Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Psychiatr. Jun 22, 2015; 5(2): 210-221
Published online Jun 22, 2015. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v5.i2.210
Table 2 Olfactory studies
Ref.AuthorsPassive smellingYearModalitySubject group(s) Finding
[46]Zatorre et al1992PETHealthy subjectsPiri (B) and OFC (RH)
[53]Levy et al1997FMRIHealthy subjectsP and UP: piri, amyg, hippocam, cing and post inf front cortex (laterality not specified)
[43]Sobel et al1998FMRIHealthy subjectsPassive smelling, lat OFC; Sniffing-piri (B) and post OFC (B)
[48]Savic et al2000PETHealthy subjectsOFC (RH), amyg/piri (RH), thal (RH), insula (LH), ant cing
[49]Gottfried et al2002FMRIHealthy subjectsP and UP: Amyg (B), post OFC (B), post piri (B), insula (RH)
[45]Royet et al2003FMRIHealthy subjectsUP and P odorants-piri/amyg, hypothal, sup temp, insula and OFC, ant cing
[44]Kareken et al2004PETHealthy subjectsPiri (B), amyg (B), insula (B); sniffing lateral OFC (B)
[47]Kjelvik et al2012FMRIHealthy subjectsPiri (B), amyg (B), OFC (B) and thal (B) cing (RH), insula (LH)
[25]Plailly et al2006PETPsychosis patientsHC > SZ Piri (LH) and inf front (LH)
SZ > HC insula (RH)
Good et alUnder reviewFMRIPsychosis patientsHC > SZ thal (RH), caud (B), ant cing, OFC (B only midly greater), mid temp gyrus (B)
Hedonics (Valence)
[55]Zald et al1997PETHealthy subjectsAversive odorant- amyg and OFC; less aversive- only OFC (LH)
[56]Fulbright et al1998FMRIHealthy subjectsPleasant- BA 46/9 (RH), 32 (LH), 8 (B) 6 (RH) and insula (B); Unpleasant- 46/9 (RH), 32 (LH), 6 (B), insula (RH)
[57]Royet et al2000PETHealthy subjectsHedonic judgement- ant cing, OFC (LH), sup front (LH), midd front gyrus (LH), inf midd temporal (LH)
[49]Gottfried et al2002FMRIHealthy subjectsUP: insula (RH), lat hypothal (LH), amyg (RH), post OFC (L); P: piri (RH), insula (RH), post OFC (RH)
[45]Royet et al2003FMRIHealthy subjectsHedonic valence -UP > P: piri (LH), amyg (LH); P > U: cing (LH)
[58]Rolls et al2003FMRIHealthy subjectsP: med OFC; ant cing
[54]Anderson et al2003FMRIHealthy subjects
[72]Crespo-Facorro et al2001PETPsychosis patientsHC > SZ P vs UP: insula (LH), para hipp (LH), sup temp gyrus (LH), accumbens (RH), lingual gyrus (B), cb. vermis (LH) SZ > HC Med OFC (B), DLPFC (B), med front (LH), lat front (RH), lat front (LH), front operculum (LH), parahipp (RH), post cing (LH)
[25]Plailly et al2006PETPsychosis patientsHC > SZ Insula (LH) and Inf front (LH)
[27]Schneider et al2007FMRIPsychosis patientsHC > SZ UP: Midd temp gyrus (RH) Midd front gyrus (RH) Insula; P: thal (L) SZ > HC UP: Midd front (RH) ant cing (RH)
Intensity
[54]Anderson et al2003FMRIHealthy subjectsAmyg (B)
[63]Winsto et al2005FMRIHealthy subjectsAmyg, (but only at the extremes of valence), OFC and piri
Familiarity
[60]Royet et al1999PETHealthy subjectsMed frontal (RH), inf front (LH), sup front(LH) cingulate (B)
[57]Royet et al2000PETHealthy subjectsOFC (B), ant cing, sup front (LH) midd front (RH)
[25]Plailly et al2006PETPsychosis patientsHC > SZ piri (LH), sup temp gyrus(LH), gyrus rectus(RH), OFC (LH), inf OFC (LH)
Identification
[47]Kjelvik et al2012FMRIHealthy subjectsCorrectly identified entorhinal cortex (LH), Hippocam (RH), parahippocam gyrus (B), OFC and piriform cortices Incorrectly identified: OFC and piri cortices
[73]Clark et al1991PETPsychosis patientsHC > SZ front (B) parietal (B); Norm > Micro thal (RH) and basal ganglia
[33]Malaspina et al1998SPECTPsychosis patientsHC > SZ inf. Front (RH), sup temp (RH) supramarg/angular gyrus (RH) HC (but not SZ) hippocam(B), fusiform(RH)
Genetic Trait
[27]Schneider et al2007FMRIPsychosis patientsHC > FDR UP: mid front gyrus(RH) FDR > HC P: ant cing(LH)