Pathological examination of lymph node metastasis (LNM) is crucial for treating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Although the tumour stroma is correlated with prognosis in multiple solid tumors, its role in detecting LNM in PDAC is unclear. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the relationship of tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) with LNM, survival and mutational profile in PDAC.

In this multicenter retrospective study, we examined molecular and clinicopathologic features of 737 PDAC patients from 5 independent cohorts, including surgically resected and endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) biopsy specimens. TSR was evaluated on hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides and classified as stroma-low (<50% stroma) or stroma-high (≥50% stroma).

Compared to TSR-high cases, TSR-low cases were significantly associated with LNM (P < 0.001). TSR could accurately distinguish patients with and without LNM with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.749, with the sensitivity and specificity of 76.5% and 71.6%, respectively. This accuracy of TSR for identifying LNM was further increased by adding other factors including PD-L1 expression or pretreatment serum CA19-9 levels. TSR showed similar levels of accuracy in analysis of resected tumor specimens and EUS-FNA biopsies. Moreover, we found that TSR could also identify residual nodal involvement after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) using pretreatment EUS-FNA biopsy samples. Heterogeneous genetic alterations were observed between TSR-low and TSR-high subgroups. TSR was identified as an independent predictor of LNM and worse disease-free survival. Major findings were all reproducible in validation, EUS-FNA biopsy, and pre-treatment NAT EUS-FNA biopsy cohorts.

TSR served as a robust and reproducible biomarker that identifies patients at risk for LNM. TSR might be used to select treatment and management strategies for PDAC patients.

Pancreatic cancer comes with one of the poorest prognoses of all cancers and as such it is crucial that new therapies are developed to improve on the current statistics. Currently, chemotherapy is the cornerstone of pancreatic cancer treatment with several drugs, and combinations of drugs being utilised for their anti-cancer effect. However, pancreatic cancer has a dense stroma around the tumour and intratumoral bacteria which result in drugs having difficulty penetrating the tumour or being metabolised by bacteria rendering them inactive. The utilisation of nanotechnology in chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer has been a huge area of focus for researchers worldwide with most of the focus being on lipid-based, inorganic and polymer-based nanoparticles. Solid lipid nanoparticles which have been studied since being first published in the 1990s, have been poorly researched for pancreatic cancer applications. Being composed of physiological lipids, solid lipid nanoparticles offer a greatly reduced risk of acute or chronic toxicities arising compared to inorganic or polymeric nanoparticles. They also possess the ability to improve on circulation time, permeability, and bioavailability of many first-line chemotherapeutics.

Surgical resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) modestly improves long-term survival due to the competing risk of metastatic disease. However, postoperative morbidity often interferes with administration of systemic therapy and may be unacceptable to some patients. Ablative radiation therapy (A-RT) has emerged as an effective noninvasive local treatment in many tumor types and may provide an alternative to surgery in select patients with resectable PDAC.

To estimate the efficacy of A-RT in technically resectable PDAC.

This cohort study of consecutive patients with histologically confirmed, radiographically resectable T1-2N0-1M0 PDAC treated with A-RT at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between June 2016 and December 2022 were included from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were not eligible for surgery because of noncancer-related comorbidities. Data were frozen for analysis in December 2023, which took place between March and November 2024.

All patients received A-RT exceeding 97.5-Gy biologically effective dose with daily computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging guidance, motion management, and daily or selective adaptation of the dose distribution.

The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included biochemical and radiographic objective response rate, cumulative incidence of local progression, progression-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival.

Of 25 patients with radiographically resectable PDAC who received A-RT, 13 (52%) were male, and the median (IQR) age at time of A-RT was 80 (74-87) years. A total of 20 patients (80%) had a Karnofsky Performance Status score of 80 or lower. A total of 15 tumors (60%) were T2, and 4 (16%) were node positive. A total of 17 patients (68%) received induction chemotherapy for a median (range) of 2.9 (1.0-6.1) months. Radiation therapy regimens delivered with conventional linear accelerators included 75 Gy in 25 fractions among 13 patients, 67.5 Gy in 15 fractions among 9 patients, 50 Gy in 5 fractions among 2 patients (magnetic resonance imaging-guided linear accelerator), and 60 Gy in 10 for 1 patient. OS, local progression, and distant metastasis-free survival at 2 years were 43.7% (95% CI, 27.4%-69.5%), 20.8% (95% CI, 7.3%-39.0%), and 20.0% (95% CI, 9.1%-43.8%), respectively. Grade 3 acute and late gastrointestinal tract toxic effects were noted in 3 and 1 patients, respectively, with no grade 4 or higher events.

In this cohort study, A-RT in patients with technically resectable PDAC led to effective local tumor control and favorable OS despite advanced age, poor Karnofsky Performance Status score, and conservative use of chemotherapy in the cohort studied. These data support a prospective study of A-RT for the management of resectable PDAC.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a major global health challenge, with rising incidence and mortality rates, particularly in high-socio-demographic index regions. Given its high mortality and significant morbidity, research on patient quality of life (QoL) has gained momentum, addressing symptom burdens, psychological distress, and treatment-related outcomes. Bibliometric analysis provides a valuable approach to mapping research trends, identifying key contributors, and forecasting future directions.

This study aimed to map global research on QoL in pancreatic cancer patients, highlighting key findings, challenges, and future directions through bibliometric analysis over the past two decades.

Data for this study were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database, using specific search strategies to retrieve relevant documents on the quality of life in pancreatic cancer patients. The data were analysed using the Bibliometrix R package to create knowledge maps and visualize research trends, collaborations, and emerging hotspots in the field.

