Copyright
©2013 Baishideng.
World J Psychiatr. Jun 22, 2013; 3(2): 34-40
Published online Jun 22, 2013. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v3.i2.34
Published online Jun 22, 2013. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v3.i2.34
Table 1 Factors associated with receiving more urgent triage categories after presentation for suicide ideation and communication or non-fatal suicidal behaviour, ordered logistic regression, 2005 to 2010, persons per year
Variables | OR | 95%CI | P value |
Sex (ref. = female ) | 1.12 | 1.04-1.22 | 0.004 |
Age (yr) | |||
10-24 | 1.00 | ||
25-44 | 1.39 | 1.27-1.52 | < 0.001 |
45-64 | 1.75 | 1.56-1.96 | < 0.001 |
≥ 65 | 2.37 | 1.90-2.96 | < 0.001 |
Attempt (ref. = SIC) | 3.93 | 3.57-4.34 | < 0.001 |
Present (ref. = 1 only) | 1.15 | 1.05-1.27 | 0.003 |
Multiple method (ref. = 1 only) | 1.63 | 1.46-1.82 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Milner A, Kõlves K, Kõlves K, Gladman B, De Leo D. Treatment priority for suicide ideation and behaviours at an Australian emergency department. World J Psychiatr 2013; 3(2): 34-40
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v3/i2/34.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v3.i2.34