Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Meta-Anal. Aug 26, 2016; 4(4): 95-104
Published online Aug 26, 2016. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v4.i4.95
Published online Aug 26, 2016. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v4.i4.95
Diagnostic methods compared | Lesion size | Ref. | Summary sensitivity, % (95%CI) | Summary specificity, % (95%CI) |
Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI alone | ≤ 2.0 cm | [18,21,28] | 0.77 (0.71-0.82) | 0.97 (0.93-0.99) |
Combined Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI with DWI | 0.86 (0.82-0.90) | 0.92 (0.88-0.96) | ||
P value | 0.0047 | 0.975 | ||
Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI alone | ≤ 1.0 cm | [18,21] | 0.56 (0.45-0.69) | 0.96 (0.90-0.99) |
Combined Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI with DWI | 0.80 (0.68-0.88) | 0.94 (0.87-0.98) | ||
P value | 0.0013 | 0.709 |
- Citation: Shan Y, Gao J, Zeng MS, Lin J, Xu PJ. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of small hepatocellular carcinoma (≤ 2.0 cm) in patients with chronic liver disease: A meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2016; 4(4): 95-104
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v4/i4/95.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v4.i4.95