Meta-Analysis
Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Meta-Anal. Feb 28, 2020; 8(1): 15-26
Published online Feb 28, 2020. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v8.i1.15
Table 1 The characteristics of each study
Ref .Study period Study design State Sampling method Age group Sample size Joshi et al [25 ] 2001 Cross-sectional Haryana Cluster sampling ≥ 60 200 Hazarika et al [9 ] 2002 Cross-sectional Assam Simple random sampling ≥ 60 888 Lena et al [31 ] 2003 Cross-sectional Karnataka ≥ 60 213 Prakash et al [2 ] 2003 Cross-sectional Rajasthan ≥ 60 300 Kishore et al [29 ] 2004 Cross-sectional Uttarakhand ≥ 60 285 Khanam et al [28 ] 2004 Cross-sectional Bangladesh Simple random sampling ≥ 60 452 Bhatia et al [17 ] 2006 Cross-sectional Haryana Stratified random sampling ≥ 65 361 Chandrashekhar et al [1 ] 2008 Cross-sectional Karnataka Systematic random sampling ≥ 60 370 Bharati et al [16 ] 2008 Cross-sectional Tamil Nadu Simple random sampling ≥ 60 225 Bhatt et al [18 ] 2008 Cross-sectional Gujarat Simple random sampling ≥ 60 218 Jacob et al [23 ] 2010 Cross-sectional Kerala Cluster sampling ≥ 60 403 Sharma et al [36 ] 2010 Cross-sectional Himachal Pradesh Multistage simple random sampling ≥ 60 400 Ghosh et al [20 ] 2011 Cross-sectional Bihar ≥ 60 431 Kamble et al [26 ] 2011 Cross-sectional Maharashtra Systematic random sampling ≥ 60 494 Qadri et al [33 ] 2011 Cross-sectional Haryana Simple random sampling ≥ 60 660 Banjare et al [14 ] 2012 Cross-sectional Odisha PPS, Systematic sampling ≥ 60 310 Dutta et al [19 ] 2012 Cross-sectional Assam Multistage sampling ≥ 60 370 Banjare et al [13 ] 2012 Cross-sectional Odisha Multistage simple random sampling ≥ 60 310 Barman et al [3 ] 2013 Cross-sectional Bihar ≥ 60 160 Shubha et al [11 ] 2013 Cross-sectional Karnataka Simple random sampling ≥ 60 180 Karanth et al [27 ] 2013 Cross-sectional Karnataka ≥ 60 500 Alam et al [12 ] 2014 Cross-sectional Chhattisgarh Multistage simple random sampling ≥ 60 640 Bardhan et al [10 ] 2014 Cross-sectional Uttar Pradesh Simple random sampling ≥ 60 980 Bartwal et al [15 ] 2014 Cross-sectional Uttarakhand Systematic sampling ≥ 60 440 Gupta et al [21 ] 2014 Cross-sectional Punjab ≥ 60 534 Kumar et al [30 ] 2014 Cross-sectional Uttar Pradesh Stratified random sampling ≥ 60 402 Naushad et al [8 ] 2014 Cross-sectional Chhattisgarh Multistage simple random sampling ≥ 60 640 Jain et al [24 ] 2014 Cross-sectional Maharashtra PPS ≥ 60 600 Noor et al [32 ] 2014 Cross-sectional Odisha Simple random sampling ≥ 60 224 Venkateshkrishna et al [37 ] 2015 Cross-sectional Karnataka ≥ 60 1452 Sahu et al [35 ] 2017 Cross-sectional Uttar Pradesh ≥ 60 231 Reddy et al [34 ] 2017 Cross-sectional Telangana Systematic random sampling ≥ 60 1265 Gupta et al [22 ] 2018 Cross-sectional Haryana Simple random sampling ≥ 60 300
Table 2 Prevalence of cardiovascular diseases in the male Indian geriatric population
Ref .n Cases Proportion 95%CI W (Random) (%) Joshi et al [25 ] 98 41 0.4184 [0.3195-0.5223] 3.0 Hazarika et al [9 ] 500 321 0.6420 [0.5982-0.6841] 3.3 Prakash et al [2 ] 190 84 0.4421 [0.3703-0.5158] 3.2 Kishore et al [29 ] 177 70 0.3955 [0.3229-0.4716] 3.1 Bhatia et al [17 ] 152 53 0.3487 [0.2733-0.4301] 3.1 Chandrashekhar et al [1 ] 181 35 0.1934 [0.1385-0.2585] 3.2 Lena et al [31 ] 92 53 0.5761 [0.4686-0.6785] 3.0 Bhatt et al [18 ] 74 19 0.2568 [0.1622-0.3716] 3.0 Bharati et al [16 ] 92 34 0.3696 [0.2712-0.4766] 3.0 Khanam et al [28 ] 204 74 0.3627 [0.2968-0.4328] 3.2 Kamble et al [26 ] 232 