Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Nephrol. Jan 6, 2017; 6(1): 45-52
Published online Jan 6, 2017. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v6.i1.45
Published online Jan 6, 2017. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v6.i1.45
Laparoscopic nephrectomy | 279 |
Left | 260 |
Right | 19 |
Open nephrectomy | 211 |
Left | 156 |
Right | 55 |
Laparoscopic LDN | Open LDN | |
Donor preoperative GFR (mL/min ± SD ) | 128.4 ± 32 | 123.6 ± 26 |
Donor preop Cr (mean ± SD) | 0.96 ± 0.4 | 0.88 ± 0.4 |
Operative time (min ± SD ) | 227 ± 58 | 244 ± 62 |
Donor postop Cr 1 mo (mean ± SD) | 1.43 ± 0.9 | 1.39 ± 0.8 |
Delayed graft function (%) | 7.2% (20/279) | 6.6% (14/211) |
Recipient postop Cr 1 mo (mean ± SD) | 1.43 ± 1.4 | 1.39 ± 1.1 |
Major complications (%) | 7.5% (21/279) | 8.5% (18/211) |
Reasons for conversion | Number of patients (n = 18) |
Bleeding | 8 |
Adhesions | 5 |
Anatomy | 5 |
- Citation: Tsoulfas G, Agorastou P, Ko DSC, Hertl M, Elias N, Cosimi A, Kawai T. Laparoscopic vs open donor nephrectomy: Lessons learnt from single academic center experience. World J Nephrol 2017; 6(1): 45-52
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v6/i1/45.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v6.i1.45