Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Nov 15, 2018; 10(11): 381-397
Published online Nov 15, 2018. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i11.381
Published online Nov 15, 2018. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i11.381
Figure 8 Comparison of surgical margins between laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery and conventional wedge resection.
A: Specimen of Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS). The surgical margin from the tumor is kept at the proper distance; B: Specimen of conventional wedge resection. Simple wedge resection causes both excessive and inadequate resection of the gastric wall, which may lead to postoperative gastric stenosis, gastric dysfunction, and local recurrence; C and D: Intraoperative view of conventional wedge resection with a linear stapler. The resection line is as shown in Figure 1B. The specimen has a portion too close to the tumor and a portion far from the tumor.
- Citation: Aisu Y, Yasukawa D, Kimura Y, Hori T. Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric tumors: Perspective for actual practice and oncological benefits. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 10(11): 381-397
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v10/i11/381.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v10.i11.381