The emergence of immuno-oncology (IO) has led to revolutionary changes in the field of cancer treatment. Despite notable advancements in this field, a thorough exploration of its full depth and extent has yet to be performed. This study provides a comprehensive overview of publications pertaining to IO. Publications on IO from 2014 to 2023 were retrieved by searching the Web of Science Core Collection database (WoSCC). VOSviewer software and Citespace software were used for the visualized analysis. A total of 1,874 articles have been published in the IO domain. The number of publications and citations has been increasing annually. This study also examines the primary research directions within the field of IO. In conclusion, this study offers a comprehensive overview of the opportunities and challenges associated with IO, illuminating the current status of research and indicating potential future trajectories in this rapidly progressing field. This study provides a comprehensive survey of the current research status and hot spots within the field of IO. It will assist researchers in comprehending the current research emphasis and development trends in this field and offers guidance for future research directions.

The development of novel microspheres for the combination of sonodynamic therapy (SDT) with transarterial embolization (TAE) therapy to amplify their efficacy has received increasing attention. Herein, a novel strategy for encapsulating sonosensitizers (e.g., oxygen-deficient manganese tungstate (MnWOX) nanodots) with gelatin microspheres was proposed. The obtained MnWOX-encapsulated microspheres (abbr. Mn-GMSs) facilitated efficient sonodynamic-embolization-metalloimmune therapy via the immune effects of metal ions on orthotopic liver cancer tumor after transarterial embolization (TAE). Due to the strong cavitation effect caused by the porous structure, Mn-GMSs exhibited a greater reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation rate than the free MnWOX nanodots under US irradiation. Efficient SDT revealed robust cell-killing effects and triggered strong immunogenic cell death (ICD). Moreover, the Mn ions released from the bioactive Mn-GMSs further stimulated the dendritic cells (DCs) maturation and triggered the activation of the cGAS/STING pathway to enhance the immunological effect. Thus, Mn-GMSs achieved significant SDT therapeutic outcomes in H22 tumors in mice, and the combination of the Mn-GMSs triggered SDT with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies could further enhance therapeutic outcomes. The Mn-GMSs exhibited high ROS generation efficacy under US irradiation, significant immune activation, good efficacy in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor, and great potential for artery embolization-assisted drug delivery, thus enabling effective destruction of liver tumors in rats and rabbits. Therefore, this work provides a strategy for applying SDT in deep tumors and highlights a promising sonodynamic-embolization therapy for combating liver cancers.

Liver cancer, more specifically hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is a global health issue and one of the dominant causes of cancer death around the world. In the past few decades, remarkable advances have been achieved in the systemic therapy of HCC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a therapy mainstay for advanced HCC and have shown promise in the neoadjuvant therapy before resection. Despite these significant advancements, the compositions and functions of the immune system occur various alterations with age, called "immunosenescence", which may affect the antitumor effects and safety of ICIs, thus raising concerns that immunosenescence may impair elderly patients' response to ICIs. Therefore, it is important to learn more about the immunosenescence characteristics of elderly patients. However, the real-world elderly HCC patients may be not accurately represented by the elderly patients included in the clinical trials, affecting the generalizability of the efficacy and safety profiles from the clinical trials to the real-world elderly patients. This review summarizes the characteristics of immunosenescence and its influence on HCC progression and immunotherapy efficacy as well as provides the latest progress in ICIs available for HCC and discusses their treatment efficacy and safety on elderly patients. In the future, more studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms of immunosenescence in HCC, and to find sensitive screening tools or biomarkers to identify the patients who may benefit from ICIs.

Tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) contribute to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progression. However, while the pro-tumour and immunosuppressive roles of lipid-loaded macrophages are well established, the mechanisms by which lipid metabolism enhances the tumour-promoting effects of TAMs remain unclear.

Single-cell RNA sequencing was performed on mouse and human HCC tumour samples to elucidate the landscape of HCC TAMs. Macrophages were stimulated with various long-chain unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs) to assess immunosuppressive molecule expression in vitro. Additionally, in vivo and in vitro studies were conducted using mice with macrophage-specific deficiencies in fatty acid-binding protein 5 (FABP5) or peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ).

Single-cell RNA sequencing identified a subpopulation of FABP5+ lipid-loaded TAMs characterized by enhanced immune checkpoint blocker ligands and immunosuppressive molecules in an oncogene-mutant HCC mouse model and human HCC tumours. Mechanistically, long-chain UFAs released by tumour cells activate PPARγ via FABP5, resulting in immunosuppressive properties in TAMs. FABP5 deficiency in macrophages decreases immunosuppressive molecule expression, enhances T cell-dependent antitumour immunity, diminishes HCC growth, and improves immunotherapy efficacy.

This study demonstrates that UFAs promote tumourigenesis by enhancing the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment via FABP5-PPARγ signalling and provides a proof-of-concept for targeting this pathway to improve the efficacy of tumour immunotherapy.

Despite the role of tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) in promoting tumour progression being well established, the mechanisms by which lipid metabolism enhances the tumour-promoting effects of TAMs remain unclear. Our study reveals that FABP5-mediated unsaturated fatty acid metabolism in TAMs is crucial for modulating antitumour T-cell immunity and influencing the efficacy of immunotherapy. This finding provides novel insights into the immunomodulatory roles of FABP5+ lipid-loaded TAMs in hepatocellular carcinoma and suggests that targeting FABP5 could offer a new approach to liver cancer treatment.

