1
|
Lee YC, Chiang TH, Chiu HM, Su WW, Chou KC, Chen SLS, Yen AMF, Fann JCY, Chiu SYH, Chuang SL, Chen YR, Chen SD, Hu TH, Fang YJ, Wu MS, Chen THH, Yeh YP. Screening for Helicobacter pylori to Prevent Gastric Cancer: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2024; 332:1642-1651. [PMID: 39348147 PMCID: PMC11581485 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.14887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 10/01/2024]
Abstract
Importance Effects of screening for Helicobacter pylori on gastric cancer incidence and mortality are unknown. Objective To evaluate the effects of an invitation to screen for H pylori on gastric cancer incidence and mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants A pragmatic randomized clinical trial of residents aged 50 to 69 years in Changhua County, Taiwan, eligible for biennial fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) for colon cancer screening. Participants were randomized to either an invitation for H pylori stool antigen (HPSA) + FIT assessment or FIT alone. The study was conducted between January 1, 2014, and September 27, 2018. Final follow-up occurred December 31, 2020. Intervention Invitation for testing for H pylori stool antigen. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were gastric cancer incidence and gastric cancer mortality. All invited individuals were analyzed according to the groups to which they were randomized. Results Of 240 000 randomized adults (mean age, 58.1 years [SD, 5.6]; 46.8% female), 63 508 were invited for HPSA + FIT, and 88 995 were invited for FIT alone. Of the 240 000 randomized, 38 792 who were unreachable and 48 705 who did not receive an invitation were excluded. Of those invited, screening participation rates were 49.6% (31 497/63 508) for HPSA + FIT and 35.7% (31 777/88 995) for FIT alone. Among 12 142 participants (38.5%) with positive HPSA results, 8664 (71.4%) received antibiotic treatment, and eradication occurred in 91.9%. Gastric cancer incidence rates were 0.032% in the HPSA + FIT group and 0.037% in the FIT-alone group (mean difference, -0.005% [95% CI, -0.013% to 0.003%]; P = .23). Gastric cancer mortality rates were 0.015% in the HPSA + FIT group and 0.013% in the FIT-alone group (mean difference, 0.002% [95% CI, -0.004% to 0.007%]; P = .57). After adjusting for differences in screening participation, length of follow-up, and patient characteristics in post hoc analyses, an invitation for HPSA + FIT was associated with lower rates of gastric cancer (0.79 [95% CI, 0.63-0.98]) but not with gastric cancer mortality (1.02 [95% CI, 0.73-1.40]), compared with FIT alone. Among participants who received antibiotics, the most common adverse effects were abdominal pain or diarrhea (2.1%) and dyspepsia or poor appetite (0.8%). Conclusions and Relevance Among residents of Taiwan, an invitation to test for HPSA combined with FIT did not reduce rates of gastric cancer or gastric cancer mortality, compared with an invitation for FIT alone. However, when differences in screening participation and length of follow-up were accounted for, gastric cancer incidence, but not gastric cancer mortality, was lower in the HSPA + FIT group, compared with FIT alone. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01741363.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Chia Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Hsien Chiang
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Integrated Diagnostics and Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Han-Mo Chiu
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Wen Su
- Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua County, Taiwan
| | | | - Sam Li-Sheng Chen
- School of Oral Hygiene, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Amy Ming-Fang Yen
- School of Oral Hygiene, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Jean Ching-Yuan Fann
- Department of Health Services Administration, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan
| | - Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu
- Department of Health Care Management and Healthy Aging Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan County, Taiwan
- Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Lin Chuang
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Ru Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Dian Chen
- Chiayi Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Chiayi City, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Hui Hu
- Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
- Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Jen Fang
- Digestive Disease Center, Show-Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua County, Taiwan
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung City, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Shiang Wu
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen
- Institute of Health Analytics and Statistics, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Po Yeh
- Changhua County Public Health Bureau, Changhua County, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Silva Luz M, Tianeze de Castro C, Bueno Lemos FF, Reis Rocha G, Lima Correa Santos G, Rocha Pinheiro SL, de Oliveira Silva LG, Santos Calmon M, Vasconcelos Oliveira M, Teixeira KN, de Magalhães Queiroz DM, Freire de Melo F. Stool Antigen Test for Helicobacter Pylori Infection in Adults: A Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2024:00004836-990000000-00379. [PMID: 39928545 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000002102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The stool antigen test (SAT) is a convenient noninvasive option for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. However, despite having been previously evaluated, there is currently a lack of evidence regarding the comparative accuracy of conventional and rapid SATs utilizing monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies in adults. Here, we perform a thorough statistical synthesis to determine and compare the diagnostic accuracy of conventional and rapid SATs for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted independent searches through July 25, 2023, for studies evaluating the accuracy of SAT against a reference standard. We assessed methodological quality using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 and calculated overall accuracy measures using the bivariate random-effect model. We also conducted subgroup analyses based on model and assessment technique, and Spearman correlation analysis to investigate a possible threshold effect. We generated summary receiver operating characteristic curves to assess heterogeneity and evaluated publication bias. RESULTS Conventional SAT demonstrated superior sensitivity (92.19% vs 85.79%), specificity (92.93% vs 91.18%), likelihood ratios (LR+ 9.68 vs 8.16; LR- 0.10 vs 0.15), and area under the curve (0.958 vs 0.940) compared with rapid SAT. Notably, the diagnostic odds ratio for conventional SAT (114.70) significantly outperformed rapid SAT (diagnostic odds ratio: 57.72). Correlation analysis revealed no threshold effect and summary receiver operating characteristic curves showed consistent accuracy for both tests. CONCLUSION Our study establishes evidence of the superior diagnostic accuracy of conventional SATs over rapid SATs for detecting H. pylori infection in adults. Also, we provide valuable insights into the impact of using monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies and different assessment techniques on diagnostic accuracy measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel Silva Luz
- Multidisciplinary Health Institute, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista
| | | | | | - Gabriel Reis Rocha
- Multidisciplinary Health Institute, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista
| | | | | | | | - Mariana Santos Calmon
- Multidisciplinary Health Institute, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sousa C, Ferreira R, Santos SB, Azevedo NF, Melo LDR. Advances on diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infections. Crit Rev Microbiol 2023; 49:671-692. [PMID: 36264672 DOI: 10.1080/1040841x.2022.2125287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The association of Helicobacter pylori to several gastric diseases, such as chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, and gastric cancer, and its high prevalence worldwide, raised the necessity to use methods for a proper and fast diagnosis and monitoring the pathogen eradication. Available diagnostic methods can be classified as invasive or non-invasive, and the selection of the best relies on the clinical condition of the patient, as well as on the sensitivity, specificity, and accessibility of the diagnostic test. This review summarises all diagnostic methods currently available, including the invasive methods: endoscopy, histology, culture, and molecular methods, and the rapid urease test (RUT), as well as the non-invasive methods urea breath test (UBT), serological assays, biosensors, and microfluidic devices and the stool antigen test (SAT). Moreover, it lists the diagnostic advantages and limitations, as well as the main advances for each methodology. In the end, research on the development of new diagnostic methods, such as bacteriophage-based H. pylori diagnostic tools, is also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cláudia Sousa
