Acute rejection (AR) remains a significant cause of graft loss. Better approaches to predict AR are being investigated. Surface CD28 protein is essential for T-cell proliferation and survival as well as cytokine production.

Pretransplant CD4⁺CD28⁺ peripheral T cells were examined in 30 liver recipients (LRs) and 31 kidney recipients (KRs) by flow cytometry.

Pretransplant CD4⁺CD28⁺ T cells in LRs were significantly lower in rejectors than nonrejectors (P = .002). Furthermore, the total number of CD28 molecules per cell in LRs (P = .02) as well as KRs (P = .047) was significantly lower in rejectors than nonrejectors. The healthy group did not display differences when compared with patients with end-stage liver disease or renal failure; however, stratification analysis displayed higher levels of CD4⁺CD28⁺ when compared with rejected LRs (P = .04) but not KRs. CD28 levels <41.94% were able to discriminate LRs at high risk of AR (P = .003). Similarly, a total number of CD28 molecules ≤8359 (P = .031) in LRs and ≤7669 (P = .046) in KRs correlated with high risk of AR.

The preliminary results presented herein exhibit a fast and noninvasive method that assists clinicians to prevent AR by monitoring CD4⁺CD28⁺ peripheral T cells.

The introduction of anti-calcineurin-based therapies has led to an increase in the one-year survival as well as graft function rates in patients undergoing solid organ transplantation (SOT). Nonetheless, early cellular acute rejection (EAR) incidence still remains a major challenge that irrevocably heads to poor outcomes. The mechanisms underlying CD4 T cell activation in SOT are still under research. In this sense, CD28 co-stimulatory molecule plays a pivotal role triggering CD4 T cell activation as well as survival maintenance. Previous own studies stated the role that CD4⁺CD28⁺ circulating T lymphocytes plays before and during EAR episodes. We assessed the percentage as well as the absolute number of CD28 molecules on CD4⁺ T cells as predictive surrogate biomarker of EAR in a prospective cohort of liver and kidney transplant recipients. Quantitative analysis of CD28 was carried out on whole peripheral blood samples by flow cytometry. Decreased pre-transplant expression of CD28 was associated with EAR in both study groups. Furthermore, the expression of CD28 within the rejected group, experimented an up-regulation upon transplantation. These preliminary results suggest that patients undergoing liver or kidney transplant can be stratified at high risk of EAR according to their CD28 molecule expression on peripheral CD4⁺ T lymphocytes.

In response to the urgent need for new reliable biomarkers to complement the guidance of the immunosuppressive therapy, a huge number of biomarker candidates to be implemented in clinical practice have been introduced to the transplant community. This includes a diverse range of molecules with very different molecular weights, chemical and physical properties, ex vivo stabilities, in vivo kinetic behaviors, and levels of similarity to other molecules, etc. In addition, a large body of different analytical techniques and assay protocols can be used to measure biomarkers. Sometimes, a complex software-based data evaluation is a prerequisite for appropriate interpretation of the results and for their reporting. Although some analytical procedures are of great value for research purposes, they may be too complex for implementation in a clinical setting. Whereas the proof of "fitness for purpose" is appropriate for validation of biomarker assays used in exploratory drug development studies, a higher level of analytical validation must be achieved and eventually advanced analytical performance might be necessary before diagnostic application in transplantation medicine. A high level of consistency of results between laboratories and between methods (if applicable) should be obtained and maintained to make biomarkers effective instruments in support of therapeutic decisions. This overview focuses on preanalytical and analytical aspects to be considered for the implementation of new biomarkers for adjusting immunosuppression in a clinical setting and highlights critical points to be addressed on the way to make them suitable as diagnostic tools. These include but are not limited to appropriate method validation, standardization, education, automation, and commercialization.

T-cell activation is a characteristic of organ rejection. T cells, located in the draining lymph nodes of the transplant recipient, are faced with non-self-molecules presented by antigen presenting cells and become activated. Activated T cells are characterized by up-regulated surface antigens, such as costimulatory molecules, adhesion molecules, chemokine receptors, and major histocompatibility complex class II molecules. Surface antigen expression can be followed by flow cytometry using monoclonal antibodies in either cell function assays using donor-specific or nonspecific stimulation of isolated cells or whole blood and without stimulation on circulating lymphocytes. Molecules such as CD30 can be proteolytically cleaved off the surface of activated cells in vivo, and the determination of the soluble protein (sCD30) in serum or plasma is performed by immunoassays. As promising biomarkers for rejection and long-term transplant outcome, CD28 (costimulatory receptor for CD80 and CD86), CD154 (CD40 ligand), and sCD30 (tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 8) have been identified. Whereas cell function assays are time-consuming laboratory-developed tests which are difficult to standardize, commercial assays are frequently available for soluble proteins. Therefore, more data from clinical trials have been published for sCD30 compared with the surface antigens on activated T cells. This short review summarizes the association between selected surface antigens and immunosuppression, and rejection in solid organ transplantation.

