Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
Artif Intell Med Imaging. Jun 8, 2025; 6(1): 106928
Published online Jun 8, 2025. doi: 10.35711/aimi.v6.i1.106928
Table 1 Summary of research progress on artificial intelligence-assisted confocal laser endomicroscopy in gastrointestinal medical imaging
Ref.
Purpose
Model
Input
Datasets
Experimental results
Machicado et al[45]Develop two CNN-based algorithms for EUS-nCLE image analysis to assist in the accurate diagnosis and risk stratification of IPMNsSBM, HBMEUS-nCLE video frames with region of interest segmentation and feature extractionEUS-nCLE video images consisting of 15027 frames were used from 35 histologically confirmed IPMN patients, including 18 cases of HGD-CaSensitivity: SBM and HBM: 83.3%; accuracy: SBM: 82.9%, HBM: 85.7%; specificity: SBM: 82.4%, HBM: 88.2%
Lee et al[46]Develop a deep learning-based computer-aided diagnostic system to support EUS-nCLE in classifying pancreatic cystic lesionsVGG19224 × 224 nCLE video frame images after data augmentation68 nCLE video clips collected from King Chulalongkorn Memorial HospitalClassification accuracy of nonmucinous PCLs: pseudocysts (98%), SCN (93.11%), NET (84.31%); classification accuracy of mucinous PCLs: IPMN (84.43%), MCN (86.1%)
André et al[47]Design pCLE diagnostic software for the automated classification of colonic polyps to support lesion identification during examinationsKNNFeature vector data135 colorectal lesion samples from 71 patients, including 93 neoplastic lesions and 42 non-neoplastic lesionsAccuracy: 89.6%; sensitivity: 92.5%; specificity: 83.3%
Gessert et al[48]CNNs and multiple transfer learning strategies were utilized to perform real-time classification of colorectal cancer in both peritoneal and colonic tissues, aiming to provide auxiliary decision support during surgeryVGG-16, Inception-V3, Densenet121, SE-Resnext50384 × 384 imagesThe dataset consisted of 1577 CLE images categorized into four classes: Healthy colon, malignant colon, healthy peritoneum, and malignant peritoneumPeritoneal metastases: 97.1 AUC; primary colorectal lesions: 73.1 AUC
Pulido et al[49]Enhancing the classification accuracy of pCLE videos for Barrett's esophagus and related lesions using deep learning modelsAttentionPooling, Multi-Module AttentionPooling224 × 224 images after removing irrelevant partspCLE videos from 78 patients, totaling 1057 clips, annotated into 3 categoriesThe AttentionPooling model performed the best, with an F1 score of 0.89; the Multi-Module AttentionPooling model exhibited the highest sensitivity for precancerous lesions (0.71)
Tong et al[50]Design the CAESNet model to leverage a large number of unlabeled eCLE images for improving the accuracy of dysplasia grading diagnosis in Barrett's esophagusCAESNet256 × 256 images after data augmentationAn eCLE image dataset comprising 429 expert-annotated images (across 9 categories) and 2826 unannotated imagesBest performance at 32 layers: Accuracy: 0.824 ± 0.0329; precision: 0.832 ± 0.0302; F1 score: 0.816 ± 0.0342; Cohen's kappa coefficient: 0.781 ± 0.04
Su et al[51]Apply deep learning techniques to the field of CLE for semantic segmentation of goblet cells in gastric mucosal intestinal metaplasiaGCSCLE512 × 512 × 3 image data334 clinical CLE gastric images from 62 subjects, covering different regions of the stomachIoU: 0.8795; dice coefficient: 0.8664; precision: 0.8554; recall: 0.8834; accuracy: 0.9925
Cho et al[52]Develop an AI-based real-time assessment system for the automatic detection of gastric cancer in CLE imagesEfficientNetV2Data-augmented grey CLE imagesTraining set: 5984 tumor images and 5984 normal images; Testing set: 1496 tumor images and 2586 normal imagesAccuracy: 0.990; specificity: 0.982; sensitivity: 1.000