50 0.2155 [0.1644-0.2741] 3.2 Sharma et al [36 ] 196 64 0.3265 [0.2614-0.3970] 3.2 Qadri et al [33 ] 336 135 0.4018 [0.3489-0.4564] 3.2 Barman et al [3 ] 88 47 0.5341 [0.4246-0.6412] 2.9 Banjare et al [13 ] 153 40 0.2614 [0.1938-0.3385] 3.2 Noor et al [32 ] 132 62 0.4697 [0.3823-0.5585] 3.1 Ghosh et al [20 ] 196 96 0.4898 [0.4179-0.5620] 3.2 Kumar et al [30 ] 190 66 0.3474 [0.2799-0.4197] 3.2 Bardhan et al [10 ] 293 30 0.1024 [0.0702-0.1429] 3.3 Dutta et al [19 ] 162 57 0.3519 [0.2786-0.4307] 3.1 Banjare et al [14 ] 153 40 0.2614 [0.1938-0.3385] 3.2 Shubha et al [11 ] 42 15 0.3571 [0.2155-0.5197] 2.6 Alam et al [12 ] 267 113 0.4232 [0.3632-0.4849] 3.2 Gupta et al [21 ] 244 94 0.3852 [0.3239-0.4495] 3.2 Bartwal et al [15 ] 187 77 0.4118 [0.3405-0.4859] 3.2 Naushad et al [8 ] 241 113 0.4689 [0.4045-0.5340] 3.2 Jain et al [24 ] 262 133 0.5076 [0.4454-0.5697] 3.2 Venkateshkrishna et al [37 ] 530 145 0.2736 [0.2360-0.3137] 3.3 Sahu et al [35 ] 61 15 0.2459 [0.1446-0.3729] 2.9 Jacob et al [23 ] 135 77 0.5704 [0.4824-0.6552] 3.1 Reddy et al [34 ] 594 191 0.3215 [0.2841-0.3608] 3.3 Gupta et al [22 ] 132 59 0.4470 [0.3604-0.5359] 3.1
Table 3 Tests of heterogeneity among studies of the male Indian geriatric population
Test of heterogeneity Prevalence LCI 95% HCI 95% Pooled Statistics 0.38 0.33 0.43 Heterogeneity 4.48 4.02 4.98 I-squared 95.0 93.8 96.0 Cochran's Q 621.09 χ2 , P value 0.0001 τ2 0.0197
Table 4 Prevalence of cardiovascular diseases in the female Indian geriatric population
Study name N Cases Proportion 95%CI %W (Random) Joshi et al [25 ] 102 57 0.5588 [0.4571-0.6571] 3.0 Hazarika et al [9 ] 388 244 0.6289 [0.5787-0.6771] 3.2 Prakash et al [2 ] 110 60 0.5455 [0.4477-0.6407] 3.0 Kishore et al [29 ] 108 48 0.4444 [0.3488-0.5432] 3.0 Bhatia et al [17 ] 209 97 0.4641 [0.3950-0.5342] 3.1 Chandrashekhar et al [1 ] 189 30 0.1587 [0.1097-0.2188] 3.2 Lena et al [31 ] 121 73 0.6033 [0.5104-0.6911] 3.0 Bhatt et al [18 ] 144 56 0.3889 [0.3088-0.4736] 3.1 Bharati et al [16 ] 122 68 0.5574 [0.4647-0.6472] 3.0 Khanam et al [28 ] 248 101 0.4073 [0.3455-0.4712] 3.2 Kamble et al [26 ] 262 69 0.2634 [0.2111-0.3211] 3.2 Sharma et al [36 ] 204 98 0.4804 [0.4101-0.5513] 3.1 Qadri et al [33 ] 324 159 0.4907 [0.4351-0.5466] 3.2 Barman et al [3 ] 72 34 0.4722 [0.3533-0.5935] 2.9 Noor et al [32 ] 92 46 0.5000 [0.3939-0.6061] 2.9 Ghosh et al [20 ] 235 82 0.3489 [0.2881-0.4136] 3.2 Kumar et al [30 ] 212 71 0.3349 [0.2717-0.4028] 3.1 Bardhan et al [10 ] 197 19 0.0964 [0.0591-0.1465] 3.2 Dutta et al [19 ] 208 77 0.3702 [0.3044-0.4397] 3.1 Banjare et al [14 ] 157 20 0.1274 [0.0796-0.1899] 3.2 Shubha et al [11 ] 138 19 0.1377 [0.0850-0.2066] 3.2 Alam et al [12 ] 373 207 0.5550 [0.5029-0.6061] 3.2 Karanth et al [27 ] 500 130 0.2600 [0.2221-0.3008] 3.2 Gupta et al [21 ] 290 158 0.5448 [0.4856-0.6031] 3.2 Bartwal et al [15 ] 253 99 0.3913 [0.3308-0.4544] 3.2 Naushad et al [8 ] 369 207 0.5610 [0.5087-0.6123] 3.2 Jain et al [24 ] 338 144 0.4260 [0.3727-0.4807] 3.2 Venkateshkrishna et al [37 ] 922 402 0.4360 [0.4037-0.4687] 3.2 Sahu et al [35 ] 170 52 0.3059 [0.2376-0.3811] 3.1 Jacob et al [23 ] 268 124 0.4627 [0.4018-0.5244] 3.2 Reddy et al [34 ] 671 193 0.2876 [0.2536-0.3235] 3.2 Gupta et al [22 ] 168 88 0.5238 [0.4455-0.6013] 3.1
Table 5 Tests of heterogeneity among studies of the female Indian geriatric population
Tests of heterogeneity Prevalence LCI 95% HCI 95% Pooled Statistics 0.409 0.355 0.462 Heterogeneity 5.31 4.82 5.84 I-squared 96.4 95.7 97.1 Cochran's Q 873.0 χ2 , P value 0.0001 τ2 0.0229