Locoregional therapies play a fundamental role in the treatment of patients with early and intermediate and locally advanced hepatocellular carcinomas. With encouraging recent advances in immunotherapy-based systemic therapies, locoregional therapies are being both promoted and challenged by new systemic therapy options. Combined locoregional and systemic therapies might enhance treatment outcomes compared with either option alone. This Series paper summarises the existing data on locoregional and systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma, and discusses evidence from studies investigating their combination with a focus on their synergistic efficacy and safety.

The impact of low-level viremia(LLV) on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(uHCC) patients remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the effect of LLV on the outcomes of ICIs-based therapy in patients with uHCC.

In this multicenter retrospective study, we included patients with uHCC who received ICIs-based therapy at four centres between January 2019 and December 2022. All patients were positive for HBsAg and were on nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) antiviral therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to balance baseline characteristics between the LLV and maintained virological response (MVR) groups. Proteomic analysis was performed on a subset of patients to identify differential protein expression.

A total of 329 patients (mean age 56 years; 92.4% male; 70.8% BCLC stage C) were included, with 170 patients in the LLV group and 159 in the MVR group. The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly lower in the LLV group compared to the MVR group (21.2% vs. 36.5%, p = 0.002), as was the disease control rate (DCR) (78.8% vs. 92.5%, p < 0.001). Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was shorter in the LLV group (7.6 vs. 12.6 months, p < 0.001), as was median overall survival (mOS) (22.8 vs. 40.0 months, p < 0.001). These differences remained consistent after PSM and IPTW adjustments. Multivariate analysis identified LLV as the only independent risk factor for overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.522, 95% CI 0.348-0.781; p = 0.002). Proteomic analysis revealed significant differences in the expression of Flt3L, SLAMF1 and FGF-5 proteins between the LLV and MVR groups.

LLV is associated with poorer responses to ICIs-based therapy and reduced survival in patients with HBV-related uHCC.

Over the past years, there has been a remarkable advance in the systemic treatment options for advanced HCC. The overall survival has gradually increased over time, with larger benefits for patients with sensitive tumors and preserved liver function, the latter being an essential condition for the delivery of sequential lines of treatment and optimization of clinical outcomes. With the approval of new first-line agents and the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies, the treatment landscape of advanced HCC is becoming wider than ever. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and, more recently, durvalumab plus tremelimumab have entered the clinical practice and are the current standard of care for treatment-naïve patients, surpassing sorafenib and lenvatinib monopoly. As no head-to-head comparisons are available among all the first-line treatment options, the recommendation for the most appropriate choice and sequence is patient-driven and integrates efficacy data with clinical comorbidities, background liver disease, and the safety profile of available drugs. In addition, predictive biomarkers for successful patients' stratification are yet to be available and constitute the focus of ongoing research. The treatment algorithm is likely to become even more complex since systemic therapeutic approaches are now being translated into earlier stages of the disease, with an impact on the evolution of the sequential treatment of patients with HCC.

The age-related decline in immunity appears to be associated not only with cancer development but also with differential responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Despite their increasing utility across various malignancies and therapeutic settings, limited data -derived primarily from subgroup analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), pooled meta-analyses, and retrospective studies- are available on the effects of aging on their efficacy and toxicity. Immunosenescence, characterized by the progressive decline of the function of the immune system, and inflammaging, a state of persistent low-grade sterile inflammation, may influence ICI outcomes. Additionally, the incidence, severity, and subtypes of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) may differ between older and younger individuals due to loss of immunotolerance. In the current review, starting from a a comprehensive discussion of the pathophysiology of immunosenescence, we proceed to critically review age-related retrospective and randomized evidence supporting FDA-approved ICIs. We highlight similarities or differences across age groups and the clinical benefit of ICIs in elderly versus younger cancer patients. The optimal integration of ICIs in geriatric oncology necessitates greater inclusion of this patient demographic in RCTs along with real-world data in order to acquire robust data which will guide evidence-based treatment decisions for this population.

In recent years, several global phase III trials have shown that combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) offer superior efficacy and survival compared to multi-kinase inhibitors, establishing them as the gold standard for treating patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This success has led to investigations into expanding the use of immunotherapy into various other settings and populations, including neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, patients with decompensated liver function and those awaiting liver transplantation. Despite its proven efficacy, a significant number of patients still develop resistance to immunotherapy, highlighting the need for innovative strategies to address this challenge. Approaches aimed at enhancing tumour immunogenicity, such as combining immunotherapy with transarterial chemoembolization or radiation therapies, show significant promise. Additionally, novel immunotherapeutics - such as triplet therapy, bispecific antibodies, adoptive T-cell therapy and cancer vaccines - are in early development for HCC. These agents have demonstrated potential for synergistic effects with existing ICIs, with initial studies yielding positive outcomes. In this review, we offer our future perspective on immunotherapy, emphasizing emerging indications, novel combination strategies and the development of new immunotherapeutic agents. Overall, the future of immunotherapy in HCC is brimming with extraordinary potential, set to transform the treatment landscape and redefine the possibilities for managing this challenging disease.

