Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc. Aug 28, 2021; 2(4): 149-156
Published online Aug 28, 2021. doi: 10.37126/aige.v2.i4.149
Published online Aug 28, 2021. doi: 10.37126/aige.v2.i4.149
VLE prediction score | ||
Parameter | Score | |
Layering | Layering present-more than 50% | 0 |
Layering present–less than 50% | 8 | |
Surface signal | Surface signal < subsurface signal | 0 |
Surface signal = subsurface signal | 6 | |
Surface signal > subsurface signal | 8 | |
Abnormal glands | 0-5 | 0 |
> 5 | 5 | |
VLE-diagnostic algorithm | ||
Mucosal layer partial effacement | Abnormal glands > 5 | Dysplasia |
Abnormal glands ≤ 5 | Non-dysplasia | |
Mucosal layer complete effacement | Surface intensity > subsurface intensity | Dysplasia |
Surface intensity ≤ subsurface intensity | Non-dysplasia |
- Citation: Gupta N, Yelamanchi R, Agrawal H, Agarwal N. Role of optical coherence tomography in Barrett’s esophagus. Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 2(4): 149-156
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2689-7164/full/v2/i4/149.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.37126/aige.v2.i4.149