Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Meta-Anal. Feb 28, 2020; 8(1): 15-26
Published online Feb 28, 2020. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v8.i1.15
Published online Feb 28, 2020. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v8.i1.15
Table 1 The characteristics of each study
Ref. | Study period | Study design | State | Sampling method | Age group | Sample size |
Joshi et al[25] | 2001 | Cross-sectional | Haryana | Cluster sampling | ≥ 60 | 200 |
Hazarika et al[9] | 2002 | Cross-sectional | Assam | Simple random sampling | ≥ 60 | 888 |
Lena et al[31] | 2003 | Cross-sectional | Karnataka | ≥ 60 | 213 | |
Prakash et al[2] | 2003 | Cross-sectional | Rajasthan | ≥ 60 | 300 | |
Kishore et al[29] | 2004 | Cross-sectional | Uttarakhand | ≥ 60 | 285 | |
Khanam et al[28] | 2004 | Cross-sectional | Bangladesh | Simple random sampling | ≥ 60 | 452 |
Bhatia et al[17] | 2006 | Cross-sectional | Haryana | Stratified random sampling | ≥ 65 | 361 |
Chandrashekhar et al[1] | 2008 | Cross-sectional | Karnataka | Systematic random sampling | ≥ 60 | 370 |
Bharati et al[16] | 2008 | Cross-sectional | Tamil Nadu | Simple random sampling | ≥ 60 | 225 |
Bhatt et al[18] | 2008 | Cross-sectional | Gujarat | Simple random sampling | ≥ 60 | 218 |
Jacob et al[23] | 2010 | Cross-sectional | Kerala | Cluster sampling | ≥ 60 | 403 |
Sharma et al[36] | 2010 | Cross-sectional | Himachal Pradesh | Multistage simple random sampling | ≥ 60 | 400 |
Ghosh et al[20] | 2011 | Cross-sectional | Bihar | ≥ 60 | 431 | |
Kamble et al[26] | 2011 | Cross-sectional | Maharashtra | Systematic random sampling | ≥ 60 | 494 |
Qadri et al[33] | 2011 | Cross-sectional | Haryana | Simple random sampling | ≥ 60 | 660 |
Banjare et al[14] | 2012 | Cross-sectional | Odisha | PPS, Systematic sampling | ≥ 60 | 310 |
Dutta et al[19] | 2012 | Cross-sectional | Assam | Multistage sampling | ≥ 60 | 370 |
Banjare et al[13] | 2012 | Cross-sectional | Odisha | Multistage simple random sampling | ≥ 60 | 310 |
Barman et al[3] | 2013 | Cross-sectional | Bihar | ≥ 60 | 160 | |
Shubha et al[11] | 2013 | Cross-sectional | Karnataka | Simple random sampling | ≥ 60 | 180 |
Karanth et al[27] | 2013 | Cross-sectional | Karnataka | ≥ 60 | 500 | |
Alam et al[12] | 2014 | Cross-sectional | Chhattisgarh | Multistage simple random sampling | ≥ 60 | 640 |
Bardhan et al[10] | 2014 | Cross-sectional | Uttar Pradesh | Simple random sampling | ≥ 60 | 980 |
Bartwal et al[15] | 2014 | Cross-sectional | Uttarakhand | Systematic sampling | ≥ 60 | 440 |
Gupta et al[21] | 2014 | Cross-sectional | Punjab | ≥ 60 | 534 | |
Kumar et al[30] | 2014 | Cross-sectional | Uttar Pradesh | Stratified random sampling | ≥ 60 | 402 |
Naushad et al[8] | 2014 | Cross-sectional | Chhattisgarh | Multistage simple random sampling | ≥ 60 | 640 |
Jain et al[24] | 2014 | Cross-sectional | Maharashtra | PPS | ≥ 60 | 600 |
