Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Methodol. Jun 20, 2025; 15(2): 94514
Published online Jun 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.94514
Published online Jun 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.94514
Table 1 Staining intensity and grading of matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression
Grade | Interpretation |
0 | No positivity |
Mild | Up to 10% of positive tumor cells |
Moderate | 11%-50% of positive tumor cells |
Intense | Above 50% of positive tumor cells |
Table 2 Staining and grading of matrix metalloproteinase-13
Grade | Interpretation |
0 | No staining of the tumor or stromal cells |
1+ | Mildly (< 50%) positive staining of the tumor cells and/or weak staining of stromal cells |
2+ | Moderately (> 50%) positive staining of the tumor cells and/or moderate staining of stromal cells |
3+ | Intense staining of the tumor cells and/or strong staining of stromal cells. No normal epithelial cells were stained |
Table 3 Gender frequency distribution of cases
Male | Female | Total | |
Cases | 25 | 15 | 40 |
Table 4 Site distribution of cases
Site | No of cases | Percentage |
Buccal mucosa | 20 | 50 |
Buccal vestibule | 01 | 2.5 |
Tongue | 16 | 40 |
Hard palate | 03 | 7.5 |
Total | 40 | 100.0 |
Table 5 Bryne’s histological grading of oral squamous cell carcinoma cases
Grade | No of cases | Percentage |
I | 12 | 30.0 |
II | 25 | 62.5 |
III | 3 | 7.5 |
Total | 40 | 100.0 |
Table 6 Comparison of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and matrix metalloproteinase-13 expression
Metastasis | MMP-9 | MMP-13 | Intense | ||||
Mild | Moderate | Intense | Nil | Mild | Moderate | ||
Absent | 1 | 5 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 |
5.6% | 27.8% | 66.7% | 11.1% | 11.1% | 33.3% | 44.4% | |
Present | 0 | 6 | 16 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
0.0% | 27.3% | 72.7% | 4.5% | 31.8% | 22.7% | 40.9% | |
Total | 1 | 11 | 28 | 3 | 9 | 11 | 17 |
2.5% | 27.5% | 70.0% | 7.5% | 22.5% | 27.5% | 42.5% |
Table 7 Association between tumor size with matrix metalloproteinase-9 and matrix metalloproteinase-13 expression
MMP-13 | MMP-9 | |||||||
Tumor size | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
None | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Mild | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Moderate | 1 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Intense | 1 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 3 | 1 |
χ2 (P) value | 11.02 (0.27) | 11.26 (0.80) |
Table 8 Association between node involvement and matrix metalloproteinase-9 and matrix metalloproteinase-13 expression
MMP-9 | MMP-13 | ||||||
Mild | Moderate | Intense | Mild | Moderate | Intense | ||
Node involvement | No involvement | 9 | 6 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 0 |
Nodes nearby | 1 | 2 | 19 | 1 | 10 | 11 | |
Distant nodes | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
χ2 (P) value | 26.17 (0.000) | 29.18 (0.000) |
Table 9 Association of presence of metastasis with matrix metalloproteinase-9 and matrix metalloproteinase-13 expression
MMP9 | MMP13 | |||||||
Mild | Moderate | Intense | None | Mild | Moderate | Intense | ||
Presence of metastasis | Presence | 1 | 2 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
Absence | 9 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 2 | 0 | |
χ2 (P) value | 26.03 (0.000) | 29.16 (0.000) |
Table 10 Association between tumor size, grade of node involvement, and presence of metastasis
Tumor size | Good | Moderate | Poor | χ2 (P) value |
T1 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 4.31 (0.63) |
T2 | 10 | 15 | 3 | |
T3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
T4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
Node involvement | ||||
No involvement | 4 | 12 | 0 | 3.55 (0.47) |
Nodes nearby | 7 | 12 | 3 | |
Distant node | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
Presence of metastasis | ||||
Presence | 8 | 13 | 3 | 2.88 (0.23) |
Absence | 4 | 12 | 0 |
- Citation: Manjunatha BS, Handge KT, Shah VS, Al-Thobaiti YE, Pateel DGS. Immunohistochemical expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and 13 in oral squamous cell carcinoma and their role in predicting lymph node metastasis. World J Methodol 2025; 15(2): 94514
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v15/i2/94514.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.94514