Editorial Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Methodol. Sep 20, 2025; 15(3): 100332
Published online Sep 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i3.100332
Interaction between gut virome and microbiota on inflammatory bowel disease
Xiao-Long Li, Mueen Megdadi, Humair S Quadri, Department of Surgery, Ascension St Agnes Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21009, United States
ORCID number: Xiao-Long Li (0000-0002-1130-7986).
Co-corresponding authors: Xiao-Long Li and Humair S Quadri.
Author contributions: Li XL designed the overall concept and outline of the manuscript; Quadri HS contributed to the discussion of the manuscript; Li XL and Quadri HS contributed equally as co-corresponding authors; Li XL and MM contributed to the writing, and editing the manuscript, illustrations, and review of literature.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Xiao-Long Li, MD, PhD, Surgeon, Department of Surgery, Ascension St Agnes Hospital, 900 S Caton Ave, Baltimore, MD 21009, United States. li.xiaolong@ascension.org
Received: August 13, 2024
Revised: December 31, 2024
Accepted: January 15, 2025
Published online: September 20, 2025
Processing time: 204 Days and 10.2 Hours

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, is a chronic condition marked by recurring gastrointestinal inflammation. While immune, genetic, and environmental factors are well-studied, the gut virome has received less attention. This editorial highlights the work which investigates the gut virome’s role in IBD and its interactions with the bacterial microbiome and host immune system. The gut virome consists of bacteriophages, eukaryotic viruses, and endogenous retroviruses. Among these, Caudovirales bacteriophages are predominant and influence bacterial communities via lysogenic and lytic cycles. Eukaryotic viruses infect host cells directly, while endogenous retroviruses impact gene regulation and immune responses. In IBD, the virome shows distinct alterations, including an increased abundance of Caudovirales phages and reduced Microviridae diversity, suggesting a pro-inflammatory viral environment. Dysbiosis, chronic inflammation, and aberrant immune responses contribute to these changes by disrupting microbial communities and modifying virome composition. Phages affect bacterial dynamics through lysis, lysogeny, and horizontal gene transfer, shaping microbial adaptability and resilience. Understanding these interactions is crucial for identifying novel therapeutic targets and restoring microbial balance in IBD.

Key Words: Virome; Microbiota; Inflammatory bowel disease; Lysogeny; Horizontal gene transfer

Core Tip: The gut virome plays a crucial role in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) pathogenesis, bacterial community dynamics, and immune responses. Alterations in virome composition in IBD patients, characterized by increased Caudovirales and decreased Microviridae phages, contribute to dysbiosis and inflammation. Understanding these interactions may reveal novel therapeutic targets for IBD.



INTRODUCTION

This editorial highlights the work which investigates the gut virome’s role in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and its interactions with the bacterial microbiome and host immune system[1]. IBD is a chronic condition characterized by recurrent inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. The two primary forms of IBD, Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), differ in their clinical presentations, pathophysiology, and affected regions of the gastrointestinal tract. However, both conditions share common features, including immune responses, genetic alterations, and environmental factors[2,3]. The etiology of IBD remains elusive. Recent research revealed that the microbiota of the gut plays a crucial role in IBD[4].

The human gut microbiota, a complex community of microorganisms, has been implicated in numerous physiological and pathological processes. Recent bloom in next-generation sequencing technologies have expanded our understanding of the gut microbiota, revealing its intricate composition and dynamic nature[5,6]. Among the microbiota, bacteria have been the primary focus of research. However, the virome—the collection of viruses within the microbiome—has received comparatively less attention. This oversight is particularly significant given the unique and potentially pivotal roles viruses may play in modulating the immune system, influencing microbial ecology, and contributing to disease pathogenesis[7].

The gut virome consists of diverse viral populations, including bacteriophages, eukaryotic viruses, and endogenous retroviruses. Bacteriophages, or phages, are viruses that infect bacteria, and they represent the most abundant viral entities in the gut[8]. Phages can influence the composition and function of bacterial communities through lysogeny or lytic cycles[9]. This phage-bacteria interaction can modulate the microbiome's structure and metabolic activities, potentially impacting host health[10]. Eukaryotic viruses, although less prevalent, can directly infect host cells and contribute to inflammation and immune dysregulation[11]. Endogenous retroviruses, remnants of ancient viral infections integrated into the human genome, may also play a role in gene regulation and immune responses[12].

