Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Crit Care Med. Aug 4, 2015; 4(3): 230-239
Published online Aug 4, 2015. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v4.i3.230
Published online Aug 4, 2015. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v4.i3.230
Figure 3 Mode of treatment in the Dutch 2008 survey of 363 myeloproliferative neoplasm (123 essential thrombocythemia, 190 polycythemia vera and 50 myelofibrosis) patients: 93% of polycythemia vera, 71% of essential thrombocythemia and 37% of myelofibrosis were on aspirin; 6% of essential thrombocythemia, 78% of polycythemia vera and 9% of myelofibrosis were treated with phlebotomy[23].
Because of symptomatic MNP disease burden 31% of ET, 29% of PV and 30% of MF were on treatment with hydroxyurea and 16% of ET, 16% of PV and 4% of MF were on treatment with pegylated interferon (PegasysR)[23]. ET: Essential thrombocythemia; PV: Polycythemia vera; MF: Myelofibrosis; MNP: Myeloproliferative neoplasm.
- Citation: Michiels JJ. Myeloproliferative and thrombotic burden and treatment outcome of thrombocythemia and polycythemia patients. World J Crit Care Med 2015; 4(3): 230-239
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v4/i3/230.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v4.i3.230