Heston TF, King JM. Predictive power of statistical significance. World J Methodol 2017; 7(4): 112-116 [PMID: 29354483 DOI: 10.5662/wjm.v7.i4.112]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Thomas F Heston, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, PO Box 1495, Spokane, WA 99210-1495, United States. tom.heston@wsu.edu
Research Domain of This Article
Medical Laboratory Technology
Article-Type of This Article
Editorial
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Methodol. Dec 26, 2017; 7(4): 112-116 Published online Dec 26, 2017. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v7.i4.112
Table 1 Statistically significant research findings can represent a true positive or false positive
Reality
Study findings
Alternative hypothesis true
Null hypothesis true
Significant P-value ≤ 0.05
True positive
False positive
Insignificant P-value > 0.05
False negative
True negative
Table 2 When the P-value is utilized to determine whether or not a finding is statistically significant, 1-beta represents the sensitivity for identifying the alternative hypothesis, and 1-alpha represents the specificity
Reality
Study findings
Alternative hypothesis true
Null hypothesis true
Significant P-value ≤ 0.05
1 - beta (power)
Alpha (exact P-value)
Insignificant P-value > 0.05
Beta
1 - alpha
Table 3 A Type I error corresponds to 1-specificity and a Type II error corresponds to 1-sensitivity when study findings are determined to be significant or insignificant based upon the P-value
Reality
Study findings
Alternative hypothesis true
Null hypothesis true
Significant P-value ≤ 0.05
Correct
Type I error
Insignificant P-value > 0.05
Type II error
Correct
Table 4 This 2 × 2 contingency table shows the corresponding values for a research study where a study finding is determined to be significant based upon a P-value of 0.05 and when the study’s power is 80%
Reality
Study findings
Alternative hypothesis true
Null hypothesis true
Significant P-value ≤ 0.05
0.8
0.05
Insignificant P-value > 0.05
0.2
0.95
Table 5P-values corrected for study power
Study power
P-value
0.95
0.05
0.9
0.047
0.85
0.045
0.8
0.042
0.75
0.039
0.7
0.037
0.65
0.034
0.6
0.032
Citation: Heston TF, King JM. Predictive power of statistical significance. World J Methodol 2017; 7(4): 112-116