Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Psychiatr. Sep 19, 2021; 11(9): 659-680
Published online Sep 19, 2021. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i9.659
Published online Sep 19, 2021. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i9.659
Ref. | Random sequence generation | Allocation concealment | Blinding of participants and personnel | Blinding of outcome assessment | Incomplete outcome data | Selective reporting | Other bias |
Abelson et al[67], 2005 | - | - | + | ||||
Barcia et al[32], 2019 | + | - | - | - | |||
Goodman et al[16], 2010 | - | - | + | ||||
Huff et al[31], 2010 | + | ||||||
Luyten et al[20], 2016 | + | - | - | ||||
Tyagi et al[17], 2019 | + | + | + | ||||
Welter et al[39], 2020 | + | - | - | - |
- Citation: Mar-Barrutia L, Real E, Segalás C, Bertolín S, Menchón JM, Alonso P. Deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review of worldwide experience after 20 years. World J Psychiatr 2021; 11(9): 659-680
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v11/i9/659.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v11.i9.659