Recent advances in the systemic treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with immunotherapy have once again reignited discussion over the role of combined therapy in earlier stages. This year, different international meetings have presented recent results from clinical trials on adjuvant therapy alone (IMBrave-050) and combined with transarterial chemoembolization (EMERALD-1 and LEAP-12). Increased enthusiasm for the use of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for liver transplantation, surgery, and local-regional treatment of HCC has been shown. However, the initial results from these trials should be interpreted cautiously as we wait for final analyses and effects on overall survival. In this position paper from the special interest group from the Latin American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (ALEH), we underline the caveats of the applicability of these potential treatments in our region, explore points of agreement, and highlight areas of uncertainty. Moreover, we underscore the role of hepatologists in the clinical decision-making process and management of these patients.

Immunotherapy has improved survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); yet, objective radiological responses occur in only about 20% of cases, suggesting variable benefits. This study aimed to identify serologic markers predictive of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). A cohort of 38 advanced HCC patients receiving immunotherapy was prospectively analyzed. Levels of cell-free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and cytokines were measured pre-treatment and three months post-treatment initiation. Genomic profiling of ctDNA was also conducted. Baseline levels of cfDNA and ctDNA effectively discriminated HCC patients based on their radiological response to ICIs. Additionally, individuals with pathologic mutations in the CDKN2A gene exhibited significantly reduced survival. Patients with progressive disease (PD) as their best radiological response had significantly fewer copy number variations (CNVs) than those with a radiological response. Furthermore, levels of IL10, PD1, and TGFβ assessed after three months of treatment showed significant variations correlating with survival status. In conclusion, the analysis of cfDNA, ctDNA, and cytokines may improve treatment selection for HCC patients by predicting their expected response to immunotherapies.

Hepatocellular carcinoma remains a life-threatening malignancy with limited therapeutic options following the failure of second-line treatments1,2. Oncolytic viruses selectively replicate in and lyse cancer cells, releasing neoantigens and stimulating systemic antitumour immunity3, offering a potential therapeutic option. Here we present the results of a multicentre phase 1 clinical trial evaluating VG161, an engineered oncolytic herpes simplex virus that expresses IL-12, IL-15, IL-15Rα and a PD-1-PD-L1-blocking fusion protein4, for safety and efficacy in patients with advanced liver cancer. VG161 was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities observed, and it demonstrated promising efficacy by reshaping the tumour immune microenvironment and re-sensitizing tumours that were previously resistant to systemic treatments. Notably, we also found that patients who had previously been sensitive to checkpoint inhibitor therapy showed enhanced efficacy with VG161 treatment. Furthermore, we developed an efficacy-prediction model based on differentially expressed genes, which successfully identified patients who were likely to benefit from VG161 and predicted prolonged overall survival. These findings position VG161 as a promising third-line therapeutic option for refractory hepatocellular carcinoma. This provides a new avenue for treatment and advances the field of oncolytic virus-based immunotherapies. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04806464 .

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with chronic infections by hepatotropic viruses such as hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV), being major risk factors. Chronic infections with these viruses are the leading cause of HCC worldwide, with HBV alone responsible for over 50% of cases. Despite advances in direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for HCV and nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) for HBV, challenges remain in HCC prevention, early detection, and treatment. Recent research highlights the role of viral-induced metabolic alterations, such as the Warburg effect, mitochondrial dysfunction, and lipid dysregulation, in promoting HCC. Moreover, immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as effective treatments for advanced HCC, though responses vary between HBV- and HCV-related cancers. Additionally, novel therapeutic approaches and metabolic-targeted therapies offer promising avenues for virus-associated HCC treatment. Advancements in liquid biopsy biomarkers and artificial intelligence-driven diagnostics are improving HCC surveillance and risk stratification, potentially enabling earlier interventions. While HBV vaccination has significantly reduced HCC incidence, disparities in global vaccination coverage persist. Furthermore, antiviral therapies combined with structured surveillance programs have proven effective in reducing HCC incidence and mortality. This review highlights the complex connection between viral, genetic, and environmental factors in HCC development and underscores the importance of integrated prevention strategies to reduce its burden globally.

There is still no noninvasive, automated, and accurate model for guiding physicians in the decision-making of transarterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation (TACE-MWA) in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

To develop a prognostic score based on the tumor burden and radiomic features for the prediction of the long-term survival of patients with intermediate-stage HCC after TACE-MWA.

From June 2008 to October 2022, a total of 2189 consecutive patients from seven tertiary-care hospitals with intermediate-stage HCC who received initial TACE combined with MWA were enrolled. Among them, 2189 were divided into training cohort (N = 1753), and internal test cohort (N = 436) in a single center, and 316 patients were assigned to external test cohort in another 6 centers. A prognostic scoring system was constructed using tumor burden and radiologic features (TBR) and compared with conventional predicting systems.

