Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Psychiatry. Apr 19, 2023; 13(4): 182-190
Published online Apr 19, 2023. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v13.i4.182
Table 2 User satisfaction with the different device
Ref.
Device
Positive
Negative
Suggested improvements
Macias et al[30], 2015WellWavePersonal messages, reading library-Test whether learning how to use the app can increase personal satisfaction
Naslund et al[31], 2016Wearable deviceSelf-monitoringDifficulties of useMake tutorials on the use of the device
Naslund et al[32], 2016Wearable deviceSelf-monitoringDifficulties of useMake tutorials on the use of the device. Participants are satisfied with the use of the app
Aschbrenner et al[27], 2016WearabledeviceSelf-monitoringDifficulties of useMake tutorials on the use of the device before. High level of satisfaction
Haller et al[28], 2018Web platformEasy to use, self-monitoringDoes not include follow-upInclude monitoring as web-based apps show a trend towards non-use over time. Show a trend towards non-use over time
Lambert et al[29], 2018eMotionSelf-monitoringNot assessedNot assessed
Naslund et al[33], 2018FacebookAccessibility, facilitates communication between people in the same condition. Allows information sharing and feedbackNot assessedNot assessed
Pfirrmann et al[34], 2018WebForum. Unspecific informationNot assessedNot assessed
Young and Morgan[35], 2018SHED-ITSelf-monitoringNot assessedLonger-term programme of longer duration