non-elderly groups in the continuous and intermittent treatment arms.

Oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy can be safely administered to elderly patients. In addition, intermittent administration may be more useful in elderly individuals for the prevention of PSN.

Rising rates of early-onset colon cancer (EOCC) present challenges in deciding how to optimally treat patients. Although standard of care for stage II CC is surgical resection, adding chemotherapy for high-risk disease, evidence suggests treatment selection may differ by age. We investigated whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) administration rates differ between patients with early- and later-onset stage II CC.

Data originated from the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR)-derived deidentified database spanning January 1, 2003, to August 1, 2021. Adults with stage II CC were grouped as age 18-49 years (EOCC) and those age 50 years or older (later-onset colon cancer [LOCC]). Demographics, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, tumor stage and site, and chemotherapy were included. Primary outcomes included rates of AC administration by age and ethnicity; secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and time to metastatic disease (TTMD). Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models evaluated relationships between chemotherapy administration, age, and ethnicity, adjusting for significant covariates.

One thousand sixty-five patients were included. Median age of patients with EOCC was 45.0 years versus 69.0 years for patients with LOCC. Adjusted multivariate analysis showed patients with EOCC received AC significantly more often than patients with LOCC. Non-Hispanic patients received AC at significantly lower rates than Hispanic patients in both cohorts. Subanalysis of stage IIA patients showed that patients with EOCC were more likely to receive AC than patients with LOCC. No significant differences in OS or TTMD were observed by age regardless of AC administration in stage II overall; however, patients with stage IIA EOCC receiving AC had significantly longer TTMD than those not receiving AC.

AC was given preferentially in stage II EOCC, even in stage IIA, despite deviation from guidelines. This may expose low-risk patients to unnecessary toxicities and suggests bias toward treating younger patients more aggressively, despite unclear evidence for better outcomes.

Standard adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer (CC) is fluoropyrimidine with oxaliplatin. Recently, stage III was subdivided into low-risk (T1-3, N1) and high-risk (T4 and/or N2), with the benefit of adding oxaliplatin varying across these substages. In this study, we aimed to assess the impact of oxaliplatin on survival outcomes in subdividing stage III CC patients based on T and N staging.

A total of 4942 stage III CC patients were pooled from the three randomized pivotal trials of oxaliplatin. Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox models stratified by study, and interaction tests were used to assess the oxaliplatin effect across subgroups based on T and N stages. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

The prevalence of tumor stages was T1-2 12.4%, T3 74.4%, and T4 13.1%; nodal stages were N1 64.7% and N2 35.3%. A significant OS benefit from oxaliplatin was seen only in T3 (5-year OS = 77.2% versus 73.0%, P < 0.001): T3N1 (hazard ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.62-0.85, P < 0.001) and T3N2 (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.95, P = 0.010). No benefit was observed for T1-2 (5-year OS = 87.8% versus 88.7%, P = 0.644) or T4 patients (5-year OS = 62.6% versus 60.2%, P = 0.648). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant interaction between T stage and the effect of oxaliplatin treatment on OS, whereas no such interaction was observed for N stage.

Our analysis revealed that oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy offers a significant survival benefit in stage III CC patients with T3 tumors. In contrast, no survival benefit was observed for T1-2 or T4 patients. These results suggested that T stage plays a more crucial role than N stage in predicting treatment benefit, highlighting the need for tailored treatment strategies based on tumor characteristics.

Based on the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy analysis, 3 months of adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) is an option for stage III colorectal cancer (colorectal cancer [CRC]), with cost and toxicity benefits. We examined the patterns of uptake of CAPOX versus fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) and chemotherapy duration in a contemporary real-world cohort of patients in Canada.

The provincial pharmacy database was used to identify patients with resected stage III CRC receiving adjuvant chemotherapy between January 2021 and December 2022. Demographic, tumor, and treatment information was collected and compared.

Of 452 patients, 234 (52%) and 218 (48%) were planned to receive 3 and 6 months of chemotherapy, respectively. Within the 3-month group, 226 (97%) received CAPOX. Within the 6-month group, there was a 51%-49% split between CAPOX and FOLFOX. Age >70 years (P = .039), well/moderately differentiated (P = .005), and low-risk disease (P < .0001) were significantly associated with 3 months. Performance status, ileostomy, or preexisting neuropathy did not affect treatment choice. Of patients planned for 6 months, 29% had low-risk disease, with 52% of these receiving CAPOX. Patients receiving 6 months were more likely to report neuropathy (68 v 36%, P < .0001) and to stop oxaliplatin early (54 v 31%, P < .0001). The most likely reason for early adjuvant discontinuation was neuropathy in the 6-month group and gastrointestinal toxicity in the 3-month group (P < .0001). Irrespective of duration, mean time from consult to starting chemotherapy was longer for FOLFOX versus CAPOX (24 v 19 days, P = .007).

In this contemporary cohort, 6 months chemotherapy is still being offered to patients with low-risk disease and is associated with more neuropathy. Exploration of patient preferences and resource costs may improve adoption of reduced duration adjuvant CAPOX in stage III CRC.

