Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Psychiatry. Jun 19, 2022; 12(6): 814-826
Published online Jun 19, 2022. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i6.814
Table 2 Components of treatment alliance: Scores on the four scales
Scores
Patients with BD, n = 160, mean ± SD (range)
WAI-Client scores
Total WAI-Client scores222.82 ± 20.14 (142-252)
Goal subscale72.24 ± 7.97 (45-84)
Bond subscale76.94 ± 7.97 (44-84)
Task subscale73.64 ± 7.55 (49-84)
PCP scores1
Total PCP scores40.34 ± 5.86 (22-60)
Emotional support subscale14.45 ± 3.23 (8-33)
Informational support subscale6.5 ± 1.03 (4-8)
SDM subscale9.68 ± 1.57 (5-12)
Supportive behaviour (support) subscale9.69 ± 1.35 (4-12)
TRIP scores
Total TRIP scores10.12 ± 1.45 (8-12)
I completely trusted my doctors3.40 ± 0.50 (2-4)
I had the impression that the doctors are very competent3.38 ± 0.51 (2-4)
With the doctors in this hospital one is in good hands3.40 ± 0.50 (2-4)
PSQ scores
Total PSQ scores9.39 ± 1.99 (6-12)
Satisfied with places and times of appointment2.30 ± 0.59 (1-3)
Satisfied with time available for talking about problems2.31 ± 0.55 (1-3)
Feel confident that members of service are competent to deal with problems2.39 ± 0.49 (2-3)
Pleased with the care received from the service so far2.38 ± 0.50 (1-3)
Correlations between scores on different scales and subscalesPearson’s coefficients2
Goal and Task subscale scores of the WAI-Client0.81a
Bond and Task subscale scores of the WAI-Client0.69a
Bond and Goal subscale scores of the WAI-Client0.66a
Total TRIP scores and WAI-Client total scores0.28b
Total TRIP scores and WAI-Client Task subscale scores0.29b
Total PCP scores and WAI-Client Task subscale scores0.28b
PCP-SDM subscale scores and WAI-Client total scores0.28b
PCP-SDM subscale scores and WAI-Client Goal subscale scores0.28b
Total scores on the TRIP and the PSQ0.45a