Juneja D, Gupta A, Singh O. Artificial intelligence in critically ill diabetic patients: current status and future prospects. Artif Intell Gastroenterol 2022; 3(2): 66-79 [DOI: 10.35712/aig.v3.i2.66]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Deven Juneja, FCCP, MBBS, Director, Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Max Super Speciality Hospital, 1, Press Enclave Road, Saket, New Delhi 110092, India. devenjuneja@gmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Critical Care Medicine
Article-Type of This Article
Minireviews
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 1 Clinical uses of artificial intelligence in management of diabetes
AI applications
Examples of AI devices
Clinical uses
Retinal screening
IDx-DR device
Screening and diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy
Clinical diagnosis
Advisor Pro
Detection and monitoring of diabetes and its associated complications. Fine-tuning insulin dose
Patient self-management tools
Medtronic Guardian Connect System, Dexcom G6 CGM systems; Mobile applications
Improve blood glucose control, activity and dietary tracking
Risk stratification
AI using random forest and; gradient boosting techniques
Prediction of new-onset diabetes; Prediction of subpopulations at risk for complications, non-compliance to therapy and hospitalization
Table 2 Possible critical care applications of artificial intelligence in diabetes management
Blood glucose monitoring and prediction
Detection of adverse glycemic events
Blood glucose control strategies
Insulin bolus calculators and advisory systems
Risk and patient stratification
Table 3 Characteristics of an ideal tool to monitor blood glucose in intensive care unit
Ease to use
Minimal burden on staff
Automated data entry
High rate of adherence
Allow for minimal sampling
Comfortable to use for the patient
Use of a proven algorithm to calculate insulin dosage
Quickly correct hyperglycemia
Consistently maintain glucose within the predetermined optimal range
Ensure minimal glycemic variability
Prevent episodes of hypoglycemia
Provide easy interface with other patient measurements and data
Easy to integrate into existing hospital systems
Avoid the need for repeated data entry
Maintain results in a comprehensive, standardized database to facilitate multi-center comparison
Table 4 Continuous glucose monitoring devices
Type of device
Name of device
Comments
Intravenous
GlucoClear by Edwards Lifesciences; (Irvine, CA)
Approved in Europe
Intravenous
Glysure System by Glysure (Abingdon, UK)
Approved in Europe
Intravenous
Eirus by Maquet Getinge Group (Rastatt, Germany)
Approved in Europe
Intravenous
OptiScanner 5000 by OptiScan; (Hayward, CA)
Approved in EuropeFDA-approved for use in US hospitals
Intravenous
GlucoScout (International Biomedical, Austin, TX)
FDA-approved for use in US hospitals
Intravenous
Dexcom G
FDA-approved and CEA approved
Intravenous
Guardian™ Connect system by Medtronic (San Diego, CA)
FDA-approved for use in US hospitals
Subcutaneous
Freestyle Libre by Abbott Diabetes Care
US FDA approved
Table 5 Limitations of artificial intelligence
Factors
Human factors
Inhibition, lack of experience
Technical factors
Cost, availability and implementation
Data limitation
Lack of data in ICU patients, lack of large scale randomized trials
Design limitation
Devices tried in certain patient populations may not be applicable in ICU patients
Ethical
Lack of guidelines
Citation: Juneja D, Gupta A, Singh O. Artificial intelligence in critically ill diabetic patients: current status and future prospects. Artif Intell Gastroenterol 2022; 3(2): 66-79