In training cohort, multivariate Cox regression analysis suggested that tumor burden (hazard ratio (HR), 0.693; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.505, 0.814; 1 point per 1.0 increase, p = 0.024), radiologic features (HR, 0.349; 95% CI: 0.236, 0.517; p < 0.001), and alpha-fetoprotein (HR, 1.629; 95% CI: 1.280, 2.073; p < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for OS. A prognostic model that comprises TBR was built, which showed significantly higher AUC values than other clinical stagings in all three cohorts. Moreover, the TBR score provided greater net benefit across the range of reasonable threshold probabilities than other models. Based on cutoff values of 32 and 74 centiles of the TBR score, the cohort was divided into low-, middle-, and high-risk strata, which provide consistent performance in survival discrimination across different patient subgroups.

The TBR score serves as an efficient instrument for risk stratification, guiding the course of adjuvant targeted and immunotherapies for HCC patients undergoing TACE-MWA combined treatment.

A retrospective, multi-institutional study.

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) or anti-programmed death ligand-1 (anti-PD-L1) with antiangiogenic agents has emerged as a revolutionary therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). Key antiangiogenic medications encompass monoclonal antibodies targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF mAbs) and multiple kinase inhibitors (MKIs). The aim of this study is to assess the difference of efficacy and safety between 2 combination therapies. This study retrospectively examined the outcomes of 57 patients with aHCC who underwent first-line treatment with a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antiangiogenic therapy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, from September 2018 to July 2023. The analysis, conducted using SPSS software, focused on patient outcomes such as tumor response (assessed according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria), objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Comparisons among different groups were also made. The anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1-anti-VEGF mAbs group showed a trend of higher partial response rate (37.50% vs 22.45%), objective response rate (37.50% vs 24.49%), disease control rate (62.50% vs 59.18%), and seemed to achieve longer median progression-free survival (14.93 vs 14.90 months) and median overall survival (15.80 vs 11.10 months) without higher grade 3 or higher adverse events comparing to anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1-MKIs group. Subgroup analysis showed that the anti-PD-1-lenvatinib group achieved longer median progression-free survival (23.97 months), while the anti-PD-1-regorafenib group achieved longer median overall survival (37.97 months). The anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 combined with anti-VEGF mAbs was effective and tolerable compared to anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1-MKIs in aHCC. The addition of lenvatinib or regorafenib may provide promising incremental benefit for patients with aHCC.

Overall survival (OS) is recommended as a gold standard endpoint but has some limitations. We aimed to finding more effective surrogate endpoints for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Three online databases were searched for randomized control trials (RCTs) on HCC, published between January 2015 and July 2023, that evaluated ICIs and reported progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and OS. The correlation between the potential surrogate endpoints and OS was evaluated at the trial, arm, and patient levels. The prediction models were validated in single-arm or non-RCTs. Individual data were collected from a real-world (RW) cohort with advanced HCC underwent ICI monotherapy at three tertiary medical centers in China.

Ten RCTs (6023 participants) with 11 comparisons were included. PFS had a moderately significant association with OS (R2 = 0.50, p = 0.014). ORR, DCR, and OS showed weak correlations. On limiting the analysis to ICI monotherapy studies, the correlations of OS with PFS became stronger (R2 = 0.85, p = 0.02). The RW cohort also verified that PFS was closely related to OS when patient received with ICI monotherapy.

PFS are recommended as surrogate markers in patients with advanced HCC treated with ICI monotherapy.

Systemic treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has rapidly advanced, with immune checkpoint inhibitors now the preferred first-line option. However, with multiple agents available and no established treatment sequence, selecting the most suitable second-line (2L) therapy remains challenging. While sorafenib is frequently chosen for 2L treatment, comprehensive data supporting its use is limited. This study evaluates the effectiveness of sorafenib as 2L therapy and factors influencing outcomes following first-line treatment failure in advanced HCC patients.

This is a retrospective, multicenter study, including 81 patients with unresectable HCC from 12 European centers who received sorafenib as 2L treatment. Median overall survival (mOS), median progression-free survival (mPFS), radiological response to treatment, and toxicity were evaluated. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify potential predictors of clinical benefit.

In this cohort, some patients were treated with 2L sorafenib mOS for 7.4 months (95% CI: 6.6-13.6) and other patients were treated with mPFS for 3.7 months (95% CI: 3.0-4.8). Multivariable analysis revealed the best median OS for patients with CP A and AFP levels < 400 ng/mL (15.5 months). Adverse events (AE) of grade ≥ 3 were reported in 59.4% of patients.

In this real-world cohort of European patients with unresectable HCC, the outcome of sorafenib treatment in the 2L setting was comparable to that of the other established 2L treatment options in patients with preserved liver function and good performance status. This study contributes to the understanding of the role of sorafenib in the 2L setting and underscores the need for further research to identify predictive factors for response and survival in order to optimize treatment algorithms for advanced HCC.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in prevalence globally, and cure remains limited with non-operative treatment. Surgical intervention, through resection or transplantation, offers a potential for cure for select patients. However, many patients present with advanced or unresectable disease, and recurrence rates remain high. Recent advances in systemic therapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, have demonstrated promise in treating unresectable HCC and as adjuvant therapy. Evidence from adjuvant trials highlights the synergistic potential of combined liver-directed and systemic therapies. These findings have ignited growing interest in neoadjuvant therapy across various scenarios: (1) as a bridging strategy while awaiting transplantation, (2) for downstaging disease to enable transplantation, (3) for converting unresectable disease to a resectable state, or (4) as neoadjuvant treatment in operable cases. Early-stage trials of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable HCC have reported promising outcomes. To realize the potential of neoadjuvant treatment for HCC, thoughtfully designed, adequately powered, multi-center clinical trials are essential.

