Esophageal Cancer
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2003. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 15, 2003; 9(3): 404-407
Published online Mar 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i3.404
Expression of MUC1 in esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma and its relationship with prognosis of patients from Linzhou city, a high incidence area of northern China
Zi-Bo Song, Shan-Shan Gao, Xin-Na Yi, Yan-Jie Li, Qi-Ming Wang, Ze-Hao Zhuang, Li-Dong Wang
Zi-Bo Song, Institute of Medical Genetics, People’s Hospital of Henan Province, 450003, Henan Province, China
Shan-Shan Gao, Xin-Na Yi, Yan-Jie Li, Qi-Ming Wang, Ze-Hao Zhuang, Li-Dong Wang, Laboratory for Cancer Research, Medical College of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan Province, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Supported by National Outstanding Young Scientist Award of China , NO. 30025016; NCI CA65871 (U.S.A.)
Correspondence to: Zi-Bo Song, Institute of Medical Genetics, People’s Hospital of Henan Province, 450003, Henan Province, China. zbsong@sohu.com
Telephone: +86-371-5580463
Received: October 30, 2002
Revised: November 13, 2002
Accepted: November 19, 2002
Published online: March 15, 2003
Abstract

AIM: To further characterize the possible relationship between the molecular changes and prognosis of ESC and to elucidate the possible mechanisms involved.

METHODS: 114 specimens of ESC were collected from Linzhou city, and all patients were followed up for more than 5 years after resection. Histopathological analysis and immunohistochemical staining (ABC) were employed to detect the alteration of MUC1.

RESULTS: The positive immunostaining rate for MUC1 was 79% (90/114), and the high-expression rate was 63% (72/114). The mean survival periods (months) of those with high- and low-expression rates of MUC1 were 41 (95%CI: 35, 47) and 52 (95%CI: 45, 59), respectively. Patients in the low-expression group obviously survived longer than those in high-expression group, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). The expression of MUC1 protein in the esophageal carcinoma specimens with metastasis was stronger than those without metastasis, the difference was also significant (P < 0.05). The stepwise multivariate analysis showed that “differentiation”, “expression of MUC1” and “TNM staging” were the most important factors affecting the prognosis of esophageal carcinoma patients (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: A good correlation between the alteration of MUC1 and the regional lymph node metastasis was observed. Furthermore, high-expression of MUC1 was associated with poor prognosis for esophageal cancer patients. These results indicated that MUC1 is a promising biomarker for predicting lymph node metastasis and prognosis in esophageal cancer.

Keywords: $[Keywords]