Minireviews Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Meta-Anal. Feb 28, 2022; 10(1): 1-11
Published online Feb 28, 2022. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v10.i1.1
Uses of knockout, knockdown, and transgenic models in the studies of glucose transporter 4
Tian-Nan Wang, Xin-Ge Hu, Guo-Xun Chen, Department of Nutrition, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, United States
ORCID number: Tian-Nan Wang (0000-0001-5584-3628); Xin-Ge Hu (0000-0002-3253-7537); Guo-Xun Chen (0000-0001-6226-4050).
Author contributions: Chen GX was responsible for the design of the topics; Wang TN and Hu XG were responsible for PubMed search and information collection; Wang TN, Hu XG and Chen GX were responsible for writing.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors confirmed that there is no conflict-of-interest to be reported.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Guo-Xun Chen, PhD, Associate Professor, Research Scientist, Department of Nutrition, The University of Tennessee, Room 229, Jessie Harris Building 1215 West Cumberland Avenue, Knoxville, TN 37996, United States. gchen6@utk.edu
Received: November 21, 2021
Peer-review started: November 21, 2021
First decision: December 10, 2021
Revised: December 10, 2021
Accepted: February 23, 2022
Article in press: February 23, 2022
Published online: February 28, 2022
Processing time: 99 Days and 7.6 Hours

Abstract

Currently, glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) has been considered as the key player for the insulin-stimulated glucose transport in the muscle and adipose tissues. The development of recombinant DNA techniques allows the creations of genetically knockout, knockdown and transgenic animals and cells for the study of GLUT4’s physiological functions. Here, we have used key words to search the PubMed and summarized the methods used in Slc2a4 gene knockout, GLUT4 knockdown and overexpression in the whole body and tissue specific manner. The whole body GLUT4-null mice have growth retardation, but normal glucose tolerance and basal glucose turnover rates. Compared with whole body Slc2a4 knockout mice, adipose and muscle double knockout mice have impaired insulin tolerance and glucose intolerance. The results of GLUT4 knockdown in 3T3-L1 adipocytes have shown that its expression is needed for lipogenesis after, but not during, differentiation. Transgenic mice with the whole body GLUT4 overexpression have normal body weight and lowered blood glucose level. The adipose tissue specific overexpression of GLUT4 leads to increases in mouse body weight and adipose tissue weight. The insulin-stimulated GLUT4 translocation in the skeletal muscle contributes to the regulation of glucose homeostasis. Data from both transgenic overexpression and tissue specific Slc2a4 knockout indicate that GLUT4 probably plays a role in the glucose uptake in the fasting state. More studies are warranted to use advanced molecular biology tools to decipher the roles of GLUT4 in the control of glucose homeostasis.

Key Words: Glucose transporter 4; Knockout; Knockdown; Transgene; Overexpression; Insulin

Core Tip: The whole body glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4)-null mice have growth retardation, but normal glucose tolerance and basal glucose turnover rates. The muscle-specific GLUT4 knockout mice have normal body weight and fat pad weight at least before 6 mo of age, whereas the adipose-GLUT4 knockout mice have glucose intolerance. The adipose and muscle GLUT4 double knockout mice develop hyperglycemia in the fasting state, suggesting the role of GLUT4 in fasting state. Compared to the control mice, wholebody GLUT4 transgenic mice have similar growth rate before 10 wk of age, lower blood glucose in the fasting, and lower insulin level in the fed state. The adipose tissue specific GLUT4 overexpression increases body weight, glucose transport rate and adipose tissue weight. Data from both transgenic overexpression and tissue specific knockout of GLUT4 indicate that GLUT4 probably plays a role in the glucose uptake in the fasting state.



INTRODUCTION

Genes in an organism are codes responsible for genetic traits. In most cases, genes usually exist in the form of nucleotide sequences. In a cell, the DNA sequence of a gene is first transcribed into mRNA, which serves as the template for protein translation. The newly synthesized proteins contribute to biological processes in an organism. To understand the biochemical, biophysical, and genetic functions of a given gene and its protein, recombinant DNA technologies have been developed and used extensively. Since 1970s, the discovery of restriction enzymes has facilitate the development of molecular cloning methods and allowed the manipulation of DNA sequences selectively and specifically to create novel recombinant molecules[1]. DNA fragments are inserted into vectors to form recombinant genetic materials for their replication, studies of gene functions and productions of recombinant proteins. The recombinant DNA technology was first used to study gene functions when the genes responsible for metabolism of galactose in E. coli were fused into the SV40 vector in 1972[2]. For the past few decades, procedures of molecular cloning have been simplified and standardized to construct recombinant DNA with various sizes for different purposes[3]. All these have been applied to generate transgenic organisms and produce recombinant proteins for the use in variety of research and clinical settings.

Glucose enters cells via a family of proteins called glucose transporters (GLUTs), which have 14 known members. Glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) encoded by SLC2A4 gene in human genome and Slc2a4 gene in others such as rodent genomes has 409 amino acid residues, and a Km value of 5 mmol/L for glucose[4]. GLUT4 was first identified in a screen for the insulin-stimulated glucose transporter in cell membrane preparations of rat adipocytes using monoclonal antibodies against these membrane proteins[5]. Subsequently, Slc2a4 gene was cloned from rat adipose tissue, and is homologous with GLUT1, which is encoded by Slc2a1 gene[6-8]. GLUT4 is expressed in not only adipose and muscle cells, but also other tissues such as the heart and brain[9]. The N- and C- termini of GLUT4 are located in the cytoplasm and responsible for the insulin-mediated translocation from the cytosol to the cell membrane[10]. The current model is that insulin stimulates GLUT4 translocation from the intracellular locations to the plasma membrane, where it facilitates the glucose entry into cells[11]. In addition, exercise also stimulates the expression of SLC2A4 mRNA in the skeletal muscle and improves insulin sensitivity in human patients[12], which may be mediated by GLUT4[13]. Insulin-stimulated glucose transport is significantly impaired in the skeletal muscle of patients with type 2 diabetes[14]. Therefore, understanding the role of GLUT4 in the regulation of glucose homeostasis is critical for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Here, we summarize the recombinant DNA technologies used to study expression profiles and functions of GLUT4 in tissues and cells. Key words as indicated in the following sections were used to search PubMed. The title and abstracts of the retrieved articles were read by authors. Only the articles that contained descriptions of knockout, transgenic overexpression and knockdown molecular techniques, and confirmed gene or protein expression levels were chosen for further reading. The methods used to manipulate the expression levels of GLUT4 in vivo and in vitro and reported observations in retrieved studies were summarized here. This review may help researchers who are interested in the physiological functions of GLUT4 to have a clear understanding of the status.

