Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Methodol. Jun 26, 2016; 6(2): 133-142
Published online Jun 26, 2016. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v6.i2.133
Published online Jun 26, 2016. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v6.i2.133
Table 1 The methods commonly used for analyzing hemoglobin A1c according to the surveys conducted by Labquality Ltd. in 1994
Numerical summary from a diabetic EDTA-blood sample 1/1994 | ||||
Analyte/method group | Mean | SD | CV% | Number |
GHbA1c % | ||||
Ion exchange Ciba Corning | 8.7 | 0.4 | 4.3 | 4 |
Ion exchange Diamat Biorad | 9.7 | 0.8 | 8.4 | 15 |
Ion exchange Kyoto Daichii | 8.4 | 0.3 | 3.4 | 3 |
Ion exchange Pharmacia MonoS | 9.0 | 0.8 | 8.7 | 17 |
Ion exchange Shimadzu | 10.7 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 2 |
Ion exchange others | 9.5 | 0.8 | 7.9 | 5 |
Ion exchange minicolumn Biorad | 9.7 | 0.8 | 8.1 | 4 |
Electrophoresis Beckman | 9.7 | 0.8 | 7.8 | 8 |
Affininity method Abbott Imx | 8.4 | 0.6 | 7.5 | 15 |
Affininity method Abbott Vision | 8.8 | 0.4 | 4.8 | 8 |
LaInIA Ames DCA 2000 | 9.1 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 29 |
TinIA Boehringer | 9.1 | 1.0 | 10.4 | 15 |
Immunochemical others | 8.8 | 1.7 | 19.3 | 2 |
All method groups | 9.2 | 0.8 | 8.9 | 127 |
GHbA1 | ||||
Ion exchange Ciba Corning | 11.8 | 0.3 | 2.4 | 2 |
Ion exchange Diamat Bio-Rad | 12.1 | 0.4 | 3.2 | 7 |
Ion exchange others | 11.5 | - | - | 1 |
All methods groups | 12.0 | 0.4 | 3.3 | 10 |
GHb | ||||
Affinity method Abbott Imx | 13.4 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 2 |
Affinity method mini col Isolab | 10.3 | 1.4 | 13.7 | 2 |
All method groups | 11.8 | 2.0 | 16.5 | 4 |
Table 2 The methods commonly used for analyzing hemoglobin A1c according to the surveys conducted by Labquality Ltd. in 2015
Numerical summary from a diabetic EDTA-blood sample 5/2015 | ||||||
Analyte/method group | Mean | SD | CV% | Min | Max | Number |
HbA1c, mmol/mol | ||||||
Abbott Arhitect enzymatic | 53.64 | 2.45 | 4.6 | 48.4 | 32.1 | 6 |
Axis-Shield Afinion | 54.70 | 2.17 | 4.0 | 51.0 | 58.0 | 44 |
Beckman Coulter | 55.2 | 1 | ||||
Hemoque | 51.4 | 3.98 | 7.7 | 46.0 | 55.0 | 5 |
HPLC Bio-Rad D-10 | 55.00 | 1 | ||||
HPLC Bio-Rad Variant | 56.00 | 3.21 | 5.7 | 54.0 | 58.0 | 2 |
HPLC Tosoh | 56.42 | 1.23 | 2.2 | 35.6 | 59.8 | 33 |
Roche Cobas c Tina-Quant | 54.76 | 2.56 | 4.7 | 33.0 | 57.0 | 13 |
Roche Cobas Integra | 55.0 | 1 | ||||
Rocgw Tina Quant | 56.00 | 1 | ||||
Siemens Advia Centaur | 57.93 | 1 | ||||
Siemens DCA 2000+ and Vant | 55.05 | 1.96 | 3.6 | 51.0 | 58.0 | 33 |
Thermo Scientific Konelab | 54.44 | 2.63 | 4.8 | 48.0 | 58.4 | 24 |
All | 55.05 | 2.17 | 3.9 | 32.1 | 59.8 | 165 |
HbA1c | ||||||
Abbott Arhitect enzymatic | 7.20 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 3 |
Axis-Shield Afinion | 7.17 | 0.21 | 2.9 | 6.9 | 7.5 | 44 |
Beckman Coulter | 7.2 | 1 | ||||
Hemoqe | 6.88 | 0.25 | 3.7 | 6.6 | 7.2 | 6 |
HPLC Bio-Rad D-10 | 7.2 | 1 | ||||
HPLC Bio-Rad Variant | 7.5 | 1 | ||||
HPLC Tosoh | 7.34 | 0.13 | 1.8 | 7.0 | 8.8 | 23 |
Roche Cobas c Tina-Quant | 7.29 | 0.12 | 1.6 | 6.7 | 7.4 | 7 |
Siemens Advia Centaur | 7.45 | 5.8 | 7.0 | 1 | ||
Siemens DCA 2000+ and Vant | 7.19 | 0.18 | 2.6 | 6.8 | 7.5 | 31 |
Thermo Scientific Konelab | 7.13 | 0.25 | 3.5 | 6.6 | 7.5 | 26 |
All | 7.20 | 0.21 | 2.9 | 6.6 | 8.8 | 143 |
Table 3 Summary of the questionnaires about the use of the hemoglobin A1c units sent to 35-51 societies of laboratory medicine (mainly clinical chemistry) and returned by 28.12.2014
Year | 2009 | 2011 | 2013 | 2014 |
Queries sent | 35 | 37 | 47 | 51 |
Only % unit | 16 | 14 | 15 | 17 |
Parallel units, % and mmol/mol | 4 | 9 | 12 | 11 |
mmol/mol unit only in use | (1) | 6 | 11 | 13 |
No reply | 15 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
Table 4 The relationships between the hemoglobin A1c units as % values to the mmol/mol values are presented at different levels of hemoglobin A1c
HbA1c | HbA1c | HbA1c |
(%) | (mmol/mol) | |
Reference limits | 4.0-6.0 | 20-42 |
Diagnosis limit | 6.5 | 48 |
Treatment limits, adults | 7.0 | 53 |
children < 6 yr | 7.5 | 69 |
children 6-12 yr | 8.0 | 64 |
children 13-19 yr | 8.5 | 58 |
Poor diabetic balance | 9.0 | 75 |
Very poor diabetic balance | 12.0 | 108 |
- Citation: Penttilä I, Penttilä K, Holm P, Laitinen H, Ranta P, Törrönen J, Rauramaa R. Methods, units and quality requirements for the analysis of haemoglobin A1c in diabetes mellitus. World J Methodol 2016; 6(2): 133-142
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v6/i2/133.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v6.i2.133