|
1
|
Kim SC. Buried T-Bar after Gastrostomy Placement in Children. Indian J Pediatr 2022; 89:833. [PMID: 35674884 DOI: 10.1007/s12098-022-04236-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Soon Chul Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Jeonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University - Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, 54907, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Gkolfakis P, Arvanitakis M, Despott EJ, Ballarin A, Beyna T, Boeykens K, Elbe P, Gisbertz I, Hoyois A, Mosteanu O, Sanders DS, Schmidt PT, Schneider SM, van Hooft JE. Endoscopic management of enteral tubes in adult patients - Part 2: Peri- and post-procedural management. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2021; 53:178-195. [PMID: 33348410 DOI: 10.1055/a-1331-8080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
ESGE recommends the "pull" technique as the standard method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the direct percutaneous introducer ("push") technique for PEG placement in cases where the "pull" method is contraindicated, for example in severe esophageal stenosis or in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) or esophageal cancer.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the intravenous administration of a prophylactic single dose of a beta-lactam antibiotic (or appropriate alternative antibiotic, in the case of allergy) to decrease the risk of post-procedural wound infection.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.ESGE recommends that inadvertent insertion of a nasogastric tube (NGT) into the respiratory tract should be considered a serious but avoidable adverse event (AE).Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends that each institution should have a dedicated protocol to confirm correct positioning of NGTs placed "blindly" at the patient's bedside; this should include: radiography, pH testing of the aspirate, and end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring, but not auscultation alone.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends confirmation of correct NGT placement by radiography in high-risk patients (intensive care unit [ICU] patients or those with altered consciousness or absent gag/cough reflex).Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends that EN may be started within 3 - 4 hours after uncomplicated placement of a PEG or PEG-J.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.ESGE recommends that daily tube mobilization (pushing inward) along with a loose position of the external PEG bumper (1 - 2 cm from the abdominal wall) could mitigate the risk of development of buried bumper syndrome.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Edward J Despott
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy and Centre for Gastroenterology, UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, The Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Asuncion Ballarin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Torsten Beyna
- Department of Gastroenterology and Therapeutic Endoscopy, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Kurt Boeykens
- Nutrition Support Team, AZ Nikolaas Hospital, Moerlandstraat 1, 9100, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium
| | - Peter Elbe
- Department of Upper Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ingrid Gisbertz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, the Netherlands
| | - Alice Hoyois
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ofelia Mosteanu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - David S Sanders
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital & University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Peter T Schmidt
- Department of Medicine (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Medicine, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stéphane M Schneider
- Université Côte d'Azur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Gastroentérologie et Nutrition, Nice, France
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Chang A, Watcharamon C, Rattanasupa A, Thongsonkleeb K, Chowdok B, Khaimook A, Ovartlarnporn B, Prachayakul V. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Surgical Gastrostomy and Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy with Introducer Technique in Patients with Upper Aerodigestive Malignancies: A Single-Center Analysis. World J Surg 2020; 44:3070-3076. [PMID: 32358639 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05532-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conventional percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in patients with upper aerodigestive malignancies inevitably carries a risk of stomal metastasis that could be avoided by the direct insertion of the gastrostomy tube through the abdomen. This study compared the efficacy and safety between surgical gastrostomy (SG) and Introducer PEG in patients with upper aerodigestive malignancies. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients with upper aerodigestive malignancies undergoing SG or Introducer PEG. Procedure data, postprocedural clinical outcomes and 30-day mortality were assessed. RESULTS In total, 99 patients were feasible to analysis: 53 were in the SG group, and 46 were in the Introducer PEG group. The SG group had a higher incidence of (in-hospital) major complications [28.3% VS 4.3%, p = 0.002], a longer procedure duration [52.02 ± 21.30 VS 21.46 ± 8.22 min, p < 0.001], higher pain scores at 24 h [median (interquartile range, IQR); 5(3-8) VS 1(0-5), p < 0.001] and longer length of hospitalization (LOH) [median (IQR); 5(4-6) days VS 3(2-4) days, p < 0.001)]. In-hospital (3.8% VS 0%, p = 0.493) and 30-day mortality (17.0% VS 13.0%, p = 0.586) were not different between the two groups. In univariate analysis, high BMI, anemia (hemoglobin <11 g/dL), normal nutritional status (serum albumin >3 g/dL) and procedural type were found to be predicting factors for complications. Procedural type (Introducer PEG) was an independent factor for major complications in multivariate analysis [OR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.61, p= 0.011]. CONCLUSIONS In patients with upper aerodigestive malignancies, Introducer PEG was associated with lower rate of (in-hospital) major complications, faster operative time, lower pain scores and shorter LOH. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY NUMBER TCTR20181220004.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arunchai Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hatyai Hospital, Songkhla, Thailand