Aberrant expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) facilitates tumor immune evasion. Protein arginine methyltransferase 3 (PRMT3), a member of type I PRMT family, mediates asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) modification of various substrate proteins. This study investigates the role of PRMT3 in PD-L1-associated tumor immunosuppression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Hepatocyte-specific knockout of Prmt3 significantly suppressed HCC progression in DEN-CCL4-treated mice. Knockout of Prmt3 in HCC cells markedly increased CD8+ T cell infiltration, and reduced lactate production in tumors. PRMT3 interacted with pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDHK1), asymmetric dimethylation of PDHK1 at arginine 363 and 368 residues and increased its kinase activity. The R363/368 K mutant or inhibition of PDHK1 by JX06 blocked the effect of PRMT3 on lactate production. JX06 treatment also attenuated the tumor-promoting role of PRMT3 in HCC in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, RNA-seq analysis revealed that knockout of PRMT3 downregulates the tumor-associated immune checkpoint, PD-L1, in tumor tissues. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay demonstrated that PRMT3 promotes lactate-induced PD-L1 expression by enhancing the direct binding of histone H3 lysine 18 lactylation (H3K18la) to the PD-L1 promoter. Tissue microarray analysis showed a positive correlation between PRMT3 and PD-L1 expression in HCC patients. Anti-PD-L1 treatment reversed PRMT3-induced tumor growth and restored CD8+ T cell infiltration. Our research links PRMT3-mediated metabolic reprogramming and immune evasion, revealing that the PRMT3-PDHK1-lactate-PD-L1 axis may be a potential target for improving the efficacy of immunotherapy in HCC.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of liver cancer. HCC treatment is challenging; surgical resection is the primary curative treatment for early-stage disease, but recurrence rates are high. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a promising neoadjuvant treatment that can reduce recurrence rates and mortality after surgery and achieve complete/partial responses. Clinical trials provide strong evidence for the efficacy and safety of ICI monotherapy for neoadjuvant HCC treatment.

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a leading and increasing contributor to cancer-related death worldwide. Recent advancements in both liver-directed therapies in the form of yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization (RE) and systemic therapy in the form of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have expanded treatment options for patients with an otherwise poor prognosis. Despite these gains, ICIs and 90Y-RE each have key limitations with low objective response rates and persistent hazard of out-of-field recurrence, respectively, and overall survival remains low. However, each therapy's strength may mitigate the other's weakness, making them potentially ideal partners for combination treatment strategies. This review discusses the scientific and clinical rationale for combining 90Y-RE with ICIs, highlights early clinical trial data on its safety and effectiveness, and proposes key issues to be addressed in this emerging field. With optimal strategies, combination therapies can potentially result in increasing likelihood of durable and curative outcomes in later stage patients.

Liver cancer, primarily HCC, exhibits highly heterogeneous histological and molecular aberrations across tumors and within individual tumor nodules. Such intertumor and intratumor heterogeneities may lead to diversity in the natural history of disease progression and various clinical disparities across the patients. Recently developed multimodality, single-cell, and spatial omics profiling technologies have enabled interrogation of the intertumor/intratumor heterogeneity in the cancer cells and the tumor immune microenvironment. These features may influence the natural history and efficacy of emerging therapies targeting novel molecular and immune pathways, some of which had been deemed undruggable. Thus, comprehensive characterization of the heterogeneities at various levels may facilitate the discovery of biomarkers that enable personalized and rational treatment decisions, and optimize treatment efficacy while minimizing the risk of adverse effects. Such companion biomarkers will also refine HCC treatment algorithms across disease stages for cost-effective patient management by optimizing the allocation of limited medical resources. Despite this promise, the complexity of the intertumor/intratumor heterogeneity and ever-expanding inventory of therapeutic agents and regimens have made clinical evaluation and translation of biomarkers increasingly challenging. To address this issue, novel clinical trial designs have been proposed and incorporated into recent studies. In this review, we discuss the latest findings in the molecular and immune landscape of HCC for their potential and utility as biomarkers, the framework of evaluation and clinical application of predictive/prognostic biomarkers, and ongoing biomarker-guided therapeutic clinical trials. These new developments may revolutionize patient care and substantially impact the still dismal HCC mortality.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) was an effective treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and its effectiveness in combination with targeted immunotherapy regimens was controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of adding HAIC to lenvatinib in combination with programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors.

Literature related to the efficacy of HAIC in combination with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors in the treatment of advanced HCC was searched through PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases. TSA was used to control for the risk of random error and assess whether the meta-analysis evidence was conclusive.

Eight relevant papers with a total of 1244 patients. Compared with the L-P treatment group, the H-L-P treatment group significantly prolonged OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.11 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.82-2.44]; p < 0.001) and PFS (HR 1.91 [95 % CI 1.67-2.17]; p < 0.001) and improved ORR (risk ratio [RR] 2.20 [95 % CI 1.74-2.78]; p < 0.001) and DCR (RR 1.28 [95 % CI 1.15-1.42]; p < 0.001) in patients with advanced HCC. TSA analysis indicated that further trials were unnecessary, preliminary positive results were promptly obtained. Prognostic factor analysis demonstrated that extrahepatic metastasis were common independent risk factor for OS and PFS. The rate of adverse events (AEs) was higher in the H-L-P treatment group than in the L-P treatment group.