A total of 819 articles on pancreatic cancer and quality of life were identified, with an average citation count of 47.13 per article, highlighting moderate academic impact. The research revealed a growing trend in collaborative efforts, with an average of 9.42 co-authors per article and 16 % international collaborations. The United States emerged as the leading contributor, with 203 publications and the highest citation count, followed by France and the United Kingdom.

This bibliometric analysis highlights the growing volume of pancreatic cancer and quality of life research, with a steady annual growth rate of 6.9 % and increasing collaboration, especially from the United States. However, despite the rising number of publications, a decline in citation impact for recent studies suggests a need for continued innovation in therapeutic strategies to improve clinical outcomes.

We investigated the association between serum MUC5AC (sMUC5AC) levels and patient outcomes in individuals who underwent resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA), including those treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and those who had upfront surgery (UpS) followed by adjuvant therapy.

Serum samples from the Ohio State University biorepository collected from January 2010 to June 2021 were utilized. The human MUC5AC kit (NBP2-76703) was used to perform enzyme-linked immunoassays to measure sMUC5AC levels. Logistic regression, Cox regression models (univariate and multivariate), recurrence prediction, analysis of variance (ANOVA), t-tests, and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analysis.

In the NAT cohort (n = 23), elevated sMUC5AC levels were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with pathological treatment response, margin positivity, and residual disease. Among 21 patients who had an R0/R1 resection (R2 resection, n=2), higher sMUC5AC levels were associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 1.64, P = 0.0006) and overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.6, P = 0.005) on univariate analysis. Multivariate models confirmed sMUC5AC as an independent predictor of PFS and OS alongside pathological differentiation and postoperative therapy. Patients with lower sMUC5AC levels had more favorable pathological characteristics, better treatment responses, and improved survival outcomes. These findings were consistent in the FOLFIRINOX subgroup (n = 17). In the UpS cohort (n = 17), post-resection sMUC5AC levels tend to be associated with PFS (P = 0.07) and OS (P = 0.05). Combining sMUC5AC with Carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 enhanced sensitivity (79%) and specificity (67%) to predict recurrence. Higher sMUC5AC levels were associated with earlier recurrence and poor survival outcomes, highlighting its utility in post-surgery risk stratification. Among patients with pre-treatment data (n = 11), sMUC5AC levels were significantly higher among patients with poorly differentiated tumors.

This study provides compelling evidence for the clinical utility of sMUC5AC as a prognostic biomarker among patients with resected PDA. Future large-scale studies are needed to validate these findings and establish standard thresholds for sMUC5AC integration into clinical practice.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a highly lethal malignancy, with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) being the most common and aggressive subtype, characterized by late diagnosis, aggressive progression, and resistance to conventional therapies. Despite advances in understanding its pathogenesis, including the identification of common genetic mutations (e.g., KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4) and dysregulated signaling pathways (e.g., KRAS-MAPK, PI3K-AKT, and TGF-β pathways), effective therapeutic strategies remain limited. Current treatment modalities including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, and emerging therapies such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells, oncolytic viruses (OVs), cancer vaccines, and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), face significant challenges. This review comprehensively summarizes these treatment approaches, emphasizing their mechanisms, limitations, and potential solutions, to overcome these bottlenecks. By integrating recent advancements and outlining critical challenges, this review aims to provide insights into future directions and guide the development of more effective treatment strategies for PC, with a specific focus on PDAC. Our work underscores the urgency of addressing the unmet needs in PDAC therapy and highlights promising areas for innovation in this field.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the most lethal cancer. The prognosis of small PC (tumor ≤ 20 mm) is better than that of larger PC, indicating the importance of detecting early-stage PC for patient outcome. The aim of this study was to elucidate the molecular features in small PC (≤20 mm).

This study included 79 PC tumors (≤20 mm in pathological examination) resected between 2004 and 2022. c-Myc, Caveolin-1, Smad4, and Thrombospondin-1 were examined by immunostaining. These molecular alterations were compared in PC patients with tumor size ≤ 10 mm (n = 11) (14%) and 10 mm < tumor size ≤ 20 mm (n = 68) (86%). Mutation analyses of KRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF were performed by pyrosequencing in 22 PCs.

PC with 10 mm < tumor size ≤ 20 mm showed significantly worse overall survival and disease-free survival than PC with tumor size < 10 mm (P = 0.024 and P = 0.028). Tumor c-Myc and stromal Caveolin-1 expressions were significantly increased in tumors larger than 10 mm (P = 0.02 and P = 0.04). c-Myc and Caveolin-1 expressions were associated with poor disease-free survival and overall survival. KRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF mutation status did not differ between the 2 groups.

Tumor c-Myc and stromal Caveolin-1 overexpressions were detected in tumors larger than 10 mm. Their overexpressions were associated with worse prognosis even in small PC. These molecular alterations in small PC may be a clue for the detection of early-stage PC.

With the advent of improved chemotherapy options, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has gained acceptance as a multidisciplinary treatment approach for localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to clarify whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 influences preoperative nutritional status and postoperative outcomes, particularly in patients undergoing highly invasive pancreatic resection.

Patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy as upfront surgery or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 between January 2015 and December 2022 were assessed. In addition to perioperative surgical outcomes, preoperative nutritional status was evaluated using serum albumin, controlling nutritional status, and prognostic nutritional index.