- CEB - Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
- LABBELS - Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
| | - Rute Ferreira
- CEB - Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
- LABBELS - Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
- i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Sílvio B Santos
- CEB - Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
- LABBELS - Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
| | - Nuno F Azevedo
- LEPABE - Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- ALiCE - Associate Laboratory in Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Luís D R Melo
- CEB - Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
- LABBELS - Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen MJ, Bair MJ, Chen PY, Lee JY, Yang TH, Fang YJ, Chen CC, Chang AT, Hsiao WD, Yu JJ, Kuo CC, Chiu MC, Lin KP, Tsai MH, Hsu YC, Chou CK, Chen CY, Lin JT, Lee YC, Wu MS, Liou JM. Declining trends of prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and incidence of gastric cancer in Taiwan: An updated cross-sectional survey and meta-analysis. Helicobacter 2022; 27:e12914. [PMID: 35848363 DOI: 10.1111/hel.12914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Revised: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to assess the latest prevalence and secular trend of Helicobacter pylori infection and its association with the incidence and mortality of gastric cancer in Taiwan. MATERIALS AND METHODS Adults naive to H. pylori eradication received 13 C-urea breath test (13 C-UBT), H. pylori stool antigen test, and serology test during 2019-2020 in this prospective screening program. Children and adolescent aged between 7 and 19 years received 13 C-UBT for H. pylori screening. We also conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the secular trend of prevalence of H. pylori from 1990 to 2020 in Taiwan. The secular trends of age-standardized incidence and mortality of gastric cancer were obtained from the Taiwan Cancer Registry. RESULTS A total of 1494 participants were enrolled, including 294 children or adolescents and 1200 adults. The overall prevalence of active H. pylori infection by 13 C-UBT was 26.6% (397/1494), which was 30.8% in adults and 9.5% in adolescents/children. The age-standardized prevalence of active H. pylori infection was 32.3% in adults after adjustment of the population structure in Taiwan. Of the 29 studies including 38,597 subjects eligible for the meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of H. pylori infection decreased from 63.8% (95% CI: 55.9%-71%) in 1990-2000 to 28.2% (95% CI:21.8%-35.6%) in 2016-2020. The age-standardized incidence and mortality of gastric cancer have also declined from 15.2 to 10.75 per 100,000, respectively, in 1999 to 9.29 and 5.4 per 100,000, respectively, in 2019. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of H. pylori infection has declined in Taiwan, which correlates with the declining trends of age-standardized incidence and mortality of gastric cancer in Taiwan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei-Jyh Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Integrated Diagnostics and Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Jong Bair
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taitung Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taitung, Taiwan.,Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Po-Yueh Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
| | - Ji-Yuh Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Hua Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Jen Fang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin, Taiwan
| | - Chieh-Chang Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - An-Ti Chang
- Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Wang-De Hsiao
- Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jian-Jyun Yu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chi Kuo
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin, Taiwan
| | - Min-Chin Chiu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Pei Lin
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Min-Horn Tsai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chun Hsu
- Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital and I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chu-Kuang Chou
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Yi Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
| | - Jaw-Town Lin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Digestive Medicine Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chia Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Shiang Wu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jyh-Ming Liou
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ansari S, Yamaoka Y. Helicobacter pylori Infection, Its Laboratory Diagnosis, and Antimicrobial Resistance: a Perspective of Clinical Relevance. Clin Microbiol Rev 2022; 35:e0025821. [PMID: 35404105 PMCID: PMC9491184 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00258-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the recent decrease in overall prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection, morbidity and mortality rates associated with gastric cancer remain high. The antimicrobial resistance developments and treatment failure are fueling the global burden of H. pylori-associated gastric complications. Accurate diagnosis remains the opening move for treatment and eradication of infections caused by microorganisms. Although several reports have been published on diagnostic approaches for H. pylori infection, most lack the data regarding diagnosis from a clinical perspective. Therefore, we provide an intensive, comprehensive, and updated description of the currently available diagnostic methods that can help clinicians, infection diagnosis professionals, and H. pylori researchers working on infection epidemiology to broaden their understanding and to select appropriate diagnostic methods. We also emphasize appropriate diagnostic approaches based on clinical settings (either clinical diagnosis or mass screening), patient factors (either age or other predisposing factors), and clinical factors (either upper gastrointestinal bleeding or partial gastrectomy) and appropriate methods to be considered for evaluating eradication efficacy. Furthermore, to cope with the increasing trend of antimicrobial resistance, a better understanding of its emergence and current diagnostic approaches for resistance detection remain inevitable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shamshul Ansari
- Department of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu City, Oita, Japan
| | - Yoshio Yamaoka
- Department of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu City, Oita, Japan
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
- Institute of Tropical Disease, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gastric Cancer Due to Chronic H. pylori Infection: What We Know and Where We Are Going. Diseases 2022; 10:diseases10030057. [PMID: 36135213 PMCID: PMC9498082 DOI: 10.3390/diseases10030057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori is an established cause of many gastrointestinal pathologies including peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, and gastric cancer. It is an entity that affects the global population, and its true nature has only been known since the 1980s. Although there is much known about H. pylori including its pathophysiology, detection, and eradication, resistance to current therapy models is common. This is problematic because untreated or inadequately treated H. pylori increases morbidity and mortality related to gastric cancer and peptic ulcer disease among others. In order to improve the treatment and reduce resistance, there is significant ongoing research identifying new detection and eradication methods for H. pylori. This review aims to highlight what has already been established regarding H. pylori’s epidemiology, pathophysiology, detection, and treatment as well as the most current and novel research involving detection and treatment of H. pylori.