The consensus molecular subtype (CMS) classification divides colon tumors into four subtypes holding promise as a predictive biomarker. However, the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence free survival (RFS) per CMS in stage III patients remains inadequately explored. With this intention, we selected stage III colon cancer (CC) patients from the MATCH cohort (n = 575) and RadboudUMC (n = 276) diagnosed between 2005 and 2018. Patients treated with and without adjuvant chemotherapy were matched based on tumor location, T- and N-stage (n = 522). Tumor material was available for 464 patients, with successful RNA extraction and CMS subtyping achieved in 390 patients (surgery alone group: 192, adjuvant chemotherapy group: 198). In the overall cohort, CMS4 was associated with poorest prognosis (HR 1.55; p = .03). Multivariate analysis revealed favorable RFS for the adjuvant chemotherapy group in CMS1, CMS2, and CMS4 tumors (HR 0.19; p = .01, HR 0.27; p < .01, HR 0.19; p < .01, respectively), while no significant difference between treatment groups was observed within CMS3 (HR 0.68; p = .51). CMS subtyping in this non-randomized cohort identified patients with poor prognosis and patients who may not benefit significantly from adjuvant chemotherapy.

The standard of care for stage III colon cancer is 3 or 6 months of double-drug regimen chemotherapy following radical surgery. However, patients with positive circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) exhibit a high risk of recurrence risk even if they receive standard adjuvant chemotherapy. The potential benefit of intensified adjuvant chemotherapy, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, leucovorin and fluoropyrimidine (FOLFOXIRI), for ctDNA-positive patients remains to be elucidated.

This multicentre phase II randomised controlled trial aims to investigate the utility of ctDNA in monitoring chemosensitivity and to preliminarily assess whether intensified chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI can increase ctDNA clearance and improve survival outcomes. A total of 60 eligible patients with stage III colon cancer exhibiting postoperatively positive ctDNA before and after two cycles of oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) will be randomly assigned to continue five additional cycles of XELOX (control arm) or switch to eight cycles of FOLFOXIRI (experimental arm). This sequential approach is designed to escalate treatment for patients with persistent ctDNA positivity while avoiding overtreatment in those who may respond well to standard chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is the change in ctDNA concentration, defined as the difference between the ctDNA concentration measured after two cycles of XELOX and after the completion or termination of chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints include the ctDNA clearance rate, 2-year disease-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, chemotherapy-related side effects and quality of life.

This trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the West China Hospital, Sichuan University (approval number: 20231998). The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific conferences.

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06242418, registered on 27 January 2024).

Precision cancer medicine is widely established, and numerous molecularly targeted drugs for various tumor entities are approved or are in development. Personalized pharmacotherapy in oncology has so far been based primarily on tumor characteristics, for example, somatic mutations. However, the response to drug treatment also depends on pharmacological processes summarized under the term ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion). Variations in ADME genes have been the subject of intensive research for >5 decades, considering individual patients' genetic makeup, referred to as pharmacogenomics (PGx). The combined impact of a patient's tumor and germline genome is only partially understood and often not adequately considered in cancer therapy. This may be attributed, in part, to the lack of methods for combined analysis of both data layers. Optimized personalized cancer therapies should, therefore, aim to integrate molecular information, which derives from both the tumor and the germline genome, and taking into account existing PGx guidelines for drug therapy. Moreover, such strategies should provide the opportunity to consider genetic variants of previously unknown functional significance. Bioinformatic analysis methods and corresponding algorithms for data interpretation need to be developed to integrate PGx data in cancer therapy with a special meaning for interdisciplinary molecular tumor boards, in which cancer patients are discussed to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical management based on individual tumor profiles. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The era of personalized oncology has seen the emergence of drugs tailored to genetic variants associated with cancer biology. However, the full potential of targeted therapy remains untapped owing to the predominant focus on acquired tumor-specific alterations. Optimized cancer care must integrate tumor and patient genomes, guided by pharmacogenomic principles. An essential prerequisite for realizing truly personalized drug treatment of cancer patients is the development of bioinformatic tools for comprehensive analysis of all data layers generated in modern precision oncology programs.

FOLFIRI (5-FU + leucovorin + irinotecan) plus ramucirumab is one of the standards in second-line metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients progressing after treatment with oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidine with bevacizumab, but there is no evidence on its efficacy without prior bevacizumab. Moreover, VEGF-D has not been confirmed as a predictive biomarker for ramucirumab's efficacy, either.

The RAINCLOUD study was a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial conducted in Japan. Patients with recurrent CRC pretreated with fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin without bevacizumab were analyzed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints measured were overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety.

A total of 48 patients were enrolled from 15 sites between September 2017 and September 2020. Their median age was 63.5 years (25~77), 20.1% had a right-sided tumor, and 68.8% had RAS-mutant cancer. The median PFS was 8.9 months (90% CI: 6.3-11.8), so the primary endpoint was met. Their median OS and ORR were 22.3 months (95% CI: 17.4-NA) and 41.7% (95% CI: 4.9-7.6), respectively. An incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events that reached over 5% applied to neutropenia (44%), leucopenia (10%), and hypertension (8%). In the biomarker analysis, the serum VEGF-D levels post-treatment were higher than those pre-treatment, but the PFS in those with high VEGF-D levels trended towards being worse than that in those with low VEGF-D (7.6M/5.6M (p = 0.095; HR: 0.56)). Instead, those with low TSP-2 had a better PFS than those with high TSP-2 (7.5M/4.3M (p = 0.022; HR: 0.45)).

Our data suggested that FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab was effective and tolerable for CRC refractory to fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin without anti-angiogenesis. Serum VEGF-D levels may not be predictive but TSP-2 may be a potential prognostic biomarker for ramucirumab's efficacy.

The adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer (CC) is chemotherapy combining fluoropyrimidine (FP) and oxaliplatin (OX). FP regimen plus OX (FPOX) may benefit in high-risk stage II CC. We performed a pooled analysis of pivotal MOSAIC and C-07 studies evaluating FPOX for the treatment of high-risk stage II CC according to prognostic factors, number of high-risk factors, and current clinicopathologic risk classification on the basis of T stage, tumor perforation, and number of lymph nodes examined.