HAIC combined with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors markedly extended OS and PFS, particularly in patients without extrahepatic metastases. Furthermore, it markedly enhanced ORR and DCR in patients with HCC.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors, characterized by high incidence and mortality rates. Due to its insidious onset, most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, often missing the opportunity for surgical resection. Consequently, systemic treatments play a pivotal role. In recent years, an increasing number of drugs have been approved for first-line systemic treatment of HCC. However, their efficacy is limited, and some patients develop drug resistance after a period of treatment. For such patients, there is currently a lack of standard second-line systemic treatment options. This review summarizes the latest advancements in second-line systemic treatment research for HCC patients who have developed resistance to various first-line systemic treatments, aiming to provide more rational and personalized second-line treatment strategies.

The relationship between treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and efficacy in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with anti-angiogenic therapy remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the potential correlation between TRAEs and efficacy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) treated with the combination of camrelizumab and apatinib.

We conducted an analysis of efficacy and safety data obtained from 189 patients with uHCC enrolled in a phase II trial. All patients received intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg every 2 weeks and oral apatinib 250 mg once daily in 4-week cycles. Efficacy was evaluated based on objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). We described the profiles of TRAEs and analyzed the correlation between TRAEs and treatment efficacy. To mitigate the impact of immortal time bias, landmark analysis and time-dependent Cox regression analysis were employed to assess the correlation between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and survival outcomes.

As of March 10, 2021, irAEs of any grade were reported in 88 (46.6%) patients, with 17 (9.0%) patients experiencing grade 3-4 irAEs. The median onset time for any grade irAEs was 17.4 weeks. Apatinib-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade were reported in 188 (99.5%) patients. Among them, 139 (73.5%) patients experienced any grade of apatinib-related hypertension, while 65 (34.4%) patients had grade 3-4 hypertension. Patients who experienced irAEs exhibited significantly higher ORR and DCR, but the onset of irAEs occurred later than the time of PR or CR in 75.0% (30/40) of patients. Furthermore, in the landmark analysis and time-dependent Cox regression analysis, no significant differences in survival outcomes were observed between patients with irAEs and those without. Notably, patients with apatinib-related hypertension demonstrated better ORR (38.1% vs. 18.0%, p = 0.009) and DCR (84.2% vs. 60.0%, p < 0.001), as well as longer PFS (6.5 vs. 3.7 months, p = 0.001) and OS (23.0 vs. 15.1 months, p = 0.03).

In this study, the occurrence of irAEs did not predict the efficacy of camrelizumab in combination with apatinib, likely due to the decreased incidence and delayed occurrence. On the other hand, apatinib-related hypertension was associated with improved treatment efficacy.

Portal and hepatic vein tumor thrombosis is associated with inferior outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and systemic treatment alone is often insufficient. This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of combining sorafenib with radiotherapy in advanced HCC with thrombosis.

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03535259), this phase II single-arm prospective trial targeted patients with HCC with portal or hepatic vein tumor thrombosis, liver minus gross tumor volume >700 ml, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status scores of 0 or 1. Participants underwent 40-66 Gy radiotherapy for the hepatic primary tumor and vein tumor thrombosis, with concurrent oral sorafenib (400 mg twice daily) until disease progression or unacceptable adverse events. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (mOS) and the secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), median progression-free survival (mPFS), time to tumor progression (TTP), tumor thrombosis control, and grade ≥3 adverse events.

Between May 2018 and January 2020, 86 patients were enrolled with a median radiotherapy dose of 54 Gy (40-65 Gy). At a median follow-up of 17.2 months, mOS, mPFS, and TTP stood at 16.5, 6.1, and 6.8 months, respectively. ORR reached 47.7% and 52.3% per RECIST and mRECIST, respectively. For the tumor thrombosis, 2-year control rates per mRECIST were 93.1%. No grade 5 adverse events were noted, whereas thrombocytopenia (22.1%) and leukopenia (14.0%) were the main grade 3 adverse events.

Concurrent sorafenib and radiotherapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with HCC with portal or hepatic vein tumor thrombosis.

Treatment options for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and vascular tumor thrombus are limited. The efficacy and safety of concurrent sorafenib and radiation for HCC with portal or hepatic vein tumor thrombosis has not been elucidated. This phase II trial shows that concurrent sorafenib and radiotherapy is effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of advanced HCC with portal vein or hepatic vein tumor thrombosis.

This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03535259).