A total of 158 patients who underwent upfront pancreaticoduodenectomy and 119 who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 before pancreaticoduodenectomy were evaluated. Preoperative nutritional assessments (serum albumin, controlling nutritional status score, and prognostic nutritional index) showed no significant differences between groups, either at the initial consultation or immediately before surgery. No significant differences were observed in postoperative outcomes, including blood loss, operation time, and morbidity. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 group had a significantly greater rate of negative tumor margins (R0 resection rate 86% vs 74%, P = .018), and improved overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.67, P < .001) compared with the upfront pancreaticoduodenectomy group.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 does not adversely impact preoperative nutritional status and enhances the effectiveness of pancreaticoduodenectomy for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, leading to improved pathologically curative resection rates and overall survival.

The ESPAC4 trial showed that adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GemCap) produced longer overall survival (OS) than gemcitabine monotherapy. Subsequently, the PRODIGE24-CCTG PA.6 trial showed even longer survival for modified fluorouracil, folinic acid, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) than gemcitabine but had more restrictive eligibility criteria. Our aim was to analyze the ESPAC4 survival on long-term follow-up.

The OS of 732 ESPAC4 patients comparing 367 randomly assigned to gemcitabine and 365 to GemCap was previously reported after a median follow-up time of 43.2 months (95% CI, 39.7 to 45.5) and 458 deaths. Analysis was now carried out after a median follow-up of 104 months (101-108) and 566 deaths.

The median OS was 29.5 months (27.5-32.1) for all patients, 28.4 months (25.2-32.0) in the gemcitabine group and 31.6 months (26.5-38.0) in the GemCap group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83 [0.71 to 0.98]; P = .031). R0 patients given gemcitabine had a median survival of 32.2 months (27.9-41.6) compared with 49.9 months (39.0-82.3) for those given GemCap (HR, 0.63 [0.47 to 0.84]; P = .002). Lymph node-negative patients had significantly higher 5 year OS rates on GemCap (59% [49%-71%]) than gemcitabine (53% [42%-66%]; HR, 0.63 [0.41 to 0.98]; P = .04) but not those with positive lymph nodes (P = .225). The OS advantage for GemCap was retained in the PRODIGE24 subgroup of 193 (26.4%) ESPAC4 patients not eligible for PRODIGE24 with a median survival of 20.7 (16.2-27.3) months in patients allocated to gemcitabine compared with 25.9 (22.3-30.2) months for ineligible patients allocated to GemCap (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.98]; χ2log-rank-1df = 4.31; P = .038).

GemCap is a standard option for patients not eligible for mFOLFIRINOX. Exploratory evidence suggests that GemCap may be particularly efficacious in R0 patients and also in lymph node-negative patients.

[Figure: see text].

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is a lethal malignancy characterized by insidious onset and lack of effective therapy. The molecular pathogenesis of PDA remains to be understood fully. Transcriptional factor GATA6 is an important transcriptional regulator in normal pancreas development, particularly in the initial specification and differentiation of the pancreas. Recent studies have linked pancreatic malignancy closely to GATA6. Increased levels of GATA6 expression enhance pancreatic cancer cell growth. GATA6 emerges as a lineage-specific oncogenic factor in PDA, augmenting the oncogenic phenotypes of PDA cells upon its overexpression. However, elevated GATA6 levels are correlated with well-differentiated tumors and a more favorable patient prognosis. Experimental evidence in genetic mouse models has revealed a tumor-suppressive role for GATA6. The circumstantial roles of GATA6 in pancreatic tumorigenesis remain to be defined. This review aims to elucidate recent advances in comprehending GATA6, emphasizing its crucial roles in both pancreas physiology and pathology. Special attention will be given to its involvement in PDA pathogenesis, exploring its potential as a novel biomarker and a promising therapeutic target for PDA.

A fundamental challenge for cancer vaccines is to generate long-lived functional T cells that are specific for tumour antigens. Here we find that mRNA-lipoplex vaccines against somatic mutation-derived neoantigens may solve this challenge in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), a lethal cancer with few mutations. At an extended 3.2-year median follow-up from a phase 1 trial of surgery, atezolizumab (PD-L1 inhibitory antibody), autogene cevumeran1 (individualized neoantigen vaccine with backbone-optimized uridine mRNA-lipoplex nanoparticles) and modified (m) FOLFIRINOX (chemotherapy) in patients with PDAC, we find that responders with vaccine-induced T cells (n = 8) have prolonged recurrence-free survival (RFS; median not reached) compared with non-responders without vaccine-induced T cells (n = 8; median RFS 13.4 months; P  =  0.007). In responders, autogene cevumeran induces CD8+ T cell clones with an average estimated lifespan of 7.7 years (range 1.5 to roughly 100 years), with approximately 20% of clones having latent multi-decade lifespans that may outlive hosts. Eighty-six percent of clones per patient persist at substantial frequencies approximately 3 years post-vaccination, including clones with high avidity to PDAC neoepitopes. Using PhenoTrack, a novel computational strategy to trace single T cell phenotypes, we uncover that vaccine-induced clones are undetectable in pre-vaccination tissues, and assume a cytotoxic, tissue-resident memory-like T cell state up to three years post-vaccination with preserved neoantigen-specific effector function. Two responders recurred and evidenced fewer vaccine-induced T cells. Furthermore, recurrent PDACs were pruned of vaccine-targeted cancer clones. Thus, in PDAC, autogene cevumeran induces de novo CD8+ T cells with multiyear longevity, substantial magnitude and durable effector functions that may delay PDAC recurrence. Adjuvant mRNA-lipoplex neoantigen vaccines may thus solve a pivotal obstacle for cancer vaccination.

