To investigate the preoperative factors influencing textbook outcomes (TO) in Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients and evaluate the feasibility of an interpretable machine learning model for preoperative prediction of TO, we developed a machine learning model for preoperative prediction of TO and used the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) technique to illustrate the prediction process.

To analyze the factors influencing textbook outcomes before surgery and to establish interpretable machine learning models for preoperative prediction.

A total of 376 patients diagnosed with ICC were retrospectively collected from four major medical institutions in China, covering the period from 2011 to 2017. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify preoperative variables associated with achieving TO. Based on these variables, an EXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) machine learning prediction model was constructed using the XGBoost package. The SHAP (package: Shapviz) algorithm was employed to visualize each variable's contribution to the model's predictions. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare the prognostic differences between the TO-achieving and non-TO-achieving groups.

Among 376 patients, 287 were included in the training group and 89 in the validation group. Logistic regression identified the following preoperative variables influencing TO: Child-Pugh classification, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, hepatitis B, and tumor size. The XGBoost prediction model demonstrated high accuracy in internal validation (AUC = 0.8825) and external validation (AUC = 0.8346). Survival analysis revealed that the disease-free survival rates for patients achieving TO at 1, 2, and 3 years were 64.2%, 56.8%, and 43.4%, respectively.

Child-Pugh classification, ECOG score, hepatitis B, and tumor size are preoperative predictors of TO. In both the training group and the validation group, the machine learning model had certain effectiveness in predicting TO before surgery. The SHAP algorithm provided intuitive visualization of the machine learning prediction process, enhancing its interpretability.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with lenvatinib (Len) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) still needs further confirmation. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of HAIC combined with Len and ICI (HAIC + Len + ICI) versus Len alone in advanced HCC.

A total of 290 patients in Len group and 349 patients in HAIC + Len + ICI group were analysed. Propensity score matching (PSM), inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW), and coarsened exact matching (CEM) analyses were used to balance the bias between two groups. Mediation analysis of treatment type in survival was performed for analysis.

The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.9 ± 0.2 months in Len group and 9.2 ± 0.5 months in HAIC + Len + ICI group. The HAIC + Len + ICI group demonstrated significantly better PFS than the Len group across the entire cohort (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% CI 0.43-0.60; P < 0.001). This advantage in PFS was sustained in the PSM, IPTW, and CEM cohorts. HAIC + Len + ICI group also showed better overall survival (OS) than the Len group (HR, 0.38; 95% CI 0.31-0.46; P < 0.001). The OS was also superior in the PSM, IPTW, and CEM cohorts. The objective response rate (ORR) in HAIC + Len + ICI group was twice as high as that in Len group. Further mediation analysis showed tumor response at 3 and 6 months had different mediation effect on survival.

HAIC combined with Len and ICI showed improved better OS and PFS than Len alone. This triple therapy could be considered as a first-line treatment for advanced HCC.

Our study aimed to explore whether hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels affected the role of nucleot(s)ide analog treatment (entecavir [ETV] and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate [TDF]) in improving the prognosis of patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver resection.

A total of 865 patients with HBV-related HCC after hepatectomy treated with TDF or ETV were included in our study. Patients were divided into the high HBsAg cohort (n = 681) and the low HBsAg cohort (n = 184). Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to reduce the impact of potential confounding factors. Kaplan-Meier method and competing risk analysis were used to compare the survival outcomes.

In the high HBsAg cohort, patients in the TDF group had better recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with patients in the ETV group both before (RFS: P < 0.001; OS: P < 0.001) and after (RFS: P = 0.005; OS: P = 0.035) PSM. TDF treatment was a favorable factor independently associated with RFS (hazard ratio: 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.45-0.75, P < 0.001) and OS (hazard ratio: 0.43, 95% confidence interval: 0.28-0.66, P < 0.001). In the low HBsAg cohort, no difference was observed in RFS and OS between the TDF group and the ETV group both before (RFS: P = 0.140; OS: P = 0.640) and after (RFS: P = 0.480; OS: P = 0.920) PSM. TDF treatment remained superiority after controlling for competing events by competing risk analysis in the high HBsAg cohort.

