Analysis of influencing factors of psychological resilience in patients with traumatic fractures and its effect on posttraumatic growth

Table 1 General data of the better and poor resilience groups, n (%)

Data	Better resilience group (n = 80)	Poor resilience group (n = 108)	χ2	P value
Gender			5.113	0.024
Male (n = 114)	56 (70.00)	58 (53.70)
Female (n = 74)	24 (30.00)	50 (46.30)
Age (years)			4.516	0.034
< 40 (n = 85)	29 (36.25)	56 (51.85)
≥ 40 (n = 103)	51 (63.75)	52 (48.15)
Cause of injury			1.086	0.581
Traffic accident (n = 105)	45 (56.25)	60 (55.56)
Falling from heights (n = 54)	25 (31.25)	29 (26.85)
Others (n = 29)	10 (12.50)	19 (17.59)
Severity of trauma			6.521	0.038
Minor injury (n = 71)	38 (47.50)	33 (30.56)
Serious injury (n = 46)	19 (23.75)	27 (25.00)
Critical injury (n = 71)	23 (28.75)	48 (44.44)
Fracture site			1.252	0.535
Tibial shaft fracture (n = 59)	22 (27.50)	37 (34.26)
Radius fracture (n = 70)	30 (37.50)	40 (37.04)
Humeral fracture (n = 59)	28 (35.00)	31 (28.70)
Personality			7.315	0.007
Extroversion (n = 73)	40 (50.00)	33 (30.56)
Introversion (n = 115)	40 (50.00)	75 (69.44)