Emerging evidence suggests that the gut virome is altered in individuals with IBD, characterized by changes in viral diversity, composition, and abundance[13]. Several studies have reported an increase in the relative abundance of Caudovirales bacteriophages in IBD patients, alongside a decrease in Microviridae bacteriophages[14]. These alterations in the virome are thought to influence the bacterial microbiome, potentially exacerbating dysbiosis - a disrupted microbial community associated with disease states[15]. Dysbiosis has been implicated in the pathogenesis of IBD, with shifts in the microbial community structure leading to enhanced immune activation, impaired mucosal barrier function, and increased production of pro-inflammatory mediators[16].

The potential mechanisms through which the gut virome may contribute to IBD pathogenesis are multifaceted. Phages may affect bacterial community dynamics, thereby influencing the overall microbiota composition and its metabolic profiles[17]. For instance, the lytic activity of phages can lead to the release of bacterial antigens and other immunogenic components, which can potentially trigger an immune response[18]. Moreover, phage-derived proteins and genetic material may directly interact with the host immune system, modulate immune responses, and contribute to the inflammation[19].

Given the emerging recognition of the virome's importance in gut health and disease, there is a need to elucidate the specific contributions of the virome to IBD. Understanding the interactions between the virome, bacterial microbiome, and the host immune system may uncover novel insights into IBD pathogenesis and identify potential therapeutic targets.

VIROME COMPOSITION IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS AND IBD PATIENTS

In healthy individuals, the gut virome is characterized by a balanced and relatively stable composition, dominated by temperate phages from the Caudovirales and Microviridae families[7]. Caudovirales and Microviridae contribute to intestinal microbiota diversity through bacterial population control, gene transfer, co-evolution, ecological stabilization, and functional modulation. This stability contributes to maintaining a diverse and resilient microbiota, which is crucial for gut homeostasis and immune modulation[9]. In contrast, patients with IBD, encompassing both CD and UC, exhibit notable alterations in their gut virome. Several studies have reported a marked increase in the relative abundance of Caudovirales phages, particularly members of the Siphoviridae family, in IBD patients compared to healthy controls[13]. Caudovirales phages act as predators of specific bacterial species, preventing overgrowth and maintaining microbial balance. Additionally, a reduction in the diversity of Microviridae phages has also been observed[15]. Normally, Microviridae phages induced lysis of host bacteria releases nutrients and genetic material that can be utilized by other microbes in the ecosystem. The above findings suggest a shift towards a more pro-inflammatory viral community. These changes in the virome composition are often accompanied by an overall decrease in viral diversity, which may reflect a disrupted ecological balance within the gut[20].

The observed differences in the gut virome between healthy individuals and IBD patients has multiple mechanisms. One key contributor is the alteration of the bacterial microbiota in IBD, which in turn affects the virome. The gut microbiota in IBD patients is often characterized by dysbiosis, with reduced diversity and an overrepresentation of specific bacterial taxa, such as Enterobacteriaceae and Bacteroidaceae[21]. The altered bacterial landscape may provide a conducive environment for the proliferation of specific bacteriophages, particularly those capable of lysing pathogenic bacteria. This shift could result in an increased presence of lytic phages, contributing to the observed changes in the virome composition[18].

Another contributing factor may be the inflammatory environment characteristic of IBD. Chronic inflammation can lead to increased intestinal permeability, allowing for greater translocation of microbial and viral components across the gut barrier[22]. This heightened exposure may trigger an immune response that selectively targets certain viral populations, leading to a decline in viral diversity. Moreover, the inflammatory milieu may favor the expansion of viruses with pro-inflammatory properties, such as certain lytic phages, further exacerbating the disease[23].