THE COMMON MOLECULAR BIOLOGY TECHNIQUES TO STUDY GENE AND PROTEIN FUNCTIONS

The development of molecular cloning techniques allows isolation, generation, and production of DNA sequence independence of the species and organisms that carry the original sequences. DNA fragments isolated from genomes or created via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are inserted into vectors that can replicate and express in the host cells, and in turn alter the genetic features of the host cells, tissues or organisms[15]. PCR technique quickly produces large numbers of copies of a specific DNA fragment for sequencing analysis and molecular cloning. Cloning of a specific DNA sequence helps to explore the gene’s biological functions, and to create large amounts of protein, such as growth hormone, insulin and clotting factors for therapeutic purposes[16]. In addition, a comparison of DNA sequences from different organisms can determine the evolutionary relationship within and between species, and functional domains of a gene. Recombinant DNA technologies can be used in gene therapies to treat diseases such as immunodeficiency diseases and metabolic disorders[17] and diagnosis of genetic diseases[18]. Genetically modified organisms or genetically engineered organisms can be created via alterations of the genetic sequences of the chromosome or insertions of the foreign DNA fragments into the genome to alter the phenotypes of the offspring[19].

Genes in plants, animals and microorganisms have been deleted or their expression levels have been knocked down to investigate their functions or treat genetic diseases clinically[20]. Methods are developed to silence or remove the target gene, such as gene silencing, conditional knockout, homologous recombination, and gene editing[20]. Homologous recombination occurs when homologous recombinases (nucleases) recombine two linearized DNA fragments with the same terminal sequences to create a novel fragment for molecular manipulations[21]. This makes accurate gene editing possible and becomes emerging tools in genetics[22]. Zinc finger nucleases, transcription activator-like effector nucleases, and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) are developed and shown differences in knockout efficiency, completion time, and off-target efficiency[20]. Each of these techniques uses a nuclease to introduce DNA double-strand breaks at the targeted locations with the guidance of homologous binding proteins or RNA[23]. Gene knockdown methods such as RNA-based RNA interference, small interfering RNA and short hairpin RNA (shRNA), and antisense oligonucleotides have been developed to inhibit protein expression[24]. RNA interference (RNAi) is triggered by double-stranded RNA and causes the sequence-specific mRNA degradation of the single-stranded target RNA[25]. Small non-coding RNA molecules can also act to inhibit RNA translation[26].

In addition to the change of gene expression, tagged proteins or fusion proteins with novel properties can be created using molecular biology tools[27]. Fusion or tagged proteins with two or more domains from different proteins can be easily obtained and purified for their uses in research and clinical treatments, detection of the expression levels, and visualization of the intracellular locations of the expressed proteins[27]. These have been used to create vaccines, multifunctional enzymes, targeted drugs, thrombolytics, antimicrobial peptides, etc[28].

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY TECHNIQUES USED IN THE STUDIES OF GLUT4

The identification of GLUT4 and cloning its gene[29] have facilitated the studies of its tissue distribution, functions, the mechanisms responsible for its translocation, and the regulations of its protein and mRNA expressions in different cells. The tagged or fluorescent GLUT4 fusion proteins are used to study its intracellular trafficking. GLUT4 overexpression and knockdown, and Slc2a4 gene knockout in vitro and in vivo have been developed to study the insulin-stimulated GLUT4 translocation and glucose homeostasis, which contribute significantly to our understanding of the role of GLUT4[29]. To review the techniques of molecular biology in the study of GLUT4, "GLUT4, molecular biology" and "SLC2A4, molecular biology" as keywords were used to search the PubMed database to retrieve relevant articles. We have focused on the techniques used in Slc2a4 knockout, knockdown and transgenic studies, and results associated with the genetic changes in vivo and in vitro were analyzed and summarized here. As shown in Figure 1, Slc2a4 genes have been knocked out and GLUT4 protein has been overexpressed in the whole body and in specific tissues and cells. In addition, GLUT4 protein has been knocked down using shRNA, and its translocation has been studied using fusion or tagged proteins. Various methods such as in situ hybridization, fluorescent microscopy, immunohistochemistry, Western blotting for protein and Northern blot and real-time PCR for mRNA used to determine endogenous or transgenic GLUT4 expressions are also summarized in this review.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Recombinant DNA technologies used in the study of glucose transporter 4 functions and its translocation mechanism. Slc2a4 gene is transcribed into mRNA, which is translated into glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) protein. The binding of insulin to its receptor leads to the activation of insulin signaling system, which facilitates the movement of GLUT4 from its intracellular location to the cell membrane, and in turn the entry of glucose in the cells. Recombinant DNA technologies have been used to alter gene expression level (1), reduce mRNA translation (2) and tracing intracellular movement of GLUT4 protein (3). 1. Slc2a4 gene has been deleted in the whole body via homologous recombination and in individual tissues or cells via Cre-LoxP system driven by tissue specific promoters. In addition, transgenic overexpression of GLUT4 in whole body or specific tissues and cells has been done using mini gene or SLC2A4 cDNA driven by different promoters, respectively. 2. The GLUT4 protein is knocked down using short-hairpin RNA under the control of different promoters to interfere the translation process. 3. Fusion or tagged GLUT4 has been created to study the insulin-stimulated GLUT4 translocation mechanism using fluorescent microscopy, and immune assays.
Whole-body and tissue specific Slc2a4 knockout studies

Slc2a4 mRNA expression is detected not only in brown and white adipose tissue, skeletal and cardiac muscle, but also in other tissues such as neurons[30]. To study GLUT4 functions, mice with the Slc2a4 deletion in the whole body or specific tissues or cells have been created. We searched PubMed to retrieve the original articles that initially reported the Slc2a4 deletions. Table 1 shows the techniques for creating knockouts, experimental animals, methods to confirm the gene deletion and expression, and observations. In the end, seven representative articles that the research groups generated a specific knockout model to study GLUT4 and clearly described the methods of GLUT4 deletion are summarized here as shown in Table 1. The animal models were also used by many other groups.