Collapse
|
7
|
Tseng PH, Hung CS, Tu CH, Chen CC, Liao WC, Lee YC, Chiu HM, Yang WS, Wu MS. Association of Incidence of Acid-related Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders With Glycated Hemoglobin Level. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2022; 107:e2563-e2571. [PMID: 35134176 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgac062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Previous cross-sectional studies show diabetes and higher levels of plasma hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) are associated with a higher prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) complications. However, whether the glycemic status is associated with incident acid-related upper GI disorders remains unclear. OBJECTIVE We aimed to determine the effect of hyperglycemia per se, in terms of HbA1c, on the incidence of acid-related disorders. METHODS We analyzed consecutive subjects who had undergone repeated upper endoscopies as part of the health examinations at the National Taiwan University Hospital from 2005 to 2011. Acid-related endoscopic abnormalities were defined as erosive esophagitis (EE), Barrett's esophagus (BE), and peptic ulcer disease (PUD), which included gastric ulcers (GUs) and duodenal ulcers (DUs). All subjects were categorized by 3 tertiles of HbA1c levels. We analyzed the occurrence of respective acid-related disorders during the follow-up period. RESULTS A total of 11 391 participants (mean HbA1c level 5.6 ± 0.7%) were enrolled in this longitudinal study. During the 38 426.3 person-years of follow-up (mean duration 3.37 ± 1.59 years), the incidence of EE, BE, GU, DU, PUD, and any acid-related disorders were 22.1%, 0.5%, 4.5%, 8.6%, 12.3%, and 30.3%, respectively. The higher HbA1c level was associated with higher risk of disease incidents, except BE, during the follow-up (all log-rank P < .001). In the Cox regression analyses with confounding factors fully adjusted, the hazard ratios for EE, GU, DU, PUD, and acid-related disorders were 1.174, 1.339, 1.24, 1.24, and 1.186, respectively, for the third tertile of HbA1c (all P < .05). CONCLUSION Higher HbA1c level was associated with a higher risk of acid-related upper GI endoscopic abnormalities. Efforts toward better glycemic control may help to prevent the development of late GI complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping-Huei Tseng
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Sheng Hung
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Hung Tu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Chuan Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wan-Chung Liao
- Health Management Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chia Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Han-Mo Chiu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Shiung Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Shiang Wu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Collatuzzo G, Fiorini G, Vaira B, Violante FS, Farioli A, Boffetta P. The role of the occupational physician in controlling gastric cancer attributable to Helicobacter pylori infection: A review. Prev Med Rep 2021; 24:101527. [PMID: 34976604 PMCID: PMC8683938 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
This review aimed to describe the potential role of occupational physician in the implementation of a screening program for Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection for gastric cancer prevention. We reviewed the epidemiological background of gastric cancer and its association with Hp, exploring the hypothesis of a "test-and-treat" protocol among working population. Clinical trials and model-based studies were collected to provided empirical evidence of the feasibility of eradication on large scale. In particular, previous studies conducted in occupational settings were discussed. Hp prevalence ranges between about 20 and 90%, with higher rates in Asia and Latin America and lower rates in Europe and North America. Large-scale trials on screening and treatment of infection have been conducted especially in East Asia, lacking elsewhere. Only few studies investigated Hp prevalence among workers. The benefit of eradication at occupational level has not yet been adequately studied. The design of a workplace-based Hp screening program appears to be innovative and could contribute to controlling gastric cancer. The benefit would involve not only high-risk subjects, but also their families, since the route of transmission is principally within the household. An occupational setting for a Hp screening would have positive consequences in terms of individual and public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Collatuzzo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Fiorini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Berardino Vaira
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Farioli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Boffetta
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Stony Brook Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Qiu E, Li Z, Han S. Methods for detection of Helicobacter pylori from stool sample: current options and developments. Braz J Microbiol 2021; 52:2057-2062. [PMID: 34392499 PMCID: PMC8578210 DOI: 10.1007/s42770-021-00589-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Accurate detection of Helicobacter pylori infection and determination of antibiotics have significant meaning in clinical practice. The detection methods can be categorized into two types, invasive and non-invasive, but nowadays we use the urease breath test most frequently which is non-invasive. However, many developing countries cannot meet the requirements for having specialized equipment and they lack trained personnel. Also, for the children, it is difficult to make them cooperate for the test. Methods that detect Helicobacter pylori from stool sample can be a promising alternative for detection used in children and mass screening. Stool antigen tests have several advantages such as rapidity, simplicity, and cheapness, though their results may be influenced by the heterogenicity of antigens, the nature of biochemical techniques, and the amount of antigen presented in the stool. PCR-based methods can specifically detect Helicobacter pylori infection and antibiotic resistance by targeting specific gene sequence, but they also are limited by the requirements of facilities and experts, the existence of inhibitory substance, and interference from the dead bacteria. Some novel methods also deserve our attention. Here we summarized the results of researches about methods using stool sample and we hope our work can help clinicians choose the appropriate test in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enming Qiu
- General Surgery Center, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Haizhu District, No.253. Gongye Middle Avenue, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510280, China
| | - Zhou Li
- General Surgery Center, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Haizhu District, No.253. Gongye Middle Avenue, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510280, China.
| | - Shuai Han
- General Surgery Center, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Haizhu District, No.253. Gongye Middle Avenue, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510280, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lee YC, Chiang TH, Chiu HM, Wu MS, Yeh YP, Hsiu-Hsi Chen T. Community-Based Gastric Cancer Screening Coupled With a National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Baseline Results. Gastroenterology 2021; 160:2159-2161.e4. [PMID: 33444571 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Chia Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan; Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Hsien Chiang
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Integrated Diagnostics and Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Han-Mo Chiu
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan; Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Shiang Wu
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Po Yeh
- Changhua County Public Health Bureau, Chang-Hua County, Taiwan.
| | - Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Liou JM, Malfertheiner P, Lee YC, Sheu BS, Sugano K, Cheng HC, Yeoh KG, Hsu PI, Goh KL, Mahachai V, Gotoda T, Chang WL, Chen MJ, Chiang TH, Chen CC, Wu CY, Leow AHR, Wu JY, Wu DC, Hong TC, Lu H, Yamaoka Y, Megraud F, Chan FKL, Sung JJ, Lin JT, Graham DY, Wu MS, El-Omar EM. Screening and eradication of Helicobacter pylori for gastric cancer prevention: the Taipei global consensus. Gut 2020; 69:2093-2112. [PMID: 33004546 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 262] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A global consensus meeting was held to review current evidence and knowledge gaps and propose collaborative studies on population-wide screening and eradication of Helicobacter pylori for prevention of gastric cancer (GC). METHODS 28 experts from 11 countries reviewed the evidence and modified the statements using the Delphi method, with consensus level predefined as ≥80% of agreement on each statement. The Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was followed. RESULTS Consensus was reached in 26 statements. At an individual level, eradication of H. pylori reduces the risk of GC in asymptomatic subjects and is recommended unless there are competing considerations. In cohorts of vulnerable subjects (eg, first-degree relatives of patients with GC), a screen-and-treat strategy is also beneficial. H. pylori eradication in patients with early GC after curative endoscopic resection reduces the risk of metachronous cancer and calls for a re-examination on the hypothesis of 'the point of no return'. At the general population level, the strategy of screen-and-treat for H. pylori infection is most cost-effective in young adults in regions with a high incidence of GC and is recommended preferably before the development of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia. However, such a strategy may still be effective in people aged over 50, and may be integrated or included into national healthcare priorities, such as colorectal cancer screening programmes, to optimise the resources. Reliable locally effective regimens based on the principles of antibiotic stewardship are recommended. Subjects at higher risk of GC, such as those with advanced gastric atrophy or intestinal metaplasia, should receive surveillance endoscopy after eradication of H. pylori. CONCLUSION Evidence supports the proposal that eradication therapy should be offered to all individuals infected with H. pylori. Vulnerable subjects should be tested, and treated if the test is positive. Mass screening and eradication of H. pylori should be considered in populations at higher risk of GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jyh-Ming Liou
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Medicine, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Peter Malfertheiner
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.,Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Yi-Chia Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bor-Shyang Sheu
- Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.,Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Kentaro Sugano
- Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical School, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Hsiu-Chi Cheng
- Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, Tainan Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Khay-Guan Yeoh
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ping-I Hsu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, An Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Khean-Lee Goh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Varocha Mahachai
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Takuji Gotoda
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wei-Lun Chang
- Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Mei-Jyh Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Integrated Diagnostics and Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Hsien Chiang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Integrated Diagnostics and Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chieh-Chang Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Ying Wu
- Institute of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Division of Translational Research, Department of Medical Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Alex Hwong-Ruey Leow
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Jeng-Yih Wu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Deng-Chyang Wu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Tzu-Chan Hong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Bei-Hu Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hong Lu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yoshio Yamaoka
- Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu, Oita, Japan.,Department of Medicine, Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Francis Megraud
- French National Reference Centre for Helicobacters, Bacteriology laboratory, Pellegrin Hospital, Bordeaux, & INSERM U1053, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Francis K L Chan
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.,Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
| | - Joseph Jy Sung
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.,Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jaw-Town Lin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Digestive Medicine Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - David Y Graham
- Department of Medicine, Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ming-Shiang Wu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan .,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Emad M El-Omar
- Department of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Microbiome Research Centre, St George & Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fang YJ, Chen MJ, Chen CC, Lee JY, Yang TH, Yu CC, Chiu MC, Kuo CC, Weng YJ, Bair MJ, Wu MS, Luo JC, Liou JM. Accuracy of rapid Helicobacter pylori antigen tests for the surveillance of the updated prevalence of H. pylori in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 2020; 119:1626-1633. [PMID: 31926791 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2019] [Revised: 11/28/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The updated prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is lacking in Taiwan. We aimed to assess the accuracy of Vstrip® H. pylori Stool Antigen Rapid Test (Vstrip®HpSA) in the detection and surveillance of the updated prevalence of H. pylori in Taiwan. METHODS A total of 347 adult subjects including 152 volunteers and 195 symptomatic patients were recruited. Stool samples were collected for detection of H. pylori using Vstrip® HpSA, ImmunoCard STAT!® HpSA and Premier Platinum HpSA® PLUS. All subjects who have completed the stool sample collections were included in the ITT analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Vstrip® HpSA were calculated compared to gold standard test with 13C-Urea breath test. RESULTS The un-adjusted prevalence of H. pylori infection was 22.5% (95% CI: 18.3-27%) in 2018. The age-standardized prevalence of H. pylori was 21.8% in asymptomatic adults in Taiwan. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the Vstrip® HpSA, and ImmunoCard STAT!® HpSA tests were 91% (95% CI: 82-96%) versus 76.9% (95% CI: 66-86%), 97% (95% CI: 94.1-98.6%) versus 97% (95% CI: 94.1-98.6%), and 95.7% (95% CI: 92-97%) versus 92.5% (95% CI: 89-95%), respectively. CONCLUSION The age-standardized prevalence of H. pylori infection in Taiwan was 21.8% in asymptomatic adults in 2018. The Vstrip® HpSA had equivalent performance as the ImmunoCard STAT!® HpSA, and can be used in future mass screening of H. pylori infection for gastric cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Jen Fang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, Douliou, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Mei-Jyh Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chieh-Chang Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, Douliou, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ji-Yuh Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, Douliou, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Hua Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, Douliou, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Chun Yu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, Douliou, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Min-Chin Chiu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, Douliou, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chi Kuo
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, Douliou, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Jong Weng
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chiayi Branch, Taichung Veteran General Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Jong Bair
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taitung Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taitung, Taiwan; Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Shiang Wu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jiing-Chyuan Luo
- Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine and Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Keelung Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Jyh-Ming Liou
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Voynovan IN, Embutnieks YV, Mareeva DV, Kolbasnikov SV, Bordin DS. Helicobacter pylori as a risk factor for gastric cancer: the evidence and primary prevention strategy. ALMANAC OF CLINICAL MEDICINE 2019; 47:535-547. [DOI: 10.18786/2072-0505-2019-47-052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
Russia is a country with a high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection, a high incidence of gastric cancer, and its late diagnosis. HР infection has been recognized as the leading manageable risk factor for gastric cancer. Accurate diagnostic tests must be used to identify and control the effectiveness of HP eradication, and effective schemes must be implemented for HP eradication. The aim of this article was to analyze the latest consensus documents, systematic reviews and meta-analyzes that reflected the role of HP as a risk factor for the development of gastric cancer, as well as measures for the risk reduction. We describe in detail the diagnostic methods for HP infection, provide data on their use in the Russian Federation, and analyze the efficacy of eradication regimens. In all HPinfected individuals, HP leads to chronic inflammation in the gastric mucosa and launches a precancerous cascade (Correa's cascade). The risk of gastric cancer increases with severe atrophy, intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia. Primary prevention of gastric cancer is most effective if the eradication is performed before atrophic gastritis develops. The available consensus documents underline the importance of HP infection identification by accurate diagnostics at this stage of chronic gastritis. In Russia, the primary HP diagnosis is based on histology (37.7%), rapid urease test (29.2%), and serology (29.7%). HP stool antigen test (31.3%), 13C-urea breath test (23.4%) and the histological method (23.3%) are most often used to control eradication. Currently, the first line of eradication therapy is recommended as triple therapy with clarithromycin prescribed for 14 days. It is recommended to use double dose of proton pump inhibitors and bismuth to increase the effectiveness of this scheme. A 14-days triple regimen enhanced by bismuth has been recommended as the first-line therapy in the Russian Federation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I. N. Voynovan
