Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Psychiatr. Sep 22, 2015; 5(3): 305-314
Published online Sep 22, 2015. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v5.i3.305
Published online Sep 22, 2015. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v5.i3.305
Table 3 Suggested grading of performance on the months backward test
Simple grading: |
0 = The subject cannot engage meaningfully with testing procedures |
1 = The subject engages but cannot complete the test, even with prompting |
2 = The subject completes the test, but with prompting and/or errors |
3 = The subject completes the test without error within 30 s (under 65 years old) or 60 s (over 65 years old) |
Detailed grading (e.g., for research) |
0 The subject does not understand that they are being assessed? i.e., lacking basic awareness |
1 The subject understands that they are being assessed |
2 The subject understands the “rules” of the test (i.e., can grasp/ comprehend the test) |
3 The subject engages with testing procedures, e.g., recite months forward (i.e., focused attention) |
4 The subject engages in a sustained manner, i.e., sustained attention |
5 The subject successfully shifts to backwards testing, i.e., shift attention |
6 The subject can reach July |
7 The subject can reach January |
8 If the subject makes any errors, they recognise this and/or try to correct the errors |
9 The subject completes the test without errors |
10 Completion of the test takes less than 90 s/60 s/30 s |
- Citation: Meagher J, Leonard M, Donoghue L, O’Regan N, Timmons S, Exton C, Cullen W, Dunne C, Adamis D, Maclullich AJ, Meagher D. Months backward test: A review of its use in clinical studies. World J Psychiatr 2015; 5(3): 305-314
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v5/i3/305.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v5.i3.305