Table 1 Methods used to create whole body and tissue specific Slc2A4 knockout animals, tissues and animals studied, analytic methods included, and observations reported.
Methods
Tissues/Animals
Analysis
Observations
Ref.
A construct with a disrupted mouse Slc2a4 gene was electroporated into WW6/22 ES cells to create deletion, which were microinjected into C57Bl/6 blastocystsSkeletal muscle/GLUT4-null mice and wild-type control miceSouthern blot for DNA, Northern blot for mRNA, and Western blot for protein measurementsThe Slc2a4-/-mice have normal glycemia, growth retardation, decreased longevity, cardiac hypertrophy, reduced adipose deposits, postprandial hyperinsulinemia, and lowered insulin sensitivity; The male Slc2a4-/-mice have lower and higher blood glucose levels than the controls in fasted and fed states, respectively[31]
GLUT4-loxP mice were crossed with α-MHC promoter-driven CreHeart/Cardiac-selective Slc2a4-/-deletion mice (G4H–/– mice) and control miceSouthern blotting and PCR for DNA, and Western blot for GLUT4 levels using various antiseraG4H–/– mice have modest cardiac hypertrophy, normal life span and serum levels of insulin, glucose, FFAs, lactate, and β-hydroxybutyrate, increased basal cardiac glucose transport and GLUT1 expression, and abolished insulin-stimulated cardiac glucose uptake[33]
GLUT4loxP mice as shown in[33] were crossed with the muscle CK promoter driven Cre transgenic mice to obtain Muscle-G4KOSkeletal muscle/Muscle-G4KO mice and heterozygous Slc2a4 deletion mice in the 129SV and C57Bl/6J backgroundReverse transcription–PCR for mRNA, and Western blot for GLUT4 protein (anti-GLUT4 AB1346)Muscle-G4KO mice show a reduction in basal and near-absence of insulin- or contraction-stimulated glucose transport, showing; severe insulin resistance and glucose intolerance from an early age[34]
GLUT4-null mice were crossed with transgenic mice expressing GLUT 4 driven by MLC promoter[55] to create MLC-GLUT4-null mice EDL and soleus muscle/MLC-GLUT4-null mice having GLUT4 in the fast-twitch EDL muscle, GLUT4 null mice, and control miceWestern blot for GLUT4 protein (rabbit polyclonal antiserum)MLC-GLUT4-null mice have less GLUT4 in WAT (females only) and soleus muscle, adipose tissue deposits, adipocyte size, and plasma free fatty acid levels in the fed state than the controls. Glucose uptake in the EDL, but not in the soleus, muscle is restored to normal in male and above normal in female MLC-GLUT4-null mice[32]
GLUT4–loxP mice were crossed with aP2-driven Cre transgenic mic to obtain G4A-/- mice Adipose tissue/G4A-/-, and control miceWestern blot for GLUT4 protein in BAT and WAT tissuesG4A-/- mice show impaired insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in adipocytes, glucose intolerance, hyperinsulinemia, and insulin resistance in the muscle and liver[35]
The G4A-/- mice[35] were crossed with the muscle-G4KO mice[34] to generate AMG4KO mice Adipose tissue and skeletal muscle/G4A-/-, muscle-G4KO, and AMG4KO miceWestern blot for GLUT4 protein using antibodies from H. Haspel in the Charles River LaboratoryAMG4KO mice develop fasting hyperglycemia and glucose intolerance and are at risk for greater insulin resistance than mice lacking GLUT4 in only one tissue[37]
The neuron-specific Nestin promoter-driven Cre transgenic mice were crossed with GLUT4-loxP mice (FVB strain) to obtainBG4KO miceWhole brain/BG4KO and control miceWestern blot for GLUT4 protein in the brain using antibody from ChemiconBG4KO mice have glucose intolerance, insulin resistance, and impaired glucose sensing, suggesting that the brain GLUT4 may sense and respond to glucose[36]

In1995, the mouse Slc2a4 locus was disrupted using homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells which generated mice without GLUT4 expression (GLUT4-null) in the whole body[31]. The GLUT4-null mice showed growth retardation, enlarged hearts and complete lack of the white adipose tissue[31]. GLUT4-null mice have normal glucose tolerance and basal glucose turnover rates. However, they are insulin intolerant, suggesting insulin resistance. Later on, the GLUT4-null mice[31] have been used to create mice expressing GLUT4 specifically in the extensor digitorum longus muscle[32].

Tissue specific GLUT4 knockout mice have been created by crossing mice carrying a Slc2a4 allele with exon 10 flanked by loxP sites with those carrying Cre gene expression driven by tissue specific promoters[33-36]. The various phenotypes of these knockout mice help us to understand the roles of GLUT4 in different tissues and glucose metabolism. For example, the muscle-specific GLUT4 knockout mice (muscle-G4KO) were created by breeding mice carrying the Slc2a4 exon 10 flanked by loxP sites with mice carrying a transgene encoding Cre recombinase under the control of the muscle creatine kinase promoter[34]. Compared with GLUT4-null mice, muscle-G4KO mice have normal body weight and fat pad weight at least before 6 mo of age[34]. The skeletal muscle mass is also normal. The increase in heart weight is consistent with GLUT4-null mice[31] and cardiac-G4KO mice[33]. Compared with the shortened lifespan of GLUT4-null mice, the life span of muscle-G4KO mice is normal. In contrast to GLUT4-null mice and cardiac-G4KO mice, adipose-G4KO mice[35] are similar to muscle-G4KO mice. However, adipose-G4KO mice have glucose intolerance[35]. Interestingly, unlike other GLUT4 knockout mice, the heart weight of adipose-G4KO mice is normal.