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare Department
| | - Yu. V. Embutnieks
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare Department
| | - D. V. Mareeva
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare Department
| | | | - D. S. Bordin
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare Department;
Tver State Medical University;
A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of
Medicine and Dentistry
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bordin DS, Voynovan IN, Kolbasnikov SV, Embutnieks YV. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in clinical practice. TERAPEVT ARKH 2019; 90:133-139. [PMID: 30701845 DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2018.12.000020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Diagnostic tests used to detection Helicobacter pylori are divided into invasive (requiring endoscopy) and non-invasive, direct (bacteriological, histological or molecular detection of the bacterium) and indirect (detection of urease activity of the bacterium or antibodies to it). The choice of the test is determined by the clinical situation, as well as by its availability and cost. The sensitivity of most tests is affected by the use of antisecretory drugs and antibiotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D S Bordin
- A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Research and Practical Center of the Department of Health of Moscow, Moscow, Russia.,Tver State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Tver, Russia
| | - I N Voynovan
- A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Research and Practical Center of the Department of Health of Moscow, Moscow, Russia
| | - S V Kolbasnikov
- Tver State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Tver, Russia
| | - Yu V Embutnieks
- A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Research and Practical Center of the Department of Health of Moscow, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wu JY, Lee YC, Graham DY. The eradication of Helicobacter pylori to prevent gastric cancer: a critical appraisal. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 13:17-24. [PMID: 30791844 PMCID: PMC6391731 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2019.1542299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gastric cancer is one of the top causes of cancer-related death worldwide. How to eliminate gastric cancer is an urgent public-health issue. Areas covered: In this review, we present up-to-date results of studies on gastric cancer prevention through the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and discuss strategies and obstacles for the implementation of population-wide screening and treatment of this pathogen to prevent gastric cancer. Expert commentary: Gastric cancer is an inflammation-associated cancer with multistep carcinogenesis. The process consists of H. pylori infection, ongoing inflammation, development of metaplastic epithelia and genetic instability eventuating in gastric cancer. H. pylori infection is critical for development of the disease and studies have consistently shown that H. pylori eradication results in a reduction in (a) gastric mucosal inflammation, (b) progression of histologic damage, (c) risk of peptic ulcers and ulcer recurrence, and (d) risk of gastric cancer. Compared with a large number of clinical trials evaluating chemopreventive approaches, studies of population-wide screening, and eradication of H. pylori have only recently begun and only in high-risk populations. To eliminate gastric cancer requires information on how to implement an effective program for screening and treatment of H. pylori taking into consideration the other health priorities in any specific population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeng-Yih Wu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chia Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Innovation and Policy Center for Population Health and Sustainable Environment, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - David Y. Graham
- Department of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sabbagh P, Mohammadnia-Afrouzi M, Javanian M, Babazadeh A, Koppolu V, Vasigala VR, Nouri HR, Ebrahimpour S. Diagnostic methods for Helicobacter pylori infection: ideals, options, and limitations. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2018; 38:55-66. [PMID: 30414090 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-018-3414-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
17
|
Best LMJ, Takwoingi Y, Siddique S, Selladurai A, Gandhi A, Low B, Yaghoobi M, Gurusamy KS. Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 3:CD012080. [PMID: 29543326 PMCID: PMC6513531 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012080.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection has been implicated in a number of malignancies and non-malignant conditions including peptic ulcers, non-ulcer dyspepsia, recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding, unexplained iron deficiency anaemia, idiopathic thrombocytopaenia purpura, and colorectal adenomas. The confirmatory diagnosis of H pylori is by endoscopic biopsy, followed by histopathological examination using haemotoxylin and eosin (H & E) stain or special stains such as Giemsa stain and Warthin-Starry stain. Special stains are more accurate than H & E stain. There is significant uncertainty about the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for diagnosis of H pylori. OBJECTIVES To compare the diagnostic accuracy of urea breath test, serology, and stool antigen test, used alone or in combination, for diagnosis of H pylori infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic people, so that eradication therapy for H pylori can be started. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Science Citation Index and the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Database on 4 March 2016. We screened references in the included studies to identify additional studies. We also conducted citation searches of relevant studies, most recently on 4 December 2016. We did not restrict studies by language or publication status, or whether data were collected prospectively or retrospectively. SELECTION CRITERIA We included diagnostic accuracy studies that evaluated at least one of the index tests (urea breath test using isotopes such as 13C or 14C, serology and stool antigen test) against the reference standard (histopathological examination using H & E stain, special stains or immunohistochemical stain) in people suspected of having H pylori infection. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened the references to identify relevant studies and independently extracted data. We assessed the methodological quality of studies using the QUADAS-2 tool. We performed meta-analysis by using the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model to estimate and compare SROC curves. Where appropriate, we used bivariate or univariate logistic regression models to estimate summary sensitivities and specificities. MAIN RESULTS We included 101 studies involving 11,003 participants, of which 5839 participants (53.1%) had H pylori infection. The prevalence of H pylori infection in the studies ranged from 15.2% to 94.7%, with a median prevalence of 53.7% (interquartile range 42.0% to 66.5%). Most of the studies (57%) included participants with dyspepsia and 53 studies excluded participants who recently had proton pump inhibitors or antibiotics.There was at least an unclear risk of bias or unclear applicability concern for each study.Of the 101 studies, 15 compared the accuracy of two index tests and two studies compared the accuracy of three index tests. Thirty-four studies (4242 participants) evaluated serology; 29 studies (2988 participants) evaluated stool antigen test; 34 studies (3139 participants) evaluated urea breath test-13C; 21 studies (1810 participants) evaluated urea breath test-14C; and two studies (127 participants) evaluated urea breath test but did not report the isotope used. The thresholds used to define test positivity and the staining techniques used for histopathological examination (reference standard) varied between studies. Due to sparse data for each threshold reported, it was not possible to identify the best threshold for each test.Using data from 99 studies in an indirect test comparison, there was statistical evidence of a difference in diagnostic accuracy between urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology and stool antigen test (P = 0.024). The diagnostic odds ratios for urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test were 153 (95% confidence interval (CI) 73.7 to 316), 105 (95% CI 74.0 to 150), 47.4 (95% CI 25.5 to 88.1) and 45.1 (95% CI 24.2 to 84.1). The sensitivity (95% CI) estimated at a fixed specificity of 0.90 (median from studies across the four tests), was 0.94 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.97) for urea breath test-13C, 0.92 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.94) for urea breath test-14C, 0.84 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.91) for serology, and 0.83 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.90) for stool antigen test. This implies that on average, given a specificity of 0.90 and prevalence of 53.7% (median specificity and prevalence in the studies), out of 1000 people tested for H pylori infection, there will be 46 false positives (people without H pylori infection who will be diagnosed as having H pylori infection). In this hypothetical cohort, urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test will give 30 (95% CI 15 to 58), 42 (95% CI 30 to 58), 86 (95% CI 50 to 140), and 89 (95% CI 52 to 146) false negatives respectively (people with H pylori infection for whom the diagnosis of H pylori will be missed).Direct comparisons were based on few head-to-head studies. The ratios of diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were 0.68 (95% CI 0.12 to 3.70; P = 0.56) for urea breath test-13C versus serology (seven studies), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.14 to 5.56; P = 0.84) for urea breath test-13C versus stool antigen test (seven studies). The 95% CIs of these estimates overlap with those of the ratios of DORs from the indirect comparison. Data were limited or unavailable for meta-analysis of other direct comparisons. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In people without a history of gastrectomy and those who have not recently had antibiotics or proton ,pump inhibitors, urea breath tests had high diagnostic accuracy while serology and stool antigen tests were less accurate for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.This is based on an indirect test comparison (with potential for bias due to confounding), as evidence from direct comparisons was limited or unavailable. The thresholds used for these tests were highly variable and we were unable to identify specific thresholds that might be useful in clinical practice.We need further comparative studies of high methodological quality to obtain more reliable evidence of relative accuracy between the tests. Such studies should be conducted prospectively in a representative spectrum of participants and clearly reported to ensure low risk of bias. Most importantly, studies should prespecify and clearly report thresholds used, and should avoid inappropriate exclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lawrence MJ Best
- Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical SchoolDepartment of SurgeryRowland Hill StreetLondonUKNW32PF
| | - Yemisi Takwoingi
- University of BirminghamInstitute of Applied Health ResearchEdgbastonBirminghamUKB15 2TT
| | | | | | | | | | - Mohammad Yaghoobi
- McMaster University and McMaster University Health Sciences CentreDivision of Gastroenterology1200 Main Street WestHamiltonONCanada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shehata MA, Talaat R, Soliman S, Elmesseri H, Soliman S, Abd-Elsalam S. Randomized controlled study of a novel triple nitazoxanide (NTZ)-containing therapeutic regimen versus the traditional regimen for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter 2017; 22. [PMID: 28524341 DOI: 10.1111/hel.12395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Helicobacter pylori infection has become more and more resistant to conventional first-line treatment regimens. So, there is a considerable interest in evaluating new antibiotic combinations and regimens. Nitazoxanide is an anti-infective drug with demonstrated activity against protozoa and anaerobic bacteria including H. pylori. This work is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a unique triple nitazoxanide-containing regimen as a treatment regimen in Egyptian patients with H. pylori infection. METHODS Two hundred and 24 patients with upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT) dyspeptic symptoms in whom H. pylori -induced GIT disease was confirmed were included in the study. They have been randomized to receive either nitazoxanide 500 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., and omeprazole 40 mg twice daily for 14 days or metronidazole 500 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., and omeprazole 40 mg twice daily for 14 days. Laboratory evaluation for H. pylori antigen within the stool was performed 6 weeks after cessation of H. pylori treatment regimens to assess the response. RESULTS The response to treatment was significantly higher in group 1 of nitazoxanide treatment regimen than group 2 of traditional treatment regimen. One hundred and six cases (94.6%) of 112 patients who completed the study in group 1 showed complete cure, while only 63 cases (60.6%) of 104 patients who completed the study in group 2 showed the same response according to per-protocol (PP) analysis (P<.001). The regimen was well tolerated by all the patients enrolled in the study. CONCLUSION Nitazoxanide-containing triple therapy is a promising therapy for the first-line eradication of H. pylori. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02422706).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Ah Shehata
- Department of Tropical Medicine & Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Raghda Talaat
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Samah Soliman
- Department of Tropical Medicine & Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Huda Elmesseri
- Department of Tropical Medicine & Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Shaimaa Soliman
- Department of Public health and Community medicine, Menoufia University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Sherief Abd-Elsalam
- Department of Tropical Medicine & Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sheu B, Wu M, Chiu C, Lo J, Wu D, Liou J, Wu C, Cheng H, Lee Y, Hsu P, Chang C, Chang W, Lin J. Consensus on the clinical management, screening-to-treat, and surveillance of Helicobacter pylori infection to improve gastric cancer control on a nationwide scale. Helicobacter 2017; 22:e12368. [PMID: 28066960 PMCID: PMC5434958 DOI: 10.1111/hel.12368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2016] [Revised: 11/12/2016] [Accepted: 11/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous international consensus statements provided general policies for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection. However, there are geographic differences in the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of H. pylori, and in the availability of medications and endoscopy. Thus, nationwide or regional consensus statements are needed to improve control of H. pylori infection and gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS This consensus statement for management of H. pylori in Taiwan has three major sections: (1) optimal diagnosis and indications; (2) current treatment strategies; and (3) screening-to-treat and surveillance for control of gastric cancer. The literature review emphasized recent data for development of draft statements and determination of levels of evidence. Twenty-five Taiwan experts conducted a consensus conference, by a modified Delphi process, to modify the draft statements. Consensus, defined as an agreement of least 80% of the experts, and recommendation grade were determined by anonymous voting. RESULTS There were 24 consensus statements. Section 1 has seven statements on recommendations for the diagnosis and indications for treatment of H. pylori infection. Section 2 has 10 statements that provide an updated treatment algorithm for first-line, second-line, and third-line regimens. Section 3 has seven statements regarding H. pylori eradication for reducing the risk of gastric cancer, with a cost-benefit analysis. After H. pylori eradication, the consensus highlights the use of endoscopic surveillance and/or chemoprevention to further reduce the burden of gastric cancer. CONCLUSIONS This consensus statement has updated recommendations for improving the clinical management of H. pylori infection in areas such as Taiwan, which have high prevalence of H. pylori infection and gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bor‐Shyang Sheu
- Departments of Institute of Clinical Medicine and Internal MedicineNational Cheng Kung University HospitalCollege of MedicineNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
- Department of Internal MedicineTainan HospitalMinistry of Health and WelfareTainanTaiwan
| | - Ming‐Shiang Wu
- Department of Internal MedicineNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Cheng‐Tang Chiu
- Gastroenterology Endoscopy CenterChang Gung Memorial HospitalLinkoTaiwan
| | - Jing‐Chuan Lo
- Department of Internal MedicineTaipei Veterans General HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Deng‐Chyang Wu
- Department of Internal MedicinePrivate Kaohsiung Medical University HospitalKaohsiungTaiwan
| | - Jyh‐Ming Liou
- Department of Internal MedicineNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Chun‐Ying Wu
- Department of Internal MedicineTaichung Veterans General HospitalTaichungTaiwan
| | - Hsiu‐Chi Cheng
- Departments of Institute of Clinical Medicine and Internal MedicineNational Cheng Kung University HospitalCollege of MedicineNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
- Department of Internal MedicineTainan HospitalMinistry of Health and WelfareTainanTaiwan
| | - Yi‐Chia Lee
- Department of Internal MedicineNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Ping‐I Hsu
- Department of Internal MedicineKaohsiung Veterans General HospitalKaohsiungTaiwan
| | - Chun‐Chao Chang
- Department of Internal MedicinePrivate Taipei Medical University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Wei‐Lun Chang
- Departments of Institute of Clinical Medicine and Internal MedicineNational Cheng Kung University HospitalCollege of MedicineNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
- Department of Internal MedicineTainan HospitalMinistry of Health and WelfareTainanTaiwan
| | - Jaw‐Town Lin
- School of MedicineFu Jen Catholic UniversityNew Taipei CityTaiwan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography: Practical Tips and Clinical Indications for Biliary Disease Management. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2017; 2017:2403012. [PMID: 28348578 PMCID: PMC5350537 DOI: 10.1155/2017/2403012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2016] [Accepted: 01/15/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Since its introduction, MRCP has been improved over the years due to the introduction of several technical advances and innovations. It consists of a noninvasive method for biliary tree representation, based on heavily T2-weighted images. Conventionally, its protocol includes two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo images, acquired with thin sections or with multiple thick slabs. In recent years, three-dimensional T2-weighted fast-recovery fast spin-echo images have been added to the conventional protocol, increasing the possibility of biliary anatomy demonstration and leading to a significant benefit over conventional 2D imaging. A significant innovation has been reached with the introduction of hepatobiliary contrasts, represented by gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine: they are excreted into the bile canaliculi, allowing the opacification of the biliary tree. Recently, 3D interpolated T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo images have been proposed for the evaluation of the biliary tree, obtaining images after hepatobiliary contrast agent administration. Thus, the acquisition of these excretory phases improves the diagnostic capability of conventional MRCP—based on T2 acquisitions. In this paper, technical features of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography are briefly discussed; main diagnostic tips of hepatobiliary phase are showed, emphasizing the benefit of enhanced cholangiography in comparison with conventional MRCP.