Radiation therapy (RT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) continues to be controversial. Advances in both systemic therapy and RT techniques have changed the landscape of LAPC management in recent years. Clinical outcomes of ablative RT have been encouraging, and randomized clinical trials may clarify the role of RT for LAPC. We present a contemporary critical review of key aspects regarding optimal patient selection, radiation dose escalation techniques, novel radiosensitizers and radioprotectors, and treatment response assessment for LAPC.

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The decision to initiate chemotherapy involves both patient and physician factors, decision-specific criteria, and contextual considerations. This study aimed to assess medical oncologists' views on adjuvant chemotherapy following pancreatic resection for PDAC.

An online survey and case vignette study were distributed to medical oncologists via the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (DPCG), International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) and related networks.

A total of 91 oncologists from 14 countries participated, 46 % of whom treated more than 40 new PDAC patients annually, with a median experience of 15 years. Significant discrepancies were noted in their recommendations for adjuvant chemotherapy across case vignettes. In patients over 70, 17 % advised against chemotherapy, while 31 % said age was not a factor. Oncologists with less than 10 years of experience and those in non-academic settings were less likely to recommend adjuvant therapy. While 87 % agreed mFOLFIRINOX is the preferred adjuvant treatment, consensus on individual cases was lacking. The recommended interval between surgery and chemotherapy ranged from 3 to 26 weeks, with varying reasons for withholding treatment, primarily due to postoperative recovery and performance status.

Our study revealed substantial variation among oncologists in counseling on adjuvant chemotherapy after PDAC resection. This emphasizes the need for more patient involvement in decision-making and improving shared decision-making.

This study assessed the anticancer potential of genetically modified exosomes engineered to express CD133-binding peptides on their surface and carry PD-L1 siRNA for the treatment of murine model of metastatic pancreatic cancer.

CD133-targeting exosomes (tEx) were generated by harvesting conditioned media from adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) that had undergone transformation using pDisplay vectors encoding CD133-binding peptide sequences. Subsequently, siPD-L1-loaded CD133-targeting Exosomes, referred to as tEx(s), were created by incorporating PD-L1 siRNA into the tEx using Exofect kit.

tEx(s) demonstrated superior targetability compared to other materials, including Ex, Ex(p), and tEx. This was substantiated by higher total radiant efficiency (TRE) observed in metastatic liver and pancreatic tissues following intravenous administration of tEx(s) ( P < 0.05). Furthermore, the intravenous delivery of tEx(s) resulted in the most pronounced upregulation of proapoptotic markers (BIM and c-caspase 3) and the least downregulation of the antiapoptotic markers (Mcl-1 and Bcl-xL), which has been demonstrated in various methods, including real-time polymerase chain reaction, western blot analysis, and immunohistochemistry in the metastatic lesions in the livers ( P < 0.05).

PD-L1 siRNA-loaded CD133-tEx demonstrated remarkable anticancer efficacy, characterized by specific binding to CD133-positive pancreatic cancer cells and suppression of PD-L1 expression within these cells.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, and its global burden has increased significantly over the past few years. The incidence of pancreatic cancer has also increased in the United States, and most of this increase is attributed to the population's aging process in addition to the rise in the prevalence of risk factors such as obesity, diabetes, smoking, and alcohol intake. Most patients with pancreatic cancer present with advanced unresectable or metastatic disease. Only a few patients present at an early stage with localized disease, and a multidisciplinary approach is required to maximize survival and outcomes. The surgical approach is an option for localized disease, and surgery's safety and efficacy have also been improved in recent years due to the increasing use of minimally invasive surgical techniques. Moreover, systematic chemotherapy has also been used and has had a significant impact on survival. More recently, neoadjuvant therapy has been used for pancreatic cancer along with radiation therapy, optimizing survival among those patients. Targeted therapies have been introduced based on genetic testing in metastatic pancreatic cancer and have shown promising results. Moreover, immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted agents such as PARP inhibitors and vaccines have emerged with optimal results in terms of survival. To conclude, pancreatic cancer is considered a disease with poor long-term survival; however, recent developments in pharmacotherapy have changed its treatment and have improved outcomes with improved survival. Our review summarizes ongoing therapeutic options for local and metastatic pancreatic cancer. It also summarizes new state-of-the-art therapies that have emerged or are in trials, which can change the pancreatic cancer treatment perspective.

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and yield of blood sample collection in an investigator-initiated nationwide randomized controlled trial (RCT).

In the PREOPANC-2 trial, 375 patients with (borderline) resectable pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to two neoadjuvant regiments in 19 centers in the Netherlands (2018-2021). Blood sample collection was scheduled at seven time points before, during, and after treatment. The primary outcome was the proportion of successfully collected blood samples at each scheduled time point.

Of the 375 randomized patients, 12 were excluded from blood sample collection before any treatment. From the remaining 363 patients, 1513 (87 %) of 1748 blood samples were collected, processed, mailed, and centrally stored. The blood samples were collected before treatment from 347 (96 %) of the 363 patients, after the first neoadjuvant cycle from 322 (94 %) of 343 patients, after neoadjuvant treatment (i.e., before surgery) from 260 (83 %) of 313 patients, and after surgery from 210 (77 %) of 271 patients. During the follow-up visits, blood samples were collected from 147 (82 %) of 179 patients 12 months after randomization and from 83 (77 %) of 108 patients after 24 months. A total of 220 samples (13 %) were missing. The most common causes for missing blood samples were scheduling oversights, unsuccessful blood draw attempts, and mailing failures (151 times, 69 %). Blood sample collection was canceled 69 times (31 %) due to COVID-19.

