Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Psychiatry. Sep 19, 2023; 13(9): 607-619
Published online Sep 19, 2023. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v13.i9.607
Table 8 Development of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease
Ref.
Method
Result
Adverse events
Significance
Spagnolo et al[84], 201410 Hz DTMS for PF stimulationUPDRS was improvedSlight and transitory hypotension and headacheDTMS might be a safe treatment for PD motor symptoms
Cohen et al[87], 2018M1 + PFC or M1M1 + PFC OR M1 group was improved in T-UPDRS and M-UPDRSMild and transient head discomfort, transient fatigue, and rare mild visual transient hallucinations during stimulationDTMS improved PD motor symptoms but the effect was moderate
Torres et al[80], 2015M1 + PFCUPDRS was improvedSleepiness, headaches, and nauseaDTMS improved motor, postural, and motivational symptoms of PD patients
Cohen et al[88], 20161 Hz DTMS M1 and 10 Hz DTMS PFCUPDRS was improvedHeadache, dizziness, pain in the head or neck during treatment; nausea, general weakness, and transient aggravation of gait disturbanceDTMS improved motor, but no advantage compared to sham treatment
Spagnolo et al[85], 2020M1 + PFC or M1UPDRS was improvedMild, not-distressing, and transient dyskinesiasDTMS was a safe and potentially effective procedure
Cohen et al[87], 20181 Hz M1 or 10 Hz PFCUPDRS was improvedHeadache, nausea, and discomfort of the eye region or tearing of the eyes during stimulationDTMS can decrease the subjective motor symptom severity and depression