Personalized and continuous care intervention affects rehabilitation, living quality, and negative emotions of patients with breast cancer

Table 3 Comparison of limb shoulder joint activity of the affected limb between the routing and the intervention groups (°, mean ± SD)

Time	Group	Case	Anteflexion	Posterior extension	Abduction	Internal rotation	External rotation
T1
	Routing group	134	150.39 ± 11.57	40.75 ± 3.25	161.97 ± 8.14	72.10 ± 5.63	77.26 ± 5.72
	Intervention group	66	148.97 ± 13.99	39.68 ± 5.24	163.03 ± 7.21	73.97 ± 7.67	75.70 ± 6.69
	t value		0.760	1.514	0.899	1.763	1.629
	P value		0.448	0.134	0.370	0.081	0.106
T2
	Routing group	134	123.90 ± 14.14a	28.49 ± 4.58a	115.48 ± 7.37a	60.00 ± 8.66a	64.37 ± 5.29a
	Intervention group	66	130.97 ± 17.07a	32.83 ± 5.59a	126.21 ± 9.40a	64.65 ± 9.34a	67.58 ± 8.44a
	t value		3.102	5.470	8.131	3.481	2.822
	P value		0.002	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.001	0.006

^aP < 0.05, comparison of the same group before care.

T₁: Before care intervention; T₂: After one month of care intervention.