TDF treatment was superior to ETV treatment in improving RFS and OS of HBV-related HCC patients with high HBsAg level after liver resection. Even after controlling for survival competing events, the advantage of TDF treatment remained. Our findings may better help clinicians to assign individualized antiviral regimens to patients with HBV-related HCC after liver resection.

Ablation is a promising approach for eliminating intrathoracic metastases. We compared the effectiveness of a combination of metastasis-directed ablation and systemic therapy with that of systemic therapy alone for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) having pulmonary oligometastases.

We analyzed 679 patients with HCC and pulmonary oligometastases from seven tertiary hospitals. A total of 372 patients received systemic therapy (System group), whereas 307 patients received the combination therapy of pulmonary oligometastases ablation and systemic therapy (Ablation + System group).

The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.7 ± 0.6 and 11.5 ± 0.6 months in the System and Ablation + System groups, respectively. The Ablation + System group exhibited significantly better PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-0.85; P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.65; 95% CI 0.52-0.81; P < 0.001) than the System group. The subgroup analysis revealed that OS (HR, 0.91; 95% CI 0.65-1.28; P = 0.590) and PFS (HR, 0.81; 95% CI 0.62-1.05; P = 0.100) did not differ between tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and TKI plus programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor therapies in the Ablation + system group. In addition, PFS (HR, 0.53; 95% CI 0.38-0.74; P < 0.001) and OS (HR, 0.66; 95% CI 52-0.84; P < 0.001) showed obviously different for intrahepatic tumors with partial response (PR) status.

The application of a combination of ablation of pulmonary oligometastases and systemic therapy resulted in longer PFS and OS than systemic therapy alone.

To analyze the clinical effectiveness of Entecavir (ETV) and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) Tablets for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

Clinical data from 100 CHB patients admitted to our hospital from April 2022 to April 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 45 cases in the control group received ETV, and 55 cases in the research group received TDF tablets. Data on clinical effectiveness, safety (creatine kinase elevation, fatty liver, and lactic acidosis), hepatic function (total bilirubin [TBIL], alanine aminotransferase [ALT], and aspartate aminotransferase [AST]), viral markers (hepatitis B virus-deoxyribonucleic acid [HBV-DNA] and hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]), and quality of life (the MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-36], assessing cognitive, physical, emotional, role, social functions) were comparatively analyzed.

The research group showed an evidently higher overall effective rate and a markedly lower incidence of total adverse reactions than the control group (all P<0.05). Additionally, statistically lower post-treatment TBIL, ALT, AST, HBV-DNA, and HBsAg levels and higher SF-36 scores across all five dimensions were observed in the research group (all P<0.05). Moreover, the research group showed markedly higher negative conversion rates of HBsAg after treatment compared to the control group (P<0.05).

TDF provides better clinical effects in the treatment of CHB than ETV and thus it is worthy of clinical promotion.

Currently, there remains ongoing controversy about the selection of postoperative antiviral drugs for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with concurrent metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (HPMH) who underwent hepatectomy.

A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model and a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis were implemented to ensure equal baseline characteristics. The Kaplan‒Meier survival curves were employed for prognosis comparison between the two groups.

This study included 225 HPMH who all received post-hepatectomy antiviral therapy; with 107 in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) group and 118 in the entecavir (ETV) group. In the entire cohort, according to the multivariate analysis, patients in the TDF group showed better recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.55-0.95; p = 0.030) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30-0.97; p = 0.021) than those in the ETV group. After executing a PSM analysis, Kaplan‒Meier survival curve analysis disclosed significant differences for both RFS and OS between the two groups (p = 0.03 and p = 0.01, respectively).