One thousand five hundred and ninety-five patients with stage II CC receiving FP or FPOX were pooled. The overall survival (OS) benefit of OX was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and unadjusted Cox models stratified by study. Three thousand and fifty-nine patients with stage III CC were used only for interaction tests between the allocated chemotherapy and stage.

In the pooled analysis of stage II patients, independent prognostic factors in multivariable analysis were sex, age, perforation/obstruction, and tumor sidedness. There was a significant interaction in OS between stage and allocated chemotherapy with hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.03 for stage II (95% CI, 0.82 to 1.29; P = .813) and 0.82 for stage III (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.92; P = .001; Pint = .073). There was no benefit from the addition of OX to FP for any of the prognostic factors. The number of high-risk factors tested was not predictive of OX benefit. According to the currently agreed clinicopathologic risk classification, no OS benefit of OX was observed, as HR was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.18; P = .349).

No OS benefit of adjuvant OX was found in high-risk stage II CC, regardless of the definition used to characterize tumors as having a high risk for recurrence. Hence, our analysis suggests that OX should not be the standard of care for adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II CC, even in high-risk patients.

Several studies have observed that some stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients cannot benefit from standard adjuvant chemotherapy. However, there is no unified screening standard to date.

Consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed colon adenocarcinoma treated in 3 centers between January 2016 and December 2018 were included. Patients were divided into four groups according to different stages and positive paracolic lymph-node ratio (P-LNR) [Cohort 1: pT1-3N0M0, Cohort 2: pT1-3N + (P-LNR ≤ 0.15)M0, Cohort 3: pT4N0M0, Cohort 4: stage III patients except for pT1-3N + (P-LNR ≤ 0.15)M0], and further overall survival was compared by Kaplan-Meier method. The univariate and multivariate analyses were employed for cox proportional hazards model.

We retrospectively reviewed 5581 consecutive CRC patients with, and 2861 eligible patients were enrolled for further analysis. The optimal cut-off value of P-LNR in our study was 0.15. There was no significant difference in OS (91.36 vs. 93.74%) and DFS (87.65 vs. 90.96%) between stage III patients with pT1-3N + (P-LNR ≤ 0.15)M0 and those with pT1-3N0M0. Further analysis demonstrated that CRC patients with pT1-3N + (P-LNR ≤ 0.15)M0 were less likely to benefit from 8 cycles of CAPOX or FOLFOX chemotherapy and suffered fewer adverse events from declining chemotherapy. Comparing with 0-4 cycles versus 8 cycles, the overall survival rates were 91.35 versus 90.19% (P = 0.79), and with a DFS of 87.50 versus 88.24% (P = 0.49), the duration of adjuvant chemotherapy was not an independent risk factor for patients with pT1-3N + (P-LNR ≤ 0.15)M0 (HR: 0.70, 95% CI 0.90-1.30, P = 0.42).

The concept of P-LNR we proposed might have a high clinical application value and accurately enable clinicians to screen out specific CRC patients who decline or prefer limited chemotherapy.

The clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2300076883.

Biomarkers have revolutionized the management of colorectal cancer (CRC), facilitating early detection, prevention, personalized treatment, and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. This review explores current CRC screening strategies and emerging biomarker applications.

We summarize the landscape of non-invasive CRC screening and MRD detection strategies, discuss the limitations of the current approaches, and highlight the promising potential of novel biomarker solutions. The fecal immunochemical test remained the cornerstone of CRC screening, but its sensitivity has been improved by assays that combined its performance with other stool analytes. However, their sensitivity for advanced adenomas and the patient compliance both remain suboptimal. Blood-based tests promise to increase compliance but require further refinement to compete with stool-based biomarker tests. The ideal scenario involves leveraging blood tests to increase screening participation, and simultaneously promote stool- and endoscopy-based screening among those who are compliant. Once solely reliant on upfront surgery followed by stage and pathology-driven adjuvant chemotherapy, the treatment of stage II and III colon cancer has undergone a revolutionary transformation with the advent of MRD testing after surgery. A decade ago, the concept of using a post-surgical test instead of stage and pathology to determine the need for adjuvant chemotherapy was disruptive. Today, a blood test may be more informative of the need for chemotherapy than the stage at diagnosis.

Biomarker research is not just improving, but bringing a transformative change to CRC clinical management. Early detection is not just getting better, but improving thanks to a multi-modality approach, and personalized treatment plans are not just becoming a reality, but a promising future with MRD testing.

Pivotal articles that had been published between 2022 and 2023 on surgical and perioperative adjuvant treatments for locally advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) were reviewed. This review focuses on new evidence in the following areas: optimization of surgical procedures for colon cancer, including the optimal length of bowel resection and use of the no-touch isolation technique; minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer, such as laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision and robotic surgery; neoadjuvant treatments for rectal cancer, including total neoadjuvant therapy; neoadjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer; and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for Stage II and III colon cancer. Although the current understanding may not enable perfect decision-making for patients and medical professionals, ongoing advancements are expected to result in more effective personalized treatment plans, ultimately improving the prognosis and quality of life of patients.

Locally advanced colon cancer is a high-risk condition for tumour recurrence with poor survival. The current treatment is surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy based on fluoropyrimidines and oxaliplatin. This approach has improved the oncological outcomes on this population, however the mucinous condition has not been studied in depth and although the evidence is weak, it is thought to have a worse response to systemic chemotherapy. The CHEMUCCA study aims to answer this question.

To evaluate the effectiveness of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy using the disease-free survival for stage II and III mucinous colon cancer who underwent surgical resection plus systemic adjuvant chemotherapy vs. surgery alone.