Blood sample collection in the PREOPANC-2 trial had a yield of 96 % before treatment and an overall yield of 87 %. Collection of blood samples for biomarker studies is feasible in a nationwide RCT.

Despite the benefits of surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), over 30 % of patients fail to complete adjuvant oncological treatment. Whether postoperative complications affect chemotherapy completion rates and overall survival remains uncertain. We hypothesized that postoperative complications would be associated with chemotherapy delays, omission, and reduced overall survival (OS).

This was a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for PDAC from 2008 to 2022 to assess whether serious surgical complications, defined as Clavien Dindo Grade 3b or higher, were associated with the omission or delay of adjuvant oncologic treatment as well as OS.

A total of 920 patients were available for analysis. Pancreatic and bile leakage were associated with risk of chemotherapy omission (OR 1.97 [CI 95 % 1.25-3.12], p = 0.004 and OR 1.96 [CI 95 % 1.04-3.67], p = 0.032, respectively). No delay of adjuvant chemotherapy >90 days nor change in OS was found.

Major surgical complications influence the likelihood of omitting adjuvant chemotherapy but not delaying it > 90 days. Patients with pancreatic or bile leakage were at greater risk of not completing planned chemotherapy but had the same OS.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with a poor prognosis, and biomarkers to guide treatment decisions in PDAC are generally lacking. Intratumoural expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is a potential prognostic parameter in patients with PDAC undergoing surgical resection and postoperative chemotherapy. In the present study, DPD was analysed by immunohistochemistry of a tissue microarray platform including a real-world cohort of 495 patients with PDAC who had undergone resection with curative intent at any of three tertiary centres, including Northern, Western and Southeastern regions of Sweden, between 1993 and 2019. DPD level (high/low) was analysed and overall survival associations were assessed in treatment subgroups using a multivariate Cox regression model accounting for potential confounders. In patients who had not received adjuvant chemotherapy (n=182), the median overall survival time was 11.6 months (95% CI 9.6-13.5), compared with 28.8 months (25.0-32.6) among those who had (n=313; log-rank P<0.001). The most common type of chemotherapy was gemcitabine single agent (Gem, n=239) followed by gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GemCape, n=39). Tumour-Node-Metastasis (TNM) stage and DPD expression were statistically significant prognostic parameters in the Gem group (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.41, P=0.036), with high expression of DPD linked with worse survival. In addition, tumour grade and TNM stage were statistically significant prognostic factors in the group that did not receive any chemotherapy (P≤0.001). No statistically significant parameters were identified in the GemCape group. Taken together, intratumoural expression of DPD may be considered a prognostic marker for patients with PDAC treated with adjuvant gemcitabine following surgical resection, with low expression levels predicting better survival. Further studies in larger cohorts of patients receiving multi-drug or non-gemcitabine based regimens are warranted.

The postoperative overall survival of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is not optimal. The aim of this study was to explore the perioperative risk factors for overall survival after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). From January 2015 to January 2022, consecutive patients who underwent LPD with a pathological diagnosis of PDAC at our center were included in the study. LASSO regression and multivariate Cox regression were used to explore perioperative risk factors associated with overall survival. A total of 159 patients were included in the study. The median overall survival was 21 months. In the multivariate analysis, the level of direct bilirubin in serum (HR: 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02, P = 0.043), postoperative pancreatic fistula (HR: 0.36, 95% CI 0.18-0.86, P = 0.010), and adjuvant therapy after surgery within 12 weeks (HR: 0.53, 95% CI 0.34-0.83, P = 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors associated with overall survival. A high level of direct bilirubin in the serum, happened with postoperative pancreatic fistula and delayed postoperative adjuvant therapy are prognostic risk factors affecting the overall survival of patients with PDAC after LPD.

Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) and xenografts (PDXs) are powerful tools for personalized medicine in pancreatic cancer (PC) research. This study explores the complementary strengths of PDOs and PDXs in terms of practicality, genetic fidelity, cost, and labor considerations. Among other models like 2D cell cultures, spheroids, cancer-on-chip systems, cell line-derived xenografts (CDX), and genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs), PDOs and PDXs uniquely balance genetic fidelity and personalized medicine potential, offering distinct advantages over the simplicity of 2D cultures and the advanced, but often resource-intensive, GEMMs and cancer-on-chip systems. PDOs excel in high-throughput drug screening due to their ease of use, lower cost, and shorter experimental timelines. However, they lack a complete tumor microenvironment. Conversely, PDXs offer a more complex microenvironment that closely reflects patient tumors, potentially leading to more clinically relevant results. Despite limitations in size, number of specimens, and engraftment success, PDXs demonstrate significant concordance with patient responses to treatment, highlighting their value in personalized medicine. Both models exhibit significant genetic fidelity, making them suitable for drug sensitivity testing. The choice between PDOs and PDXs depends on the research focus, resource availability, and desired level of microenvironment complexity. PDOs are advantageous for high-throughput screening of a diverse array of potential therapeutic agents due to their relative ease of culture and scalability. PDXs, on the other hand, offer a more physiologically relevant model, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation of drug efficacy and mechanisms of action.