In addition, adipose and muscle Slc2a4 double knockout (AMG4KO) mice are also created by crossing the respective tissue knockout mice[37]. Interestingly, these AMG4KO mice develop hyperglycemia in the fasting state[37]. It appears that GLUT4 also plays a role in a physiological condition that does not need the insulin-stimulated glucose uptake.

GLUT4 knockdown studies

The deletion of a gene completely stops the genetic information flow. Another way to block the protein expression is to knockdown a gene’s expression, which temporarily stops or reduces the expression of the targeted gene. Unlike knockout, gene knockdown involves the methods interfering with RNA molecules (mRNA or non-coding RNA) that bridges DNA and proteins. "GLUT4, knockdown" and "SLC2A4, knockdown" as keywords were used to search the PubMed database to retrieve relevant articles. Table 2 summarizes the methods of knockdown and confirmation, cells used, observations of GLUT4 knockdown studies.

Table 2 Methods used to knockdown glucose transporter 4 and analyze its expression in cell lines, and reported observations.
Methods
Cells
Analysis
Observations
Ref.
Recombinant lentivirus was used to express shRNA based on SLC2A4 sequence (NM_001042.3)Human head and neck squamous cancer cell lines, HSC-2Western blot for GLUT4 protein using antibody from EpitomicsThe knockdown of GLUT4 expression in HSC-2 cells induced DDX58 and OASL protein expressions, and reduced cell migration in culture[39]
pSIREN RetroQ system was used to obtain recombinant retroviruses that produce shRNAs corresponding to mouse Slc2a4 sequence GGTGATTGAACAGAGCTAC (GenBank ID was not provided)3T3-L1 adipocytesImmunofluorescence of phase-contrast and epifluorescence images for GLUT4 protein using antibodies (rabbit anti-GLUT4, a gift from Dr. Sam Cushman (National Institutes of Health)GLUT4 knockdown does not affect IRAP trafficking, showing that IRAP traffics is independent of GLUT4[40]
Recombinant lentivirus was used to generate shRNA under the control of human H1-RNA promoter using the mouse Slc2a4 mRNA sequence (GenBank ID not provided)3T3-L1 adipocytesImmunofluorescence microscopy and Western blot for GLUT4 using rabbit polyclonal antibody from Chemicon International IncGLUT4 knockdown in 3T3-L1 adipocytes reduces insulin-stimulated glucose uptake by 50%-60%, IRAP expression of depending on differentiation stage, and lipogenic capacity of differentiated, but not differentiating cells[41]

Recently, RNAi has emerged as a powerful tool for the study of gene function in mammalian cells[38]. After transfection, the shRNAs molecules are transcribed under promoters in constructs that drive the RNA synthesis within the targeted cells. Oligo nucleotides with sequences of shRNAs may be transfected directly into the cells[38]. In all studies summarized in Table 2, shRNAs method is used to achieve GLUT4 knockdown[39-41], which is delivered via recombinant retroviruses. Two of three studies investigated the roles of GLUT4 in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. It appears that GLUT4 expression is needed for the lipogenesis after differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells, but not necessary for lipogenesis during differentiation[41]. In addition, the insulin-regulated aminopeptidase trafficking is not always associated with the GLUT4 movement[40].

Transgenic studies

We have used key words “GLUT4 transgenic” (314 hits) and “GLUT4 overexpression” (609 hit) to search PubMed to retrieve GLUT4 transgenic studies. After going through the titles or abstracts containing “GLUT4 overexpression and GLUT4 transgenic”, we found 15 papers that have described their original methods or clearly cited the methods used by them, confirmed the GLUT4 overexpression in mice and provided results. Table 3 summarizes the techniques used to overexpress GLUT4, the methods to confirm the expression and results observed in those animals.

Table 3 The transgenic studies using the SLC2A4 mini gene and its promoter for the whole-body expression in mice.
Transgenic constructs
Analysis
Observations
Ref.
A 11.5-kb mini gene of human SLC2A4 starts with a 5.3-kb fragment upstream of transcription start and terminates within exon 10 of the gene followed by the bacterial CAT in pHSS6 vectorRNase protection assay and Western blot were used for SLC2A4 mRNA and GLUT4 protein in BAT, WAT, heart and skeleton muscle, respectivelyThe transgene expression was detected in WAT and BAT, heart and skeleton muscle of mice. Female transgenic mice have higher GLUT4 protein in the adipose tissue and less SLC2A4 mRNA in skeleton muscle than male ones. Transgenic mice have higher GLUT4 protein level in adipose tissue, liver, heart and skeleton muscle than the controls[43]
The 11.5-kb minigene with the CAT reporter as shown in[43]Reverse transcription PCR was used to measure SLC2A4 mRNA in cardiac and hindquarter muscle, BAT and WAT. Immunofluorescent test was for GLUT4 translocationTransgenic mice gained more weight after 15 wk old of age, and have lower blood glucose in both fasting and fed states, lower insulin level in fasting and higher after refeeding, and higher glycogen contents, GLUT4 translocation in cardiac and skeleton muscle than the control mice[44]
The 11.5 kb minigene with the CAT reporter as shown in[43]Western blot was used to detect GLUT4 in gastrocnemius musclesTransgenic mice have lower serum glucose level in both fasting and fed state, higher insulin level during fasting and lower after fed than the control ones[45]
The 11.5 kb minigene with the CAT reporter as shown in[43]Western blot was used to detect GLUT4 in the heartTransgenic mice have higher glucose uptake, glycolysis and glycogen content, and lower insulin-stimulated glycolysis rate and glycogen synthesis in the heart than the control ones. Glucose and fatty acid oxidation remain the same[46]
The 11.5 kb minigene with the CAT reporter as shown in[43]Immunofluorescence was used to detect GLUT4 in cardiac myocytes and adipocytesTransgenic mice have similar body weight, and epididymal adipose tissue weight and adipocyte size as the controls. Transgenic mice have higher levels of triglycerides, β-hydroxybutyrate and free fatty acids, and parametrial fat weight and lower glucose level after an oral glucose challenge and insulin level after an insulin injection than the controls. The insulin-stimulated glucose uptake is impaired in transgenic mice[47]
A 2.4-kb of 5’ flanking DNA fragment of human SLC2A4 promoter fused with the CAT as a reporter constructCAT activity assay and RNase protection assay were used to detect promoter activation and mRNA, respectivelyIn transgenic mice, CAT activity can be detected in the tissues that generally express GLUT4, including BAT and WAT, and smooth, skeleton and cardiac muscle, but not the liver[42]
A 2.4-kb of 5’ flanking DNA of human SLC2A4 promoter fused to CAT as shown in[42]Western blot was used to detect GLUT4 in adipose and skeleton muscle tissuesTransgenic mice have slower rise of blood glucose (no difference in glucose and insulin levels) during pentobarbital sodium anesthesia, and higher glucose infusion rate (40% increase) during hyper insulinemic euglycemic clamp than the controls[48]
A 2.4-kb of 5 flanking DNA of human SLC2A4 promoter fused to CAT as shown in[42]Only cited previous publications[42]Transgenic mice have lower blood glucose, higher lactate and β-hydroxybutyrate levels during both fasting and fed states, and better glucose transport in the soleus muscle when fed a high-fat and high-sugar diet than the controls[49]