| | | | - Attapon Rattanasupa
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hatyai Hospital, Songkhla, Thailand
| | | | - Bunlue Chowdok
- Department of Surgery, Hatyai Hospital, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Araya Khaimook
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hatyai Hospital, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Bancha Ovartlarnporn
- Faculty of Medicine, NKC Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Songklanagarind Hospital, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Varayu Prachayakul
- Siriraj Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Dietrich CG, Schoppmeyer K. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy – Too often? Too late? Who are the right patients for gastrostomy? World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:2464-2471. [PMID: 32523304 PMCID: PMC7265142 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i20.2464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is an established method to provide nutrition to patients with restricted oral uptake of fluids and calories. Here, we review the methods, indications and complications of this procedure. While gastrostomy can be safely and easily performed during gastroscopy, the right patients and timing for this intervention are not always chosen. Especially in patients with dementia, the indication for and timing of gastrostomies are often improper. In this patient group, clear data for enteral nutrition are lacking; however, some evidence suggests that patients with advanced dementia do not benefit, whereas patients with mild to moderate dementia might benefit from early enteral nutrition. Additionally, other patient groups with temporary or permanent restriction of oral uptake might be a useful target population for early enteral nutrition to maintain mobilization and muscle strength. We plead for a coordinated study program for these patient groups to identify suitable patients and the best timing for tube implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph G Dietrich
- Medical Clinic, Bethlehem-Gesundheitszentrum Stolberg/Rhld., Stolberg D-52222, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Fujiogi M, Tanaka Y, Amano H, Deie K, Suzuki K, Kawashima H, Murase N, Uchida H. A new laparoscopic triangle fixation technique for gastrostomy: a safe and effective procedure for reduction of the wound infection rate. NAGOYA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE 2018; 80:497-503. [PMID: 30587864 PMCID: PMC6295438 DOI: 10.18999/nagjms.80.4.497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Gastrostomy is often performed with fundoplication in handicapped children. We devised a new laparoscopic triangle fixation technique for gastrostomy. In this study, 100 patients underwent gastrostomy with fundoplication between January 2008 and January 2016. We retrospectively reviewed the early postoperative results between the new laparoscopic procedure (NLP) group (n = 63) and conventional procedure (CP) group (n = 37). In the CP, the gastrostomy tube was inserted with a purse-string ligature at the gastric wall, and the gastric wall was sutured to the peritoneum under a small laparotomy. In NLP, three sutures were placed on the gastric wall, forming the three sides of a triangle, and the tube was inserted into the center of the triangle. The ends of each suture were pulled directly through the abdominal wall using a laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure needle to join the gastric wall and peritoneum. Both groups showed no significant differences in age, body weight, and external leakage rate. The wound infection rate was significantly lower in the NLP group. In conclusions, the NLP is straightforward and can achieve firm fixation between the stomach and abdominal wall by suturing in the form of a triangle. The NLP was associated with a lower complication rate, especially concerning infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michimasa Fujiogi
- Department of Pediatric surgery, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yujiro Tanaka
- Department of Pediatric surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hizuru Amano
- Department of Pediatric surgery, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kyoichi Deie
- Department of Pediatric surgery, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Keisuke Suzuki
- Department of Pediatric surgery, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kawashima
- Department of Pediatric surgery, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Naruhiko Murase
- Department of Pediatric surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hiroo Uchida
- Department of Pediatric surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Toh Yoon EW, Yoneda K, Nakamura S, Nishihara K. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) using a novel large-caliber introducer technique kit: a retrospective analysis. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4:E990-6. [PMID: 27652307 PMCID: PMC5025309 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-112587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2016] [Accepted: 07/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) using the introducer technique is not only useful in patients with upper digestive tract stenosis but has been shown to reduce peristomal infection. In this study, we evaluated the safety and utility of a novel large-caliber introducer PEG kit (using 20 Fr size tube) compared with a push kit of similar size. