Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Meta-Anal. Aug 26, 2016; 4(4): 77-87
Published online Aug 26, 2016. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v4.i4.77
Published online Aug 26, 2016. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v4.i4.77
Figure 1 Network of comparisons antibiotics for preventing meningococcal infections.
The lines that connect antibiotics refer the direct comparison of two antibiotics. The number beside a line is the number of trials that directly compared the two antibiotics lined by the line.
Math 6 Math(A1).
Figure 2 Funnel plot - estimated effects (log odds ratio) of antibiotics in placebo-controlled studies.
Funnel plot asymmetry was not statistically significant (Harbord’s test for small study effects P = 0.600).
Figure 3 Inconsistencies (and 95%CIs) between direct and indirect estimates for comparisons with closed loops.
logROR: 0 indicates no difference between the direct and indirect estimates.
Figure 4 Rifampin vs ciprofloxacin for preventing meningococcal infections.
The outcome is the failure to eradicate at 1 wk. Pooled direct and indirect estimates were the results of mixed treatment comparison, and other results were from DerSimonian-Laird meta-analyses.
Figure 5 Proportions of failure to eradicate in individual arms of trials for the direct and indirect comparison of rifampin and ciprofloxacin.
- Citation: Abdelhamid AS, Loke YK, Abubakar I, Song F. Antibiotics for eradicating meningococcal carriages: Network meta-analysis and investigation of evidence inconsistency. World J Meta-Anal 2016; 4(4): 77-87
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v4/i4/77.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v4.i4.77