Background and study aims  In esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), the effectiveness of traction including clip-thread method has been reported, but it is difficult to adjust the direction of traction. Therefore, we developed a dedicated over-tube type traction device (ENDOTORNADO) that has a working channel and allows traction from any directions by rotating itself. We investigated the clinical feasibility and potential usefulness of this new device in esophageal ESD. Patients and methods  This was a single-center, retrospective study. Six cases of esophageal ESD with ENDOTORNADO from January to March 2022 (tESD group) were compared with 23 cases of conventional esophageal ESD performed by the same operator from January 2019 to December 2021 (cESD group) in terms of clinical treatment outcomes. Results  In all cases, en bloc resection was achieved without intraoperative perforation. The total procedure speed was significantly increased in tESD group (23 vs. 30 mm 2 /min, P  = 0.046). In particular, the submucosal dissection time was significantly reduced to about one-quarter in tESD group (11 vs. 42 min, P  = 0.004). Conclusions  ENDOTORNADO creates the adjustable traction from any directions and may have the clinical feasibility. It would be an option for human esophageal ESD.

Bleeding and hematoma formation during submucosal injection in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) reduce the visibility of the submucosa. Red dichromatic imaging (RDI) is an endoscopic technique that provides better visualization of the deep submucosal blood vessels. We speculated that blood vessel injury could be avoided with RDI. This pilot study evaluated the role of RDI in preventing bleeding and hematoma formation during esophageal ESD.

This was a single-center retrospective observational study. We examined 60 patients who underwent ESD with white light imaging (WLI) and RDI. A single endoscopist reviewed all of the surgical videos to document the incidence and severity of bleeding episodes. Eighteen videos provided adequate quality and detail, and the number of blood vessels traversing the mucosal incision lines of the lesions in these videos was evaluated under WLI and RDI.

The WLI group had a significantly higher incidence of hematomas per unit area compared to the RDI group (0.18/cm² [range 0-0.38] vs. 0 [0-0.18]/cm², p = 0.024). The WLI group also had a significantly higher incidence of total bleeding episodes compared to the RDI group (42.9% [range 21.7-60.4] vs 16.7% [range 13.8-22.9], p < 0.001). Significantly more blood vessels were visible under RDI compared to WLI (5 [range 4-8] vs. 2 [range 1-5], p = 0.0020).

RDI reduced the incidence of bleeding and hematoma formation during submucosal injection in esophageal ESD. It was assumed that the improvement of blood vessel visibility by RDI might have contributed to the result.

Traction techniques have emerged as a desirable "second-hand" while performing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), enabling adequate visualization of submucosal tissue and vasculature, which allows for safe and efficient dissection. Multiple traction techniques have been developed over the years, and these can be broadly divided into internal and external traction techniques. This arsenal of techniques allows for traction that is personalized to the location of the lesion undergoing ESD. Mastering traction techniques requires structured training, and understanding of the benefits and pitfalls of each technique. Future research and development efforts need to focus on pathways and curriculums for trainees to master the currently available endoscopic traction techniques and provide avenues for the development of newer traction modalities.

Duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered technically challenging and has a high risk of adverse events. However, we recently made some progress with the ESD technique and device by introducing 2 features: a water pressure (WP) method and a second-generation ESD knife (DualKnife) with a water jet function (DualKnife J). The present study aimed to assess whether these changes improved the clinical outcomes of duodenal ESD.

This was a retrospective observational study. Among all patients who underwent ESD for superficial duodenal epithelial tumors from June 2010 to December 2018, patients in whom a single expert performed the procedure were included in this study. Various factors, including the use of the WP method and ESD devices (DualKnife or DualKnife J) and the treatment phase (early, mid, and late), were analyzed to determine whether they were associated with intraprocedural perforation and procedure time. Treatment phase was assigned by dividing the study population equally into 3 subgroups according to the treatment phase.

The procedure time was significantly shorter, and the proportion of patients with intraprocedural perforations was the lowest in the late phase. Multivariate analysis of the use of the WP method revealed that it significantly decreased the intraprocedural perforation rate (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.96), and analysis of the use of both the WP method (β coefficient, -0.40; P < .01) and the DualKnife J (β coefficient, -0.10; P = .032) revealed they were independently and negatively correlated with procedure time.

The present study reveals that the WP method significantly reduced the intraprocedural perforation rate and that both the WP method and the DualKnife J significantly shortened procedure times for duodenal ESD.