The role of the host immune response in shaping the virome composition is also critical. IBD is associated with an aberrant immune response, characterized by excessive activation of both innate and adaptive immune pathways[3]. This dysregulated immune response can influence the virome by selectively targeting certain viral strains. For example, an increase in IgA-coated viruses has been reported in IBD patients, suggesting a targeted immune response against these viral populations[24]. The selective pressure exerted by the immune system may thus contribute to the observed virome alterations.

VIROME-MICROBIOTA INTERACTIONS

Recent studies have demonstrated the critical role of phages in modulating bacterial populations through mechanisms such as lysis and lysogeny[9]. Phages can selectively infect and lyse specific bacterial hosts, by which they can influence bacterial species within the microbiota. This predator-prey dynamic can lead to the elimination of dominant bacterial populations and the subsequent proliferation of less dominant or rare taxa, resulting in alterations of microbial diversity and ecosystem resilience[25].

In addition to direct effects on bacterial populations, phages can also impact bacterial community dynamics through horizontal gene transfer (HGT). Phages can facilitate HGT by transducing bacterial genes, including those involved in antibiotic resistance, virulence, and metabolic functions[26]. This genetic exchange enhances the adaptability and functional capabilities of bacterial communities, improving their response to environmental challenges and host immune pressures. Furthermore, one study identified several phage-associated genes linked to metabolic pathways, suggesting that phages may play a role in the metabolic versatility of the gut microbiota[10]. The mechanisms through which the virome influences microbiota composition are multifaceted. One potential mechanism is the modulation of bacterial community structure via lysogeny. In lysogenic cycles, phages integrate their genetic material into the host bacterial genome. It often provides the host with beneficial genes that can enhance fitness under specific conditions[27]. It can also lead to the emergence of lysogenic bacteria with altered phenotypes, which can potentially impact their interactions with other microbial species and the host[28]. The presence of prophages within bacterial genomes may also serve as a reservoir of genetic diversity, leading to rapid adaptation to environmental changes. Prophages are dormant bacteriophage genomes integrated into bacterial chromosomes or maintained as plasmids. They arise during lysogenic cycles when a phage infects a bacterium and inserts its DNA into the host genome, allowing it to replicate with the bacterium. Prophages can influence bacterial fitness, virulence, and evolution by carrying genes that confer advantages, such as toxin production, antibiotic resistance, or stress tolerance.

Another mechanism is the induction of microbial dysbiosis. Dysbiosis, characterized by an imbalance in microbial communities, has been implicated in various gastrointestinal disorders such as IBD and irritable bowel syndrome[29]. Phage-mediated lysis of beneficial bacteria can disrupt the equilibrium of the microbiota, leading to the overgrowth of pathogenic or opportunistic bacteria. This shift in microbial balance can compromise the gut's barrier function, promote inflammation, and exacerbate disease symptoms[14].

CONCLUSION

The interplay between the virome and microbiota has far-reaching implications for understanding gut health and disease. The virome's ability to influence bacterial diversity and function suggests that it may play a crucial role in maintaining gut ecosystem homeostasis. Moreover, the virome's involvement in HGT highlights its potential contribution to the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes, a growing public health concern[30]. Understanding the dynamics of phage-bacteria interactions may provide new avenues for therapeutic interventions, such as phage therapy, which leverages phages' ability to target specific bacterial pathogens[31]. Future research should focus on elucidating the functional roles of specific phages within the gut ecosystem. Advanced metagenomic and metatranscriptomic approaches can provide insights into the active virome and its interactions with the microbiota at the gene expression level. Additionally, longitudinal studies are needed to investigate the temporal dynamics of the virome and microbiota, particularly in response to dietary changes, antibiotic treatments, and disease states. Understanding the complex interactions between the virome and microbiota is crucial for developing targeted therapies and interventions aimed at modulating the gut ecosystem to promote health and prevent disease. An example for virome therapy is faecal virome transplantation (FVT). FVT significantly altered overall bacteriome compositions, however, most of the studies were conducted via mouse models in small sample size. We are hoping to see more promising data in virome targeted therapy in IBD.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Thomas Kang for providing research opportunity and approving necessary fundings.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country of origin: United States

