Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
Artif Intell Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2022; 3(2): 66-79
Published online Apr 28, 2022. doi: 10.35712/aig.v3.i2.66
Published online Apr 28, 2022. doi: 10.35712/aig.v3.i2.66
Table 1 Clinical uses of artificial intelligence in management of diabetes
AI applications | Examples of AI devices | Clinical uses |
Retinal screening | IDx-DR device | Screening and diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy |
Clinical diagnosis | Advisor Pro | Detection and monitoring of diabetes and its associated complications. Fine-tuning insulin dose |
Patient self-management tools | Medtronic Guardian Connect System, Dexcom G6 CGM systems; Mobile applications | Improve blood glucose control, activity and dietary tracking |
Risk stratification | AI using random forest and; gradient boosting techniques | Prediction of new-onset diabetes; Prediction of subpopulations at risk for complications, non-compliance to therapy and hospitalization |
Table 2 Possible critical care applications of artificial intelligence in diabetes management
Blood glucose monitoring and prediction |
Detection of adverse glycemic events |
Blood glucose control strategies |
Insulin bolus calculators and advisory systems |
Risk and patient stratification |
Table 3 Characteristics of an ideal tool to monitor blood glucose in intensive care unit
Ease to use |
Minimal burden on staff |
Automated data entry |
High rate of adherence |
Allow for minimal sampling |
Comfortable to use for the patient |
Use of a proven algorithm to calculate insulin dosage |
Quickly correct hyperglycemia |
Consistently maintain glucose within the predetermined optimal range |
Ensure minimal glycemic variability |
Prevent episodes of hypoglycemia |
Provide easy interface with other patient measurements and data |
Easy to integrate into existing hospital systems |
Avoid the need for repeated data entry |
Maintain results in a comprehensive, standardized database to facilitate multi-center comparison |
Table 4 Continuous glucose monitoring devices
Type of device | Name of device | Comments |
Intravenous | GlucoClear by Edwards Lifesciences; (Irvine, CA) | Approved in Europe |
Intravenous | Glysure System by Glysure (Abingdon, UK) | Approved in Europe |
Intravenous | Eirus by Maquet Getinge Group (Rastatt, Germany) | Approved in Europe |
Intravenous | OptiScanner 5000 by OptiScan; (Hayward, CA) | Approved in EuropeFDA-approved for use in US hospitals |
Intravenous | GlucoScout (International Biomedical, Austin, TX) | FDA-approved for use in US hospitals |
Intravenous | Dexcom G | FDA-approved and CEA approved |
Intravenous | Guardian™ Connect system by Medtronic (San Diego, CA) | FDA-approved for use in US hospitals |
Subcutaneous | Freestyle Libre by Abbott Diabetes Care | US FDA approved |
Table 5 Limitations of artificial intelligence
Factors | |
Human factors | Inhibition, lack of experience |
Technical factors | Cost, availability and implementation |
Data limitation | Lack of data in ICU patients, lack of large scale randomized trials |
Design limitation | Devices tried in certain patient populations may not be applicable in ICU patients |
Ethical | Lack of guidelines |
- Citation: Juneja D, Gupta A, Singh O. Artificial intelligence in critically ill diabetic patients: current status and future prospects. Artif Intell Gastroenterol 2022; 3(2): 66-79
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2644-3236/full/v3/i2/66.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.35712/aig.v3.i2.66