Clinical application of multidisciplinary team- and evidence-based practice project in gynecological patients with perioperative hypothermia

Table 2 Quality evaluation results of the included systematic reviews

Indicators	Galvão et al[17]	Moola and Lockwood[18]	Wang and Mao[16]
Was an “a priori” design provided?	Yes	Yes	Yes
Was there duplicate study selection and data extraction?	Yes	Yes	Yes
Was a comprehensive literature search performed?	Yes	Yes	Yes
Was the status of publication used as an inclusion criteria, such as grey literature?	No	Yes	No
Was a list of studies provided?	Yes	Yes	Yes
Were the characteristics of the included studies provided?	Yes	Yes	Yes
Was the scientific quality of the included studies assessed and documented?	Yes	Yes	Yes
Was the scientific quality of the included studies used appropriately in formulating conclusions?	Yes	Yes	Yes
Were the methods used to combine the findings of studies appropriate?	Yes	Yes	Yes
Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed?	No	No	Yes
Was the conflict of interest stated?	Yes	Yes	No