In 1992, a 2.4-kb fragment of 5’ flanking DNA of human SLC2A4 promoter fused with the bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) as a reporter construct was developed and used to show the SLC2A4 expression profile in mice[42]. In 1993, an 11.5-kb SLC2A4 mini gene in pHSS6 vector was created and used to overexpress human GLUT4 in the whole body of mice[43]. As shown in Table 3, the mouse line containing the 11.5-kb mini gene has been used in seven out of eight papers testing the effects of overexpression of human GLUT4 in the mouse whole body on metabolism[43-49]. CAT activity, SLC2A4 mRNA and/or GLUT4 protein level in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle and other tissues have been analyzed to confirm the success of transgenic expression[43,44]. In general, the whole-body human GLUT4 overexpression reduces blood glucose in both fasting and fed states and increased glucose uptake in mice, but affects the blood insulin level in wild type mice and diabetic mice differentially[44]. Whole body GLUT4 overexpression does not alter body weight, but can reduce blood glucose level and affect serum insulin level.

GLUT4 has been overexpressed in a tissue specific manner as shows in Table 4. Majority of the studies have been focused on adipose tissues[50-54]. There is one for the skeletal muscle[55] and one for adipocytes[56]. A 6.3-kb genomic DNA fragment of human SLC2A4 gene driven by the mouse ap2[50] promoter has been used to overexpress GLUT4 in mouse adipose tissues. This method was first published in 1993[50] and was used in many other studies in the genetic settings of wild-type and diabetic mice[51-54]. Like the papers summarized in Table 3, a human SLC2A4 gene under a tissue-specific promoter was used to overexpress GLUT4. Human SLC2A4 cDNA was also used to overexpress GLUT4 in adipocytes[56], but mouse Slc2a4 gene was used to express GLUT4 in the hindlimb muscle[55]. All adipose tissue specific GLUT4 overexpression studies[50-55] tested the SLC2A4 mRNA or GLUT4 protein level to confirm GLUT4 expression, which is found to be expressed in both brown and white adipose tissues. In conclusion, adipose tissue specific GLUT4 overexpression in mice can cause increases in body and adipose tissue weights[50,51]. The adipose tissue specific GLUT4 transgenic mice also have higher glucose disposal rate, may be caused by increased basal and insulin-stimulated glucose transport rate. It is interesting to find out that the elevated expression of GLUT4 in the adipose tissue only can increase glucose transport rate and adipose tissue weight, which is associated with the significant increase in body weight, suggesting the importance of GLUT4 expression in adipose tissue.

Table 4 Recombinant DNA techniques to create tissue specific glucose transporter 4 overexpression in animals and cells, analysis performed, and observations reported.
Techniques
Tissue/analysis
Observations
Ref.
A 6.3-kb genomic DNA fragment of human SLC2A4 gene is under the control of a 5.4-kb’ DNA fragment of mouse ap2 promoter using Gateway cloningAdipose-specific overexpression/ Western blot was used to detect GLUT4 in BAT and WATTransgenic mice have lower glucose level in the fasting, insulin level in the fed state, higher body weight and body fat at 18 to 21 wk of age, and higher basal and insulin-stimulated glucose transport rates in epididymal, parametrial, and subcutaneous adipocytes than the controls[50]
Same as in[50]Adipose-specific overexpression/Only cited previous publications[50]Transgenic mice have higher body weight, parametrial fat pad weight and adipocyte size, and glucose transport in both fasting and fed states, and lower plasma insulin and glucose levels after a glucose challenge than the controls[51]
Same as in[50]Adipose-specific overexpression/Only cited previous publications[50]Transgenic mice have higher glucose disposal rate in a glucose tolerance test, and palmitic acid-hydroxy stearic acid levels in serum, WAT and BAT than the controls[52]
Same as in[50]Adipose-specific overexpression/Western blot was used to detect GLUT4 in BAT and WATTransgenic mice fed a high-fat diet have higher glucose disposal rate than those fed a low-fat diet, and stable GLUT4 expression in fat and no increase in body fat[53]
Same as in[50]Adipose-specific overexpression/Western blot was used to detect GLUT4 in BAT and WATTransgenic mice have higher gonadal adipose weight, basal and maximum insulin stimulated glucose transport in isolated adipocytes, glucose transport rate, triglyceride synthesis and CO2 production than the controls[54]
A 4.5-kb DNA fragment of the mouse Slc4a2 gene is under the control of a 3-kb fragment of the mouse myosin light chain gene promoterHindlimb muscle overexpression/Northern blot and Western blot were used to detect Slc4a2mRNA and GLUT4 in different tissues respectivelyTransgenic mice have higher basal and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake and turnover, higher glycogen content in the skeleton muscle, higher insulin sensitivity, higher levels of free fatty acid and ketone in both fasting and fed state, and lower fasting glucose level than the controls[55]
The human SLC2A4 cDNA is driven by the CMV promoter in pCIS2 vectorRat adipocytes overexpression/Immunofluorescence was used to detect GLUT4 overexpressionRat adipose cell transfected with the GLUT4 construct had significantly higher antibody binding after insulin stimulation than the control cells[56]
CONCLUSION
Conclusion and future perspectives