In Western countries, debates between ESD vs piece-meal EMR as the best treatment for large colorectal adenomas persist regarding the difficulty of ESD the colon, and the safety and relatively good results of piece-meal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Pocket-creation method (PCM) and double-clip countertraction (DCT) are two strategies recently published to facilitate ESD in this challenging situation.

This is a randomized animal study to compare PCM and DCT strategies for colonic ESD on ex vivo models (bovine colon) performed by 3 operators novice in ESD. Hybridknife type T was used to inject normal saline tinted with a small amount of blue dye in all procedures. Randomization was stratified according to the use of gravity assist. Primary endpoint was the difference in resection speed between PCM and DCT strategies.

Resection speed was significantly higher in the DCT group than in the PCM group (56.3 vs. 31.6 mm²/min, p = 0.01). Technical success rate, defined as en bloc resection in under 60 min, was significantly better in the DCT group than in the PCM group (100% vs. 84.4%, p = 0.024), perforation rate was lower (0% vs. 18.8%, p = 0.012), and difficulty score was better (2.4 vs. 6.2, p < 0.0001) as was procedure duration (24.2 vs. 40.2 min, p < 0.0001).

DCT was superior to PCM for ESD in our validated bovine colon model. This strategy is inexpensive, easy to use and adaptive. It might facilitate the widespread use of colonic ESD in Western countries and change Western ideas regarding the use of colonic ESD compared with piece-meal EMR for large benign lesions.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is being performed more frequently as a local treatment for superficial duodenal epithelial tumors (SDETs). However, ESD for SDETs is technically difficult because of specific anatomic features that increase the risk of perforation and often require surgery. This study was performed to evaluate the management of ESD-related perforation in patients with SDETs.

Patients who underwent ESD for SDETs from July 2010 to December 2018 were studied. We collected data on complete closure, insertion of endoscopic nasobiliary and pancreatic duct drainage (ENBPD) tubes, and additional interventions. We also evaluated clinical outcomes, including the fasting period, hospital stay, and maximum serum C-reactive protein level.

ESD was completed in 264 patients with SDETs. Perforation was observed in 36 patients, including 4 patients with delayed perforation. Among 32 patients with intraoperative perforation, complete closure was achieved in 13 patients. Compared with patients without complete closure, the fasting period and hospital stay were significantly shorter and the maximum serum C-reactive protein level was significantly lower in patients with complete closure, which were equivalent to those in patients without perforation. In patients without complete closure for mucosal defect, no additional interventions were required when an ENBPD tube was inserted, whereas 2 patients without ENBPD tube insertion underwent additional interventions such as percutaneous drainage and a surgical operation.

Perforation associated with ESD for SDETs required complex conservative management with complete closure or insertion of an ENBPD tube.

Mucosal traction as a "second hand" in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is very helpful for ESD operators. The efficacy of using a snare combined with endoclips to assist in ESD (SC-ESD) was evaluated whether it could achieve peroral external traction (PET) and peroral internal traction (PIT) and real-time adjustment of mucosal traction position. This study aimed to preliminarily evaluate its feasibility.

A snare was fixed using endoclips to the incised mucosal flap that was intended for dissection. Subsequently, the snare was adjusted to achieve mucosal traction. This study included 54 gastroesophageal neoplasias in 54 consecutive patients who underwent SC-ESD. The operative and clinical data were retrospectively collected.

Peroral external tractions were performed for 22 esophageal neoplasias, and PETs and PITs were performed for 32 gastric neoplasias. The median (interquartile range) sizes of lesions were 4.3 (2.5) and 4.2 (2.1) cm, operation times were 73.4 (43.8) and 60.0 (45.2) min, and submucosal dissection times were 27.0 (32.0) and 31.0 (34.5) min in the esophagus and stomach, respectively. Mucosal traction position could be effectively adjusted by fixing the snare to the incised mucosal flap intended for dissection during SC-ESD. All lesions in the esophagus and stomach were completely resected, with R0 resection rates of 100%. Besides postoperative bleeding in a patient with gastric neoplasia, no intraoperative and postoperative perforations occurred.

SC-ESD seems to be feasible for resecting gastroesophageal neoplasia, and two types of mucosal tractions (PET and PIT) could be effectively achieved during SC-ESD. Further prospective comparative study with a large sample is warranted.

The objective of this study is to analyse the short- and long-term results of surgery for malignant pulmonary nodules in patients with a history of oesophageal cancer (EC) in order to assess the significance of surgery in these patients.

