For: | Li NP, Liu JQ, Zhou ZQ, Ji TY, Cai XY, Zhu QY. Ampulla dilation with different sized balloons to remove common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(6): 903-908 [PMID: 23431070 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i6.903] |
---|---|
URL: | https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i6/903.htm |
Number | Citing Articles |
1 |
Qian Zhang, Lili Chen, Jun Liu, Weiwei Chen, Meng Zhou, Chaowu Chen. Comparison of 12- and 15-mm endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation combined with a limited endoscopic sphincterotomy for large bile duct stones: A propensity score-matched analysis. Arab Journal of Gastroenterology 2025; doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2025.03.003
|
2 |
Hao Dong, Wengang Zhang, Xingping Lyu, Xiao Li, Jiafeng Wang, Yujie Feng, Chenyi Zhao, Ningli Chai, Enqiang Linghu. Long-term prognosis and risk factors associated with post-ERCP pneumobilia in patients with common bile duct stones. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2024; 99(4): 577 doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.11.016
|
3 |
Dai Akiyama, Tsuyoshi Hamada, Hiroyuki Isayama, Yousuke Nakai, Takeshi Tsujino, Gyotane Umefune, Naminatsu Takahara, Dai Mohri, Hirofumi Kogure, Saburo Matsubara, Yukiko Ito, Natsuyo Yamamoto, Naoki Sasahira, Minoru Tada, Kazuhiko Koike. Superiority of 10-mm-wide Balloon over 8-mm-wide Balloon in Papillary Dilation for Bile Duct Stones: A Matched Cohort Study. Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology 2015; 21(4): 213 doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.161634
|
4 |
Toshio Fujisawa, Koichi Kagawa, Kantaro Hisatomi, Kensuke Kubota, Atsushi Nakajima, Nobuyuki Matsuhashi. Is endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation really a risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis?. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2016; 22(26): 5909-5916 doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i26.5909
|
5 |
Byoung Wook Bang, Tae Hoon Lee, Tae Jun Song, Joung-Ho Han, Hyun Jong Choi, Jong Ho Moon, Chang-Il Kwon, Seok Jeong. Twenty-Second versus Sixty-Second Dilation Duration in Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation for the Treatment of Small Common Bile Duct Stones: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial. Clinical Endoscopy 2015; 48(1): 59 doi: 10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.59
|