Immunosuppression is mandatory after solid organ transplantation between HLA mismatched individuals. It is a lifelong therapy that needs to be closely monitored to avoid under- and over-immunosuppression. For many drugs, pharmacokinetic monitoring has been proven to be beneficial. However, the therapeutic ranges are statistically derived surrogate markers for the effects that cannot predict the individual response of single patients. Better tailored immunosuppression biomarkers are needed that indicate immune activation. T cells are critically involved in organ rejection, and the means to assess their activation state may be promising to individualize immunosuppressive therapies. Activated T cells can be monitored with flow cytometry based on surface molecules that are typically up regulated or with molecules that are cleaved off the cell surface. Among these molecules are the interleukin-2 receptor (CD25); transferrin receptor (CD71); the T cell co-stimulatory molecules CD28, CD69, and CD154 and sCD30, which is a member of the TNF-alpha family. The effect of immunosuppressive drugs on T cell activation can be recorded with indirect cell function assays or by directly monitoring activated T cells in whole blood. Soluble proteins can be measured with immunoassays. This review provides a summary of the experimental and clinical studies investigating the potential of surface molecules as a tool for immune monitoring. It critically discusses the obstacles and shortcomings from an analytical and diagnostic perspective that are currently preventing their use in multicenter trials and clinical routine monitoring of transplant patients.

The evaluation of the immunosuppression state in liver transplanted patients is crucial for a correct post-transplant management and a major step towards the personalisation of the immunosuppressive therapy. However, current immunological monitoring after liver transplantation relies mainly on clinical judgment and on immunosuppressive drug levels, without a proper assessment of the real suppression of the immunological system. Various markers have been studied in an attempt to identify a specific indicator of graft rejection and graft acceptance after liver transplantation. Considering acute rejection, the most studied markers are pro-inflammatory and immunoregulatory cytokines and other proteins related to inflammation. However there is considerable overlap with other conditions, and only few of them have been validated. Standard liver tests cannot be used as markers of graft rejection due to their low sensitivity and specificity and the weak correlation with the severity of histopathological findings. Several studies have been performed to identify biomarkers of tolerance in liver transplanted patients. Most of them are based on the analysis of peripheral blood samples and on the use of transcriptional profiling techniques. Amongst these, NK cell-related molecules seem to be the most valid marker of graft acceptance, whereas the role CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells has still to be properly defined.

The gold standard for the diagnosis of acute cellular rejection (ACR) is a liver biopsy. The quest for an alternative non-invasive biomarkers has been long and is ongoing. However, an efficient and useful biomarker has not been developed yet. In this manuscript, we review all possible candidate biomarkers that have been studied in recent years, starting with cytokines and ending with an overview of different newly discovered "omics". Promising paths are being explored but a valid non-invasive biomarker has not been discovered yet.

Viral infections and cellular acute rejection (AR) condition immunosuppressive therapy and compromise the evolution of allografts. Immune monitoring can be useful for ascertaining rejection and for differentiating allo-reaction from activation induced by infections. This work analyzes the usefulness of monitoring the expression of CD28 and KIR2D receptors in peripheral blood T lymphocytes by flow cytometry, to ascertain the immune response in heart and liver transplant recipients. In both types of transplant, the up-regulation of CD28 in CD4(+) lymphocytes in the periods of greatest AR frequency indicates an effective allo-response, whereas the post-transplantation emergence of circulating CD8(+)CD28(-) and CD8(+)CD28(-)KIR2D(+) T cells correlates with better early clinical results. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, but not hepatitis C virus (HCV) or other infections, abrogated both CD28 up-regulation and CD8(+)CD28(-)KIR2D(+) T-cell expansion. Our results show that monitoring the expression of CD28 and KIR2D receptors on T lymphocytes might be considered as sensors of the immune status of heart and liver recipients.