Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Meta-Anal. Aug 28, 2022; 10(4): 206-219
Published online Aug 28, 2022. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v10.i4.206
Table 1 Exclusion criteria for the qualitative review
Studies that did not unambiguously study burnout and/or stress at work
Studies that did not focus on HCWs or a subpopulation thereof
Literature reviews, meta-analyses and systematic reviews
Full English text not available
Preprints, unreviewed articles
Short communications, editorials, etc. (not sufficient data)
Table 2 Main features of the studies selected (N = 41)

N
%

N
%
Publication month (2020)Region
March12Asia & Pacific1229
April37Europe1844
May37Global25
June512Middle east37
July37North America410
August1537South/Latin America25
September615
October512Population
Physicians3688
Type of workNurses2766
Cross-sectional survey3995Other HCWs1741
Longitudinal study12
Longitudinal cohort study12Measuring scale
Validated burnout scale1844
Validated stress scale1844
Table 3 Sociodemographic data of the respondents of studies reviewed

N






%
Region
Asia & Pacific
Europe
Middle east
North America
South/Latin America
Multi-country
Total

Studies1218342241
Respondents12587975417741546512173427907
%45.1 35.0 6.4 5.5 1.8 6.2
Gendera
Female9775659011765441793421860670.4
Male26953'073598339333659769729.1
Non-binary/other379101001290.5
Age categoryb
18-305344176743040794397843930.7
31-455134354311576762496391139841.5
> 4520784019187460169699761227.7
Occupational role
Physician33083780799113451217341126740.4
Nurse79964499552248001329547.6
Other1283147542316400334512.0
Warda
Front line53362931860947010011107544.4
Usual ward725142129142525127331387455.6
Married/concubinea
Yes5704262498792-8311023866.2
No3691120414919-170523333.8
Childrena
Yes5151086277185-0206348.6
No905778149352-0218451.4
Psychological comorbiditiesa
Yes-45122-1801859.2
No-6751013-1450183390.8