Noor et al[32] | 2014 | Cross-sectional | Odisha | Simple random sampling | ≥ 60 | 224 |
Venkateshkrishna et al[37] | 2015 | Cross-sectional | Karnataka | ≥ 60 | 1452 | |
Sahu et al[35] | 2017 | Cross-sectional | Uttar Pradesh | ≥ 60 | 231 | |
Reddy et al[34] | 2017 | Cross-sectional | Telangana | Systematic random sampling | ≥ 60 | 1265 |
Gupta et al[22] | 2018 | Cross-sectional | Haryana | Simple random sampling | ≥ 60 | 300 |
Table 2 Prevalence of cardiovascular diseases in the male Indian geriatric population
Ref. | n | Cases | Proportion | 95%CI | W (Random) (%) |
Joshi et al[25] | 98 | 41 | 0.4184 | [0.3195-0.5223] | 3.0 |
Hazarika et al[9] | 500 | 321 | 0.6420 | [0.5982-0.6841] | 3.3 |
Prakash et al[2] | 190 | 84 | 0.4421 | [0.3703-0.5158] | 3.2 |
Kishore et al[29] | 177 | 70 | 0.3955 | [0.3229-0.4716] | 3.1 |
Bhatia et al[17] | 152 | 53 | 0.3487 | [0.2733-0.4301] | 3.1 |
Chandrashekhar et al[1] | 181 | 35 | 0.1934 | [0.1385-0.2585] | 3.2 |
Lena et al[31] | 92 | 53 | 0.5761 | [0.4686-0.6785] | 3.0 |
Bhatt et al[18] | 74 | 19 | 0.2568 | [0.1622-0.3716] | 3.0 |
Bharati et al[16] | 92 | 34 | 0.3696 | [0.2712-0.4766] | 3.0 |
Khanam et al[28] | 204 | 74 | 0.3627 | [0.2968-0.4328] | 3.2 |
Kamble et al[26] | 232 | 50 | 0.2155 | [0.1644-0.2741] | 3.2 |
Sharma et al[36] | 196 | 64 | 0.3265 | [0.2614-0.3970] | 3.2 |
Qadri et al[33] | 336 | 135 | 0.4018 | [0.3489-0.4564] | 3.2 |
Barman et al[3] | 88 | 47 | 0.5341 | [0.4246-0.6412] | 2.9 |
Banjare et al[13] | 153 | 40 | 0.2614 | [0.1938-0.3385] | 3.2 |
Noor et al[32] | 132 | 62 | 0.4697 | [0.3823-0.5585] | 3.1 |
Ghosh et al[20] | 196 | 96 | 0.4898 | [0.4179-0.5620] | 3.2 |
Kumar et al[30] | 190 | 66 | 0.3474 | [0.2799-0.4197] | 3.2 |
Bardhan et al[10] | 293 | 30 | 0.1024 | [0.0702-0.1429] | 3.3 |
Dutta et al[19] | 162 | 57 | 0.3519 | [0.2786-0.4307] | 3.1 |
Banjare et al[14] | 153 | 40 | 0.2614 | [0.1938-0.3385] | 3.2 |
Shubha et al[11] | 42 | 15 | 0.3571 | [0.2155-0.5197] | 2.6 |
Alam et al[12] | 267 | 113 | 0.4232 | [0.3632-0.4849] | 3.2 |
Gupta et al[21] | 244 | 94 | 0.3852 | [0.3239-0.4495] | 3.2 |
Bartwal et al[15] | 187 | 77 | 0.4118 | [0.3405-0.4859] | 3.2 |
Naushad et al[8] | 241 | 113 | 0.4689 | [0.4045-0.5340] | 3.2 |
Jain et al[24] | 262 | 133 | 0.5076 | [0.4454-0.5697] | 3.2 |
Venkateshkrishna et al[37] | 530 | 145 | 0.2736 | [0.2360-0.3137] | 3.3 |
Sahu et al[35] | 61 | 15 | 0.2459 | [0.1446-0.3729] | 2.9 |
Jacob et al[23] | 135 | 77 | 0.5704 | [0.4824-0.6552] | 3.1 |
Reddy et al[34] | 594 | 191 | 0.3215 | [0.2841-0.3608] | 3.3 |
Gupta et al[22] | 132 | 59 | 0.4470 | [0.3604-0.5359] | 3.1 |
Table 3 Tests of heterogeneity among studies of the male Indian geriatric population
Test of heterogeneity | Prevalence | LCI 95% | HCI 95% |
Pooled Statistics | 0.38 | 0.33 | 0.43 |
Heterogeneity | 4.48 | 4.02 | 4.98 |
I-squared | 95.0 | 93.8 | 96.0 |
