Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Nephrol. Nov 6, 2014; 3(4): 243-248
Published online Nov 6, 2014. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v3.i4.243
Published online Nov 6, 2014. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v3.i4.243
Contra-Indications | Advantages | Disadvantages | |
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy | Pregnancy, potential malignant kidney tumour, tumour in access tract area, atypical bowel interposition | Large renal and staghorn stones Able to remove large fragments Quicker large stone fragmentation and removal | Needs renal puncture plus dilatation Renal bleeding +/- embolisation Patient positioning (often prone) Requires a general anaesthetic (with risk in prone ventilation) Multiple days inpatient stay |
Shock wave lithotripsy | Infection, pregnancy, arterial aneurysm, bleeding diatheses, distal ureteric obstruction | Non-invasive treatment Out-patient treatment No anaesthetic needed | Lower success rates Renal colic (secondary stone fragments) Steinstrasse May need multiple treatments Success rates less for lower calyx stones |
Ureteroscopy | None | No incisions Day case procedure Can be used in pregnancy, obese and patients not suitable for prone position | Might require 2 operations for stone clearance May need a ureteric stent post op Ureteric avulsion/strictures Requires a general anaesthetic |
- Citation: Wright AE, Rukin NJ, Somani BK. Ureteroscopy and stones: Current status and future expectations. World J Nephrol 2014; 3(4): 243-248
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v3/i4/243.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v3.i4.243