Collapse
|
21
|
Wang YK, Kuo FC, Liu CJ, Wu MC, Shih HY, Wang SSW, Wu JY, Kuo CH, Huang YK, Wu DC. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: Current options and developments. World J Gastroenterol 2016. [PMID: 26523098 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11221.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is a crucial part in the effective management of many gastroduodenal diseases. Several invasive and non-invasive diagnostic tests are available for the detection of H. pylori and each test has its usefulness and limitations in different clinical situations. Although none can be considered as a single gold standard in clinical practice, several techniques have been developed to give the more reliable results. Invasive tests are performed via endoscopic biopsy specimens and these tests include histology, culture, rapid urease test as well as molecular methods. Developments of endoscopic equipment also contribute to the real-time diagnosis of H. pylori during endoscopy. Urea breathing test and stool antigen test are most widely used non-invasive tests, whereas serology is useful in screening and epidemiological studies. Molecular methods have been used in variable specimens other than gastric mucosa. More than detection of H. pylori infection, several tests are introduced into the evaluation of virulence factors and antibiotic sensitivity of H. pylori, as well as screening precancerous lesions and gastric cancer. The aim of this article is to review the current options and novel developments of diagnostic tests and their applications in different clinical conditions or for specific purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao-Kuang Wang
- Yao-Kuang Wang, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung 812, Taiwan
| | - Fu-Chen Kuo
- Yao-Kuang Wang, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung 812, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Jung Liu
- Yao-Kuang Wang, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung 812, Taiwan
| | - Meng-Chieh Wu
- Yao-Kuang Wang, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung 812, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Yao Shih
- Yao-Kuang Wang, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung 812, Taiwan
| | - Sophie S W Wang
- Yao-Kuang Wang, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung 812, Taiwan
| | - Jeng-Yih Wu
- Yao-Kuang Wang, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung 812, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Hung Kuo
- Yao-Kuang Wang, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung 812, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Kang Huang
- Yao-Kuang Wang, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung 812, Taiwan
| | - Deng-Chyang Wu
- Yao-Kuang Wang, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung 812, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lee YC, Chiang TH, Liou JM, Chen HH, Wu MS, Graham DY. Mass Eradication of Helicobacter pylorito Prevent Gastric Cancer: Theoretical and Practical Considerations. Gut Liver 2016; 10:12-26. [PMID: 26696028 PMCID: PMC4694730 DOI: 10.5009/gnl15091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Although the age-adjusted incidence of gastric cancer is declining, the absolute number of new cases of gastric cancer is increasing due to population growth and aging. An effective strategy is needed to prevent this deadly cancer. Among the available strategies, screen-and-treat for Helicobacter pylori infection appears to be the best approach to decrease cancer risk; however, implementation of this strategy on the population level requires a systematic approach. The program also must be integrated into national healthcare priorities to allow the limited resources to be most effectively allocated. Implementation will require adoption of an appropriate screening strategy, an efficient delivery system with a timely referral for a positive test, and standardized treatment regimens based on clinical efficacy, side effects, simplicity, duration, and cost. Within the population, there are subpopulations that vary in risk such that a "one size fits all" approach is unlikely to be ideal. Sensitivity analyses will be required to identify whether the programs can be utilized by heterogeneous populations and will likely require adjustments to accommodate the needs of subpopulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Chia Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Public Health, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Hsien Chiang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Integrated Diagnostics and Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jyh-Ming Liou
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Public Health, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Hsi Chen
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Public Health, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Shiang Wu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - David Y Graham
- Department of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cheng YL, Hu HY, Lin XH, Luo JC, Peng YL, Hou MC, Lin HC, Lee FY. Use of SSRI, But Not SNRI, Increased Upper and Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study in Taiwan. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94:e2022. [PMID: 26579809 PMCID: PMC4652818 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000002022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Selective serotonin receptor inhibitor (SSRI) and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) users have been reported to have an increased risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), but their association with lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is less studied. This study aimed to analyze the incidence of UGIB and LGIB among SSRI users, SNRI users, and controls.Using the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan, 9753 subjects who were taking serotonin reuptake inhibitors (8809 with SSRIs, and 944 with SNRIs), and 39,012 age, sex, and enrollment time-matched controls were enrolled at a 1:4 ratio. The log-rank test was used to analyze differences in the cumulative hazard of UGIB and LGIB between groups. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent risk factors for UGIB and LGIB.During the 10-year follow-up period from 2000 to 2010, SSRI users, but not SNRI users, had significantly higher incidences of UGIB and LGIB than the controls (P < 0.001; log-rank test). The use of SSRIs, but not SNRIs, was independently associated with an increased risk of UGIB (hazard ratio [HR]:1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67-2.31) and LGIB (HR: 2.96, 95% CI: 2.46-3.57) after adjusting for age, sex, underlying comorbidities, and medications.The long-term use of SSRIs significantly increased the risk of UGIB and LGIB, and caused more LGIB than UGIB in the general population after adjusting for possible confounding factors, but the association between SNRIs and GIB is insignificant. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify this important issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Lung Cheng