As summarized in this review, methods such as whole body and tissue specific gene knockout, recombinant viruses, real-time PCR, immunofluorescence, stable cell line and transgenic animals have been used to study GLUT4 system and insulin action in different target cells and tissues. The advantages of using multiple molecular biology methods allow us to confirm the functions of GLUT4 for insulin-stimulated glucose transport in different cells and tissues, and in the regulation of whole-body glucose homeostasis. Interestingly, GLUT4-null mice which do not have a functional Slc2a4 gene in the whole genome have normal glucose tolerance and basal glucose turnover rates, but they are insulin-intolerant which suggests insulin resistance[31]. AMG4KO mice (adipose and muscle double knockout) have reduced whole body glucose uptake and hyperglycemia[37]. Compared with GLUT4-null mice, AMG4KO mice have more severe glucose homeostasis defects. Although the explanation for this difference is not clear, differences in genetic background and differences in developmental stages, where GLUT4 is deleted have been proposed. More importantly, the hyperglycemia in these double knockout mice develops in the fasting state, rather than fed state[37]. This phenomenon appears to indicate that GLUT4 plays an important role in the control of glucose homeostasis during fasting, a state that insulin level is low. The translational value of these observations is that GLUT4’s physiological role from the integrated homeostatic point of view may be extended beyond the insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. Of course, more studies are warranted on this line of research.

On the other hand, the GLUT4 knockdown studies used the shRNAs method and have been done in cell lines to reduce GLUT4 expression. This may be helpful for us to understand the GLUT4 functions and the underlying mechanisms in particular cells. It appears that GLUT4 expression is not necessary for lipogenesis during 3T3-L1 cells differentiation. Apparently, it will be helpful when more GLUT4 knockdown studies are done in animals.

The GLUT4 overexpression in transgenic mice at wholebody level reduces blood glucose in both fasting and fed states and increased glucose uptake, glycolysis and glycogen level[44]. Compared to the control mice, overexpression of GLUT4 in adipose tissue in mice leads to lowered blood glucose in the fasting state, and increase in body weight and adipose tissue weight[50]. The expression of GLUT4 in adipose tissue and skeleton muscle affects the rate of whole-body glucose disposal, which may be caused by increased basal and insulin-stimulated glucose transport rates. This lowered blood glucose level in the transgenic mice also indicates that GLUT4 probably plays a role in the basal glucose uptake.

For the tissue specific GLUT4 knockout, Cre-loxP–mediated gene recombination under the control of promoters has been the main method to delete Slc2a4 gene. Since the development of CRISPR technology, it has not been used to knockout Slc2a4 in whole body or tissues, which is a limitation in the field. We have used “GLUT4” and “CRISPR”, and “SLC2A4” and “CRISPR” as key words to search PubMed, and retrieved eight and two published articles, respectively. However, none of the published articles used the CRISPR methods to knockout SLC2A4 or Slc2A4 gene in cells or animals. All of them used CRISPR methods to study the components in the exocytosis process of GLUT4 translocation. As CRISPR has been developed and used widely, GLUT4 knockout/knockdown through this system may be worth to be done. This may provide us another tool to manipulate the GLUT4 expression in the whole body or in tissue specific manners.

In addition, results of glucose tolerance are different between mice with whole body and tissue specific GLUT4 knockout. Therefore, whether the loss of GLUT4 in a specific tissue (muscle or fat) or the expression of GLUT4 in other tissues without gene deletion plays a role in this difference is worth to be investigated. It is safe to say that more research works are anticipated in the future to precisely define the role of GLUT4 in the control of glucose homeostasis at whole body and tissue levels. In so doing, we develop effective ways to prevent and treat type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Endocrinology and metabolism

Country/Territory of origin: United States

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): B

Grade C (Good): C

Grade D (Fair): D

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Ding L, Liu L S-Editor: Liu JH L-Editor: A P-Editor: Liu JH