The data of 28 consecutive patients with a history of EC who underwent pulmonary resection for malignant pulmonary nodules were reviewed. The perioperative and long-term results were analysed.

The histological type of oesophageal cancer was squamous cell carcinoma in all of the patients. The preceding treatments for EC were surgery with or without neoadjuvant therapy in 21, chemoradiotherapy in 4 and endoscopic resection in 3. The patients were smokers, with low body mass indices, and had high incidences of a history of malignancy besides EC and other comorbidities. Complete resection was achieved in 27 patients (96%). There was no perioperative mortality and 7 patients (25%) developed postoperative complications. Based on the pathological and clinical criteria, 14 patients (50%) were diagnosed with primary lung cancer, 10 patients (35%) with pulmonary metastases from EC and 4 patients (25%) with pulmonary metastasis from another cancer. The 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates of all patients were 48% and 60%, respectively.

Surgery for malignant pulmonary nodules in patients with a history of EC can be performed with acceptable surgical risk despite the high rate of comorbid illness in these patients. Proactive surgical management should be considered for treating malignant pulmonary nodules in patients with a previous history of EC as this strategy provides favourable long-term results.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely practiced in Japan and the Eastern World and is rapidly expanding in western countries for the management of early malignancies of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tube. In addition, novel therapeutic applications deriving from ESD have emerged including the treatment of achalasia, of submucosal tumors, of diverticula, of strictures and of reflux disease. An ESD procedure necessitates not only skills and specific training, but also familiarization with a vast spectrum of devices (endoscopes, high-frequency generators and their settings, endoknives, hoods, irrigation devices) and techniques (such as countertraction, artificial ulcer closure), that render the procedure faster, more efficient and safer. This technological article gives an overview on current and novel equipment for an ESD and associated techniques.

Esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically difficult. To make it safer, we developed a novel method using overtube with a traction forceps (OTF) for countertraction during submucosal dissection. We conducted an ex vivo animal study and compared the clinical outcomes between OTF-ESD and conventional method (C-ESD). A total of 32 esophageal ESD procedures were performed by four beginner and expert endoscopists. After circumferential mucosal incision for the target lesion, structured as the isolated pig esophagus 3 cm long, either C-ESD or OTF-ESD was randomly selected for submucosal dissection. All the ESD procedures were completed as en bloc resections, while perforation only occurred in a beginner's C-ESD procedure. The dissection time for OTF-ESD was significantly shorter than that for C-ESD for both the beginner and expert endoscopists (22.8 ± 8.3 min versus 7.8 ± 4.5 min, P < 0.001, and 11.3 ± 4.4 min versus 5.9 ± 2.5 min, P = 0.01, resp.). The frequency and volume of the submucosal injections were significantly smaller for OTF-ESD than for C-ESD (1.3 ± 0.6 times versus 2.9 ± 1.5 times, P < 0.001, and 5.3 ± 2.8 mL versus 15.6 ± 7.3 mL, P < 0.001, resp.). Histologically, muscular injury was more common among the C-ESD procedures (80% versus 13%, P = 0.009). Our results indicated that the OTF-ESD technique is useful for the safe and easy completion of esophageal ESD.

Inspired by natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), the authors launched a development of novel endoscopic irrigation and suction (I/S) catheter for "laparoscopy-like" I/S in flexible gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. The aims were to describe its basic research and development (R&D) process and to estimate its performance in both preclinical and clinical settings.

In basic R&D phase, a layout of side hole at apex nozzle of endoscopic I/S (EIS) catheter were theoretically calculated and designed. Material of nozzle was selected based on the strength analysis. The performance of final prototype EIS catheter was then assessed preclinically in the porcine stomach, to compare with conventional endoscopic "tip irrigation" and "tip suction" as control. After regulatory clearance, safety and feasibility of I/S using EIS catheter were clinically assessed by endoscopists in small number of patients.

Bench tests revealed 0.4 mm in diameter, 24 holes, and 6-8 holes per circumference as most suitable layout of side holes, and polyetheretherketone as an optimal nozzle material, respectively. Time to inject 500 mL saline with the EIS catheter was significantly shorter than tip irrigation (101 ± 3.1 seconds versus 154 ± 3.1 seconds; P < .05). The EIS suction was significantly weaker than conventional endoscopic tip suction, though it remained within the practical range. No mucosal injuries were noted in the EIS suction. In clinical assessments for human use, no adverse events were observed, and high degree of satisfaction for endoscopists was obtained.

The newly developed EIS catheter is safely used with satisfactory performance in flexible GI endoscopy.