Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Psychiatr. Apr 19, 2020; 10(4): 46-58
Published online Apr 19, 2020. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v10.i4.46
Published online Apr 19, 2020. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v10.i4.46
Table 3 Accuracy of conventional bedside tests of cognition for delirium diagnosis in the overall population (n = 180) and for those with dementia (n = 90)
Sensitivity (95%CI) | Specificity (95%CI) | Positive predictive value (95%CI) | Negative predictive value (95%CI) | Overall accuracy (95%CI) | |
Overall population (n = 180) | |||||
WORLD | 89.4% (81.9–94.6) | 40.8% (29.7–52.7) | 67.4% (62.9-71.6) | 73.8% (60.2-84.0) | 68.9% (61.6-75.6) |
MBT | 80.8% (71.9-87.4) | 71.1% (59.5-80.9) | 79.3% (72.6-84.6) | 73.0% (64.0-80.4) | 76.7% (69.8-82.6) |
SSF | 75.0% (65.6-83.0) | 55.3% (43.4-67.0) | 69.6% (64.0-75.1) | 61.8% (52.3-70.5) | 66.7% (59.3-73.5) |
SSB | 77.9% (68.7-85.4) | 57.9% (46.0-69.1) | 71.7% (65.6-77.1) | 65.7% (56.0-74.2) | 69.4% (62.2-76.1) |
Vigilance A | 75.0% (65.6-83.0) | 81.6% (71.0-89.6) | 84.8% (77.4-90.1) | 70.5% (62.7-77.2) | 77.8% (71.0-83.6) |
Vigilance B | 94.2% (87.9-97.9) | 56.6% (44.7-67.9) | 74.8% (69.6-79.4) | 87.8% (76.3-94.1) | 78.3% (71.6-84.1) |
GVS | 76.9% (67.6-84.6) | 63.2% (51.3-73.9) | 74.1% (67.6-79.6) | 66.7% (57.5-74.7) | 71.1% (63.9-77.6) |
CDT | 72.1% (62.5-80.5) | 64.5% (52.7-75.1) | 73.5% (66.7-79.4) | 62.8% (54.3-70.6) | 68.9% (61.6-75.6) |
IPT | 70.2% (60.4-78.8) | 73.7% (62.3-83.1) | 78.5% (71.1-84.4) | 64.4% (56.6-71.4) | 71.7% (64.5-78.1) |
Dementia population (n = 90) | |||||
WORLD | 91.7% (81.6-97.2) | 20.0% (7.7-38.6) | 69.6% (65.4-73.6) | 54.6% (28.5-78.3) | 67.8% (57.1-77.3) |
MBT | 86.7% (75.4-94.1) | 66.7% (47.2-82.7) | 83.9% (75.6-89.7) | 71.4% (55.6-83.3) | 80.0% (70.3-87.7) |
SSF | 80.0% (67.7-89.2) | 43.3% (25.5-62.6) | 73.9% (66.8-79.8) | 52.0% (36.1-67.5) | 67.8% (57.1-77.3) |
SSB | 86.7% (75.4-94.1) | 50.0% (31.3-68.7) | 77.6% (70.5-83.4) | 65.2% (47.3-79.7) | 74.4% (64.2-83.1) |
Vigilance A | 83.3% (71.5-91.7) | 76.7% (57.7-90.1) | 87.7% (78.1-93.2) | 69.7% (55.8-80.7) | 81.1% (71.5-88.6) |
Vigilance B | 95.0% (86.1-99.0) | 43.3% (25.5-62.6) | 77.0% (70.9-82.2) | 81.3% (57.2-93.4) | 77.8% (67.8-85.9) |
GVS | 75.0% (62.1-85.3) | 40.0% (22.7-59.4) | 71.4% ( 64.3-77.6) | 44.4% (30.1-59.8) | 63.3% (52.5-73.3) |
CDT | 78.3% (65.8-87.9) | 46.7% (28.3 -65.7) | 74.6% (67.2-80.8) | 51.9% (36.8-66.6) | 67.8% (57.1-77.3) |
IPT | 76.7% (64.0-86.6) | 60.0% (40.6-77.3) | 79.3% (70.8-85.9) | 56.3% (42.7-68.9) | 71.1% (60.6-80.2) |
- Citation: Meagher DJ, O’Connell H, Leonard M, Williams O, Awan F, Exton C, Tenorio M, O’Connor M, Dunne CP, Cullen W, McFarland J, Adamis D. Comparison of novel tools with traditional cognitive tests in detecting delirium in elderly medical patients. World J Psychiatr 2020; 10(4): 46-58
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v10/i4/46.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v10.i4.46