Over the past several years, the therapeutic landscape for patients with advanced, unresectable, or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma has been transformed by the incorporation of checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy into the treatment paradigm. Frontline systemic treatment options have expanded beyond anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as sorafenib, to a combination of immunotherapy approaches, including atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab, both of which have demonstrated superior response and survival to sorafenib. Additionally, combination treatments with checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been investigated with variable success. In this review, we discuss these advances in systemic treatment with immunotherapy, with a focus on understanding both the underlying biology and mechanism of these strategies and their efficacy outcomes in clinical trials. We also review challenges in identifying predictive biomarkers of treatments and discuss future directions with novel immunotherapy targets.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the common malignant cancers worldwide. Although immunotherapy has improved the treatment outcome in HCC, a significant percentage of patients with advanced HCC still cannot benefit from immunotherapy. Therefore, developing new targets or combination therapeutic strategies to improve the efficacy of immunotherapy is urgently needed. A deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying immune regulation may help in this regard. The tumor microenvironment (TME) consists of a diverse set of components modulating the efficacy of immunotherapy. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are critical components of the TME and can regulate both tumor and immune cells through secreted cytokines and exosomes that impact various signaling pathways in target cells. CAF-derived cytokines can also participate in extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, thereby impacting cancer progression and tumor responsiveness to immunotherapy among other effects. A thorough understanding of the phenotypic and functional profile dynamism of CAFs may lead the way for new treatment strategies and/or better treatment outcomes in HCC patients. In this review, we outline the biomarkers and functional heterogeneity of CAFs in HCC and elaborate on molecular mechanisms of CAFs, including anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy. We also examine current clinical implications of CAFs-related targets as potential therapeutic candidates in HCC.

The administration of second-line or subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in previously treated patients with advanced solid cancers has been clinically investigated. However, previous clinical trials lacked an appropriate primary endpoint for efficacy assessment. This systematic review aimed to explore the most optimal early efficacy endpoint for such trials.

Phase 2 or 3 clinical trials involving patients with advanced solid cancers with disease progression following standard first-line therapy receiving second-line or subsequent ICI administration, with adequate survival outcome data, were included from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases before February 2023. Quality assessment was conducted using the Cochrane tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized trials, respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 3, 6, and 9 months were investigated as potential early efficacy endpoint candidates for 12-month overall survival (OS), with a strong correlation defined as Pearson's correlation coefficient r ≥ 0.8.

A total of 64 RCTs comprising 22,725 patients and 106 non-randomized prospective trials involving 10,608 participants were eligible for modeling and external validation, respectively. RCTs examined 15 different cancer types, predominantly non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (17, 28%), melanoma (9, 14%), and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (5, 8%). The median sample size of RCTs was 124 patients, and the median follow-up time was 3.2-57.7 months. The ORR (r = 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.54) and PFS (r = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.14-0.64) exhibited weak trial-level correlations with OS. Within ICI treatment arms, the r values of ORR and 3-, 6-, and 9-month PFS with 12-month OS were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.37-0.79), 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.88), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.90), and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.90), respectively. External validation of 6-month PFS indicated an acceptable discrepancy between actual and predicted 12-month OS.

In non-randomized phase 2 trials on second-line or subsequent ICI therapy in patients with advanced solid cancers, 6-month PFS could serve as an early efficacy endpoint. However, early efficacy endpoints are not recommended in RCTs to replace OS.

The determinants of the response to checkpoint immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain poorly understood. The organisation of the immune response in the tumour microenvironment (TME) is expected to govern immunotherapy outcomes but spatial immunotypes remain poorly defined.

We hypothesised that the deconvolution of spatial immune network architectures could identify clinically relevant immunotypes in HCC.

We conducted highly multiplexed imaging mass cytometry on HCC tissues from 101 patients. We performed in-depth spatial single-cell analysis in a discovery and validation cohort to deconvolute the determinants of the heterogeneity of HCC immune architecture and develop a spatial immune classification that was tested for the prediction of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy.

Bioinformatic analysis identified 23 major immune, stroma, parenchymal and tumour cell types in the HCC TME. Unsupervised neighbourhood detection based on the spatial interaction of immune cells identified three immune architectures with differing involvement of immune cells and immune checkpoints dominated by either CD8 T-cells, myeloid immune cells or B- and CD4 T-cells. We used these to define three major spatial HCC immunotypes that reflect a higher level of intratumour immune cell organisation: depleted, compartmentalised and enriched. Progression-free survival under ICI therapy differed significantly between the spatial immune types with improved survival of enriched patients. In patients with intratumour heterogeneity, the presence of one enriched area governed long-term survival.

Preclinical studies have demonstrated that carvacrol possesses various biological and pharmacological properties, including anti-hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) effects. However, the molecular basis of its therapeutic action on HCC remains unclear.

The aim of this study was to investigate and further validate the multi-target therapeutic mechanism of carvacrol against HCC.

The chemical structure of carvacrol was obtained from the PubChem database, and its potential targets were identified using SwissTargetPrediction, HERB, and BATMAN-TCM. HCC-specific genes were screened from the TCGA-LIHC cohort. The therapeutic targets of carvacrol against HCC were determined through the intersection of these datasets. Subsequently, a multivariate Cox regression prognostic model was established. Molecular docking was performed to analyze the interactions between carvacrol and its therapeutic targets. Additionally, molecular dynamics simulations were conducted to validate the molecular docking results using Discovery Studio 2019 software.