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred and thirty-six patients who received PEG at our hospital between January 2014 and December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline characteristics, laboratory biomarkers, hemodynamic changes, postoperative adverse events and clinical outcomes with both kits were compared. RESULTS The new introducer PEG kit was used in 61 patients while the remaining 75 patients received tube placement using a push technique PEG kit. Except for the prevalence of dementia, which was lower in the introducer PEG kit group, baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Tube placements were 100 % successful with both PEG kits and there were no significant differences in the change of postoperative hemodynamic or laboratory biomarkers. The Introducer PEG kit group experienced fewer incidence of feeding-related aspiration pneumonia (8.2 % vs. 24 %, P = 0.02), lower peristomal infection scores (1.2 vs. 1.6, P < 0.01), shorter postoperative length of stay (16 days vs. 23.7 days, P = 0.01) and fewer deaths at day 60 (3.3 % vs. 16 %, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Gastrostomy using the new large-caliber introducer PEG kit is safe and produced non-inferior (with some favourable) results when compared to the push technique using similar size tubes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ezekiel Wong Toh Yoon
- Department of Internal Medicine (Gastroenterology), Hiroshima Kyoritsu Hospital, Hiroshima City, Japan,Corresponding author Ezekiel Wong Toh Yoon, MD Department of Internal MedicineHiroshima Kyoritsu Hospital2-20-20 Nakasu Asaminami-kuHiroshima CityJapan+81-82-879-1111
| | - Kaori Yoneda
- Endocopy Center, Hiroshima Kyoritsu Hospital, Hiroshima City, Japan
| | - Shinya Nakamura
- Department of Internal Medicine (Gastroenterology), Hiroshima Kyoritsu Hospital, Hiroshima City, Japan
| | - Kazuki Nishihara
- Department of Internal Medicine (Gastroenterology), Hiroshima Kyoritsu Hospital, Hiroshima City, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Retes FA, Kawaguti FS, de Lima MS, da Costa Martins B, Uemura RS, de Paulo GA, Pennacchi CM, Gusmon C, Ribeiro AV, Baba ER, Geiger SN, Sorbello MP, Kulcsar MA, Ribeiro U, Maluf-Filho F. Comparison of the pull and introducer percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy techniques in patients with head and neck cancer. United European Gastroenterol J 2016; 5:365-373. [PMID: 28507748 DOI: 10.1177/2050640616662160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2016] [Accepted: 07/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients is associated with higher complication and mortality rates when compared to a general patient population. The pull technique is still the preferred technique worldwide but it has some limitations. The aim of this study is to compare the pull and introducer PEG techniques in patients with HNC. PATIENTS AND METHODS This study is based on a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of 309 patients with HNC who underwent PEG in the Cancer Institute of São Paulo. RESULTS The procedure was performed with the standard endoscope in 205 patients and the introducer technique was used in 137 patients. There was one procedure-related mortality. Age, sex and albumin level were similar in both groups. However in the introducer technique group, patients had a higher tumor stage, a lower Karnofsky status, and presented more frequently with tracheostomy and trismus. Overall, major, minor, immediate and late complications and 30-day mortality rates were similar but the introducer technique group presented more minor bleeding and tube dysfunctions. CONCLUSION The push and introducer PEG techniques seem to be both safe and effective but present different complication profiles. The choice of PEG technique in patients with HNC should be made individually.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe A Retes
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fabio S Kawaguti
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcelo S de Lima
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Bruno da Costa Martins
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ricardo S Uemura
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gustavo A de Paulo
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Caterina Mp Pennacchi
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Carla Gusmon
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Adriana Vs Ribeiro
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Elisa R Baba
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Sebastian N Geiger
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mauricio P Sorbello
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marco A Kulcsar
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ulysses Ribeiro
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fauze Maluf-Filho
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Okumura N, Tsuji N, Ozaki N, Matsumoto N, Takaba T, Kawasaki M, Tomita T, Umehara Y, Taniike S, Kono M, Kudo M. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with Funada-style gastropexy greatly reduces the risk of peristomal infection. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2015; 3:69-74. [PMID: 25567471 PMCID: PMC4324871 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/gou086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Peristomal wound infections are common complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). The Funada-style gastropexy device has two parallel needles with a wire loop and suture thread, and was developed about 20 years ago in Japan. This kit has allowed us to perform dual gastropexy very easily; PEG with gastropexy has become a very popular technique in Japan. The present study aimed to compare the advantages and disadvantages of PEG with the gastropexy technique with the standard 'pull' method. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 182 consecutive, non-randomized patients undergoing PEG in our hospital, and a comparative analysis was made between the gastropexy (87 patients) and non-gastropexy (95 patients) groups. RESULTS The rates of patients having erythema (11.6% vs. 47.9%; P < 0.001), exudates (2.3% vs. 14.9%; P < 0.01) and infection (0% vs. 6.4%; P = 0.01) in the peristomal area were lower in the gastropexy than in the non-gastropexy group. The rate of minor bleeding from the peristomal area was higher in the gastropexy than in the non-gastropexy group (12.8% vs. 2.1%; P < 0.01), but no patient required a blood transfusion. Mean procedure time was longer in the gastropexy group than in the non-gastropexy group (31 vs. 24 min; P < 0.001). The 30-day mortality rates were 4.7% and 5.3% respectively, and these deaths were not related to the gastrostomy procedure. CONCLUSION PEG with gastropexy markedly reduces peristomal inflammation. Although minor bleeding and a longer procedure time were disadvantages, there were no severe complications. The findings suggested that PEG with Funada-style gastropexy was a safe and feasible method for reducing early complications of PEG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoki Okumura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sakai Hospital, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Sakai, Japan