Background/Objectives: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a cancer with very poor prognosis despite early surgical management. To date, only clinical variables are used to predict outcome for decision-making about adjuvant therapy. We sought to generate a deep learning approach based on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or hematoxylin, eosin and saffron (HES) whole slides to predict patients' outcome, compare these new entities with known molecular subtypes and question their biological significance; Methods: We used as a training set a retrospective private cohort of 206 patients treated by surgery for PDAC cancer and a validation cohort of 166 non-metastatic patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) PDAC project. We estimated a multi-instance learning survival model to predict relapse in the training set and evaluated its performance in the validation set. RNAseq and exome data from the TCGA PDAC database were used to describe the transcriptomic and genomic features associated with deep learning classification; Results: Based on the estimation of an attention-based multi-instance learning survival model, we identified two groups of patients with a distinct prognosis. There was a significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between these two groups in the training set (hazard ratio HR = 0.72 [0.54;0.96]; p = 0.03) and in the validation set (HR = 0.63 [0.42;0.94]; p = 0.01). Transcriptomic and genomic features revealed that the poor prognosis group was associated with a squamous phenotype. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that deep learning could be used to predict PDAC prognosis and offer assistance in better choosing adjuvant treatment.

An increasing number of elderly patients are being diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, with increasing need to consider pancreatic surgery. This study aims to provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy in octogenarians.

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed via a search of Medline, PubMed and Cochrane databases. Studies comparing outcomes of patients >80 years to younger patients undergoing PD were included.

26 studies were included. This included 22481 patients, with 20134 (89.6%) aged <80 years old, and 2347 (10.4%) octogenarians. Octogenarians were associated with higher rates of mortality (OR 2.37 (95%CI 1.91-2.94, p < 0.00001)), all-cause morbidity (OR 1.60 (95%CI 1.30-1.96), p<0.00001) and re-operation (OR 1.41 (95%CI 1.13-1.75), p = 0.002). Octogenarians had a two-fold risk of cardiac complications and respiratory complications (OR 2.13 (95%CI 1.67-2.73), p < 0.00001), (OR 2.38 (95%CI 1.72-3.27), p < 0.0001). There was no difference in postoperative pancreatic fistula, post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage or delayed gastric emptying. Younger patients were more likely to return to adjuvant therapy (OR 0.20 (95%CI 0.12-0.34), p < 0.00001).

Octogenerians are associated with higher mortality rate, postoperative complications, and reduced likelihood to undergo adjuvant therapy. Careful preoperative assessment and selection of elderly patients for consideration of pancreatic surgery is essential.

This systematic review aims to evaluate the methodology used in pancreatic cancer (PC) randomised controlled trials (RCTs) measuring quality of life (QOL) and focuses on the type, frequency, survey compliance and duration of these assessments.

Systematic review of PC RCTs measuring QOL.

A search of PubMed.gov and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted for PC RCTs measuring QOL from inception to 21 March 2023. Only phase III RCTs were included. Studies were excluded if QOL was not measured, the study was phase I/II, in the second-line setting or unavailable in English. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers in a standardised fashion.

Primary outcomes included the type of QOL instrument used, the timing and frequency of assessments, methods of analysis and survey completion rates (SCRs) over time. Secondary outcomes included patient demographics, significant QOL improvements and the frequency of trials measuring QOL.

Out of 269 studies screened, 54 RCTs were identified, and 24 measured QOL (involving 11 229 patients). Instruments used included the EORTC QLQ-C30 (n=15), FACT-HEP (n=3), Spitzer-QOL-Index (n=2), EQ-5D (n=2), LASA (n=1) and FACT-PA (n=1). Most trials assessed QOL until disease progression or death (10/24), with 4-week intervals being the most common (7/24). SCRs were reported in 15/24 trials, with disease stage influencing SCRs over time. In trials with metastatic, locally advanced/metastatic, and resectable disease, the median times to reach a 50% response rate-defined as the point where the number of surveys completed was half of the enrolled participants-were 12.41 weeks (n=2), 14.14 weeks (n=10), and 54.2 weeks (n=3), respectively." Only 2/24 trials reported significant QOL improvements between treatment arms. Patient age was reported in all trials, while race/ethnicity was only reported in 4/24 trials.

Significant variability exists in the timing, methods and reporting of QOL assessments in PC trials. There is a need for further research to assess the implications of missing data and consider the temporality of QOL assessment in patients with advanced cancers and poor prognosis.

Pancreatic neoplasm, a highly aggressive and often fatal cancer, poses challenges due to late detection and nonspecific symptoms. Therefore, both early diagnosis and appropriate therapeutic approaches are necessary to augment the condition of these patients. Cancer cells undergo metabolic deregulation, which enables their proliferation, survival, and invasion. As a result, it is crucial to focus on the metabolic pathways in prevalent cancers and explore treatment strategies that target these pathways to control tumor growth effectively. This is particularly relevant in cancers like pancreatic cancer, which undergo numerous metabolic alterations. The ketogenic regimen, characterized by low carbohydrate and protein contents and high-fat sources, does not involve caloric restriction. This allows for the induction of ketogenesis and an increase in ketone bodies, while insulin and glucose levels remain low even after meals. This unique metabolic state may influence the tumor microenvironment. Given the lack of unanimous agreement on the precise role and mechanism of the ketogenic diet, this review aims to clarify the diagnostic value and accuracy of ketone bodies in various types of pancreatic tumors and explore the potential anti-cancer effects of the ketogenic diet when used alone or in conjunction with chemotherapy, also to determine the potential of the ketogenic diet to be used as adjuvant therapy. The outcomes of this study are instrumental in enhancing our understanding of the benefits and drawbacks associated with employing this diet for the management and diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy is a standard therapeutic option for resected pancreatic cancer. However, the risk factors for incompletion of adjuvant chemotherapy remain unclear.