Retrospective analytical study including patients diagnosed with high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer, treated between 2010 and 2021, with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Demographic variables and tumour features were analysed. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival. Log rank test and Cox regression were used.

Of 1134 patients with high-risk stage II and III colon cancer disease, 206 (18,17 %) had mucinous histology and 928 (81,83 %) had non-mucinous histology. 708 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, 129 (62,62 %) in mucinous group and 579 (62,39 %) in the non-mucinous group. Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in stage II and III mucinous colon cancer improved the DFS (HR = 0.58 [95 % CI 0.37-0.91]; p = 0,017). However, in a stratified analysis, patients with high-risk stage II mucinous colon cancer showed no benefit with this approach (HR = 0.4541 [95 % CI 0.19-1.03]; p = 0.06).

Adjuvant chemotherapy has demonstrated to be effective in locally advanced mucinous colorectal cancer improving the oncological outcomes. However, this benefit could be diminished in high-risk stage II mucinous colon cancer patients. The administration of adjuvant chemotherapy on this patient's sub-group must be balanced according to risk versus benefits.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, and the second most common cause of cancer-related death. In 2020, the estimated number of deaths due to CRC was approximately 930000, accounting for 10% of all cancer deaths worldwide. Accordingly, there is a vast amount of ongoing research aiming to find new and improved treatment modalities for CRC that can potentially increase survival and decrease overall morbidity and mortality. Current management strategies for CRC include surgical procedures for resectable cases, and radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, in addition to their combination, for non-resectable tumors. Despite these options, CRC remains incurable in 50% of cases. Nonetheless, significant improvements in research techniques have allowed for treatment approaches for CRC to be frequently updated, leading to the availability of new drugs and therapeutic strategies. This review summarizes the most recent therapeutic approaches for CRC, with special emphasis on new strategies that are currently being studied and have great potential to improve the prognosis and lifespan of patients with CRC.

Adjuvant chemotherapy following curative surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC) significantly improves long-term patient prognosis. However, delayed chemotherapy (DC), in which patients are unable to receive timely treatment, is a common phenomenon in clinical practice for various reasons. This study aimed to investigate the impact of DC on the prognosis of patients with stage II-III locally AGC and explore the associated risk factors.

Data from four prospective studies were included in the pooled analysis. The planned chemotherapy (PC) group was defined as the time interval between surgery and the first chemotherapy ≤ 49 d, while the DC group was defined as the time interval between surgery and chemotherapy > 49 d. The prognosis, recurrence, and risk factors were compared, and a nomogram for predicting DC was established.

In total, 596 patients were included, of whom 531 (89.1%) had PC and 65 (10.9%) had DC. Survival analysis revealed that the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were significantly lower in the DC group than those in the PC group (log-rank P < 0.001). Cox univariable and multivariable analyses showed that DC was an independent risk factor for OS and DFS in stage II-III patients (P < 0.05). Based on the significant factors for DC, a prediction model was established that had a good fit, high accuracy (AUC = 0.780), and clinical applicability in both the training and validation sets.

Delayed chemotherapy after gastrectomy is associated with poor long-term prognosis in patients with locally advanced stage II-III GC disease. But standardized, full-cycle adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery may play a remedial role, and can to a certain extent compensate the poor effects caused by delayed chemotherapy.

Despite an established association with improved patient outcomes, compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines remains suboptimal. We sought to assess the effect of patient characteristics (PCs), operative characteristics (OCs), hospital characteristics (HCs), and social determinants of health (SDoH) on noncompliance with NCCN guidelines for colon cancer.

Patients treated for stage I to III colon cancer from 2004 to 2017 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Multilevel multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with receipt of NCCN-compliant care and quantify the proportion of variance explained by PCs, OCs, HCs, and SDoH.

Among 468,097 patients with colon cancer treated across 1319 hospitals, 1 in 4 patients did not receive NCCN-compliant care (122,170 [26.1%]). On regression analysis, older age (odds ratio [OR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.96-0.96), female sex (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99), Black race (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98), higher Charlson-Deyo score (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.82-0.86), tumor stage ≥II (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.40-0.44), and tumor grade ≥ 3 (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.32-0.34) were associated with lower odds of receiving NCCN-compliant care (all P values <.05). Higher hospital volume (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.02-1.03), minimally invasive or robotic surgical approach (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.23-1.29), adequate (≥12) lymph node assessment (OR, 3.46; 95% CI, 3.38-3.53), private insurance status (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.26-1.40), Medicare insurance status (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.35-1.49), and higher educational status (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.09) were associated with higher odds of receiving NCCN-compliant care (all P values <.05). Overall, PCs contributed 36.5%, HCs contributed 1.3%, and OCs contributed 12.9% to the variation in guideline-compliant care, while SDoH contributed only 3.6% of the variation in receipt of NCCN-compliant care.

The variation in NCCN-compliant care among patients with colon cancer was largely attributable to patient- and surgeon-level factors, whereas SDoH were associated with a smaller proportion of the variation.

Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb. (Rosaceae, A. pilosa) has been used in traditional medicine in China, Japan, Korea, and other Asian countries for treatment of acute and chronic enteritis and diarrhea. Secondary metabolites have been isolated and tested for biological activities. It remains unclear in terms of its potential components of anti-colorectal cancer properties.

The study aimed to how extracts from A. pilosa and their components influenced tumor microenvironment and the colorectal tumor growth in vivo on AOM/DSS induced colorectal cancer mice, the metabolites of A. pilosa was also been studied.