A total of 223 carvacrol targets and 882 HCC-specific genes were identified. Fifteen therapeutic targets of carvacrol against HCC were obtained, including CA2, AR, ALB, AURKA, ALPL, EPHX2, BCHE, IL1RN, AGRN, CRP, DMGDH, APOA1, SOX9, HPX, and CHKA. The prognostic model accurately and independently predicted survival outcomes. AGRN and AURKA were significantly associated with HCC overall survival. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations demonstrated that carvacrol exhibited strong potential for stable binding to the therapeutic targets AGRN and AURKA.

Our findings elucidate the multi-target mechanism of action of carvacrol against HCC, providing a foundation for future research on its application in HCC management.

Over the past two decades, the "hallmarks of cancer" have revolutionized cancer research and highlighted the crucial roles of inflammation and immunity. Protumorigenic inflammation promotes cancer development along with inhibition of antitumor immunity, shaping the tumor microenvironment (TME) toward a tumor-permissive state and further enhancing the malignant potential of cancer cells. This immunosuppressive TME allows tumors to evade immunosurveillance. Thus, understanding the complex interplay between tumors and the immune system within the TME has become pivotal, especially with the advent of immunotherapy. Although immunotherapy has achieved notable success in many malignancies, primary liver cancer, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma, presents unique challenges. The hepatic immunosuppressive environment poses obstacles to the effectiveness of immunotherapy, along with high mortality rates and limited treatment options for patients with liver cancer. In this review, we discuss current understanding of the complex immune-mediated mechanisms underlying liver neoplasms, focusing on hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases. We describe the molecular and cellular heterogeneity within the TME, highlighting how this presents unique challenges and opportunities for immunotherapy in liver cancers. By unraveling the immune landscape of liver neoplasms, this review aims to contribute to the development of more effective therapeutic interventions, ultimately improving clinical outcomes for patients with liver cancer.

The combination therapy of lenvatinib and immunotherapy as first-line treatment remains controversial in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). This research aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib monotherapy (L) and combination therapy of lenvatinib and immune checkpoint inhibitor (LI) in lenvatinib-insensitive patients with uHCC.

Two hundred fifty-five uHCC patients were enrolled in this study. Patients were classified into two groups: (1) Lenvatinib monotherapy (L); (2) Combination therapy (LI). Patients who remained stable disease (SD) but did not achieve complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) or progression disease (PD) for at least 3 months after receiving lenvatinib monotherapy were defined as lenvatinib-insensitive. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), baseline characteristics, and safety were compared between groups.

The LI group had longer OS (15.9 months vs. 11.9 months, P = 0.001) and PFS (12.6 months vs. 7.3 months, P < 0.001) than the L group. ECOG PS was an independent prognostic factor affecting OS and Up-to-seven was an independent prognostic factor affecting PFS. The frequency of grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was not significantly different.

Our study demonstrated that the combination therapy (LI) had longer OS and PFS than the lenvatinib monotherapy (L) in lenvatinib-insensitive patients with uHCC.

In the global, phase III HIMALAYA study in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), STRIDE (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab) improved overall survival (OS) vs. sorafenib; durvalumab was non-inferior to sorafenib. HBV is the predominant HCC aetiology in most of Asia vs. HCV or non-viral aetiologies in Western countries and Japan. This analysis evaluated safety and efficacy outcomes for STRIDE and durvalumab monotherapy vs. sorafenib, in HIMALAYA participants enrolled in Asia, excluding Japan.

In HIMALAYA, participants were randomised to STRIDE, durvalumab, or sorafenib. The Asian subgroup in this analysis included participants enrolled in Hong Kong, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. OS, objective response rate (ORR; per RECIST, version 1.1), and safety were assessed in the Asian subgroup and in an exploratory subgroup of participants in Hong Kong and Taiwan.

The Asian subgroup included 479 participants randomised to STRIDE (n = 156), durvalumab (n = 167), or sorafenib (n = 156). OS was improved for STRIDE vs. sorafenib (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68; 95% CI 0.52-0.89). The OS HR for durvalumab vs. sorafenib was 0.83 (95% CI 0.64-1.06). In Hong Kong and Taiwan (n = 141), OS HRs for STRIDE vs. sorafenib and durvalumab vs. sorafenib were 0.44 (95% CI 0.26-0.77) and 0.64 (95% CI 0.37-1.08), respectively. In the Asian subgroup, ORR (including unconfirmed responses) was numerically higher for STRIDE (28.2%) and durvalumab (18.6%) vs. sorafenib (9.0%), and Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were numerically lower for STRIDE (19.9%) and durvalumab (13.3%) vs. sorafenib (30.5%).

STRIDE improved outcomes vs. sorafenib in the Asian subgroup. These results support the benefits of STRIDE for participants with uHCC globally, including in the Asia-Pacific region.

NCT03298451.

The global, phase III HIMALAYA study found that the STRIDE (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab) regimen improved overall survival (OS), including long-term OS vs. sorafenib, and that durvalumab monotherapy was non-inferior to sorafenib in participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, there are differences in the aetiology and clinical practices related to HCC in parts of Asia, compared to Western countries and Japan, which could lead to differences in treatment outcomes between these regions. The results of this analysis demonstrate the benefits of STRIDE for participants in the Asia-Pacific region, consistent with the full, global study population. Overall, these findings continue to support the use of STRIDE in a diverse population, reflective of uHCC globally.