References
1.  Nathans D, Smith HO. Restriction endonucleases in the analysis and restructuring of dna molecules. Annu Rev Biochem. 1975;44:273-293.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 329]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 260]  [Article Influence: 5.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Jackson DA, Symons RH, Berg P. Biochemical method for inserting new genetic information into DNA of Simian Virus 40: circular SV40 DNA molecules containing lambda phage genes and the galactose operon of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972;69:2904-2909.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 454]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 359]  [Article Influence: 6.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Yoon BK, Kim JW. How to Begin Molecular Research of Metabolic Diseases. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2016;31:505-509.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Huang S, Czech MP. The GLUT4 glucose transporter. Cell Metab. 2007;5:237-252.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 917]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 939]  [Article Influence: 55.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Elbrink J, Bihler I. Membrane Transport: Its Relation to Cellular Metabolic Rates: Glucose transport into animal cells is adapted to their metabolic rate and often controls rates of glucose use. Science. 1975;188:1177-84.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Birnbaum MJ, Identification of a novel gene encoding an insulin-responsive glucose transporter protein.   Cell 1989; 57: 305-315.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 393]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 448]  [Article Influence: 12.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Bell GI, Murray JC, Nakamura Y, Kayano T, Eddy RL, Fan YS, Byers MG, Shows TB. Polymorphic human insulin-responsive glucose-transporter gene on chromosome 17p13. Diabetes. 1989;38:1072-1075.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  James DE, Strube M, Mueckler M. Molecular cloning and characterization of an insulin-regulatable glucose transporter. Nature. 1989;338:83-87.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 594]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 652]  [Article Influence: 18.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Wang T, Wang J, Hu X, Huang XJ, Chen GX. Current understanding of glucose transporter 4 expression and functional mechanisms. World J Biol Chem. 2020;11:76-98.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 33]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34]  [Article Influence: 8.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
10.  Vargas E, Podder V, Carrillo Sepulveda MA.   Physiology, Glucose Transporter Type 4. 2021 May 9. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Thorens B, Mueckler M. Glucose transporters in the 21st Century. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2010;298:E141-E145.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 588]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 632]  [Article Influence: 45.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Bryant NJ, Govers R, James DE. Regulated transport of the glucose transporter GLUT4. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3:267-277.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 860]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 855]  [Article Influence: 38.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Shepherd PR, Kahn BB. Glucose transporters and insulin action--implications for insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:248-257.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 906]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 849]  [Article Influence: 34.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Andréasson K, Galuska D, Thörne A, Sonnenfeld T, Wallberg-Henriksson H. Decreased insulin-stimulated 3-0-methylglucose transport in in vitro incubated muscle strips from type II diabetic subjects. Acta Physiol Scand. 1991;142:255-260.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 48]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 58]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Lee J, Arun Kumar S, Jhan YY, Bishop CJ. Engineering DNA vaccines against infectious diseases. Acta Biomater. 2018;80:31-47.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 73]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 113]  [Article Influence: 18.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Zhang YP, Sun J, Ma Y. Biomanufacturing: history and perspective. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;44:773-784.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 58]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 70]  [Article Influence: 10.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Khan S, Ullah MW, Siddique R, Nabi G, Manan S, Yousaf M, Hou H. Role of Recombinant DNA Technology to Improve Life. Int J Genomics. 2016;2016:2405954.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 76]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 65]  [Article Influence: 8.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Raymond FL, Whittaker J, Jenkins L, Lench N, Chitty LS. Molecular prenatal diagnosis: the impact of modern technologies. Prenat Diagn. 2010;30:674-681.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 48]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Gordon JW, Ruddle FH. Integration and stable germ line transmission of genes injected into mouse pronuclei. Science. 1981;214:1244-1246.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 441]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 354]  [Article Influence: 8.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Bennett EP, Petersen BL, Johansen IE, Niu Y, Yang Z, Chamberlain CA, Met Ö, Wandall HH, Frödin M. INDEL detection, the 'Achilles heel' of precise genome editing: a survey of methods for accurate profiling of gene editing induced indels. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:11958-11981.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 51]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 45]  [Article Influence: 11.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Jacobus AP, Gross J. Optimal cloning of PCR fragments by homologous recombination in Escherichia coli. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0119221.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 77]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 80]  [Article Influence: 8.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Li H, Yang Y, Hong W, Huang M, Wu M, Zhao X. Applications of genome editing technology in the targeted therapy of human diseases: mechanisms, advances and prospects. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5:1.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 949]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 943]  [Article Influence: 235.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  LaFountaine JS, Fathe K, Smyth HD. Delivery and therapeutic applications of gene editing technologies ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPR/Cas9. Int J Pharm. 2015;494:180-194.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 75]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 68]  [Article Influence: 7.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Behlke M. Mini-review on current strategies to knockdown long non-coding RNAs. J Rare Dis Res Treat. 2016;1:66-70.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Winkle M, El-Daly SM, Fabbri M, Calin GA. Noncoding RNA therapeutics - challenges and potential solutions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20:629-651.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 884]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 826]  [Article Influence: 275.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Paul S, Bravo Vázquez LA, Uribe SP, Manzanero Cárdenas LA, Ruíz Aguilar MF, Chakraborty S, Sharma A. Roles of microRNAs in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism disorders and their therapeutic potential. Biochimie. 2021;187:83-93.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 6.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Kant Bhatia S, Vivek N, Kumar V, Chandel N, Thakur M, Kumar D, Yang YH, Pugazendhi A, Kumar G. Molecular biology interventions for activity improvement and production of industrial enzymes. Bioresour Technol. 2021;324:124596.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Costa S, Almeida A, Castro A, Domingues L. Fusion tags for protein solubility, purification and immunogenicity in Escherichia coli: the novel Fh8 system. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:63.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 189]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 252]  [Article Influence: 25.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Huang S, Czech MP. The GLUT4 glucose transporter. Cell Metab. 2007;5:237-252.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 917]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 939]  [Article Influence: 55.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Charron MJ, Katz EB, Olson AL. GLUT4 gene regulation and manipulation. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:3253-3256.