Different methods have been used to extract different parts of A. pilosa. And the anti-proliferation effect of these extracts on colon cancer cells have been tested. The components of A. pilosa and its metabolites in vivo were analyzed by UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS. The anti-colorectal cancer (CRC) effects of A. pilosa and its components in vivo were studied on AOM/DSS induced CRC mice. The effects of constituents of A. pilosa on the composition of immune cells in tumor microenvironment (TME) were analyzed by flow cytometry. 16 S rDNA technology was used to analyze the effect of administration on the composition of intestinal microflora. Pathological section staining was used to compare the morphological changes and molecular expression of intestinal tissue in different groups.

The constituent exists in root of A. pilosa showed the strongest anti-proliferation ability on colon cancer cells in vitro. The extract from the root of A. pilosa could attenuate the occurrence of colorectal tumors induced by AOM/DSS in a concentration-dependent manner. Administration of the extract from the root of A. pilosa could affect the proportion of γδT cells, tumor associated macrophages and myeloid derived suppressor cells in TME, increasing the proportion of anti-tumor immune cells and decrease the immunosuppressive cells in the TME to promote the anti-tumor immune response. The administration of the extract adjusted the composition of gut microbiota and its components Agrimoniin and Agrimonolide-6-o-glucoside showed the strongest anti-CRC effect in vivo with adjusting the gut microbiota differently.

The extract from root of A. pilosa showed anti-colorectal cancer effects in vivo and in vitro, affecting the composition of gut microbiota and the anti-tumor immune response. Within all components of A. pilosa, Agrimoniin and Agrimonolide-6-o-glucoside showed remarkable anti-CRC efficiency in vivo and in vitro. Besides, the metabolites of extract from root of A. pilosa in gastrointestinal tract mainly composed of two parts: Agrimonolide-related metabolites and Urolithins. The extract from root of A. pilosa could contribute to potential drugs for assisting clinical anti-colon cancer therapy.

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) following radical resection. The aim of the present study is to review appropriate chemotherapeutic regimens for elderly patients. We examined 1138 Japanese patients who were operated for high-risk stage II or stage III CRC between July 2010 and June 2021 at our hospital. Patients were divided according to an age of 70 years. The efficacy of adjuvant therapy was analyzed in association with age and adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimens. A total of 507 patients (45%) were ≥70 years old. They were less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001) or palliative chemotherapy after recurrence (p < 0.001) than patients aged <70 years. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) in stage III CRC patients was longer in the <70 years group than in the ≥70 years group (p = 0.006); however, CSS by regimens did not significantly differ between these groups. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with the longer relapse-free survival of stage III CRC patients in the <70 years group (p = 0.005). Although adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a favourable CSS regardless of age, the implementation rate of adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly CRC patients was low, which may explain shorter CSS in stage III CRC patients the ≥70 years group than in the <70 years group.

To assess the effectiveness of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) combined with adjuvant chemotherapy on myelosuppression for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients using network meta-analysis (NMA).

Literature searches in both international (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) and Chinese (China Science and Technology Journal Database, Wanfang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure) databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted from inception until October 10, 2022. We included RCTs of patients who received CHM combined with chemotherapy, including FOLFOX, XELOX, FOLFIRI, and other relevant regimens in the CHM treatment group. The outcomes included the incidence of myelosuppression, leukopenia, hemoglobin reduction, and thrombocytopenia. Two reviewers independently screened the databases, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias and credibility of evidence. RevMan 5.4.1 software and STATA 14.0 were used to perform the NMA.

A total of 31 RCTs were included, published from 2008 to 2021 in Chinese. Among these, 2,314 participants comparing the following 9 CHMs were identified: Shengbai Recipe (SBR), Bazhen Decoction (BZD), Jianpi Jiedu Recipe (JJR), Jianpi Recipe (JR), Compound Cantharis Capsule (CCC), Zaofan Pill (ZFP), Guilu Erxian Gel (GL), Buzhong Tiaogan Decoction (BZ), and Qiamagu Capsule (QM). The results of NMA found an indirect comparison. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), the ZFP+ chemotherapy group had the lowest incidence of myelosuppression, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.08 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01, 0.76], whereas the GL+ chemotherapy group had the lowest incidence of leukopenia, hemoglobin reduction, and thrombocytopenia, with an OR of 5.25 (95% CI: 2.41, 11.43), 4.66 (95% CI: 2.23, 9.72), and 0.27 (95% CI: 0.13, 0.54), respectively. Moreover, BZD + chemotherapy could alleviate leukopenia, hemoglobin reduction, and thrombocytopenia (P<0.01). Pairwise comparison showed that there was no difference in the efficacy among the 8 CHMs+ chemotherapy group. The comparison and adjustment funnel plot indicated that small-study effect had no impact on these outcomes.

This NMA provided evidence to support that patients with CRC benefit from receiving different combination of CHM chemotherapies. Among these, GL plus chemotherapy and BZD plus chemotherapy were the more effective for myelosuppression in patients; however, as the qualtiy of evidence is insufficient, further research is needed. (PROSPERO, No. CRD42022369025).

A number of studies suggest that older patients may have reduced or no benefit from the addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidines as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer (CC).

We studied the prognostic impact of age, as well as treatment adherence/toxicity patterns according to age, in patients with stage III CC who received 3 or 6 months of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin/capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) on the basis of data collected from trials from the ACCENT and IDEA databases. Associations between age and time to recurrence (TTR), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), survival after recurrence (SAR), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were assessed by a Cox model or a competing risk model, stratified by studies and adjusted for sex, performance status, T and N stage, and year of enrollment.