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade B, Grade B, Grade B

Novelty: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B

Creativity or Innovation: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B

Scientific Significance: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B

P-Reviewer: Gugulothu D; Wen R; Zhou C S-Editor: Lin C L-Editor: A P-Editor: Wang WB

References
1.  Hetta HF, Ahmed R, Ramadan YN, Fathy H, Khorshid M, Mabrouk MM, Hashem M. Gut virome: New key players in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. World J Methodol. 2025;15.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (10)]
2.  Podolsky DK. Inflammatory bowel disease. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:417-429.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2693]  [Cited by in RCA: 2725]  [Article Influence: 118.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
3.  Kaser A, Zeissig S, Blumberg RS. Inflammatory bowel disease. Annu Rev Immunol. 2010;28:573-621.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1352]  [Cited by in RCA: 1499]  [Article Influence: 99.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Xavier RJ, Podolsky DK. Unravelling the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. 2007;448:427-434.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2894]  [Cited by in RCA: 3273]  [Article Influence: 181.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (11)]
5.  Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, Manichanh C, Nielsen T, Pons N, Levenez F, Yamada T, Mende DR, Li J, Xu J, Li S, Li D, Cao J, Wang B, Liang H, Zheng H, Xie Y, Tap J, Lepage P, Bertalan M, Batto JM, Hansen T, Le Paslier D, Linneberg A, Nielsen HB, Pelletier E, Renault P, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Turner K, Zhu H, Yu C, Li S, Jian M, Zhou Y, Li Y, Zhang X, Li S, Qin N, Yang H, Wang J, Brunak S, Doré J, Guarner F, Kristiansen K, Pedersen O, Parkhill J, Weissenbach J; MetaHIT Consortium, Bork P, Ehrlich SD, Wang J. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature. 2010;464:59-65.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7052]  [Cited by in RCA: 7646]  [Article Influence: 509.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (4)]
6.  Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2012;486:207-214.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9088]  [Cited by in RCA: 7803]  [Article Influence: 600.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
7.  Norman JM, Handley SA, Baldridge MT, Droit L, Liu CY, Keller BC, Kambal A, Monaco CL, Zhao G, Fleshner P, Stappenbeck TS, McGovern DP, Keshavarzian A, Mutlu EA, Sauk J, Gevers D, Xavier RJ, Wang D, Parkes M, Virgin HW. Disease-specific alterations in the enteric virome in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell. 2015;160:447-460.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 765]  [Cited by in RCA: 862]  [Article Influence: 86.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Reyes A, Haynes M, Hanson N, Angly FE, Heath AC, Rohwer F, Gordon JI. Viruses in the faecal microbiota of monozygotic twins and their mothers. Nature. 2010;466:334-338.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 912]  [Cited by in RCA: 832]  [Article Influence: 55.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Gogokhia L, Buhrke K, Bell R, Hoffman B, Brown DG, Hanke-Gogokhia C, Ajami NJ, Wong MC, Ghazaryan A, Valentine JF, Porter N, Martens E, O'Connell R, Jacob V, Scherl E, Crawford C, Stephens WZ, Casjens SR, Longman RS, Round JL. Expansion of Bacteriophages Is Linked to Aggravated Intestinal Inflammation and Colitis. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25:285-299.e8.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 351]  [Cited by in RCA: 348]  [Article Influence: 58.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Patel SK, Singh SK. Pyroglutamylated RFamide peptide (QRFP): Role in early testicular development in relation to Sertoli cell maturation in prepubertal mice. Neuropeptides. 2022;91:102215.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Virgin HW, Wherry EJ, Ahmed R. Redefining chronic viral infection. Cell. 2009;138:30-50.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 720]  [Cited by in RCA: 773]  [Article Influence: 48.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Zhang K, Rana F, Silva C, Ethier J, Wehrly K, Chesebro B, Power C. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope-mediated neuronal death: uncoupling of viral replication and neurotoxicity. J Virol. 2003;77:6899-6912.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in RCA: 40]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Norman JM, Handley SA, Virgin HW. Kingdom-agnostic metagenomics and the importance of complete characterization of enteric microbial communities. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:1459-1469.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 130]  [Cited by in RCA: 131]  [Article Influence: 11.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Clooney AG, Sutton TDS, Shkoporov AN, Holohan RK, Daly KM, O'Regan O, Ryan FJ, Draper LA, Plevy SE, Ross RP, Hill C. Whole-Virome Analysis Sheds Light on Viral Dark Matter in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;26:764-778.e5.