Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
Artif Intell Med Imaging. Jun 8, 2025; 6(1): 106928
Published online Jun 8, 2025. doi: 10.35711/aimi.v6.i1.106928
Published online Jun 8, 2025. doi: 10.35711/aimi.v6.i1.106928
Table 1 Summary of research progress on artificial intelligence-assisted confocal laser endomicroscopy in gastrointestinal medical imaging
Ref. | Purpose | Model | Input | Datasets | Experimental results |
Machicado et al[45] | Develop two CNN-based algorithms for EUS-nCLE image analysis to assist in the accurate diagnosis and risk stratification of IPMNs | SBM, HBM | EUS-nCLE video frames with region of interest segmentation and feature extraction | EUS-nCLE video images consisting of 15027 frames were used from 35 histologically confirmed IPMN patients, including 18 cases of HGD-Ca | Sensitivity: SBM and HBM: 83.3%; accuracy: SBM: 82.9%, HBM: 85.7%; specificity: SBM: 82.4%, HBM: 88.2% |
Lee et al[46] | Develop a deep learning-based computer-aided diagnostic system to support EUS-nCLE in classifying pancreatic cystic lesions | VGG19 | 224 × 224 nCLE video frame images after data augmentation | 68 nCLE video clips collected from King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital | Classification accuracy of nonmucinous PCLs: pseudocysts (98%), SCN (93.11%), NET (84.31%); classification accuracy of mucinous PCLs: IPMN (84.43%), MCN (86.1%) |
André et al[47] | Design pCLE diagnostic software for the automated classification of colonic polyps to support lesion identification during examinations | KNN | Feature vector data | 135 colorectal lesion samples from 71 patients, including 93 neoplastic lesions and 42 non-neoplastic lesions | Accuracy: 89.6%; sensitivity: 92.5%; specificity: 83.3% |
Gessert et al[48] | CNNs and multiple transfer learning strategies were utilized to perform real-time classification of colorectal cancer in both peritoneal and colonic tissues, aiming to provide auxiliary decision support during surgery | VGG-16, Inception-V3, Densenet121, SE-Resnext50 | 384 × 384 images | The dataset consisted of 1577 CLE images categorized into four classes: Healthy colon, malignant colon, healthy peritoneum, and malignant peritoneum | Peritoneal metastases: 97.1 AUC; primary colorectal lesions: 73.1 AUC |
Pulido et al[49] | Enhancing the classification accuracy of pCLE videos for Barrett's esophagus and related lesions using deep learning models | AttentionPooling, Multi-Module AttentionPooling | 224 × 224 images after removing irrelevant parts | pCLE videos from 78 patients, totaling 1057 clips, annotated into 3 categories | The AttentionPooling model performed the best, with an F1 score of 0.89; the Multi-Module AttentionPooling model exhibited the highest sensitivity for precancerous lesions (0.71) |
Tong et al[50] | Design the CAESNet model to leverage a large number of unlabeled eCLE images for improving the accuracy of dysplasia grading diagnosis in Barrett's esophagus | CAESNet | 256 × 256 images after data augmentation | An eCLE image dataset comprising 429 expert-annotated images (across 9 categories) and 2826 unannotated images | Best performance at 32 layers: Accuracy: 0.824 ± 0.0329; precision: 0.832 ± 0.0302; F1 score: 0.816 ± 0.0342; Cohen's kappa coefficient: 0.781 ± 0.04 |
Su et al[51] | Apply deep learning techniques to the field of CLE for semantic segmentation of goblet cells in gastric mucosal intestinal metaplasia | GCSCLE | 512 × 512 × 3 image data | 334 clinical CLE gastric images from 62 subjects, covering different regions of the stomach | IoU: 0.8795; dice coefficient: 0.8664; precision: 0.8554; recall: 0.8834; accuracy: 0.9925 |
Cho et al[52] | Develop an AI-based real-time assessment system for the automatic detection of gastric cancer in CLE images | EfficientNetV2 | Data-augmented grey CLE images | Training set: 5984 tumor images and 5984 normal images; Testing set: 1496 tumor images and 2586 normal images | Accuracy: 0.990; specificity: 0.982; sensitivity: 1.000 |
- Citation: Liu YS, Shi ZH, Jin YR, Yang CP, Liu CL. Application of artificial intelligence-assisted confocal laser endomicroscopy in gastrointestinal imaging analysis. Artif Intell Med Imaging 2025; 6(1): 106928
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2644-3260/full/v6/i1/106928.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.35711/aimi.v6.i1.106928