In summary, our study suggests a more significant association of TDF in improving RFS and OS than ETV in HPMH who underwent hepatectomy through multivariate and PSM analysis. These findings indicate that the choice of antiviral drugs in HPHM holds crucial significance in guiding patient long-term prognosis.

Globally, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is among the most prevalent and deadly cancers. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is an important etiology and disease progression factor for HCC. Hepatectomy is a widely accepted curative treatment for HCC, but the long-term survival rate is still unsatisfactory due to the high recurrence rate after resection. Preoperative or postoperative antiviral therapy plays an important role in improving the prognosis for HBV-related HCC patients who underwent hepatectomy. However, many patients miss out on the chance to receive long-term preoperative antiviral medication because their HBV and HCC infections are discovered concurrently, necessitating the start of remedial antiviral therapy in the perioperative phase. Therefore, it is of great value to know when antiviral therapy is more appropriate and whether perioperative rescue antiviral therapy can achieve the effect of preoperative long-term antiviral therapy.

Lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor on infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have obtained demonstrated efficacy and still need improvement. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has shown promising results for advanced HCC. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of HAIC combined Lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor versus Lenvatinib combined PD-1 inhibitor for infiltrative HCC.

A total of 232 patients were enrolled. There were 114 patients received Lenvatinib combined PD-1 inhibitor (Len+PD-1 group) and 118 patients received HAIC combined Lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor (HAIC+Len+PD-1 group). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety of patients were compared between the two groups by propensity score-matching (PSM).

The 6-, 12-, and 24-month OS rates were 93.8%, 65.1% and 13.4% in Len+PD-1 group, and 100%, 77.3% and 32.1% in HAIC+Len+PD-1 group, respectively. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month PFS rates were 86.4%, 45.7% and 14.1% in Len+PD-1 group, and 95.1%, 59.3% and 25.9% in HAIC+Len+PD-1 group, respectively. The HAIC+Len+PD-1 group had obviously better survival than the Len+PD-1 group both in OS (P=0.002) and PFS (P=0.004). Subgroup analysis revealed that OS in patients with metastasis was improved with HAIC+Len+PD-1 treatment. Patients with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response after treatment showed better survival than the non-response. In addition, HAIC+Len+PD-1 group showed manageable adverse events (AEs).

Patient with infiltrative HCC, HAIC+Len+PD-1 treatment had longer OS and PFS than Len+PD-1 treatment. Early AFP response was an effective indicator of better survival and tumor response to therapy.

Background: Hepatitis B, often leading to Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), poses a major global health challenge. While Tenofovir (TDF) and Entecavir (ETV) are potent treatments, their comparative effectiveness in improving recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates in HBV-related HCC is not well-established. Methods: We conducted an individual patient data meta-analysis using survival data from randomized trials and high-quality propensity score-matched studies to compare the impact of Tenofovir (TDF) and Entecavir (ETV) on RFS and OS in HBV-related HCC patients. Data from six databases and gray literature up to 30 August 2023, were analyzed, utilizing Kaplan-Meier curves, stratified Cox models, and shared frailty models for survival rate assessment and to address between-study heterogeneity. The study employed restricted mean survival time analysis to evaluate differences in RFS and OS between TDF-treated and ETV-treated patients. Additionally, landmark analyses compared early (<2 years) and late (≥2 years) tumor recurrence in these cohorts. Results: This study incorporated seven research articles, covering 4,602 patients with HBV-related HCC (2,082 on TDF and 2,520 on ETV). Within the overall cohort, TDF recipients demonstrated significantly higher RFS (p = 0.042) and OS (p < 0.001) than those on ETV. The stratified Cox model revealed significantly improved OS for the TDF group compared to the ETV group (hazard ratio, 0.756; 95% confidence interval, 0.639-0.896; p = 0.001), a result corroborated by the shared frailty model. Over a follow-up period of 1-8 years, no significant difference was noted in the mean time to death between the TDF and ETV groups. The rates of early recurrence did not significantly differ between the groups (p = 0.735). However, TDF treatment was significantly associated with a reduced risk of late recurrence compared to ETV (p < 0.001). In the HCC resection subgroup, the disparities in OS, early, and late recurrence rates between the two treatments paralleled those seen in the overall cohort. Conclusion: Compared to ETV, TDF may enhance OS and reduce late tumor recurrence risk in HBV-related HCC patients receiving curative treatment. However, there was no statistically significant distinction in the timing of tumor recurrence and mortality between patients administered TDF and those prescribed ETV. Systematic Review Registration: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