- From the Department of Medicine (Y-LC, X-HL, J-CL, Y-LP, M-CH, H-CL, F-YL); Institute of Public Health and Department of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine (H-YH); Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Y-LC, X-HL, J-CL, Y-LP, H-CL, F-YL); Endoscopic Center for Diagnosis and Therapy (M-CH); Healthcare and Management Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei (M-CH); Department of Education and Research, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei City (H-YH); and Department of Medicine, Taipei Municipal Gan-Dau Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y-LC)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wang YK, Kuo FC, Liu CJ, Wu MC, Shih HY, Wang SSW, Wu JY, Kuo CH, Huang YK, Wu DC. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: Current options and developments. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:11221-11235. [PMID: 26523098 PMCID: PMC4616200 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 232] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2015] [Revised: 08/06/2015] [Accepted: 09/28/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is a crucial part in the effective management of many gastroduodenal diseases. Several invasive and non-invasive diagnostic tests are available for the detection of H. pylori and each test has its usefulness and limitations in different clinical situations. Although none can be considered as a single gold standard in clinical practice, several techniques have been developed to give the more reliable results. Invasive tests are performed via endoscopic biopsy specimens and these tests include histology, culture, rapid urease test as well as molecular methods. Developments of endoscopic equipment also contribute to the real-time diagnosis of H. pylori during endoscopy. Urea breathing test and stool antigen test are most widely used non-invasive tests, whereas serology is useful in screening and epidemiological studies. Molecular methods have been used in variable specimens other than gastric mucosa. More than detection of H. pylori infection, several tests are introduced into the evaluation of virulence factors and antibiotic sensitivity of H. pylori, as well as screening precancerous lesions and gastric cancer. The aim of this article is to review the current options and novel developments of diagnostic tests and their applications in different clinical conditions or for specific purposes.
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are a major cause of false-negative Helicobacter pylori test results. Detecting PPI use and stopping it 2 weeks before testing is the preferred approach to improve the reliability of H pylori diagnostic tests. Immunoblot and molecular methods may be useful for the detection of H pylori infection in difficult cases. When conventional tests are negative and eradication is strongly indicated, empirical H pylori treatment should be considered. In this article, an updated critical review of the usefulness of the various invasive and noninvasive tests in the context of extensive PPI use is provided.
Collapse
|
26
|
Ghosh A, Mondal S, Sinha D, Nag A, Chakraborty S. Comment on: Ultrasonography as a useful modality for documenting sacroiliitis in radiographically negative inflammatory back pain: a comparative evaluation with MRI: reply. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2015; 54:1535. [PMID: 26044043 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alakendu Ghosh
- Department of Rheumatology, Department of General Medicine and
| | | | | | | | - Sumit Chakraborty
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research, Kolkata, India
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lee YC, Chiu HM, Chiang TH, Yen AMF, Chiu SYH, Chen SLS, Fann JCY, Yeh YP, Liao CS, Hu TH, Tu CH, Tseng PH, Chen CC, Chen MJ, Liou JM, Liao WC, Lai YP, Wang CP, Ko JY, Wang HP, Chiang H, Lin JT, Chen HH, Wu MS. Accuracy of faecal occult blood test and Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test for detection of upper gastrointestinal lesions. BMJ Open 2013; 3:e003989. [PMID: 24176798 PMCID: PMC3816242 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Highly sensitive guaiac-based faecal occult blood (Hemoccult SENSA) and Helicobacter pylori stool antigen testing might help detect upper gastrointestinal lesions when appended to a colorectal cancer screening programme with faecal immunochemical testing. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracies of two stool tests in detecting upper gastrointestinal lesions. DESIGN Cross-sectional design. SETTING Hospital-based and community-based screening settings. PARTICIPANTS A hospital-based deviation cohort of 3172 participants to evaluate test performance and a community-based validation cohort of 3621 to verify the findings. INTERVENTIONS Three types of stool tests with bidirectional endoscopy as the reference standard. OUTCOMES Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios. RESULTS For detecting upper gastrointestinal lesions in cases with negative immunochemical tests, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of the guaiac-based and H pylori antigen tests were 16.3% (95% CI 13.3% to 19.8%), 90.1% (88.9% to 91.2%), 1.64 (1.31 to 2.07), and 0.93 (0.89 to 0.97), respectively, and 52.5% (48.1% to 56.9%), 80.6% (79.0% to 82.1%), 2.71 (2.41 to 3.04) and 0.59 (0.54 to 0.65), respectively. For detecting upper gastrointestinal lesions in cases with normal colonoscopy, the results of the guaiac-based and H pylori antigen tests were 17.9% (14.8% to 21.5%), 90.1% (88.9% to 91.2%), 1.81 (1.45 to 2.26) and 0.91 (0.87 to 0.95), respectively, and 53.1% (48.6% to 57.4%), 80.7% (79.1% to 82.2%), 2.75 (2.45 to 3.08) and 0.58 (0.53 to 0.64), respectively. Within the community, positive predictive values of the immunochemical and H pylori antigen tests were 36.0% (26.0% to 46.0%) and 31.9% (28.3% to 35.5%), respectively, for detecting lower and upper gastrointestinal lesions, which were similar to expected values. CONCLUSIONS The H pylori stool antigen test is more accurate than the guaiac-based test in the screening of upper gastrointestinal lesions in a population with high prevalence of H pylori infection and upper gastrointestinal lesions. It is applicable to add the H pylori antigen test to the immunochemical test for pan detection. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01341197 (ClinicalTrial.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Chia Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Han-Mo Chiu
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Hsien Chiang
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Integrated Diagnostic and Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Amy Ming-Fang Yen
- School of Oral Hygiene, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu
- Department and Graduate Institute of Health Care Management, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Sam Li-Sheng Chen
- School of Oral Hygiene, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jean Ching-Yuan Fann
- Department and Graduate Institute of Health Care Management, Kainan University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Po Yeh
- Changhua County Public Health Bureau, Changhua County, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Sheng Liao
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Hui Hu
- Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Hung Tu
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ping-Huei Tseng
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Chuan Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Mei-Jyh Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Integrated Diagnostic and Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jyh-Ming Liou
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chih Liao
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yo-Ping Lai
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Ping Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jenq-Yuh Ko
- Department of Otolaryngology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Po Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hung Chiang
- Taipei Institute of Pathology, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jaw-Town Lin
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung County, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Hsi Chen
- Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Shiang Wu
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|