Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Nephrol. Sep 6, 2016; 5(5): 437-447
Published online Sep 6, 2016. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v5.i5.437
Table 1 Initial dose of vitamin D analogue (calcitriol) to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism due to chronic kidney disease
PTH levelVitamin D analogue dose (calcitriol)
PTH 200-499 pg/mL0.25 mcg qd once a day
PTH 500-999 pg/mL0.50 mcg qd or 1 mcg qd once a day/3 times a week
PTH > 1000 pg/mL2.0 mcg qd once a day/3 times a week
Table 2 Mantainance dose of vitamin D analogue (calcitriol) to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism due to chronic kidney disease in initially unresponsive patients
PTH levelVitamin D analogue dose (calcitriol)
PTH 200-299 pg/mL0.25 mcg qd once a day
PTH 300-399 pg/mL0.50 mcg qd or 0.75 mcg qd once a day, 3 times a week
PTH 400-999 pg/mL1.0 mcg qd once a day 3 times a week
PTH > 1000 pg/mL2.0 mcg oral or IV 3 times a week
Table 3 Clinical and demographical characteristics of the studied population
Without nodule (n = 32)With nodule (n = 53)TotalPRR (95%CI)
Sex
Male1625410.801
Female1628441.12 (0.46-2.69)
Total325385
Age43 ± 1446 ± 130.1821.02 (0.99-1.06)
Time on dialysis104.4 ± 53.6106.0 ± 64.70.9121.00 (0.99-1.01)
Access for RRT
Others2790.4712.3 (0.4-11.7)
AVF3046761.00
Table 4 Comparison of laboratory results of patients without and with nodule
SurgeryPTHCaPCa × PAPBAP
No nodule (n = 32)796.2 ± 229.78.6 ± 0.74.8 ± 1.241.5 ± 12.4246.7 ± 128.7100.8 ± 69.6
With nodule (n = 53)1106.4 ± 462.59.0 ± 0.65.9 ± 1.053.1 ± 10.3283 ± 254.4106.4 ± 91.9
P< 0.0010.006< 0.001< 0.0010.3870.783
Table 5 Observed outcomes until end of follow-up in January 2009 (n = 85)
Nodule in US
PRR (95%CI)
No (n = 32)Yes (n = 53)
Deceased
No29 (90.6%)41 (77.4%)0.12021.00
Yes3 (9.4%)12 (22.6%)2.83 (0.73; 10.93)
Transplant
No28 (87.5%)48 (90.6%)0.72321.37 (0.54; 5.53)
Yes4 (12.5%)5 (9.4%)1.00
Cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular event4
No25 (78.1%)43 (81.1%)0.73711.20 (0.41; 3.56)
Yes7 (21.9%)10 (18.9%)1.00
Vascular calcification5
No23 (71.9%)33 (62.3%)0.63311.00
Yes7 (21.9%)13 (24.5%)1.29 (0.40; 4.28)
No register2 (6.3%)7 (13.2%)
Bone disease6
No18 (56.3%)34 (64.2%)0.20211.89 (0.63; 5.56)
Yes12 (37.5%)12 (22.6%)1.00
No register2 (6.3%)7 (13.2%)
Surgery
No32 (100%)37 (69.8%)< 0.0013
Yes0 (0%)16 (30.2%)
Table 6 Comparison of parathyroid hormone, calcium, phosphorus, calcium × phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase between October 2008 and January 2009 for each group (n = 60)
NodulesPTHCaPCa × PAP
Without nodules (n = 25)Mean833.28.704.8041.4249.6
SD602.20.71.4012.50255.6
With nodules (n = 35)Mean1031.28.705.1044.60396.2
SD775.10.91.5013.60535.8
P10.2710.9740.3410.3500.210
Table 7 Comparison between patients submitted or not to parathyroidectomy
SurgeryPTHCaPCa × PAPBAP
No (n = 37)1030.8 ± 391.89.0 ± 0.66.0 ± 1.053.7 ± 10.9212.6 ± 121.582.7 ± 55.3
Yes (n = 16)1281.1 ± 571.49.1 ± 0.65.7 ± 1.051.6 ± 9.0445.9 ± 385.1160.5 ± 132
P10. 1250. 6050. 3540. 4970. 0300. 050
Table 8 Comparison of results of parathyroid hormone, calcium, phosphorus, calcium × phosphorus product, alkaline phosphatase levels from October 2008 to January 2009, patients with nodules, with and without parathyroidectomy (n = 35)
SurgeryPTHCaPCa × PAP
No (n = 20)Mean992.48.905.6049.90214.9
SD639.50.801.2011.70251.7
Yes (n = 15)Mean1082.98.404.5037.60638
SD948.21.101.6013.10708.3
P10.7520.1260.0300.0060.041
Table 9 Comparison of laboratory results of patients with nodules submitted to parathyroidectomy (n = 15) in 2 different periods: 2005/2006 and 2008/2009
2005/2006
2008/2009
P
MeanMedianSDMeanMedianSD
PTH1281.11155.7571.41082.9811.0948.20.1731
Ca9.19.10.78.48.71.10.0171
P5.75.81.04.54.31.60.0091
Ca × P51.853.09.337.637.613.10.0041