Tenofovir (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) are highly effective and well-tolerated nucleos(t)ide analogs commonly prescribed for hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatment. Yet, it is unclear whether survival outcomes differ for HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with ETV and TDF. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the prognostic effectiveness of ETV and TDF in HBV-related HCC patients.

We comprehensively searched four databases, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, to identify pertinent studies utilizing keywords "entecavir," "tenofovir," "hepatocellular carcinoma," and "liver resection." Our primary outcomes of interest encompassed overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), early recurrence, and late recurrence. The statistical effect size for these measures was expressed in terms of hazard ratios (HRs).

Our search yielded 10 studies encompassing 11 datasets involving 7,400 patients. Our meta-analysis revealed that patients treated with TDF achieved better OS (HR = 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.40-0.70, p < 0.0001), RFS (HR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.57-0.80; p < 0.0001), early recurrence (HR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.67-0.94; p < 0.0077), and late recurrence (HR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.43-0.97; p = 0.0368). We detected publication bias potentially affecting OS but not RFS.

Our findings demonstrated that TDF outperformed ETV regarding RFS for HBV-related HCC patients. However, to bolster the evidence and establish more conclusive conclusions, further validation via extensive and high-quality randomized controlled trials is essential.

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier CRD 42024542579.

For chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection patients, increasing evidence has demonstrated the effectiveness of expanding the indications and applicable population for antiviral therapy. However, the expanded indication of antiviral therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains to be further explored.

196 HBV-related HCC patients who received radical hepatectomy and nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) therapy at Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital were enrolled in this study. HCC recurrence, overall survival (OS), early virological (VR) and biochemical responses (BR) of patients were compared between different NAs therapy and the use of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy.

NAs therapy at different timing of surgery was a strong independent risk factor for postoperative recurrence and overall mortality of HBV-related HCC patients. Furthermore, in HCC patients who received postoperative anti-PD-1 therapy, patients with HBV DNA < 1000 copy/mL had significantly better recurrence-free survival (RFS) and OS than those with HBV DNA ≥ 1000 copy/mL (HR: 7.783; P = 0.002; HR: 6.699; P < 0.001). However, the differences of RFS and OS rates between entecavir group and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group were not statistically significant. Similar results were also observed in the rates of early VR, BR and combined VR and BR.

Timely and reasonable preoperative NAs therapy showed clinical benefit in improving the prognosis of patients with HBV-related HCC, even in the case of normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level and negative hepatitis e antigen (HBeAg). Furthermore, a possible synergistic effect between antiviral therapy and anti-PD-1 therapy was founded and need further verification.

The selection of postoperative antiviral therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with HBV infection undergoing radical treatments (HPHR) is a topic of ongoing debate and controversy. The primary aim of this study was to compare the prognostic impact of selecting entecavir (ETV) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) as antiviral therapy options in HPHR. All the studies included in this analysis were implemented propensity score matching (PSM) methodology. Meta-analysis was performed using R statistical software (version 4.3.0). The primary outcome measures, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), were quantified using hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). This study analyzed 13 studies involving 6961 patients (2394 in the TDF group and 4567 in the ETV group). We conducted a meta-analysis of 8 studies that included a total of 5289 patients using the PSM analysis method. In comparison to the ETV group, the TDF group demonstrated significantly better RFS (HR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.93; p = 0.0034) and OS (HR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.88; p = 0.0085). Furthermore, the disparity between the two drugs was particularly evident in the prognosis of patients undergoing hepatectomy. Regional disparities were observed, with mainland China studies favoring RFS benefits and Taiwan or Korea studies favoring OS benefits. In conclusion, TDF has demonstrated significant superiority over ETV in terms of RFS and OS outcomes for HPHR. The findings hold significant implications for informing clinical decision-making and guiding the selection of postoperative antiviral therapy drugs in HCC patients.