A total of 17,909 patients were included; 24% of patients were age older than 70 years (n = 4,340). Patients age ≥70 years had higher rates of early treatment discontinuation. Rates of grade ≥3 adverse events were similar between those older and younger than 70 years, except for diarrhea and neutropenia that were more frequent in older patients treated with CAPOX (14.2% v 11.2%; P = .01 and 12.1% v 9.6%; P = .04, respectively). In multivariable analysis, TTR was not significantly different between patients <70 years and those ≥70 years, but DFS, OS, SAR, and CSS were significantly shorter in those patients ≥70 years.

In patients ≥70 years with stage III CC fit enough to be enrolled in clinical trials, oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy was well tolerated and led to similar TTR compared with younger patients, suggesting similar efficacy. TTR may be a more appropriate end point for efficacy in this patient population.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a global health concern, necessitating adjuvant chemotherapy post-curative surgery to mitigate recurrence and enhance survival, particularly in intermediate-stage patients. However, existing therapeutic disparities highlight the need for biomarker-guided adjuvant chemotherapy to achieve better CRC inhibition. This study explores the molecular mechanisms underlying the inhibition of CRC through a genome-wide association study (GWAS) focused on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based adjuvant therapy in intermediate-stage CRC patients, a domain previously unexplored. We retrospectively included 226 intermediate-stage CRC patients undergoing surgical resection followed by 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy. The exploration cohort comprised 31 patients, and the validation cohort included 195 individuals. Genotyping was carried out using either Axiom Genome-Wide TWB 2.0 Array Plate-based or polymerase chain reaction-based methods on genomic DNA derived from collected tissue samples. Statistical analyses involved descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier analyses, and Cox proportional hazard analyses. From the GWAS, potential genetic predictors, GALNT14-rs62139523 and DNMBP-rs10786578 genotypes, of 5-FU-based adjuvant therapy following surgery in intermediate-stage CRC patients were identified. Validation in a larger cohort of 195 patients emphasized the predictive significance of GALNT14-rs62139523 genotypes, especially the "A/G" genotype, for improved overall and progression-free survival. This predictive association remained robust across various subgroups, with exceptions for specific demographic and clinical parameters such as age < 58 years old, CEA ≤ 2.5 ng/mL, tumor diameter > 44.0 mm, and tumor-free margin ≥ 50 mm. This study identifies that the GALNT14-rs62139523 "A/G" genotype modulates therapeutic outcomes, establishing it as a promising biomarker for predicting favorable responses to 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy in intermediate-stage CRC patients, although further investigations are needed to detail these mechanisms.

Fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity and mortality risk increases significantly in patients carrying certain DPYD genetic variants with standard dosing. We implemented DPYD genotyping at a multisite cancer center and evaluated its impact on dosing, toxicity, and hospitalization.

In this prospective observational study, patients receiving (reactive) or planning to receive (pretreatment) fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy were genotyped for five DPYD variants as standard practice per provider discretion. The primary end point was the proportion of variant carriers receiving fluoropyrimidine modifications. Secondary end points included mean relative dose intensity, fluoropyrimidine-related grade 3+ toxicities, and hospitalizations. Fisher's exact test compared toxicity and hospitalization rates between pretreatment carriers, reactive carriers, and wild-type patients. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with toxicity and hospitalization risk. Kaplan-Meier methods estimated time to event of first grade 3+ toxicity and hospitalization.

Of the 757 patients who received DPYD genotyping (median age 63, 54% male, 74% White, 19% Black, 88% GI malignancy), 45 (5.9%) were heterozygous carriers. Fluoropyrimidine was modified in 93% of carriers who started treatment. In 442 patients with 3-month follow-up, 64%, 31%, and 30% of reactive carriers, pretreatment carriers, and wild-type patients had grade 3+ toxicity, respectively (P = .085); 64%, 25%, and 13% were hospitalized (P < .001). Reactive carriers had 10-fold higher odds of hospitalization compared with wild-type patients (P = .001), whereas no significant difference was noted between pretreatment carriers and wild-type patients. Time-to-event of toxicity and hospitalization were significantly different between genotype groups (P < .001), with reactive carriers having the earliest onset and highest incidence.

DPYD genotyping prompted fluoropyrimidine modifications in most carriers. Pretreatment testing reduced toxicities and hospitalizations compared with reactive testing, thus normalizing the risk to that of wild-type patients, and should be considered standard practice.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant global health challenge. Notably, the risk of CRC escalates with age, with the majority of cases occurring in those over the age of 65. Despite recent progress in tailoring treatments for early and advanced CRC, there is a lack of prospective data to guide the management of older patients, who are frequently underrepresented in clinical trials. This article reviews the contemporary landscape of managing older individuals with CRC, highlighting recent advancements and persisting challenges. The role of comprehensive geriatric assessment is explored. Opportunities for treatment escalation/de-escalation, with consideration of the older adult's fitness level. are reviewed in the neoadjuvant, surgical, adjuvant, and metastatic settings of colon and rectal cancers. Immunotherapy is shown to be an effective treatment option in older adults who have CRC with microsatellite instability. Promising new technologies such as circulating tumor DNA and recent phase III trials adding later-line systemic therapy options are discussed. Clinical recommendations based on the data available are summarized. We conclude that deliberate efforts to include older individuals in future colorectal cancer trials are essential to better guide the management of these patients in this rapidly evolving field.

Real-world evidence (RWE)-derived from analysis of real-world data (RWD)-has the potential to guide personalized treatment decisions. However, because of potential confounding, generating valid RWE is challenging. This study demonstrates how to responsibly generate RWE for treatment decisions. We validate our approach by demonstrating that we can uncover an existing adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) guideline for stage II and III colon cancer (CC)-which came about using both data from randomized controlled trials and expert consensus-solely using RWD.

