Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Psychiatr. Nov 19, 2021; 11(11): 997-1016
Published online Nov 19, 2021. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i11.997
Table 2 Summary of the effects of various nutrients, food groups, dietary patterns and lifestyle on prevalent or incident depression
Dietary componentsTotal/number of casesmean follow-up t (yr)Main Results1 [comparisons between quantiles (q) or the designated categories]
Cohort studies
Nutrients
Omega-3 fatty acids[6]7903/5122.4q4 vs q1: OR (95%CI) 0.65 (0.47–0.90). P for trend = 0.376
Trans fatty acids[37]12059/6576.1q5 vs q1: 1.42 (1.09-1.84); P for trend = 0.003
MUFA[37]12059/6576.1q5 vs q1: 0.80 (0.62-1.03); P for trend = 0.05
PUFA[37]12059/6576.1q5 vs q1; 0.76 (0.59-0.99; P for trend = 0.03
Magnesium[123]12939/7376.3q5 vs q1: 1.11 (0.77-1.59) No association.
Nutritional adequacy[124]13983/9538.5≥ 4 nutritional deficiencies vs ≤ 1: 1.37 (1.01-1.85)
Total Fiber[40]548/198Cross-sectionalq4 vs q1: OR = 0.54 (95%CI: 0.11–2.63); Non significant association
Foods and food groups
Fast food[125]8964/4936.2q5 vs q1: 1.36 (1.02-1.81); P for trend = 0.03
Ultra-processed foods[126]14907/77410.3q4 vs q1: 1.33 (1.07, 1.64); P for trend = 0.004
Baked goods[125]8964/4936.2q2-5 vs q1: 1.38 (1.06-1.80);
Olive oil[37]12059/6576.1q5 vs q1: 0.80 (0.62-1.04); P for trend = 0.06
Seafoods[127]6587/1367Cross-sectionalq3 vs q1 of fatty fish consumption: OR 0.72 (0.59–0.88). Higher intakes were non-significant
Coffee[128]14413/19910≥ 4 cups/d vs < 1 cup/d: 0.37 (0.15–0.95); P for trend = 0.220
Yoghurt[36]14542/7279.3Low fat: max vs min: 1.32 (1.06–1.65); P for trend = 0.001
Whole fat: max vs min: 0.78 (0.63–0.98); P for trend = 0.02
Dietary patterns
MD score[8] 10094/4804.43pts vs 0-2pts: 0.74 (0.57-0.98)
4pts vs 0-2pts: 0.66 (0.50-0.86)
5pts vs 0-2pts: 0.49 (0.36-0.67)
6-9pts vs 0-2pts: 0.58 (0.44-0.77); P for trend <0.001
MD score (updated)[103]15093/10518.5q5 vs q1: 0.84 (0.69-1.02); P for trend = 0.001
Pro-vegetarian[103]15093/10518.5q5 vs q1: 0.74 (0.61-0.89); P for trend < 0.001
AHEI 2010[103]15093/10518.5q5 vs q1: 0.60 (0.49-0.72); P for trend < 0.001
DASH-Fung diet[102]14051/4108< 2pts vs 3-9pts: 0.76 (0.61-0.94):
Pro-inflammatory pattern[129]15093/10518.5q5 vs q1: 1.47 (1.17, 1.85); P for trend = 0.010
Lifestyle
Mediterranean lifestyle[130]11800/8068.5High vs low : 0.50 (0.32-0.81)
Healthy lifestyle score[131] 14908/77410.4Max vs min: 0.68 (0.49-0.95); P for trend 0.010
Alcohol[132]13619/4598Moderate vs no consumption: 0.62 (0.43-0.89) in female subjects
CV risk equation[133]16739/9276q5 vs q1: 3.45 (2.40-4.95) starting at 40 yr
Physical activity[7]10381/9236q5 vs q1: OR (95% CI) 0.81 (0.65-1.00) P for trend < 0.01
Leisure time physical activity[134]6343/31110.5> 20 METs-h/wk vs < 10 METs-h/wk; 0.84 (0.72–0.99); P for trend 0.046
Tobacco[135]8556/1904Smokers vs non-smokers: 1.30 (0.97-1.73)
Childhood obesity (5 yr)[136]11825/6516.1Obese vs low weight: 1.50 (1.06-2.12); P for trend = 0.012
Youth obesity (20 yr)[136]11825/6516.1Obese vs low weight: 2.22 (1.20-4.08); P for trend = 0.005
Clinical trials
The PREDIMED study[119]3923/2245.4MD + EVOO2 or nut supplements vs Low fat diet: multivariable adjusted 0.85 (0.64 to 1.13); Non significant associations
The MoodFOOD Study[117]512/541Multi-nutrient supplement vs placebo groups: OR = 1.06 (0.87-1.29); Non significant associations.