The efficacy of entecavir (ETV) versus tenofovir (TDF) on the prognosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent FOLFOX-hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) remains unclear. In this study, we compared the outcomes between ETV and TDF in HBV-related advanced HCC patients who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC.

A total of 683 patients diagnosed with HBV-related HCC who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC and received TDF or ETV between January 2016 and December 2021 were included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), HBV reactivation, and liver function of patients were compared between the ETV and TDF groups by propensity score matching (PSM).

In the PSM cohort, for all patients and patients with ≥ 4 cycles of FOLFOX-HAIC, the median OS in the ETV group (15.2 months, 95% CI: 13.0-17.4 months; 16.6 months, 95% CI: 14.8-18.5 months; respectively) was shorter than that in the TDF group (23.0 months, 95% CI: 10.3-35.6 months; 27.3 months, 95% CI: 16.5-NA months; p=0.024, p=0.028; respectively). The median PFS in the ETV group (8.7 months, 95% CI: 7.9-9.5 months; 8.9 months, 95% CI: 8.0-9.8 months; respectively) was also shorter than that in the TDF group (11.8 months, 95% CI: 8.0-15.6 months; 12.7 months, 95% CI: 10.8-14.6 months; p=0.036, p=0.025; respectively). The rate of HBV reactivation in the ETV group was higher than that in the TDF group (12.3% vs 6.3%, p=0.040; 16.5% vs 6.2%, p=0.037, respectively). For liver function, the rate of ALBI grade that remained stable or improved in the ETV group was lower than that in the TDF group (44.6% vs 57.6%, p=0.006; 37.2% vs 53.8%, p=0.019, respectively).

Compared with ETV, TDF was associated with a better prognosis, lower proportion of HBV reactivation, and better preservation of liver function in advanced HBV-HCC patients who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC, especially those who received ≥ 4 cycles.

In treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and tenofovir alafenamide have a minimal or no risk of drug-resistance. These 3 nucleos(t)ide analog agents are highly potent inducing high rate of virologic response (reducing serum HBV DNA to levels undetectable by polymerase chain reaction assays) in most treatment-naïve patients. Our randomized trials have demonstrated that monotherapy with TDF can provide a successful virological response in most of the heavily pretreated patients with multidrug resistance to ETV or adefovir.

Tenofovir disoproxil and entecavir are both commonly used first-line antiviral treatments, but their comparative recurrence and overall survival (OS) benefits remain unclear.

To explore differences of tenofovir disoproxil vs entecavir in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and OS after liver resection with curative intent in patients with hepatocellular cancer (HCC) related to hepatitis B virus (HBV).

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, a tertiary referral hospital in Shanghai, China, between January 4, 2015, and April 1, 2023. Participants included patients with HBV-related HCC who underwent liver resection with curative intent from January 2015 to December 2018. Patients who received tenofovir disoproxil were matched with patients who received entecavir in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching. Data were analyzed from April 3 to May 31, 2023.

Receiving tenofovir disoproxil or entecavir as antiviral treatment for HBV.

Primary end points were RFS and OS rates.

