Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Meta-Anal. Feb 26, 2017; 5(1): 1-13
Published online Feb 26, 2017. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i1.1
Published online Feb 26, 2017. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i1.1
Figure 1 PRISMA 2009 flow diagram.
Figure 2 Mortality rate.
No statistically significant difference was found between the colic stenting and emergency surgery groups.
Figure 3 Morbidity rate.
No statistically significant difference was found between the colon stenting and emergency surgery groups.
Figure 4 Permanent stoma rate.
No significant difference was found between the colon stenting and emergency surgery groups.
Figure 5 Primary anastomosis rate.
Tthis parameter is higher in the colonic stenting group, with a significant difference in comparison with the emergency surgery group.
Figure 6 Stoma creation rate.
Tthis parameter is higher in the emergency surgery group, with a significant difference between the two groups considered.
Figure 7 One-year recurrence rate.
This parameter is higher in the colonic stenting in comparison with the emergency surgery group, with a significant difference between the two groups.
Figure 8 Disease-free survival rate.
No significant difference was found between the colonic stenting and emergency surgery groups.
Figure 9 Overall survival rate.
No significant difference was found between the colonic stenting and emergency surgery groups.
- Citation: De Simone B, Catena F, Coccolini F, Di Saverio S, Sartelli M, Heyer A, De Angelis N, De Angelis GL, Ansaloni L. Preoperative colonic stents vs emergency surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: Meta-analysis with systematic review of the literature. World J Meta-Anal 2017; 5(1): 1-13
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v5/i1/1.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v5.i1.1