| | - Naoko Tsuji
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sakai Hospital, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Sakai, Japan
| | - Nobuto Ozaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sakai Hospital, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Sakai, Japan
| | - Nozomu Matsumoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sakai Hospital, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Sakai, Japan
| | - Takehisa Takaba
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sakai Hospital, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Sakai, Japan
| | - Masanori Kawasaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sakai Hospital, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Sakai, Japan
| | - Takafumi Tomita
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sakai Hospital, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Sakai, Japan
| | - Yasuko Umehara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sakai Hospital, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Sakai, Japan
| | - Satoko Taniike
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sakai Hospital, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Sakai, Japan
| | - Masashi Kono
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-sayama, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Kudo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-sayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Blumenstein I, Shastri YM, Stein J. Gastroenteric tube feeding: Techniques, problems and solutions. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:8505-8524. [PMID: 25024606 PMCID: PMC4093701 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 259] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2013] [Revised: 02/10/2014] [Accepted: 04/16/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastroenteric tube feeding plays a major role in the management of patients with poor voluntary intake, chronic neurological or mechanical dysphagia or gut dysfunction, and patients who are critically ill. However, despite the benefits and widespread use of enteral tube feeding, some patients experience complications. This review aims to discuss and compare current knowledge regarding the clinical application of enteral tube feeding, together with associated complications and special aspects. We conducted an extensive literature search on PubMed, Embase and Medline using index terms relating to enteral access, enteral feeding/nutrition, tube feeding, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/jejunostomy, endoscopic nasoenteric tube, nasogastric tube, and refeeding syndrome. The literature showed common routes of enteral access to include nasoenteral tube, gastrostomy and jejunostomy, while complications fall into four major categories: mechanical, e.g., tube blockage or removal; gastrointestinal, e.g., diarrhea; infectious e.g., aspiration pneumonia, tube site infection; and metabolic, e.g., refeeding syndrome, hyperglycemia. Although the type and frequency of complications arising from tube feeding vary considerably according to the chosen access route, gastrointestinal complications are without doubt the most common. Complications associated with enteral tube feeding can be reduced by careful observance of guidelines, including those related to food composition, administration rate, portion size, food temperature and patient supervision.
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Van Dyck E, Macken EJ, Roth B, Pelckmans PA, Moreels TG. Safety of pull-type and introducer percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes in oncology patients: a retrospective analysis. BMC Gastroenterol 2011; 11:23. [PMID: 21410958 PMCID: PMC3068968 DOI: 10.1186/1471-230x-11-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2010] [Accepted: 03/16/2011] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) allows long-term tube feeding. Safety of pull-type and introducer PEG placement in oncology patients with head/neck or oesophageal malignancies is unknown. Methods Retrospective analysis of 299 patients undergoing PEG tube placement between January 2006 and December 2008 revealed 57 oncology patients. All patients with head/neck or oesophageal malignancy were treated with chemo- and radiotherapy. In case of high-grade stenosis introducer Freka® Pexact PEG tube was placed (n = 24) and in all other patients (n = 33) conventional pull-type PEG tube. Short-term complications and mortality rates were compared. Results Patients' characteristics and clinical status were comparable in both groups. Short-term complications were encountered in 11/24 (48%) introducer PEG patients as compared to only 4/33 (12%) pull-type PEG patients (P < 0.05). Accidental removal of the introducer PEG tube occurred in 4/24 (17%) with need for surgical intervention in 1 vs. 0/33 (0%, P < 0.05). Wound infection occurred in 3/24 (12%) leading to septic shock and admission to intensive care unit (ICU) in 1 vs. 3/33 (9%, NS). Finally, 3/24 gastrointestinal perforations (12%) resulted from a difficult placement procedure vs. 1/33 (3%), leading to urgent surgical intervention and admission to ICU. Two introducer PEG patients died at ICU, resulting in an overall mortality rate of 8% vs. 0% (P = 0.091). Conclusion The introducer Freka® Pexact PEG procedure for long-term tube feeding may lead to significantly higher complication and mortality rates in patients with head/neck or oesophageal malignancies treated with chemo- and radiotherapy. It is suggested to use the conventional pull-type PEG tube placement in this group of patients, if possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evi Van Dyck
- Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, B-2650 Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Dormann AJ, Wejda B, Kahl S, Huchzermeyer H, Ebert MP, Malfertheiner P. Long-term results with a new introducer method with gastropexy for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101:1229-34. [PMID: 16771943 DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00541.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) using the pull-technique is the standard method for enteral feeding in patients with swallowing disorders. A different introducer technique with endoscopically controlled gastropexy is available avoiding oropharyngeal passage with the internal bumper. The aim of the study was to assess long-term safety of this technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between January 1999 and November 2001, 684 patients received a PEG in our prospective cohort trial. In 92.5% of cases a PEG was applied using the pull-through technique. In 6.7% of the patients (40 males, 6 females, mean age 60.6 yr) primary PEG application using the pull-through technique was not possible and an endoscopical controlled introducer PEG (Cliny PEG 13 CH (=13 F), AP Nenno, Germany) with two gastropexies was placed. Data collection criteria included application success, infectious complications (within 180 days), other complications (within 180 days), and mortality (within 180 days). Procedure, catheter change, and follow-up were standardized. RESULTS PEG placement was successful in all patients. During initial follow-up we saw a low rate of minor problems. In one case a peristomal peritonitis was seen due to detachment of two gastropexy sutures. During long-term follow-up only one local infection requiring antibiotic treatment occurred on day 14. We observed no treatment related mortality. In most of the patients the primary catheter was changed into a secondary system as scheduled. The average observation period was 131.8 days (range: 15-180 days). CONCLUSION The Cliny PEG 13 CH can be placed safely in an endoscopically controlled introducer procedure with dual gastropexy. Long-term follow-up of the patients revealed only minor complications. Primary indication is given in patients in whom PEG placement using the pull-through technique is not possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arno J Dormann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Köln-Holweide, Köln, and Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Abstract
In patients with gastrointestinal malignancies, i.e. cancers of the stomach, colon, liver, biliary tract or pancreas, progressive undernutrition can be regularly observed during the course of illness. Undernutrition significantly affects the patients' quality of life, morbidity and survival. Pathogenetically, two different causes are relevant in the development of undernutrition in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. One cause is reduced nutritional intake. This condition is referred to as anorexia and can be worsened by the side effects of cancer therapy. The other cause is the release of endogenous transmitters and/or other products of the tumour leading to the cachexia syndrome, which is characterized by loss of body weight, negative nitrogen balance and fatigue. Cancer anorexia and cancer cachexia may have synergistic negative effects in affecting the patients' status. In this review, current nutritional support strategies with respect to different clinically relevant situations are described. An algorithm of the treatment strategies, including dietetic counselling, oral supplements, enteral and parenteral nutritional support is given. One focus is the approach of nutrition-focused patient care, which shows promising results. In addition, the possibilities of pharmacological intervention are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Ockenga
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
Abstract
Most of the patients with advanced gastric cancer have incurable disease at presentation and require palliative treatment to reduce symptoms as vomiting, nausea and inability to eat. Treatment options are palliative surgery and endoscopic techniques. Insertion of self-expanding metal stents is nowadays a well-established method of treating biliary and esophageal strictures and is also effective in gastric tumors. The indication and application technique are described in this review. In addition, enteral nutrition is indicated if the gastrointestinal tract functions but swallowing or mastication is compromised by disease or if it is needed to pass an obstructed area, especially in gastric tumor patients. This article reviews the enteral nutrition techniques and their clinical value for patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Dormann
- Department of Medicine, Krankenhaus Holwelde, Koln, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
|
15
|
Abstract
Enteral nutrition has been increasingly used in clinical practice during the past decades. Today, nasogastric, nasoenteric, and transcutaneous gastric or enteral feeding tubes are well established as a routine endoscopic intervention. After clinical introduction of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in 1980, the sutureless 'pull' PEG has become a widespread endoscopic technique for transcutaneous gastric long-term nutrition. Multiple new techniques have been introduced since then, and today even long-term jejunal nutrition can be achieved with modified techniques. The introducer PEG (first reported in 1984) has not become an established procedure, but new techniques with an endoscopic gastropexy might be a more effective approach. To increase the quality of life of the patients, skin-level devices were designed and successfully introduced in 1984. A new development has been the one-step feeding tubes which provide the patients with a permanent tube. The standard techniques for long-term enteral feeding, new developments of feeding tubes, and future concepts are discussed in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Dormann
- Department of Medicine, Minden Hospital, Minden, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|