Among 4451 patients (mean [SD] age, 58.1 [10.0] years; 3764 male [84.6%]; median [range] follow-up, of 51 [3 to 91] months), 989 patients in each of the groups were selected in propensity score matching. Baseline characteristics were comparable. In propensity score-matched groups, OS rates were 92.2% at 1 year, 70.9% at 3 years, and 54.2% at 5 years in the entecavir group, compared with 90.9% at 1 year, 75.2% at 3 years, and 64.0% at 5 years in the tenofovir disoproxil group. RFS rates were 83.9% at 1 year, 50.0% at 3 years, and 43.3% at 5 years in the entecavir group, compared with 85.3% at 1 year, 55.6% at 3 years, and 51.4% at 5 years in the tenofovir disoproxil group. Patients in the tenofovir disoproxil group had better OS (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.94; P = .004) and RFS rates (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.92; P = .001) compared with the entecavir group. Restricted mean survival time differences of entecavir vs tenofovir disoproxil groups were -0.05 (95% CI, -0.18 to 0.08) months at 1 year (P = .45), 0.20 (95% CI, -0.62 to 1.03) months at 3 years (P = .63), and 1.82 (95% CI, 0.14 to 3.51) months at 5 years (P = .03).

These findings suggest that in patients undergoing curative liver resection for HBV-related HCC, tenofovir disoproxil was associated with better long-term OS and RFS rates compared with entecavir, providing insights for antiviral treatment.

Tenofovir (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) are first-line treatments for patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. However, the effect of TDF versus ETV on the prognosis of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been fully clarified yet.

PubMed, Embase and Web of science were searched up to March, 2021. Meta-analyses were performed for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) to assess the effect of TDF versus ETV on the prognosis of HBV-related HCC.

A total of 10 studies comprising 4706 Asian patients were included. The pooled results revealed that TDF was associated with better OS (adjusted HR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.40-0.62; I²=36.0%, p=0.167) and better RFS/DFS (adjusted HR=0.70, 95% CI: 0.55-0.89, I²=71.9%, p=0.002) than ETV in treatment of HBV-related HCC. Subgroup analysis revealed that OS benefit from TDF was generally consistent, except for patients who underwent non-surgical treatment for HCC. Subgroup analysis also indicated that TDF reduces the risk of late recurrence (HR=0.41, 95% CI: 0.18-0.0.93; I²=63.0%, p=0.067) rather than early recurrence (HR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.64-1.52; I²=61.3%, p=0.076).

Compared with ETV, TDF has the advantage of improving OS and reducing late recurrence of patients with HBV-related HCC patients who underwent resection.

There is still controversy about whether tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) have different effects on the outcomes of patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

The aim of this study was to compare the prognoses between ETV and TDF treatment among patients with HBV-related HCC after hepatectomy.

An analysis was done on data from the Taiwan Cancer Registry, which was linked to Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, for the years 2011-2016. We identified 7107 patients with HBV-related HCC after curative hepatectomy, and 25.3% of them used ETV or TDF after surgery. After propensity score overlap weighting, 1797 patients treated with ETV (n = 1365) or TDF (n = 432) were included for analyses. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the efficacy of ETV and TDF for recurrence and overall survival (OS).

After hepatectomy, the recurrence rate per 100 person-years was 14.87 for the ETV group and 9.25 for the TDF group. The risk of recurrence was similar in the TDF group and the ETV group (HR [95% CI]: 0.91 [0.69-1.19; p = 0.479]), as was the risk of all-cause mortality (HR [95% CI]: 0.67 [0.42-1.07]; p = 0.091). When considering early recurrence (<2 years) and late recurrence (≧2 years), the TDF and ETV groups showed no significant differences. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses demonstrated consistent results.

Both TDF and ETV showed similar health benefits in terms of recurrence and OS in patients with HBV-related HCC patients after hepatectomy.

At present, there are a variety of antiviral drugs for HBV in clinical practice, but there is no standard scheme for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE) combined with antiviral drugs. The aim of this study was to investigate whether TACE must be combined with antiviral therapy in patients of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). Meanwhile, the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with entecavir and TACE combined with tenofovir in the treatment of HBV-related HCC were compared.

