Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
Artif Intell Gastroenterol. Apr 30, 2024; 5(1): 90503
Published online Apr 30, 2024. doi: 10.35712/aig.v5.i1.90503
Published online Apr 30, 2024. doi: 10.35712/aig.v5.i1.90503
% | |
Basic knowledge (n = 10) | |
Comprehensive | 90 |
Correct but inadequate | 10 |
Mixed with correct and incorrect data | 0 |
Completely incorrect | 0 |
Diagnosis (n = 5) | |
Comprehensive | 60 |
Correct but inadequate | 0 |
Mixed with correct and incorrect data | 40 |
Completely incorrect | 0 |
Treatment (n = 9) | |
Comprehensive | 33.3 |
Correct but inadequate | 0 |
Mixed with correct and incorrect data | 33.3 |
Completely incorrect | 33.3 |
Other (n = 3) | |
Comprehensive | 33.3 |
Correct but inadequate | 33.3 |
Mixed with correct and incorrect data | 0 |
Completely incorrect | 33.3 |
Overall (n = 27) | |
Comprehensive | 59.3 |
Correct but inadequate | 7.4 |
Mixed with correct and incorrect data | 18.5 |
Completely incorrect | 14.8 |
% | |
Overall (n = 27) | 77.8 |
Basic knowledge (n = 10) | 90 |
Diagnosis (n = 5) | 80 |
Treatment (n = 9) | 77.8 |
Other (n = 3) | 33.3 |
- Citation: Schlussel L, Samaan JS, Chan Y, Chang B, Yeo YH, Ng WH, Rezaie A. Evaluating the accuracy and reproducibility of ChatGPT-4 in answering patient questions related to small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Artif Intell Gastroenterol 2024; 5(1): 90503
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2644-3236/full/v5/i1/90503.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.35712/aig.v5.i1.90503