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 154]  [Cited by in RCA: 162]  [Article Influence: 27.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Sheflin AM, Melby CL, Carbonero F, Weir TL. Linking dietary patterns with gut microbial composition and function. Gut Microbes. 2017;8:113-129.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 88]  [Cited by in RCA: 91]  [Article Influence: 10.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Mirzaei MK, Maurice CF. Ménage à trois in the human gut: interactions between host, bacteria and phages. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15:397-408.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 202]  [Cited by in RCA: 205]  [Article Influence: 25.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Song L, Jia J, Peng X, Xiao W, Li Y. The performance of the SEPT9 gene methylation assay and a comparison with other CRC screening tests: A meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:3032.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 116]  [Cited by in RCA: 116]  [Article Influence: 14.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Garzilli I, Itzkovitz S. Design principles of the paradoxical feedback between pancreatic alpha and beta cells. Sci Rep. 2018;8:10694.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Young GR, Mavrommatis B, Kassiotis G. Microarray analysis reveals global modulation of endogenous retroelement transcription by microbes. Retrovirology. 2014;11:59.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in RCA: 39]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Caetano MJD, Menant JC, Schoene D, Pelicioni PHS, Sturnieks DL, Lord SR. Sensorimotor and Cognitive Predictors of Impaired Gait Adaptability in Older People. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;72:1257-1263.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in RCA: 31]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Frank DN, St Amand AL, Feldman RA, Boedeker EC, Harpaz N, Pace NR. Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:13780-13785.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3075]  [Cited by in RCA: 3350]  [Article Influence: 186.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
22.  Turner JR. Intestinal mucosal barrier function in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:799-809.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2121]  [Cited by in RCA: 2605]  [Article Influence: 162.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Shkoporov AN, Hill C. Bacteriophages of the Human Gut: The "Known Unknown" of the Microbiome. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25:195-209.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 250]  [Cited by in RCA: 378]  [Article Influence: 63.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Sattentau QJ, Stevenson M. Macrophages and HIV-1: An Unhealthy Constellation. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;19:304-310.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 116]  [Cited by in RCA: 127]  [Article Influence: 14.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Suttle CA. Marine viruses--major players in the global ecosystem. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:801-812.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1874]  [Cited by in RCA: 1749]  [Article Influence: 97.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Penadés JR, Chen J, Quiles-Puchalt N, Carpena N, Novick RP. Bacteriophage-mediated spread of bacterial virulence genes. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2015;23:171-178.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 208]  [Cited by in RCA: 211]  [Article Influence: 19.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Fogg PC, Westbye AB, Beatty JT. One for all or all for one: heterogeneous expression and host cell lysis are key to gene transfer agent activity in Rhodobacter capsulatus. PLoS One. 2012;7:e43772.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 43]  [Cited by in RCA: 49]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Touchon M, Moura de Sousa JA, Rocha EP. Embracing the enemy: the diversification of microbial gene repertoires by phage-mediated horizontal gene transfer. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017;38:66-73.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 162]  [Cited by in RCA: 180]  [Article Influence: 22.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Khan MT, Nieuwdorp M, Bäckhed F. Microbial modulation of insulin sensitivity. Cell Metab. 2014;20:753-760.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 179]  [Cited by in RCA: 194]  [Article Influence: 17.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Young R. Phage lysis: do we have the hole story yet? Curr Opin Microbiol. 2013;16:790-797.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 117]  [Cited by in RCA: 131]  [Article Influence: 10.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Abedon ST, García P, Mullany P, Aminov R. Editorial: Phage Therapy: Past, Present and Future. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:981.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 148]  [Cited by in RCA: 124]  [Article Influence: 15.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]