This study included 536 patients with HBV-related HCC who underwent TACE in Union Hospital from March 2017 to March 2020, and they met the criteria. They were divided into three groups: control group (N = 212): TACE alone; Entecavir group (N = 220): TACE combined with entecavir; and Tenofovir group (N = 228): TACE combined with tenofovir. We conducted a retrospective study to analyze the efficacy and safety of the three groups of patients.

Objective response rate(ORR): 29.2% in control group, 54.1% in entecavir group, and 63.2% in tenofovir group (P < 0.05). Disease control rate(DCR): 63.7% in control group, 80.9% in entecavir group, and 88.1% in tenofovir group (P < 0.05). Median overall survival(mOS): control group, 12.2 months; entecavir group, 17.3 months; tenofovir group, 22.5 months (p < 0.05). Median progression-free survival (mPFS): control group, 9.3 months; entecavir group, 15.5 months; tenofovir group, 16.6 months (p < 0.05). At 6 months, there was an increase in creatinine(Cr) and a decrease in glomeruar filtration rate(GFR) in tenofovir group, which were statistically different from control and entecavir groups (p < 0.05).

TACE combined with entecavir and TACE combined with tenofovir had higher ORR and DCR, longer OS and PFS than TACE alone. The OS of TACE combined with tenofovir was higher than that of TACE combined with entecavir. TACE combined with tenofovir is a safe strategy, but we cannot completely ignore the impact of tenofovir on renal function.

Entecavir (ETV) and Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are the first-line drugs for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV). However, the impact of these two antiviral agents on the outcome of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after curative therapy remains to be explored. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effect of ETV and TDF on recurrence and mortality after curative treatment for HBV-related HCC. A comprehensive literature search of multiple electronic databases was conducted from 2000 to January 2022 for studies comparing ETV and TDF for HBV-related HCC patients after curative therapy. The adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) were pooled using a random-effects model. A total of nine studies with 5298 patients were included in the final meta-analysis. TDF was associated with a lower risk of HCC recurrence [aHR 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.81] compared to HCC. TDF reduced the risk of late recurrence compared to ETV (aHR 0.58, 95% CI 0.45-0.76) but not early recurrence (aHR 0.88, 95% CI 0.76-1.02). The mortality risk was also lower with TDF compared to ETV (aHR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50-0.77). TDF was associated with a lower risk of recurrence and mortality than ETV after resection or ablation of HBV-related HCC. Further prospective randomized controlled studies are warranted to validate these results.

The evidence of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) following transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) combined with sorafenib for intermediate-stage recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) is limited. Patient responses to this treatment vary because of the heterogeneous nature of RHCC, making it important to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from this combination therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of RFA following TACE and sorafenib for the intermediate-stage RHCC.

This retrospective, multicentre, cohort study included 363 patients with intermediate-stage RHCC underwent TACE combined with sorafenib (TACE-sorafenib group) or RFA following TACE and sorafenib (TACE-sorafenib + RFA group) between January 01, 2009 to December 31, 2015 from four institutions in China. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and efficacy of patients were compared between the two groups by propensity score-matching (PSM).

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 97.7%, 83.7%, 54.7% in TACE-sorafenib + RFA group, and 93.3%, 57.0%, 32.7% in TACE-sorafenib group. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 85.3%, 58.0%, 26.9% in TACE-sorafenib + RFA group, and 55.3%, 30.7%, 15.3% in TACE-sorafenib group. Compared with the TACE-sorafenib group, the TACE-sorafenib + RFA group had significantly longer OS (HR, 0.54; 95%CI, 0.40-0.73; P < 0.001) and PFS (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.41-0.66; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis was conducted to precisely screen out the beneficial population from RFA treatment.

Our findings suggest that addition of RFA following TACE and sorafenib combination was superior to TACE combined with sorafenib for intermediate-stage RHCC, resulting in longer OS and PFS. Patients who had good response to TACE and achieved downstaging successfully could not benefit from the RFA therapy.

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81627803), Chen Xiao-Ping Science and Technology Development Fund (CXPJJH1200009-06).