Brief Article
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Psychiatr. Mar 22, 2014; 4(1): 13-29
Published online Mar 22, 2014. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v4.i1.13
Table 3 Main problematic experiences by informant type, and pre- to post-intervention changes
Type of informantProblematic experience rated on the APESAPES level at preAPES level at post
VAMC administrators (n = 2)Admin 1: Employee perceptions of discriminatory practices (the allegations)25, 6
Admin 2: Personal experience of the allegations25
Admin 2: Existing practices at the VAMC0, 16
Admin 1: Management-union relationship1.52.5
Admin 2: Management-union relationship1.5-23
Union representatives (n = 2)Union 1: Lack of communication (management and unions)22.5
Union 1: Lack of employee empowerment26
Union 1: Resenting interventionists “interfering”23
Union 2: Management “doing as they please” (discriminatory hiring and promotions, lack of accountability, resulting employee disempowerment)23
VAMC employees (n = 240)Existing practices (racism, favoritism, unfairness), caused by uncaring or weak leadership, result in negative workplace climate, low morale, disempowerment of employees1, 2, 35, 6
Intolerant, adversarial attitudes by supervisors of certain areas cause no cohesion between staff1, 24, 5
VAMC-wide lack of communication, training, and support for job-related tasks2, 33, 4, 5
Understaffing creates many problems which are not addressed by leadership2, 33
Bad public image of the VAMC is unfair and depressing0, 1, 23.5, 4