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 72 patients who underwent radical pancreatectomy and received S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. The patients were assigned to two groups according to their completion or incompletion of adjuvant chemotherapy. We compared the perioperative skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) and nutritional status using prognostic nutritional index (PNI) between the two groups.

The completion and incompletion groups included 46 (64 %) and 26 (36 %) patients, respectively. Overall survival was shorter in the incompletion group than in the completion group (median survival time, 20.2 months vs. 42.0 months; log-rank, p = 0.018). Decreasing rate of PNI (12.7 % vs. 0.2 %, p = 0.010) and decreasing rate of SMI (26.9 % vs. 12.5 %, p = 0.001) were significantly larger in the incompletion group than in the completion group. Multivariate analysis showed that decreasing rate of PNI (p = 0.016), decreasing rate of SMI (p = 0.013), and old age (p = 0.049) were independent risk factors for incompletion of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. Regarding the time-series variations, PNI improved from 1 to 3 months after pancreatectomy in the completion group (p = 0.006). Furthermore, the decreasing slope of SMI was stronger in the incompletion group.

Postoperative decrease of PNI and SMI is associated with the incompletion of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy.

Despite some recent advances, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a growing oncological challenge. New drugs capable of targeting more than one oncogenic pathway may be one way to improve patient outcomes. This study characterizes the effectiveness of Metavert a first-in-class dual inhibitor of GSK3-β and histone deacetylase in treating PDAC as a single agent or in combination with standard cytotoxics.

Thirty-six Patient-Derived Organoids (hPDOs) characterised by RNASeq and whole exome sequencing were treated with Metavert alone or in combination with standard cytotoxics. Transcriptomic signatures (TS) representing sensitivity to Metavert alone or sensitivity to Metavert + irinotecan (IR) were evaluated in 47 patient samples, chemo-naïve in 26 and post-chemotherapy in 21 (gemcitabine=5; FOLFIRINOX=14, both=2) with companion multiplexed immunofluorescence and RNASeq data.

Metavert combined with gemcitabine, irinotecan, 5FU, oxaliplatin, and paclitaxel was synergistic in the hPDOs. Basal-subtype hPDOs were more sensitive to Metavert alone whereas the Metavert+IR combination exhibited synergy in Classical-subtype hPDOs with increased apoptosis and autophagy. hPDO-derived TS evaluated in PDAC tissues demonstrated that Metavert-TSHi samples were enriched for mRNA splicing and DNA repair processes; they were associated with Basal-like tissues but also with GATA6+ve-chemo-naïve samples and were higher following gemcitabine but not FOLFIRINOX treatment. In contrast, Metavert+IR-TSHI samples were enriched for TP53 pathways; they were associated with Classical-like pretreatment samples and with GATA6+ve/KRT17+ve hybrid cell types following FOLFIRINOX, but not gemcitabine treatment, and were unrelated to transcriptional subtypes.

Metavert as a single agent and in combination with irinotecan offers novel strategies for treating pancreatic cancer.

Despite advances in surgical procedures, cancer recurrence still affects a substantial proportion of patients for whom surgery is considered a curative therapy. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of RIOT, addressing its definition, influencing factors, and clinical implications.

RIOT can be defined as a continuous variable as the time from surgery to initiation of adjuvant therapies or categorically as whether patients can successfully receive adjuvant therapies or not. Factors influencing RIOT are age, sex, socioeconomic status, access to healthcare, physical performance and comorbidities, and quality of anesthesia and surgical care. Adjuvant therapies such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy are often administered to reduce the risk of recurrence after surgery and improve survival. Return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT) has emerged as a promising outcome metric reflecting patients' functional recovery after surgery and their ability to receive adjuvant therapies.

Caveolin-1 (Cav1) expressed in cancer cells (cCav1) or cancer-associated fibroblasts (fCav1) exerts either pro- or anti-tumorigenic effects depending on the cancer type or stage of cancer. We aimed to clarify the impact of cCav1 or fCav1 on survival, recurrence patterns, and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Tissue microarrays were constructed including 615 patients who underwent curative resection for PDAC. Cav1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Patients were divided into two groups based on Cav1 expression in cancer cells (cCav1high vs. cCav1low) or cancer-associated fibroblasts (fCav1high vs. fCav1low).

Among all 615 patients, 40.7% were cCav1high and 72.7% were fCav1high. cCav1high was associated with worse overall survival (OS) (p = 0.001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p = 0.001) than cCav1low, and was an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis of OS and RFS (OS: p = 0.001, hazard ratio [HR] 1.361; RFS: p = 0.001, HR 1.348). Among 596 patients with resectable/borderline resectable PDAC, cCav1high patients with NAC showed better OS than those without, while there was no significant difference between cCav1low patients with NAC and those without. cCav1high was associated with early recurrence (< 6 months) and liver metastasis after resection. Multivariate analysis revealed cCav1high as an independent predictor of liver metastasis.

cCav1high correlated with worse survival, early recurrence, and liver metastasis after resection for PDAC, while NAC improved survival in cCav1high patients. The Evaluation of cCav1 status could provide additional information contributing to the personalized management of PDAC.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has emerged as an effective and minimally invasive treatment for pancreatic lesions, particularly in patients at high surgical risk. Utilizing thermal energy, RFA induces the coagulative necrosis of the tissue and potentially triggers immunomodulation by releasing intracellular antigens. Numerous studies have confirmed the technical feasibility, safety, and efficacy of EUS-RFA in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and premalignant cystic lesions, with an acceptable profile of adverse events. The technique's potential immunomodulatory effects offer intriguing implications for the treatment of advanced pancreatic malignancies, encouraging further evaluation. This review paper aims to highlight the EUS-RFA principles, technology, and clinical applications in various pancreatic lesions and safety, and the future research directions.