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 108]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 99]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Katz EB, Stenbit AE, Hatton K, DePinho R, Charron MJ. Cardiac and adipose tissue abnormalities but not diabetes in mice deficient in GLUT4. Nature. 1995;377:151-155.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 336]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 314]  [Article Influence: 10.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Tsao TS, Stenbit AE, Li J, Houseknecht KL, Zierath JR, Katz EB, Charron MJ. Muscle-specific transgenic complementation of GLUT4-deficient mice. Effects on glucose but not lipid metabolism. J Clin Invest. 1997;100:671-677.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 51]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Abel ED, Kaulbach HC, Tian R, Hopkins JC, Duffy J, Doetschman T, Minnemann T, Boers ME, Hadro E, Oberste-Berghaus C, Quist W, Lowell BB, Ingwall JS, Kahn BB. Cardiac hypertrophy with preserved contractile function after selective deletion of GLUT4 from the heart. J Clin Invest. 1999;104:1703-1714.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 270]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 264]  [Article Influence: 10.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Zisman A, Peroni OD, Abel ED, Michael MD, Mauvais-Jarvis F, Lowell BB, Wojtaszewski JF, Hirshman MF, Virkamaki A, Goodyear LJ, Kahn CR, Kahn BB. Targeted disruption of the glucose transporter 4 selectively in muscle causes insulin resistance and glucose intolerance. Nat Med. 2000;6:924-928.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 533]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 542]  [Article Influence: 22.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Abel ED, Peroni O, Kim JK, Kim YB, Boss O, Hadro E, Minnemann T, Shulman GI, Kahn BB. Adipose-selective targeting of the GLUT4 gene impairs insulin action in muscle and liver. Nature. 2001;409:729-733.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 895]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 863]  [Article Influence: 37.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Reno CM, Puente EC, Sheng Z, Daphna-Iken D, Bree AJ, Routh VH, Kahn BB, Fisher SJ. Brain GLUT4 Knockout Mice Have Impaired Glucose Tolerance, Decreased Insulin Sensitivity, and Impaired Hypoglycemic Counterregulation. Diabetes. 2017;66:587-597.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 62]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 65]  [Article Influence: 9.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Kotani K, Peroni OD, Minokoshi Y, Boss O, Kahn BB. GLUT4 glucose transporter deficiency increases hepatic lipid production and peripheral lipid utilization. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:1666-1675.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 2.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Moore CB, Guthrie EH, Huang MT, Taxman DJ. Short hairpin RNA (shRNA): design, delivery, and assessment of gene knockdown. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;629:141-158.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 61]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 144]  [Article Influence: 10.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Chang YC, Chi LH, Chang WM, Su CY, Lin YF, Chen CL, Chen MH, Chang PM, Wu AT, Hsiao M. Glucose transporter 4 promotes head and neck squamous cell carcinoma metastasis through the TRIM24-DDX58 axis. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10:11.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Jordens I, Molle D, Xiong W, Keller SR, McGraw TE. Insulin-regulated aminopeptidase is a key regulator of GLUT4 trafficking by controlling the sorting of GLUT4 from endosomes to specialized insulin-regulated vesicles. Mol Biol Cell. 2010;21:2034-2044.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 51]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Liao W, Nguyen MT, Imamura T, Singer O, Verma IM, Olefsky JM. Lentiviral short hairpin ribonucleic acid-mediated knockdown of GLUT4 in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Endocrinology. 2006;147:2245-2252.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 56]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 57]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Liu ML, Olson AL, Moye-Rowley WS, Buse JB, Bell GI, Pessin JE. Expression and regulation of the human GLUT4/muscle-fat facilitative glucose transporter gene in transgenic mice. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:11673-11676.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
43.  Olson AL, Liu ML, Moye-Rowley WS, Buse JB, Bell GI, Pessin JE. Hormonal/metabolic regulation of the human GLUT4/muscle-fat facilitative glucose transporter gene in transgenic mice. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:9839-9846.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
44.  Gibbs EM, Stock JL, McCoid SC, Stukenbrok HA, Pessin JE, Stevenson RW, Milici AJ, McNeish JD. Glycemic improvement in diabetic db/db mice by overexpression of the human insulin-regulatable glucose transporter (GLUT4). J Clin Invest. 1995;95:1512-1518.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 165]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 167]  [Article Influence: 5.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Brozinick JT Jr, McCoid SC, Reynolds TH, Wilson CM, Stevenson RW, Cushman SW, Gibbs EM. Regulation of cell surface GLUT4 in skeletal muscle of transgenic mice. Biochem J. 1997;321 ( Pt 1):75-81.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Belke DD, Larsen TS, Gibbs EM, Severson DL. Glucose metabolism in perfused mouse hearts overexpressing human GLUT-4 glucose transporter. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001;280:E420-E427.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 35]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 35]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
47.  Liu ML, Gibbs EM, McCoid SC, Milici AJ, Stukenbrok HA, McPherson RK, Treadway JL, Pessin JE. Transgenic mice expressing the human GLUT4/muscle-fat facilitative glucose transporter protein exhibit efficient glycemic control. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:11346-11350.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 71]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 84]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
48.  Marshall BA, Mueckler MM. Differential effects of GLUT-1 or GLUT-4 overexpression on insulin responsiveness in transgenic mice. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:E738-E744.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Marshall BA, Hansen PA, Ensor NJ, Ogden MA, Mueckler M. GLUT-1 or GLUT-4 transgenes in obese mice improve glucose tolerance but do not prevent insulin resistance. Am J Physiol. 1999;276:E390-E400.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
50.  Shepherd PR, Gnudi L, Tozzo E, Yang H, Leach F, Kahn BB. Adipose cell hyperplasia and enhanced glucose disposal in transgenic mice overexpressing GLUT4 selectively in adipose tissue. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:22243-22246.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
51.  Gnudi L, Jensen DR, Tozzo E, Eckel RH, Kahn BB. Adipose-specific overexpression of GLUT-4 in transgenic mice alters lipoprotein lipase activity. Am J Physiol. 1996;270:R785-R792.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Yore MM, Syed I, Moraes-Vieira PM, Zhang T, Herman MA, Homan EA, Patel RT, Lee J, Chen S, Peroni OD, Dhaneshwar AS, Hammarstedt A, Smith U, McGraw TE, Saghatelian A, Kahn BB. Discovery of a class of endogenous mammalian lipids with anti-diabetic and anti-inflammatory effects. Cell. 2014;159:318-332.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 499]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 595]  [Article Influence: 66.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
53.  Gnudi L, Tozzo E, Shepherd PR, Bliss JL, Kahn BB. High level overexpression of glucose transporter-4 driven by an adipose-specific promoter is maintained in transgenic mice on a high fat diet, but does not prevent impaired glucose tolerance. Endocrinology. 1995;136:995-1002.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
54.  Tozzo E, Shepherd PR, Gnudi L, Kahn BB. Transgenic GLUT-4 overexpression in fat enhances glucose metabolism: preferential effect on fatty acid synthesis. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:E956-E964.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
55.  Tsao TS, Burcelin R, Katz EB, Huang L, Charron MJ. Enhanced insulin action due to targeted GLUT4 overexpression exclusively in muscle. Diabetes. 1996;45:28-36.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 116]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 126]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
56.  Quon MJ, Guerre-Millo M, Zarnowski MJ, Butte AJ, Em M, Cushman SW, Taylor SI. Tyrosine kinase-deficient mutant human insulin receptors (Met1153-->Ile) overexpressed in transfected rat adipose cells fail to mediate translocation of epitope-tagged GLUT4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:5587-5591.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 69]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 73]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]