Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 8, 2023; 4(2): 18-26
Published online Dec 8, 2023. doi: 10.37126/aige.v4.i2.18
Published online Dec 8, 2023. doi: 10.37126/aige.v4.i2.18
Figure 1 By-proceduralist analysis of adenoma detection rate for both conventional colonoscopy and Artificial Intelligence Assisted Colonoscopy.
CC: Conventional colonoscopy; AIAC: Artificial Intelligence Assisted Colonoscopy.
Figure 2 Median withdrawal time for both conventional colonoscopy and Artificial Intelligence Assisted Colonoscopy.
CC: Conventional colonoscopy; AIAC: Artificial Intelligence Assisted Colonoscopy.
Figure 3 Median adenoma and sessile serrated lesion size (mm) for both conventional colonoscopy and Artificial Intelligence Assisted Colonoscopy.
CC: Conventional colonoscopy; AIAC: Artificial Intelligence Assisted Colonoscopy; SSL: Sessile serrated lesion.
- Citation: Goetz N, Hanigan K, Cheng RKY. Artificial intelligence fails to improve colonoscopy quality: A single centre retrospective cohort study. Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 4(2): 18-26
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2689-7164/full/v4/i2/18.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.37126/aige.v4.i2.18