Cochran's Q | 621.09 | ||
χ2, P value | 0.0001 | ||
τ2 | 0.0197 |
Table 4 Prevalence of cardiovascular diseases in the female Indian geriatric population
Study name | N | Cases | Proportion | 95%CI | %W (Random) |
Joshi et al[25] | 102 | 57 | 0.5588 | [0.4571-0.6571] | 3.0 |
Hazarika et al[9] | 388 | 244 | 0.6289 | [0.5787-0.6771] | 3.2 |
Prakash et al[2] | 110 | 60 | 0.5455 | [0.4477-0.6407] | 3.0 |
Kishore et al[29] | 108 | 48 | 0.4444 | [0.3488-0.5432] | 3.0 |
Bhatia et al[17] | 209 | 97 | 0.4641 | [0.3950-0.5342] | 3.1 |
Chandrashekhar et al[1] | 189 | 30 | 0.1587 | [0.1097-0.2188] | 3.2 |
Lena et al[31] | 121 | 73 | 0.6033 | [0.5104-0.6911] | 3.0 |
Bhatt et al[18] | 144 | 56 | 0.3889 | [0.3088-0.4736] | 3.1 |
Bharati et al[16] | 122 | 68 | 0.5574 | [0.4647-0.6472] | 3.0 |
Khanam et al[28] | 248 | 101 | 0.4073 | [0.3455-0.4712] | 3.2 |
Kamble et al[26] | 262 | 69 | 0.2634 | [0.2111-0.3211] | 3.2 |
Sharma et al[36] | 204 | 98 | 0.4804 | [0.4101-0.5513] | 3.1 |
Qadri et al[33] | 324 | 159 | 0.4907 | [0.4351-0.5466] | 3.2 |
Barman et al[3] | 72 | 34 | 0.4722 | [0.3533-0.5935] | 2.9 |
Noor et al[32] | 92 | 46 | 0.5000 | [0.3939-0.6061] | 2.9 |
Ghosh et al[20] | 235 | 82 | 0.3489 | [0.2881-0.4136] | 3.2 |
Kumar et al[30] | 212 | 71 | 0.3349 | [0.2717-0.4028] | 3.1 |
Bardhan et al[10] | 197 | 19 | 0.0964 | [0.0591-0.1465] | 3.2 |
Dutta et al[19] | 208 | 77 | 0.3702 | [0.3044-0.4397] | 3.1 |
Banjare et al[14] | 157 | 20 | 0.1274 | [0.0796-0.1899] | 3.2 |
Shubha et al[11] | 138 | 19 | 0.1377 | [0.0850-0.2066] | 3.2 |
Alam et al[12] | 373 | 207 | 0.5550 | [0.5029-0.6061] | 3.2 |
Karanth et al[27] | 500 | 130 | 0.2600 | [0.2221-0.3008] | 3.2 |
Gupta et al[21] | 290 | 158 | 0.5448 | [0.4856-0.6031] | 3.2 |
Bartwal et al[15] | 253 | 99 | 0.3913 | [0.3308-0.4544] | 3.2 |
Naushad et al[8] | 369 | 207 | 0.5610 | [0.5087-0.6123] | 3.2 |
Jain et al[24] | 338 | 144 | 0.4260 | [0.3727-0.4807] | 3.2 |
Venkateshkrishna et al[37] | 922 | 402 | 0.4360 | [0.4037-0.4687] | 3.2 |
Sahu et al[35] | 170 | 52 | 0.3059 | [0.2376-0.3811] | 3.1 |
Jacob et al[23] | 268 | 124 | 0.4627 | [0.4018-0.5244] | 3.2 |
Reddy et al[34] | 671 | 193 | 0.2876 | [0.2536-0.3235] | 3.2 |
Gupta et al[22] | 168 | 88 | 0.5238 | [0.4455-0.6013] | 3.1 |
Table 5 Tests of heterogeneity among studies of the female Indian geriatric population
Tests of heterogeneity | Prevalence | LCI 95% | HCI 95% |
Pooled Statistics | 0.409 | 0.355 | 0.462 |
Heterogeneity | 5.31 | 4.82 | 5.84 |
I-squared | 96.4 | 95.7 | 97.1 |
Cochran's Q | 873.0 | ||
χ2, P value | 0.0001 | ||
τ2 | 0.0229 |
- Citation: Nanda H, Shivgotra VK. Gender prevalence of cardiovascular diseases in the geriatric population of India: A meta-analysis using R. World J Meta-Anal 2020; 8(1): 15-26
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v8/i1/15.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v8.i1.15