BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Perisse IV, Fan Z, Singina GN, White KL, Polejaeva IA. Improvements in Gene Editing Technology Boost Its Applications in Livestock. Front Genet 2020;11:614688. [PMID: 33603767 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.614688] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Nguyen TV, Vander Jagt CJ, Wang J, Daetwyler HD, Xiang R, Goddard ME, Nguyen LT, Ross EM, Hayes BJ, Chamberlain AJ, MacLeod IM. In it for the long run: perspectives on exploiting long-read sequencing in livestock for population scale studies of structural variants. Genet Sel Evol 2023;55:9. [PMID: 36721111 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-023-00783-5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Lund TB, Sandøe P, Secher J, Gamborg C. Danish milk consumers are critical of advanced breeding methods in dairy production, but only 1 in 5 is unwilling to drink milk from dairy cows bred with semen derived from such methods. J Dairy Sci 2023:S0022-0302(23)00011-5. [PMID: 36653290 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2022-22249] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Benfica R, Chambers J, Koo J, Nin-pratt A, Falck-zepeda J, Stads G, Arndt C. Food System Innovations and Digital Technologies to Foster Productivity Growth and Rural Transformation. Science and Innovations for Food Systems Transformation 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-15703-5_22] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Kumar D, Kues WA. Genome Engineering in Livestock: Recent Advances and Regulatory Framework. Anim Reprod Update 2022;3:14-30. [DOI: 10.48165/aru.2023.3.1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Jones HE, Wilson PB. Progress and opportunities through use of genomics in animal production. Trends Genet 2022;38:1228-52. [PMID: 35945076 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2022.06.014] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Park C, Jeoung Y, Zhang L, Yeddula SGR, Park K, Waters J, Telugu BP. Establishment, characterization, and validation of novel porcine embryonic fibroblasts as a potential source for genetic modification. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022;10. [DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1059710] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Altgilbers S, Dierks C, Klein S, Weigend S, Kues WA. Quantitative analysis of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated provirus deletion in blue egg layer chicken PGCs by digital PCR. Sci Rep 2022;12. [DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19861-7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Malin K, Witkowska-piłaszewicz O, Papis K. The many problems of somatic cell nuclear transfer in reproductive cloning of mammals. Theriogenology 2022;189:246-54. [DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.06.030] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Wang C, Sun Z, Wang M, Jiang Z, Zhang M, Cao H, Luo L, Qiao C, Xiao H, Chen G, Li X, Liu J, Wei Z, Shen B, Wang J, Feng J. Novel CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of LIG4 increases efficiency of site-specific integration in Chinese hamster ovary cell line. Biotechnol Lett 2022. [PMID: 35918621 DOI: 10.1007/s10529-022-03282-7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Wang S, Qu Z, Huang Q, Zhang J, Lin S, Yang Y, Meng F, Li J, Zhang K. Application of Gene Editing Technology in Resistance Breeding of Livestock. Life (Basel) 2022;12:1070. [PMID: 35888158 DOI: 10.3390/life12071070] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Müller R, Feiler J, Clare A. A Doomed Technology? On Gene Editing in Bavarian Livestock Agriculture, Policy Field Conflicts and Responsible Research and Innovation. Front Polit Sci 2022;4:800211. [DOI: 10.3389/fpos.2022.800211] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Talluri TR, Telugu BP. Advances and Applications of Transgenesis in Farm Animals. Frontier Technologies in Bovine Reproduction 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-3072-0_13] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Maruyama JI. Genome Editing Technology and Its Application Potentials in the Industrial Filamentous Fungus Aspergillus oryzae. J Fungi (Basel) 2021;7:638. [PMID: 34436177 DOI: 10.3390/jof7080638] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Kamimura S, Inoue K, Mizutani E, Kim JM, Inoue H, Ogonuki N, Miyamoto K, Ihashi S, Itami N, Wakayama T, Ito A, Nishino N, Yoshida M, Ogura A. Improved development of mouse somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos by chlamydocin analogues, class I and IIa histone deacetylase inhibitors†. Biol Reprod 2021;105:543-53. [PMID: 33982061 DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioab096] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Springer C, Wolf E, Simmet K. A New Toolbox in Experimental Embryology-Alternative Model Organisms for Studying Preimplantation Development. J Dev Biol 2021;9:15. [PMID: 33918361 DOI: 10.3390/jdb9020015] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]