Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Psychiatr. Jul 19, 2020; 10(7): 150-161
Published online Jul 19, 2020. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v10.i7.150
Published online Jul 19, 2020. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v10.i7.150
Figure 5 Comparison of the three administration routes on seizure score and onset time.
Seizure activity scores and onset times following intravitreal injection, intraperitoneal injection and immersion with 0.5 mol/L, 16 mg/kg and 500 μmol/L N-Methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA), respectively. A: The mean seizure scores (± SE) for each route plotted against time after NMDA treatment; B: The latency of seizure onset after NMDA treatment. Bars represent mean ± SE of the time lag to the onset of the first convulsion using each method. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and t-test for the different routes (n = 6) (aP < 0.05). NMDA: N-Methyl-D-aspartic acid; I.V.: Intravitreal injection; I.P.: Intraperitoneal injection; I.M.: Immersion.
- Citation: Long XY, Wang S, Luo ZW, Zhang X, Xu H. Comparison of three administration modes for establishing a zebrafish seizure model induced by N-Methyl-D-aspartic acid. World J Psychiatr 2020; 10(7): 150-161
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v10/i7/150.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v10.i7.150