Data from the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry from a total of 27,056 patients with stage II and III CC who underwent curative surgery were analyzed to estimate the overall survival (OS) benefit of ACT. Focusing on 5-year OS, the benefit of ACT was estimated for each patient using G-computation methods by adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics and estimated propensity score. Subsequently, on the basis of these estimates, an ACT decision tree was constructed.

The constructed decision tree corresponds to the current Dutch guideline: patients with stage III or stage II with T stage 4 should receive surgery and ACT, whereas patients with stage II with T stage 3 should only receive surgery. Interestingly, we do not find sufficient RWE to conclude against ACT for stage II with T stage 4 and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), a recent addition to the current guideline.

RWE, if used carefully, can provide a valuable addition to our construction of evidence on clinical decision making and therefore ultimately affect treatment guidelines. Next to validating the ACT decisions advised in the current Dutch guideline, this paper suggests additional attention should be paid to MSI-H in future iterations of the guideline.

A combination of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) is the standard for adjuvant therapy of resected early-stage colon cancer (CC). Oxaliplatin leads to lasting and disabling neurotoxicity. Reserving the regimen for patients who benefit from oxaliplatin would maximize efficacy and minimize unnecessary adverse side effects.

We trained a new machine learning model, referred to as the colon oxaliplatin signature (COLOXIS) model, for predicting response to oxaliplatin-containing regimens. We examined whether COLOXIS was predictive of oxaliplatin benefits in the CC adjuvant setting among 1,065 patients treated with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FULV; n = 421) or FULV + oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; n = 644) from NSABP C-07 and C-08 phase III trials. The COLOXIS model dichotomizes patients into COLOXIS+ (oxaliplatin responder) and COLOXIS- (nonresponder) groups. Eight-year recurrence-free survival was used to evaluate oxaliplatin benefits within each of the groups, and the predictive value of the COLOXIS model was assessed using the P value associated with the interaction term (int P) between the model prediction and the treatment effect.

Among 1,065 patients, 526 were predicted as COLOXIS+ and 539 as COLOXIS-. The COLOXIS+ prediction was associated with prognosis for FULV-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.52 [95% CI, 1.07 to 2.15]; P = .017). The model was predictive of oxaliplatin benefits: COLOXIS+ patients benefited from oxaliplatin (HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89]; P = .0065; int P = .03), but COLOXIS- patients did not (COLOXIS- HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.52]; P = .65).

The COLOXIS model is predictive of oxaliplatin benefits in the CC adjuvant setting. The results provide evidence supporting a change in CC adjuvant therapy: reserve oxaliplatin only for COLOXIS+ patients, but further investigation is warranted.

This article is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines regarding the management of non-metastatic colon cancer (CC), revised in November 2022.

These guidelines represent collaborative work of all French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of CC. Recommendations were graded in three categories (A, B, and C) according to the level of evidence found in the literature published up to November 2022.

Initial evaluation of CC is based on clinical examination, colonoscopy, chest-abdomen-pelvis computed tomography (CT) scan, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay. CC is usually managed by surgery and adjuvant treatment depending on the pathological findings. The use of adjuvant therapy remains a challenging question in stage II disease. For high-risk stage II CC, adjuvant chemotherapy must be discussed and fluoropyrimidine monotherapy or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy proposed according to the type and number of poor prognostic features. Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (FOLFOX or CAPOX) is the current standard for adjuvant therapy of patients with stage III CC. However, these regimens are associated with significant oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity. The results of the recent IDEA study provide evidence that 3 months of treatment with CAPOX is as effective as 6 months of oxaliplatin-based therapy in patients with low-risk stage III CC (T1-3 and N1). A 6-month oxaliplatin-based therapy remains the standard of care for high-risk stage III CC (T4 and/or N2). For patients unfit for oxaliplatin, fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is recommended.

French guidelines for non-metastatic CC management help to offer the best personalized therapeutic strategy in daily clinical practice. Each individual case must be discussed within a multidisciplinary tumor board and then the treatment option decided with the patient.

Colon cancer (CC) is a public health concern with increasing incidence in younger populations. Treatment for locally advanced CC (LACC) involves oncological surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) to reduce recurrence and improve overall survival (OS). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a novel approach for the treatment of LACC, and research is underway to explore its potential benefit in terms of survival. This trial will assess the efficacy of NAC in LACC.

This is a multicentre randomised, parallel-group, open label controlled clinical trial. Participants will be selected based on homogenous inclusion criteria and randomly assigned to two treatment groups: NAC, surgery, and AC or surgery followed by AC. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary outcomes including 5-year PFS, 2- and 5-year OS, toxicity, radiological and pathological response, morbidity, and mortality.

The results of this study will determine whether NAC induces a clinical and histological tumour response in patients with CCLA and if this treatment sequence improves survival without increasing morbidity and mortality.

NCT04188158.

The lungs are one of the most common sites for colon cancer metastasis. A few studies reported that approximately 2% to 10% of patients with colon cancer developed pulmonary metastasis. However, among these studies, patient characteristics were heterogeneous, and information on pulmonary metastasis incidence by the TNM stage was scarce.

This study evaluated the incidence of pulmonary metastasis in colon cancer without synchronous metastasis treated with radical surgery and identified risk factors for pulmonary metastasis according to the TNM stage.

This retrospective study included all patients with colon cancer without metastasis who underwent radical surgery for primary tumor at Samsung Medical Center between January 2007 and December 2016.

A total of 4889 patients who underwent radical surgery for stage I and III colon cancer were included.

