Clinical Research
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2003. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 15, 2003; 9(1): 174-178
Published online Jan 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i1.174
Is analysis of lower esophageal sphincter vector volumes of value in diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease?
Robert E. Marsh, Christopher L. Perdue, Ziad T. Awad, Patrice Watson, Mohamed Selima, Richard E. Davis, Charles J. Filipi
Robert E. Marsh, Christopher L. Perdue, Ziad T. Awad, Richard E. Davis, Charles J. Filipi, Mohammed Selima, Department of Surgery, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE 68131, Nebraska, United States
Patrice Watson, Department of Preventive Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE 68131, Nebraska, United States
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Dr. Charles J. Filipi, Department of Surgery, Creighton University School of Medicine, 601 N 30th Street, Suite 3740, Omaha, NE 68131, United States. cjfilipi@creighton.edu
Telephone: +1-402-2804-213 Fax: +1-402-2804-278
Received: July 23, 2002
Revised: July 25, 2002
Accepted: July 27, 2002
Published online: January 15, 2003
Abstract

AIM: With successful surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), there is interest in understanding the anti-reflux barrier and its mechanisms of failure. To date, the potential use of vector volumes to predict the DeMeester score has not been adequately explored.

METHODS: 627 patients in the referral database received esophageal manometry and ambulatory 24-hour pHmonitoring. Study data included LES resting pressure (LESP), overall LES length (OL) and abdominal length (AL), total vector volume (TVV) and intrabdominal vector volume (IVV).

RESULTS: In cases where LESP, TVV or IVV were all below normal, there was an 81.4% probability of a positive DeMeester score. In cases where all three were normal, there was an 86.9% probability that the DeMeester score would be negative. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) for LESP, TVV and IVV were nearly identical and indicated no useful cut-off values. Logistic regression demonstrated that LESP and IVV had the strongest association with a positive DeMeester score; however, the regression formula was only 76.1% accurate.

CONCLUSION: While the indices based on TVV, IVV and LESP are more sensitive and specific, respectively, than any single measurement, the measurement of vector volumes does not add significantly to the diagnosis of GERD.

Keywords: $[Keywords]