Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Psychiatr. Mar 22, 2017; 7(1): 34-43
Published online Mar 22, 2017. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v7.i1.34
Published online Mar 22, 2017. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v7.i1.34
Ref. | Participants | Treatment | Treatment duration (wk) | Imaging method | Experimental task | Neural treatment effects | Direction of change |
Cognitive remediation | |||||||
Wykes et al[8] | SCH = 2 | CRT | 12 | SPECT | Verbal fluency | Bilateral frontal, temporal, parietal and occipital | ↑ |
Penadés et al[9] | SCH = 2 | CRT | 12 | SPECT | Tower of London | Prefrontal activity | ↑ |
Wexler et al[11] | SCH = 8 | CRT | 10 | fMRI | Auditory verbal memory | L inferior frontal | ↑ |
Penadés et al[10] | SCH = 8 | CRT | 12 | SPECT | Tower of London | Prefrontal activity | ↑ |
Wykes et al[12] | SCH = 12 HC =6 | CRT OC HC | 12 | fMRI | N-back | R inferior frontal gyrus and bilateral occipital activity | ↑ |
Eack et al[20] | SCH = 53 | CET EST | 52 | MRI | - | Loss of GM in temporal cortex, including the L parahippocampal gyrus, L amygdala, bilateral anterior cingulate, and L hippocampus | ↓ |
GM in L amygdala | ↑ | ||||||
Haut et al[13] | SCH = 21 HC = 9 | CRT CBSST | 6 | fMRI | N-back, lexical task | L prefrontal activity | Case report series |
Rowland et al[15] | SCH = 17 HC = 17 | CRT | < 1 | fMRI, VBM | L amygdala, bilateral inferior parietal regions | ↑ | |
Controls also exhibited activation reductions in region and spatial extent with relational learning proficiency | ↓ | ||||||
Edwards et al[14] | SCH = 22 HC = 14 | CRT | 22 | fMRI | Continuous performance task | R middle frontal R superior parietal cortex R inferior frontal junction R visual cortex Cerebellum | ↑↓ |
Bor et al[16] | SCH = 20 HC = 15 | CRT | 8 | fMRI | N-back | L inferior/middle frontal gyrus, cingulate gyrus and inferior parietal lobule activity | ↑ |
Subramaniam et al[19] | SCH = 31 HC = 16 | AT | 13 | fMRI | Word generation and recognition | Medial PFC activity | ↑ |
Penadés et al[21] | SCH = 31 HC = 16 | CRT SST | 15 | fMRI, DTI | N-back | L superior parietal lobule and bilateral middle frontal gyri activity | ↑ |
DMN activity in L precuneus and middle frontal gyrus | ↓ | ||||||
FA in CC and R posterior thalamic radiations | ↑ | ||||||
Vianin et al[22] | SCH = 16 | CRT | 8 | fMRI | Verbal fluency | Inferior parietal lobule, precentral gyrus, Broca’s area, middle occipital cortex, middle cingulate cortex, and superior parietal lobule activity | ↑ |
Subramaniam et al[23] | HC = 15 SCH = 30 | AT | 15 | fMRI | N-back | Middle frontal and inferior frontal gyri activity | ↑ |
Social-cognitive remediation | |||||||
Haut et al[13] | SCH = 20 HC = 10 | TAR TAU | 10 | fMRI | Facial affect recognition | L middle and superior occipital lobe, R inferior and superior parietal cortex, and L and R inferior frontal cortex activity | ↑ |
Combination of cognitive and social-cognitive remediation | |||||||
Hooker et al[17] | SCH = 22 | AT + SCT | 11 | fMRI | Facial emotion recognition | Postcentral gyrus activity | ↑ |
Hooker et al[18] | SCH = 22 | AT + SCT | 11 | fMRI | Facial emotion recognition | L and R amygdala, R putamen and R medial prefrontal cortex | ↑ |
- Citation: Penadés R, González-Rodríguez A, Catalán R, Segura B, Bernardo M, Junqué C. Neuroimaging studies of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia: A systematic and critical review. World J Psychiatr 2017; 7(1): 34-43
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v7/i1/34.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v7.i1.34