The main outcome measures were the incidence of pulmonary metastasis and overall survival.

A total of 156 patients (3.2%) were diagnosed with pulmonary metastasis after a median of 16 months from the time of radical surgery for colon cancer to detection of pulmonary metastasis. The pulmonary metastasis incidence rate by the TNM stage was 0.5% in stage I, 1.6% in stage II, and 6% in stage III. Risk factors for pulmonary metastasis were preoperative CEA >5 ng/mL, cancer obstruction, N stage, vascular invasion, perineural invasion, and adjuvant chemotherapy for primary colon cancer in multivariable analysis.

This was a retrospective single-center study.

Preoperative CEA >5 ng/mL, cancer obstruction, pN stage, vascular invasion, perineural invasion, and receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for primary colon cancer were risk factors for pulmonary metastasis in colon cancer. Therefore, patients with risk factors for pulmonary metastasis should be recommended for intensive follow-up to detect lung metastases. See Video Abstract .

ANTECEDENTES:Los pulmones son uno de los sitios más comunes de metástasis del cáncer de colon. Algunos estudios informaron que aproximadamente entre el 2% y el 10% de los pacientes con cáncer de colon desarrollaron metástasis pulmonar. Sin embargo, entre estos estudios, las características de los pacientes fueron heterogéneas y la información sobre la incidencia de metástasis pulmonares según el estadio TNM fue escasa.OBJETIVO:Este estudio evaluó la incidencia de metástasis pulmonar en cáncer de colon sin metástasis sincrónica tratada con cirugía radical e identificó factores de riesgo para metástasis pulmonar según el estadio TNM.DISEÑO Y AJUSTES:Este estudio retrospectivo incluyó a todos los pacientes con cáncer de colon sin metástasis que se sometieron a cirugía radical por tumor primario en el Samsung Medical Center entre enero de 2007 y diciembre de 2016.PACIENTES:Se incluyó un total de 4.889 pacientes sometidos a cirugía radical por cáncer de colon en estadio I-III.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las principales medidas de resultado fueron la incidencia de metástasis pulmonar y la supervivencia general.RESULTADOS:Un total de 156 pacientes (3,2%) fueron diagnosticados con metástasis pulmonar con una duración media de 16 meses desde el momento de la cirugía radical por cáncer de colon hasta la detección de la metástasis pulmonar. La tasa de incidencia de metástasis pulmonares por estadio TNM fue del 0,5% en el estadio I, del 1,6% en el estadio II y del 6% en el estadio III. Los factores de riesgo de metástasis pulmonar fueron CEA preoperatorio superior a 5 ng/ml, obstrucción por cáncer, estadio N, invasión vascular, invasión perineural y quimioterapia adyuvante para el cáncer de colon primario en un análisis multivariable.LIMITACIÓN:Este fue un estudio retrospectivo de un solo centro.CONCLUSIÓN:CEA preoperatorio superior a 5 ng/ml, obstrucción por cáncer, estadio pN, invasión vascular, invasión perineural y recibir quimioterapia adyuvante para el cáncer de colon primario fueron factores de riesgo de metástasis pulmonar en el cáncer de colon. Por lo tanto, se debe recomendar un seguimiento intensivo a los pacientes con factores de riesgo de metástasis pulmonares para detectar metástasis pulmonares. (Traducción-Dr Yolanda Colorado ).

Accurate estimation of the long-term risk of recurrence in patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) is crucial for clinical management. Histology-based deep learning is expected to provide more abundant information for risk stratification.

We developed and validated a weakly supervised deep-learning model for predicting 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) to stratify patients with different risks based on histological images from three hospitals of 614 cases with non-metastatic CRC. A deep prognostic factor (DL-RRS) was established to stratify patients into high and low-risk group. The areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated to evaluate the performances of models.

Our proposed model achieves the AUCs of 0.833 (95% CI: 0.736-0.905) and 0.715 (95% CI: 0.647-0.776) on validation cohort and external test cohort, respectively. The 5-year RFS rate was 45.7% for high DL-RRS patients, and 82.5% for low DL-RRS patients respectively in the external test cohort (HR: 3.89, 95% CI: 2.51-6.03, P < 0.001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved RFS in Stage II patients with high DL-RRS (HR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.06-0.38, P < 0.001).

DL-RRS has a good predictive performance of 5-year recurrence risk in CRC, and will better serve the clinical decision-making.

Colorectal cancer is not common in patients under 40 years old, and its associations with clinical features and the prognosis remain uncertain.

Using a multicenter database, we retrospectively reviewed 3015 patients who underwent colorectal surgery between 2016 and 2021. Patients were divided by age into those < 40 years old (young; n = 52), 40-54 years old (middle-aged; n = 254) and > 54 years old (old; n = 2709). We then investigated age-related differences in clinicopathological features, perioperative outcomes and the prognosis.

The proportion of young patients increased annually from 0.63% in 2016 to 2.10% in 2021. Female patients were more frequent, the performance status was better, tumors were larger, clinically node-positive and poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas were more frequent, postoperative complications were less frequent, and the hospital stay was shorter in young patients than in older patients. Young age was an independent predictor of a low risk of postoperative complications (odds ratio, 0.204; 95% confidence interval, 0.049-0.849; p = 0.028). With pathologically node-positive status, adjuvant chemotherapy was more frequent in young patients (100%) than in middle-aged (73.7%) or old (51.8%) patients (p < 0.001), and the 3-year relapse-free survival was better in the young group than in others.

Despite higher rates of advanced tumors in younger patients, adequate adjuvant chemotherapy appears to improve the relapse-free survival.