Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Psychiatry. Jun 19, 2024; 14(6): 904-912
Published online Jun 19, 2024. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i6.904
Published online Jun 19, 2024. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i6.904
Table 2 Comparison of swallowing function classification between the two groups pre- and post-intervention, n (%)
| Group | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |||||
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |
| Coalition group (n = 45) | 0 (0.00) | 18 (40.00) | 9 (20.00) | 14 (31.11) | 12 (26.67) | 7 (15.56) | 15 (33.33) | 5 (11.11) | 9 (20.00) | 1 (2.22) |
| Regular group (n = 45) | 0 (0.00) | 8 (17.78) | 10 (22.22) | 11 (24.44) | 11 (24.44) | 10 (22.22) | 16 (35.56) | 9 (20.00) | 8 (17.78) | 7 (15.56) |
| χ2 | - | 5.409 | 0.067 | 0.498 | 0.058 | 0.653 | 0.049 | 1.353 | 0.073 | 4.939 |
| P value | - | 0.020 | 0.796 | 0.480 | 0.809 | 0.419 | 0.824 | 0.245 | 0.788 | 0.026 |
- Citation: Song J, Wang JD, Chen D, Chen J, Huang JF, Fang M. Effect of a systemic intervention combined with a psychological intervention in stroke patients with oropharyngeal dysfunction. World J Psychiatry 2024; 14(6): 904-912
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v14/i6/904.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v14.i6.904