Nerve invasion (NI) is a characteristic feature of pancreatic cancer. Traditional dichotomous statements on the presence of NI are unreasonable because almost all cases exhibit NI when sufficient pathological sections are examined. The critical implications of NI in pancreatic cancer highlight the need for a more effective criterion. This study included 511 patients, who were categorized into a training group and a testing group at a ratio of 7:3. According to the traditional definition, NI was observed in 91.2 % of patients using five pathological slides in our study. The prevalence of NI increased as more pathological slides were used. The criterion of 'two points of intraneural (endoneural) invasion in the case of four pathological slides' has the highest receiver operating characteristic (ROC) score. Based on this new criterion, NI was proved to be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) and was also correlated with tumor recurrence (P = 0.004). Interestingly, gemcitabine-based chemotherapy regimen is an independent favorable factor for patients with high NI. In the high NI group, patients who received a gemcitabine-based regimen exhibited a better prognosis than those who did not receive the gemcitabine-based regimen for OS (P = 0.000) and DFS (P = 0.001). In conclusion, this study establishes assessment criteria to evaluate the severity of NI in order to predict patient outcomes.

Early recurrence (ER) is associated with dismal outcomes in patients undergoing radical resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Approaches for predicting ER will help clinicians in implementing individualized adjuvant therapies. Postoperative serum tumor markers (STMs) are indicators of tumor progression and may improve current systems for predicting ER.

To establish an improved nomogram based on postoperative STMs to predict ER in PDAC.

We retrospectively enrolled 282 patients who underwent radical resection for PDAC at our institute between 2019 and 2021. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of variables with or without postoperative STMs, were performed to identify independent risk factors for ER. A nomogram was constructed based on the independent postoperative STMs. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the area under the curve (AUC) of the nomogram. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival plot and log-rank test.

Postoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen levels, preoperative carbohydrate antigen 125 levels, perineural invasion, and pTNM stage III were independent risk factors for ER in PDAC. The postoperative STMs-based nomogram (AUC: 0.774, 95%CI: 0.713-0.835) had superior accuracy in predicting ER compared with the nomogram without postoperative STMs (AUC: 0.688, 95%CI: 0.625-0.750) (P = 0.016). Patients with a recurrence nomogram score (RNS) > 1.56 were at high risk for ER, and had significantly poorer recurrence-free survival [median: 3.08 months, interquartile range (IQR): 1.80-8.15] than those with RNS ≤ 1.56 (14.00 months, IQR: 6.67-24.80), P < 0.001).

The postoperative STMs-based nomogram improves the predictive accuracy of ER in PDAC, stratifies the risk of ER, and identifies patients at high risk of ER for tailored adjuvant therapies.

Pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest cancers globally, with limited success from existing therapies, including chemotherapies and immunotherapies like checkpoint inhibitors for patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). A promising new approach is the use of oncolytic viruses (OV), a form of immunotherapy that has been demonstrated clinical effectiveness in various cancers. Here we investigated the potential of the oncolytic coxsackievirus B3 strain (CVB3) PD-H as a new treatment for pancreatic cancer. In vitro, PD-H exhibited robust replication, as measured by plaque assays, and potent lytic activity, as assessed by XTT assays, in most pancreatic tumor cell lines, outperforming two other coxsackievirus strains tested, H3N-375/1TS and CVA21. Thus, H3N-375/1TS showed efficient replication and lytic efficiency in distinctly fewer tumor cell lines, while most tumor cells were resistant to CVA21. The oncolytic efficiency of the three OV largely correlated with mRNA expression levels of viral receptors and their ability to induce apoptosis, as measured by cleaved caspase 3/7 activity in the tumor cells. In a syngeneic mouse model with subcutaneous pancreatic tumors, intratumoral administration of PD-H significantly inhibited tumor growth but did not completely stop tumor progression. Importantly, no virus-related side effects were observed. Although pancreatic tumors respond to PD-H treatment, its therapeutic efficacy is limited. Combining PD-H with other treatments, such as those aiming at reducing the desmoplastic stroma which impedes viral infection and spread within the tumor, may enhance its efficacy.

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most aggressive solid tumors. As a systemic disease, despite the improvement of multi-modality treatment strategies, the prognosis of pancreatic cancer was not improved dramatically. For resectable or borderline resectable patients, the surgical strategy centered on improving R0 resection rate is consensus; however, the role of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable patients and the optimal neoadjuvant therapy of chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy in borderline resectable patients were debated. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy of gemcitabine/capecitabine or mFOLFIRINOX is recommended regardless of the margin status. Chemotherapy as the first-line treatment strategy for advanced or metastatic patients included FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, or NALIRIFOX regimens whereas 5-FU plus liposomal irinotecan was the only standard of care second-line therapy. Immunotherapy is an innovative therapy although anti-PD-1 antibody is currently the only agent approved by for MSI-H, dMMR, or TMB-high solid tumors, which represent a very small subset of pancreatic cancers. Combination strategies to increase the immunogenicity and to overcome the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment may sensitize pancreatic cancer to immunotherapy. Targeted therapies represented by PARP and KRAS inhibitors are also under investigation, showing benefits in improving progression-free survival and objective response rate. This review discusses the current treatment modalities and highlights innovative therapies for pancreatic cancer.